ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
#VALUE!Digital Health Software Global Good Assessment Tool
V1.4
2
Core Indicator
and Calculated Score [0-10]		Sub-Indicatorchange rating here
3
Global UtilityCountry UtilizationLowThree or less countries or states actively use the tool as part of their health information system -1
4
7Country StrategyMediumAt least four countries or states have included the tool as part of their eHealth strategy or framework0
5
Digital Health InterventionsHighThe tool fully meets digital functional requirements (as defined by WHO's Classification of Digital Health Interventions) without signifigant customization or configuration1
6
Source Code AccessibilityHighSource code exists on a publicly accessible repository and licensed under an Open Source Initiative approved license. Software is structured to allow local customizations and new modules and functionality without requiring forking of main code1
7
Funding and RevenueHighMultiple revenue streams and funding mechanisms exist, including at least one that provides for multi-year support of core software development, documentation and other key artifacts1
8
CommunityDeveloper, Contributor and Implementor Community EngagementHighAt least 30% of estimated total number of developers, contributors, and implementers are engaged on a communication platform. Community leadership includes representation from countries where the tool is deployed1
9
10Community GovernanceHighFormal community structures (e.g. leadership, technical advisory group, community representatives) exist and are practiced with documented roles and responsibilities in a transparent fashion and are used to direct continued development of the digital health tool1
10
Software RoadmapHighNew features and functionality are documented as part of a software roadmap as part of a release cycle. There are forums for community members to discuss new feature requests. A clear prioritization process exists and is utilized for the development of new features and functionality as part of a product backlog1
11
User DocumentationHighA full suite of user documentation exists including training manuals, online courses, tutorials and implementation guides addressing most of the common functionality. Documentation has been released under a Creative Commons license1
12
Multi-Lingual SupportHighSoftware has been translated into multiple languages and fully supports internationalization requirements. There is an easy tool for new translations to be added. Significant parts of user and implementer documentation has been translated into at least one other language.1
13
SoftwareTechnical DocumentationMediumSome technical documentation exists of the source code, use cases, and functional requirements 0
14
7Software ProductizationHighSoftware has been packaged for one or more common operating systems or platforms. Software upgrades can largely be achieved without manual intervention. Unit or integration testing is part of the release process1
15
Interoperability and Data AccessibilityMediumSome APIs are available for accessing and managing data. There are user-facing interfaces to export core data and metadata in the system (e.g. in CSV format) for further analysis and data transfer purposes0
16
SecurityMediumRole-based authorization exists, if appropriate. Guidance on encrypting all remote access (web interface, APIs) is available to implementors0
17
ScalabilityHighThere is at least one jurisdicions (e.g. country, state) deployment for which 30% of all "entities" are managed within the software. Performance and load testing is a part of routine releases and results are publicly available.1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Low
32
Medium
33
High
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100