IRC, Summary of Coverage Surveys for GiveWell, 2021 (public)

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q
1	Country	District	Time (0, 1, 2, 3, 4)	Total # OTPs in the District	Total # SCs in the District	# OTPs Newly Receiving IRC Services	# SCs Newly Receiving IRC Services	What month could you feasibly launch a coverage survey?	What months is the lean season (or seasons) in this area?	Planned Programming Model	New Introduction of IRC Services in the Whole District?	New Introduction of IRC Services in Some Facilities?	New Introduction of Family MUAC?	New Introduction of Simplified Protocol?	Comments on Sampling	Estimated Cost

2	Burkina Faso	Bogodogo	0					August	June to September	CMAM + Family MUAC + Surge Approach	Yes	No	Yes	No	These are three districts close together near the capital, all are getting service introduced so no need to disaggregate by district to see "impact" of IRC services specifically	$50,000
3	Burkina Faso	Boulmiougou	0					August	June to September	CMAM + Family MUAC + Surge Approach	Yes	No	Yes	No
4	Burkina Faso	Signoghin	0					August	June to September	CMAM + Family MUAC + Surge Approach	Yes	No	Yes	No
5	Chad	Melfi	0	11	1	0	0	June-July (not possible to do it in August)	June to September - very difficult access during this time - More remote district, needs separate survey	CMAM + MUAC-only admissions criteria, + Family MUAC + CHWs treatment + Surge	No	No	No	No	Melfi is very different than Mangalme and Baro, so needs its own coverage survey. Mangalme and Baro are relatively more similar, however Baro would be the only place in Chad with "clean identification" of introduction of IRC services so it should still get its own quantitative survey (even if qualitative work is merged with Baro).	$25,000
6	Chad	Mangalme	0	12	1	0	0	Access possible all the year even during rainy season - July-August	June to September	CMAM + MUAC-only admissions criteria, + Family MUAC + Surge	No	No	No	No		$25,000
7	Chad	Baro	0	9	1	9	1	June-July (not possible to do it in August) July-August	June to September	CMAM + MUAC-only admissions criteria, + Family MUAC + Surge	Yes	No	Yes	No		$25,000	We did previously support in this district until 2018
8	DRC	Niemba	0	17	1	17	1	September-October	October to February	CMAM + Family MUAC + Procure RUTF	Yes	No	Yes	No	DRC team will need lots of support on this, so budgeting slightly higher estimated cost than in some other districts.	$40,000	We could do it earlier and would probably begin planning earlier, but might push the actual survey back a bit to align wtih the lean season.
9	Niger	Filingue	0	24	1	0	0	August	June to September	CMAM + Surge Approach	No	No		No		$25,000
10	Niger	Ouallam	0	32	1	0	0	August	June to September	CMAM + Surge Approach	No	No		No		$25,000
11	Niger	Balleyara		9	0	9	0	August	June to September	CMAM + Surge Approach	Yes					$25,000	This is almost new introduction--we were there until June 2020, there is about a one year gap and we still have other health services there.
12	Somalia	Wadajir	0					July	January to March	ComPAS	No	Yes	Yes	No	The 4 districts neighbour each other but have different livelihood zones. Wadajir is an urban district and IRC works within the displaced urban communities. Sampling will be done for each of the districts to establish baseline information on barriers to access	$25,000
13	Somalia	Nugal	0					July	January to March	ComPAS	No	Yes	Yes	Yes		$25,000
14	Somalia	Galgadud	0					August	January to March	ComPAS	No	Yes	Yes	Yes		$25,000
15	Somalia	Mudug	0					August	January to March	ComPAS	No	Yes	Yes	Yes		$25,000
16
17															Additional questions from GW
18									This question is no longer relevant, as we are proposing to focus intervention in Guera rather than Eastern regions. No refugee populations in Guera.						Would coverage surveys in Chad allow us to separately estimate the coverage rates for host vs. refugee communities (i.e. with significance)?
19									Not limited to SAM. Can be done for MAM too						Are coverage surveys limited to SAM in areas receiving CMAM, or do they also identify MAM kids who might be receiving treatment elsewhere?
20									We have to look at the methods and power for this in the sampling.						In areas receiving the combined protocol, would we be able to estimate the coverage rate for SAM vs. MAM kids (i.e. with significance)?
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100