Issues 2008-07-28
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFG
1
IDVotesType/MemberMilestonePriOwnerSummary/Comments
2
3
16460PATCHtriageP3pankratEnable SCons to Handle Big (>200MB) Files
4
consensus
5
6
Bill1.0.xDoes this patch shortcut md5 summing if the sum for a chunk doesn't match the previous builds same chunk? Also, will this force a rebuild against previous implementation of md5 usage in scons?
7
Brandon
8
David
9
Gary
10
Greg1.xp2LudwigThis isn't a regression, so 1.0.x is incorrect. Soon after that, however. Steven should review it before it goes in; it does a couple of things I wondered about.
11
Jim
12
Ken
13
Sohail
14
Steven1.0.xp3pankratI haven't looked at the code, but it would be good to get this fixed in a reasonable way. Push to 1.x if it looks risky / complicated.
15
16
21470FEATUREtriageP4stevenknightAdd the valabuilder to scons
17
consensus
18
19
Bill1.xProbably just needs some tests?
20
Brandon
21
David
22
Gary
23
Greg1.xp4depends 1086Needs batch builder, so 1.x p2 is earliest.
24
Jim
25
Ken
26
Sohail
27
Steven1.xp4?Doesn't seem like there's huge demand for it, but it should go in.
28
29
21480DEFECTtriageP4stevenknightUnable to find afxwin.h with MSVS_USE_MFC_DIRS=1
30
consensus
31
32
Bill1.0.xLooks like this may need a testcase and/or simple script to reproduce the users problem? Unless someone's reproduced it? Steven?
33
Brandon
34
David
35
Gary
36
GregSee commentIt sounds to me more like a bug in the user's code that he wants us to debug, but if there's a test case that shows it as a regression, then 1.0.x is OK (although I'd prefer 1.x p1). Otherwise 1.x p4.
37
Jim
38
Ken
39
Sohail
40
Steven1.0.xp3stevenknightLooks like a regression; fix sooner rather than later.
41
42
21490PATCHtriageP4pankratReferring to the current stack-frame creates unnecessary reference cycles
43
consensus
44
45
Bill1.0.xGood catch
46
Brandon
47
David
48
Gary
49
Greg1.xp1LudwigNot a bug, a performance enhancment, so not 1.0.x. Highest priority after that.
50
Jim
51
Ken
52
Sohail
53
Steven1.0.xp2pankratYow. Good one. Go Ludwig!
54
55
21500PATCHtriageP4pankratTransient test failures of GetBuildFailures/parallel.py
56
consensus
57
58
Bill
59
Brandon
60
David
61
Gary
62
Greganytimep1LudwigNot the same error as 1957, as far as I can determine from reading the issues. This patch fixes a test so the ouput can occur in either order, while 1057 is an actual failure.
63
Jim
64
Ken
65
Sohail
66
StevenDUP 1957benoitBenoit already had a Taskmaster fix for this, but it's relatively extensive, so currently targeted for 1.x. I'm interested in getting it into 1.0.x so we can not suffer with this...
67
68
21510PATCHtriageP4pankratBuilding Doc PDF/PS fails when using jw with openjade
69
consensus
70
71
Bill1.0.xAnything which makes building the docs more reliable is good for me. I've spent a lot of time messing with this locally. Still it would be great to document what tools are needed to build all the docs and if limited to specific versions, then which versions as well.
72
Brandon
73
David
74
Gary
75
Greganytimep4packagingIt should be a bug against the packaging component, so it's not tied to any particular core release. Do it any time after the 1.0 release.
76
Jim
77
Ken
78
Sohail
79
Steven1.0.xp4pankratMakes sense; lower priority than other things but still good to do.
80
81
21520DEFECTtriageP4matigrucaSCons fails to delete broken symbolic links.
82
consensus
83
84
Bill1.0.xp4 matigrucaSounds good
85
Brandon
86
David
87
Gary
88
Greg1.xp2MatiIt's an enhancement, really, so high priority after bug fixes. I think I'd throw an OSError rather than an UserError, but that's a minor nit.
89
Jim
90
Ken
91
Sohail
92
Steven1.0.xp4matigrucaGood patch; seems low risk. Sooner rather than later, but lower priority than other things.
93
94
21530DEFECTtriageP4stevenknightlong command lines leak tmp*.lnk files on Windows
95
consensus
96
97
Bill1.0.xNeed to verify, but perhaps it would make sense to make a per session dir for the temp files and then that whole directory could be deleted?
98
Brandon
99
David
100
Gary
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet 1