| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FUNDER ENGAGEMENT TOOLKIT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Tailored engagement strategies based on funder survey analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Funder Type | Definition of 'Enabling Legal Environment' | Top Legal Priorities | Top Non-Legal Factors | Key Questions to Ask | Engagement Strategy | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Philanthropy (Conservation-focused) | Laws exist OR government demonstrates willingness to enact them. Minimum framework to gazette MPAs at national level. | Environmental laws, MPA designation, fisheries management | Conservation significance, political will, trusted implementing partners | • What is your primary measure of success? • Are you willing to fund legal reform as part of the project? • What conservation significance threshold applies? | Lead with conservation outcomes and biodiversity significance. Demonstrate track record of effective implementation. Emphasise partner credibility. | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Philanthropy (Equity-focused) | Laws that provide for inclusion, equity and representativeness in governance. Stakeholders and rightsholders are influential in decision-making. | Laws recognising indigenous rights and customary tenure, equity provisions, benefit-sharing | Community engagement, representativeness in governance, local ownership | • How do you approach indigenous and customary governance? • What equity indicators matter most? • How do you verify community benefit? | Emphasise community-led approaches and indigenous participation. Document equitable governance structures. Show how benefits flow to local communities. | ||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Philanthropy (Civil society-focused) | Both better implementation of existing policy AND policy improvements are needed. Willingness to support legal development. | Flexible — will fund legal reform as project output | Healthy civil society network, NGO/CSO capacity, ability to add capacity to government | • What role do you see for civil society partners? • How do you assess NGO capacity? • Can the project strengthen local organisations? | Highlight capable local partners. Show how project builds civil society capacity. Demonstrate government-NGO collaboration. | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Philanthropy (Relationship-focused) | Alignment with established regional programmes and existing partnerships. Long-term commitment. | Depends on existing partnership agreements | Alignment with priority themes, existing relationships, regional programme fit | • How does this fit your existing regional strategy? • What partnerships are already in place? • What is your long-term vision for this geography? | Connect proposals to existing programmes. Leverage established relationships. Demonstrate regional coherence. | ||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Bilateral Government Funder | National laws and regulatory frameworks in place AND a system that allows violations to be prosecuted and tried. | AML/CTF, child protection, safeguards for vulnerable groups, displacement/resettlement laws | Political will, stability, capability to deliver, institutional framework | • What safeguard policies must be addressed? • If laws aren't in place, what alternatives manage risk? • What governance indicators apply? | Demonstrate compliance with safeguards. Show enforcement capacity. If gaps exist, propose partner policies or project-level mechanisms to manage risk. | ||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Multilateral Climate Fund | Gives legal effect to conservation provisions; reduces inequalities; enacts key standards and establishes institutional mechanisms to implement them. | Climate/adaptation laws, environmental protection, gender equity provisions | Adaptation rationale, science-based planning, co-benefits, accredited entity capacity | • What climate rationale strengthens this proposal? • Can project costs include legal framework development? • What co-benefits matter most? | Build strong climate adaptation narrative. Include legal reform in project design. Emphasise gender and social co-benefits. Work through accredited entities. | ||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Multilateral Development Bank | Policies, strategies, laws and regulations enabling transparent, risk-free transactions with ease of doing business. Addresses political and financial risks. | Contract enforcement, fiduciary frameworks, safeguard compliance | Bankability/ROI, implementation capacity, risk management, policy alignment | • What feasibility studies demonstrate bankability? • What ROI thresholds apply? • What fiduciary/audit requirements must be met? | Focus on project-level readiness over economy-wide reforms. Develop strong feasibility studies. Demonstrate implementation capacity and M&E systems. | ||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Private Capital / Impact Investor | Multi-layered: basic legal frameworks enabling investment of private capital PLUS environmental alignment. Robust policy frameworks supporting sustainable business evolution. | Contract enforcement, investment protection, repatriation of profits | Political stability, pipeline of investable opportunities, business environment, measurable impact | • What legal protections for dispute resolution do you require? • What pipeline are you seeking? • How do you measure impact alongside returns? | Demonstrate political stability and rule of law. Present pipeline of bankable opportunities. Show robust impact measurement. Consider blended finance to de-risk. | ||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Research / Expedition Organisation | Clear regulations and streamlined permitting for marine research. Collaboration frameworks between government, academia, NGOs, and industry. | Research permitting, species protection laws, data sharing frameworks | Research infrastructure, institutional partnerships, science track record | • What permitting requirements exist for marine research? • What research infrastructure is available? • How is data shared and used? | Emphasise scientific value and knowledge gaps. Show existing research partnerships. Demonstrate how research informs policy and management. | ||||||||||||||||||||
14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||