ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
RESEARCH PAPERSEXPERIENCE REPORTSPERSPECTIVES ON EQUITYPERSPECTIVES ON POLICY
2
Population and Conference ThemeThis submission clearly focuses on the experiences of at least one underrepresented, historically marginalized group in computing (e.g., women, African-American, Latinx, Native Americans, LGBTQIA+, persons with disabilities, community college, rural, socio-economically disadvantaged, first-generation college students).
The submission authentically and specifically addresses the reciprocal influences of research and policy and associated implications for the RESPECT community.
3
Track Specific CriteriaPlease describe the extent to which the submission's research methods, findings and discussion are clearly described and informed by the theoretical framework, scholarly literature, and positionality statement.

Be specific, using examples from the submission, when possible.		Please describe the extent to which the submission includes clear descriptions of context, audience, goals, and outcomes.

Be as specific as possible, using examples from the submission, when possible.		Please describe the extent to which the submission clearly articulates lessons learned, critical opinions, implications for theory, reflections, etc. that align with the conference theme.

Be specific, using examples from the submission, when possible.		Please describe the extent to which the submission clearly and concisely articulates background and relevant research on policy issues and makes one or more policy recommendations based on the evidence and/or discussions of how current federal, state, or local policy influences computing equity work.

Be specific, using examples from the submission, when possible.
4
LimitationsPlease describe the extent to which the author(s) address the variety of limitations (generalizability/transferability of findings, identities of focus, intersectionality of participant identities, applicability of the research, etc.). Be specific, using examples from the submission, when possible.
5
Equitable LanguagePlease describe the extent to which the author(s) make use of equitable language when describing participants, communities, and target populations. Be specific, using examples from the submission, when possible.
6
Positionality StatementDoes the submission contain a high-quality positionality statement?
7
Style, Writing, & FormatIs the submission clear, well organized, and written to be accessible to a wide range of conference participants?

If you answer no, please give justification.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100