Excellence In Technology Award Rubrics


1

2
3
4	Technology Educator of the Year Rubric
5
6
7
8	This award recognizes outstanding educators from C.I.I. Member and C.I.I. Service Participant schools and divisions who effectively use technology with students.
9
10
11		Exemplary (4 points)	Strong (3 points)	Adequate (2 points)	Weak (1 point)	Not Apparent (0 points)
12	Work reflects the mission and purpose of the C.I.I.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been satisfactory.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been limited.	Work of improving student achievement through technology is not evident.
13	Shows effective use of technology.	Provides a clear and complete description of a lesson or unit showing effective use of technology that is a model for duplication.	Provides a clear description of a lesson or unit showing effective use of technology.	Provides a clear description of a lesson or unit showing satisfactory use of technology.	Provides a description of a lesson or unit showing use of technology.	Does not provide a description of a lesson or unit showing use of technology.
14	Shows the impact of the technology on students.	Unit or lesson shows a significant increase (with measurable results) in learning due to the use of technology.	Unit or lesson shows an effective increase in learning (with measurable results) due to the use of technology.	Unit or lesson shows a moderate increase in learning due to the use of technology.	Unit or lesson shows an increase in learning due to the use of technology.	Work lacks evidence that there is an increase in learning due to the use of technology.
15	Shows the impact on the community, and/or profession.	Work has had a significant positive impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Work has had an effective impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work has had a satisfactory impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work has had a limited impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work lacks evidence of its impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.


1
2
3
4	Technology Integrator of the Year Rubric
5
6
7
8	This award recognizes outstanding integrators from C.I.I. member and C.I.I. Service Participant schools and divisions who effectively support teachers’ integration of technology into the classroom.
9
10
11		Exemplary (4 points)	Strong (3 points)	Adequate (2 points)	Weak (1 point)	Not Apparent (0 points)
12	Work reflects the mission and purpose of the C.I.I.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been satisfactory.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been limited.	Work of improving student achievement through technology is not evident.
13	Shows support of teachers using technology.	Provides a clear and complete description of supporting teachers as they integrate technology in the classroom goes above and beyond the job description.	Provides a clear description of supporting teachers as they integrate technology in the classroom.	Provides a description of supporting one or more teachers as they integrate technology in the classroom.	Provides a description of supporting one or more teachers in the classroom.	There is no description of supporting teachers’ use of technology in the classroom.
14	Shows effective use of technology.	Provides a clear and complete description of a lesson or unit showing support of effective use of technology that is a model for duplication.	Provides a clear description of a lesson or unit showing support of effective use of technology.	Provides a clear description of a lesson or unit showing satisfactory use of technology.	Provides a description of a lesson or unit showing use of technology.	Does not provide a description of a lesson or unit showing use of technology.
15	Shows the impact of the technology on students.	Unit or lesson shows a significant increase (with measurable results) in learning due to the use of technology.	Unit or lesson shows an effective increase in learning (with measurable results) due to the use of technology.	Unit or lesson shows a moderate increase in learning due to the use of technology.	Unit or lesson shows an increase in learning due to the use of technology.	Work lacks evidence that there is an increase in learning due to the use of technology.
16	Shows the impact on the community, and/or profession.	Work has had a significant positive impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide and is worthy of being imitated or modeled	Work has had an effective impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work has had a satisfactory impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work has had a limited impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work lacks evidence of its impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.


1
2
3
4	Technology Administrator of the Year Rubric
5
6
7
8	This award recognizes outstanding administrators from C.I.I. member and C.I.I. Service Participant schools and divisions who have effectively increased the use of technology within their school.
9
10
11		Exemplary (4 points)	Strong (3 points)	Adequate (2 points)	Weak (1 point)	Not Apparent (0 points)
12	Work reflects the mission and purpose of the C.I.I.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been satisfactory.	Work of improving student achievement through technology has been limited.	Work of improving student achievement through technology is not evident.
13	Has made a noteworthy contribution to promoting educational technology within his/her school.	Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been effective and worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been effective.	Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been satisfactory.	Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been limited.	Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school is not evident.
14	Shows the impact on the community, and/or profession.	Work has had a significant positive impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide and is worthy of being imitated or modeled	Work has had an effective impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work has had a satisfactory impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work has had a limited impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.	Work lacks evidence of its impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.
15	Demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning.	Effectively demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Effectively demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning.	Satisfactorily demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning.	Demonstration of exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning is limited.	Demonstration of exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning is not evident.
16	Demonstrates a commitment to professional growth.	Effectively demonstrates a commitment to professional growth and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Effectively demonstrates a commitment to professional growth.	Demonstration of a commitment to professional growth is satisfactory.	Demonstration of a commitment to professional growth is limited.	Demonstration of a commitment to professional growth is not apparent.
17	Demonstrates creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education.	Effectively demonstrates creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.	Effectively demonstrates creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education.	Demonstration of creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education is satisfactory.	Demonstration of creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education is limited.	Demonstration of creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education is not evident