Overall, how would you rate today's training event?

Today's content and feedback to the lecturers (e.g. materials, exercises, structure): – What did you like best?

Today's content and feedback to the lecturers (e.g. materials, exercises, structure): – Where should we improve?

Depth of content was

The pace of teaching was

Teaching aids used (e.g. slides) were well prepared

Hands-on exercises and demonstrations were

How would you rate the instructors overall teaching performances?

Do you feel you achieved your desired learning outcome?

Did today's course meet your expectation?

a bit more time dedicated to Jupyter

The structure is good.

The time dedicated for the interactive session/jupyter was not sufficient to try ourselves.

good material on the web that was easy to follow

The wiki of the course is really good. I will continue using it as a documentation after the course.

A good overview. I think I'll find the Jupyter lab and env extra useful in the future!

Very good, they were motivated and clear.

The lectures were very clear and the teachers were very good

The last part on Parallel and multi-threaded functions was a bit fast due to time which happens of course but it would be good to learn more on that.

exercises and structure

The part before lunch was very clear and easy to understand despite the technical issues

The after lunch section was really difficult for me to follow, I feel like the lecturers didn't stop long enough on each topic to explain it properly and I only got a partial understanding

The format and structure was good, hands on exercises was also good.

Maybe a better distribution of time between exercises would benefit. Spend less time on the begninnig and give more time to run exmaples on the interactive and parallel parts. Becuase I think this is the part were we need more help.

Good instructions, positive supportive and friendly environment, nice course structure, basic exercises.

the 14:00 to 15:00 session was a bit hard to keep up with.

Overall a great introductory course to get grasp of the basics in a positive and supportive environment with knowledgeable instructors.

Teaching was quite fast. Sometime hard to follow.

materials, exercise and structure

Time per exercise can be optimised. More time for python jupyter and GPU exercises will be good for us.

Can we have something like BYOC and you can show us how to use it to asses time and core used using library multiprocess, please?

Materials and structure were good

I personally thought Birgitte was too fast and I could not follow. I liked Richel the most.

I can not evaluate the performance of each part in a single evaluation form, as I felt it was very different depending on each teacher

Clear exercises and instructions, availability of deepening material

Time organization: morning pace was slow compared to the afternoon one. Maybe more time of coding together with the lecturer, especially for the second part of the program (more complex concepts of batch work and interactive work)

https://uppmax.github.io/R-python-julia-HPC/prereqs.html <- this webpage was great!

If prerequisite is well informed, such as little knowledge on Linus? it would have been better.

I like that the material was very well prepared and with this guidance I understood concepts and managed to do task that I could not do by myself

The first part was a good pace for me, but the second part was more complicated and I did not have time to follow and do the exercises. Maybe the second part could be done in another session, because it is the most important part to take use the resources and take advantage of that. However, I got many tools to start my own projects.

Thanks for the course, it was very useful and I feel encouraged to start my project.

Very good material, mostly in one location

There were some errors/not updated in the exercises in the material. Also can more of the material be on the course pages instead of pointing to documentation at the centers? It makes it clearer when we don't have to go difference places

More time to exercises. and the zoom problems made it confusing. I know it's not your fault. Maybe don't use breakout rooms so much , especially when you know there are problems? I have never been in a course where it works well to go back and forth between breakout rooms. Just use them as backup if anyone need to get private help.

info mail was +1, same for material

more time for exercises in afternoon, more time for the batch section, maybe don't ask random people to answer stuff I don't like that (stress - introvert)

i really need more time for exercises

Thanks for your lecture and your time.

material gathered in one space

more and slower code-alongs

A bit too uneven speed with too low in the morning and too high in the afternoon or at least too little time in the afternoon to go through everything

The pace was relatively slow, which was great. as then also those how have very limited knowledge can also keep up the pace. However, in the afternoon it clearly went more faster. Maybe speed up in the morning a bit to have more time practicing actually submitting the jobs? As that was my main motivation for this, I basically skipped the very last lecture about parallelization and instead coded to make submittinch batch jobs work.

Some students had problems loggin in to the needed systems. I also just noted that there was this log-in session in Monday when you mentioned it on tuesday. Maybe advertise that in the very beginning of the information email so that it does not go unnoticed. I had no problems loggin etc, but those who had would have benefited participating on Monday

The github website on which the course is built is very good. very easy to follow and well-explained

Thank you for recording the lectures, very helpful