ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARAS
1
Category of material Was an associated body worn video clip viewed?Please describe and identifying features of this caseG – Did the officer(s) provide clear explanation grounds for suspicion – for example, information, intelligence or specific behaviour of a person.O – Did the officer(s) provider a clear explanation of the object and purpose of the search in terms of the article being searched for.W- Did the officer(s) present a warrant card, if not in uniform or if requested.I- Did the officer(s) state their identity: name and number or, in cases involving terrorism or where there is a specific risk to the officer, just warrant or collar number. S – Did the officer(s) state the station they work at.E – Did the officer(s) inform of the entitlement to a copy of the search record within three months.L – Did the officer(s) inform on which legal power used.Y – Did the officer(s) state ‘you are being detained for the purposes of a search’ this is a requirement.If GOWISELY was not or partially followed please provide detailsWere handcuffs used?Please select the nature of the handcuffing Was a taser used?Was the individual detained for a strip search? Which station did the strip search take place?Was an item (object) found in the search?Details of object found **Did the item found match the item (object) officer(s) were looking for? Did the panel observe any identifiable vulnerabilities in the person stopped?If yes, please provide more details Based on the perception of panel members, did the officer(s) recognise and appropriately respond to the identified vulnerabilities during the interaction?Please note any evidence of good/best practice.Please provide further detailsDid the officer(s) effectively and respectfully communicate with the individuals they encountered?Please note any evidence of good/best practice.2Please provide further details2From what the panel have observed, would you say the officer(s) behaved in a way that escalated or de-escalated the situation?Comments?Does the panel have any concerns about possible officer bias relating to this interaction?Please provide details Did the officer(s) provide the individual of details of how to make a complaint?If clear, please select which MPS team conducted the viewed stop and search.Please specify.Please rate how the officer closed the interaction.CommentsPlease select the origin of the encounter with the police officer(s)?If other, please provide details Were the stop and search/use of forms completed correctly/accurately/appropriately?Comments2Overall Panel Scrutiny AssessmentAssessment Feedback Best Practice Recommendations Please specify the category of recommendations 
2
Stop and Search form ;YesBlack male, stopped in Shoreditch because he was seen doing a balloon in his car. Had a female passenger in the car YesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesThe GOWISELY information in the preceding columns is for the male driver
For the female passenger: The searching officer did not give grounds - she just said detained under s23 and what she was looking for
It is possible that another officer did GOWISELY for the female passenger. This will need to be checked using Multi Cam 		YesNon-compliant (use of force implemented)NoNoYesIt seems they found cannabis and NOS but that was said off camera YesNoNoA male officer told the female passenger aggressively to get out of the car and threatened to handcuff her and drag her out of the car. This was said when the female passenger was still being compliant and definitely escalated the situation.EscalatedThe male officer escalated the situation by threatening to handcuff and drag the female passenger out of the car
The female officer later told her she was being "very, very aggressive" which, given she was just talking loudly was (a) inaccurate and (b) escalated things again 		NoNoEmergency Response Team from Bethnal GreenGoodIt ended positively, I think the people stopped understood the outcomes and the officers were friendly at the end Identified by officers proactivelyDon't KnowWe don't have the full form in front of us AmberThe points I am concerned about are:
1. The male officer - while the female passenger was still polite and compliant - threatening to handcuff her and drag her out of the car. The female officer calling her "very, very aggressive" when she wasn't - which escalated things

2. The female passenger said she would not give her details. The female officer said I will take them from your driving licence. Is that allowed? This was before she said, I will give you a community resolution so you have to give your details

3. The officers did not properly explain that you can refuse a community resolution and what the impact of that might be

4. The female passenger admitted to using drugs, the male driver was adamant he did not. It felt disproportionate therefore to refer him to Operation Revoke, such that his driving licence will be revoked until he can prove (how?) that he's not addicted to drugs

5. This is a general point: We see handcuffing a lot and people saying the cuffs are too tight. Officers invariably say they are not but it's never seen on BWV - probably because of where the cameras are. It would greatly assist for officers to show the handcuffs

6. The female passenger also asked for her hood to be put back up repeatedly. She may have been Muslim and some greater cultural awareness could have assisted there 		Best practice feedback (informal);Learning and development feedback (informal);
3
Stop and Search form ;YesTwo people had reported a man trying to break into one of their cars and then going to another car and stealing items including a laptop, bag, and shoes (I think)YesYesNot clearYesYesYesYesYesYesCompliant NoNoNoYesHe may have been under the influence of drugs NoTo me, the guy appeared agitated as though he could have been on drugs. His female companion certainly seemed to be under the influence NoOfficers were aggressive in tone at the start EscalatedTone at the start escalated things. Tone improved as the search went on NoNoTower Hamlets Response Team FairThey said have a nice evening sarcasticallyGenerated by alert from member of the publicDon't KnowWe don't have the forms in front of us Amber1. Officers were aggressive in tone at the start
2. Officers did not explain why they immediately handcuffed the person. I think that could have helped de-escalate things 		Best practice feedback (informal);
4
Stop and Search form ;Yes
Suspect seen trying to access block of flats, believed to be a drug user. The grounds only refer to him but he did have a companion with him 		YesNot clearNoYesYesYesYesYesI don't think she said she was looking for drugs but not 100% sure YesCompliant NoNoNoYesAs noted in the grounds, he appeared to be under the influence Don't knowYesGood tone and she asked if he was okay for her to put his personal property to one sideThe officers did talk over each other - Ins Hartley identified that it would have been better for one person to have spokenDeescalatedNoNoMile End Neighbourhood Policing TeamPanel not able to assessThe footage cut off prematurely so we don't know how it ended Identified by officers proactivelyDon't KnowWe don't have the forms in front of us NeutralI think there was some really good practice here: good tone, being polite. What we saw was good. The issue is it cut short so we don't really know what happened. I felt the handcuffing could have been explained but my co-member observed that it was.
I think if this had continued and ended in the same way, it would have been a green 		Good tone
Politely asked if they could put his personal property to one side 		Best practice feedback (informal);
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100