| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | The Service Innovation Lab Lean Canvas | Designed for: | Designed by: | Date: | Version: | |||||||||||||||||
4 | SIRG, SIWG and general public | Dave Moskovitz | 29/7/18 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | https://leanpolicy.org/ | v0.4 | by Pia Andrews | pia.andrews@dia.govt.nz | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Problem / Opportunity | Vision | Impact | Partners | Customers | |||||||||||||||||
9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | O: Dramatically improve government services for NZ. | For your government experience to be easy, | Measurably better design & dev of services for NZ. | Design and development teams across government | 1) The general public - we always design around the | |||||||||||||||||
12 | empowering, equitable and empathetic. Whether | end user needs as the first priority, particularly from a | ||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Embrace new ways of working, tools, cloud and agile | directly or through your preferred/trusted partner/channel. | Working openly creates capability uplift, permission, | Business area teams responsible for services today | systemic improvements and social outcomes basis. | |||||||||||||||||
14 | to make the operations of government service design | empowerment and acceleration of better public services | ||||||||||||||||||||
15 | better, cheaper and more responsive to user needs. | Possibly: "We empower public services and inform public | Design and development companies and networks | 2) Agencies/Councils - lead (& partner) agencies are our | ||||||||||||||||||
16 | utility to be of the people, by the people, for the people." | second highest priority, as meeting their needs creates | ||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Making opportunities to collaborate around common | aka: "He aha te mea nui o te ao, He tangata, he tangata, | Taking a systemic service design approach creates | The Lab "host" agency (currently DIA) | demand for more UCD and system transformation. But | |||||||||||||||||
18 | goals and user needs easier for agencies to participate. | he tangata" | opportunities to understand and design around genuine | system needs are considered secondary to user needs. | ||||||||||||||||||
19 | causal factors rather than simply creating new services. | Iwi and Maaori community engagement forums | ||||||||||||||||||||
20 | The cost of research and innovation is high and hard | 3) Aligned service providers - organisations that are on | ||||||||||||||||||||
21 | for agencies to justify with tight budget constraints. The | Working collaboratively across govt, private and non | MBIE, IRD, Policy Project, PCO, Auckland Policy Office | user journey and a natural part of the service, like CAB. | ||||||||||||||||||
22 | Lab provides a meaningful & low cost path for creating | Unique Value Proposition | profit partners around genuine user needs, especially | (for policy and legislation innovation) | ||||||||||||||||||
23 | a backlog for agencies based on evidence based R&D. | where there is a shared need, creates new models for | 4) Machines - we design with machines as end users | |||||||||||||||||||
24 | A cross agency design and development lab to | exploring and solving shared goals without just resorting | Other "labs" and innovator networks or initiatives | in mind to ensure a) we enable good AI/bot usage & | ||||||||||||||||||
25 | Agencies are usually focused on vertical pressures | experiment, drive and enable the systemic change | to "insourcing or outsourcing", neither of which work. | b) we mitigate bad AI/bot usage (from a user's view). | ||||||||||||||||||
26 | and have little systemic pressure to work horizontally | of government for the benefit of society. | Service Design Network | |||||||||||||||||||
27 | or from an all of system or all of government approach. | Making it easy for people to get what they need from | 5) Our other key "customers" would include other | |||||||||||||||||||
28 | This creates barriers to collaboration, service integration, | Providing a way to direct public fundng to systemic | government with their mana increased by the process. | interested parties: academia, | ||||||||||||||||||
29 | improvements, horizontal efforts around shared goals, | |||||||||||||||||||||
30 | The lack of system evidence & accountability reinforces | capability uplift, high value reusable components and | ||||||||||||||||||||
31 | zero sum behaviours across government, | actionable innovation for all participating agencies. | ||||||||||||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Why does this problem exist in the first place? | Risks | Key Metrics | Rollout strategy | Who else is affected? | |||||||||||||||||
35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | Govt doesn't see value of internal capability/expertise | Each opportunity will have relevant metrics | Life event journey mapping to establish pipeline | People | ||||||||||||||||||
38 | Lack of pathways/capacity/capability to try new things | Funding gaps put pressure on team, can lose staff | ||||||||||||||||||||
39 | Lack of all of system design leading to siloed services | Appetite innovation/transformation, particularly at scale | Reusable components measured in savings and opps | Rapid prototyping of approaches | Other agencies | |||||||||||||||||
40 | Iteration only goes so far, appetite for radical change | Lab used for dirty laundry, BAU or solution validation | ||||||||||||||||||||
41 | External assumptions don't align with value prop | Life event services measured in uptake and impact | Identification and development of reusable components | Private/non-profit partners in service delivery | ||||||||||||||||||
42 | Fear of loss of resources to others | Lab seen as competition & thus disempowering | for testing, and running until operationalised. | |||||||||||||||||||
43 | Lab assumed to run user services or incur tech debt | System barriers measured in difficulty avoided | ||||||||||||||||||||
44 | Inwardly focused, unable to access funding for collab | Driven by SIRG (cross agency) agreed prioritisation | ||||||||||||||||||||
45 | insights/opps/innovation not adopted | Capability uplift measured in impact across govt | which both ensures better collaboration and buy in | |||||||||||||||||||
46 | Burnout when hiring or temps too slow for need | whilst keeping the resource focused on areas of | ||||||||||||||||||||
47 | Alignment with gov strategy | shared need. | ||||||||||||||||||||
48 | Independence from host agency not protected | |||||||||||||||||||||
49 | Costs and resources required | Revenue and/or other benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | The Public Policy Lean Canvas (or Policy Lean Canvas) is adapted from the Lean Canvas by Ash Maurya | |||||||||||||||||||||
64 | The Lean Canvas is adapted from The Business Model Canvas by Alex Osterwalder (www.businessmodelgeneration.com/canvas) | |||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | Excel implementation by: Neos Chronos Limited (http://neoschronos.com/) | |||||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit: | |||||||||||||||||||||
69 | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. | |||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||