backup Framework Scoring Experiment - Silver

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V
1	Framework	Collected User Needs, Based on:	https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/#collected-user-needs https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html
2	!!! INCOMPLETE, WORK IN PROGRESS !!!	Functional Outcomes	User Needs	Adjectival Rating	Tags					Functional Types												WCAG 2.x Mapping
3	GUIDELINES (21 NOW!!!)	COMBINED SCORE	TECHNICAL	A11Y-in-USE	FILTER CHOICES					VISION			COGNITION			MOBILITY			HEARING
4	Based on: FAST	TOTAL AVERAGE	TESTS	TESTS	ELEMENT	POUR	ROLE	TECH	T-A-U	Without	Limited	Color	Learning	Dyslexia	Seizures	Reach	Strength	Motoric	Deaf	Limited	Vocal

5	CONTRAST Enable direct perception of output for people with wide range of perception disabilities How-To = Simple Methods = Not so Simple	Visual presentation perceivable across a range of vision impairments	Luminosity contrast sufficient	BENCHMARK = SImple 1. Very good (90-100) 2. Good (76-89) 3. Acceptable (60-75) 4. Poor (30-59) 5. Unacceptable (0-29)	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	PU	Design Dev	CSS HTML PDF XR	Tech Author UA		Red	Orange		Yellow								1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced)
6			Hue contrast sufficient for certain color perception disorders	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	PU	Design Dev	CSS HTML PDF XR	Tech Author UA		Orange	Red		Yellow
7	TWEAK TEXT Adjustability of output How-To = Simple Methods = Not so Simple	Visual presentation can be adjusted to meet needs of user	Text can be resized - Content format allows resize - Author provides resize feature	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev	CSS HTML PDF XR	Tech Author UA		Red		Yellow	Orange								1.4.4 Resize text
8			Color scheme can be changed - Content format defines color style scheme that user or user agent can override - Author provides color switch options	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev		Tech Author UA		Orange	Red		Yellow								1.4.8 Visual Presentation
9			Luminosity contrast can be changed - User agent exaggerates luminosity differences - Author provides color switch options	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev		Tech Author UA		Red	Yellow		Yellow
10			Typeface, font weight, font style can be changed	1. The heading is semantic 2. Good 3. The heading not semantic and/or wrong level but doesn't hurt that much (???) 4. The heading is semantic but wrong or no level applied 5. The heading is not semantic	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev		Tech Author UA		Orange		Yellow	Red
11			Line / word / letter spacing can be changed	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev		Tech Author UA		Yellow		Yellow	Red								1.4.12 Text Spacing
12			Margins can be changed	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev		Tech Author UA		Yellow		Yellow	Orange								1.4.12 Text Spacing
13			Line length can be changed	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev		Tech Author UA		Yellow		Yellow	Red								1.4.8 Visual Presentation
14			Justification can be changed	1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	P	Design Dev		Tech Author UA		Orange		Yellow	Red								1.4.8 Visual Presentation
15	NAVIGATE User can navigate content effectively How-To = Simple Methods = Not so Simple	Useful navigation order [also relates to efficient usage]		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	O	Dev		Tech Author UA	Red	Red					Red	Red	Red				2.4.3 Focus Order
16		Navigation supports different thinking styles		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	O	Dev		Tech Author UA	Red	Orange					Orange	Orange	Orange
17	COLOR ONLY Meaning conveyed by style perceivable to users that is presented through color to be also presented in another way that does not rely on color.) How-To = Simple Methods = Not so Simple	Author provides multiple redundant style cues		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	PU	Design		Tech Author UA		Orange	Red	Yellow									1.4.1 Use of Color
18		Meaning supported by programmatically determined semantics		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable		PU	Dev		Tech Author UA	Red	Orange		Yellow
19	CONCURRENT INPUT MECHANISM Input is device independent How-To = Simple Methods = Not so Simple	Input does not require pointing device		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	O	Dev		Tech Author UA	Red	Red					Red	Red	Red
20		Support keyboard input with only visual feedback		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	O	Dev		Tech Author UA							Red	Red	Red
21		Allow speech input		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	O	Dev		Tech Author UA				Orange	Orange		Red	Red	Red
22		Input does not require speech input		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Element 1 Element 2 Etc.	O	Dev		Tech Author UA										Red	Red	Red
23	INSTRUCTIONS / IMPORTANT User can manage distractions How-To = Simple Methods = Not so Simple	Layout helps user find important content		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Inputs	U	Design		Author	Yellow	Yellow		Yellow
24	STRUCTURE Users can discover content on the page How-To = Simple Methods = Not so Simple	Headings identify regions of content		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Headings	PU
25		Regions of content are programmatically determined		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Landmarks	POUR
26		User can skip to main content		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Landmarks	O
27		Controls and their functions are programmatically determined		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Inputs Links Buttons	POUR
28		Controls have contrast with their surroundings		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Inputs Links Buttons	PU
29		Location of controls is predictable		1. Very good 2. Good 3. Acceptable 4. Poor 5. Unacceptable	Inputs Links Buttons	PU
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44	Collected User Needs, Based on:	https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/#collected-user-needs https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html
45
46
47
48	Authentication
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100