ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Results at different levels Indicators and targets***
2
PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
3
Young people active in political parties have increased their participation and influence* within politics** and work for democracy, gender equality and human rights.
4
OUTCOME 1
5
55 % of participants have increased their participation and/or influence in political parties or politics. 55 % of participants report having increased their participation and/or influence in their party and/or in politics. Participation:
6
7
40 % of participants initiate and lead action within youth wings or mother parties. 1. 40 % of participants report having initiated and led actions within youth wings or mother parties.
2. Examples of actions initiated and led by participants within youth wings or mother parties. )
8
Output 1.2
9
50 % of participants are increasingly consulted and/or given responsibilities within youth wings or mother parties by seniors.1. 50 % of participants report having been consulted and/or given responsibilities within youth wings or mother parties by seniors.
2. Examples of participants being consulted and/or given responsibilities within youth wings or mother parties by seniors. )
10
OUTCOME 2
11
40 % of participants have worked for improved democracy within youth wings and/or political parties and/or other organisations.1. 40 % of participants report having worked for improved democracy within youth wings and/or political parties and/or other organisations.
2. Examples of participants working for improved democracy within youth wings and/or political parties and/or other organisations.
12
Output 2.1
13
70 % of participants have higher tolerance and respect for political opponents. (Refers to political tolerance as part of a democratic culture.)1. 70 % of participants report having increased their tolerance and respect for political opponents.
2. Examples of participants having increased their tolerance and respect for political opponents.
14
Output 2.2
15
40 % of participants have organised or participated in contact events in order to identify the needs/concerns in society. (Refers to responsivness to citizen's needs as a quality dimension of democracy.)1. 40 % of participants report having organised or participated in contact events in order to identify the needs/concerns in society.
2. Examples of participants having organised or participated in contact events in order to identify the needs/concerns in society.
16
Output 2.3
17
40 % of participants have worked for improved internal democracy within youth wings, political parties, or other organisations.1. 40 % of participants report having worked for improved internal democracy within youth wings, political parties, or other organisations.
2. Examples of participants having worked for improved internal democracy within youth wings, political parties, or other organisations.
18
OUTCOME 3
19
40 % of participants have worked for gender equality in politics.1. 40 % of participants report having worked for gender equality in politics.
2. Examples of particpants working for gender equality in politics.
9
20
Output 3.1
21
50 % of male particpants have increased their understanding of and support for gender equality.1. 50 % of participants report having increased their support for gender equality.
2. Examples of participants having increased ther support for gender equality.
22
Output 3.2
23
70 % of female participants have increased their sense of right to participate in politics and their self esteem to claim that right (Refers to Power Within). 1. 70 % of female participants report having increased their sense of right to participate.
2. Examples of participants having increased their sense of right to participate.
3. 70 % of female participants report having increased their self esteem to participate.
4. Examples of participants having increased their self esteem to participate
24
OUTCOME 4
25
40 % of participants have worked for the fulfilment of human rights.1. 40 % of participants report having worked for for the fulfillment of human rights.
2. Examples of particpants having worked for the fulfillment of human rights.
26
Output 4.1
27
40 % of participants have protected or promoted human rights.1. 40 % of participants report having protected or promoted human rights.
2. Examples of participants having protected or promoted human rights.
28
Output 4.2
29
40 % of particpants have claimed rights.1. 40 % of participants report having claimed rights.
2. Examples of participants having have claimed rights.
30
Comments on objectives Comments on indicators
31
* Influence is seen as the highest form of particpations, for more details see the ToC.
**"in politics" refers to political parties, elected and appointed positions as well as policy making.
*** the indicators to each of the results are either quantitative (%) or qualitative (examples of). The quantitative indicators will primarily be followed up by yearly self-assessment questionnaires developed by external evaluators. Examples verifying the qualitative indicators can be given by the participants themselves, or through observations done by facilitators and evaluators or by any other stakeholder (e.g. mother parties). Since PYPA is a gender mainstreamed program, all the quantitative indicators will be gender disaggregated.
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100