| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Last updated: Dec 2021 | Total sector volume (,000 t)= | 9565.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Sustainability status as of October 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Route to 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | (,000 t) | Percent of sector total | Cumulative percent | SR Active Priorities 2022 | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Sustainable (MSC-C) | 9.0 | 0.1% | 0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Australian northern prawn | 3.6 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Exmouth Gulf prawn | 2.1 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Shark Bay prawn | 1.2 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Spencer Gulf king prawn | 2.1 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Improving (MSC-FA) | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Improving (other certifications) | 790.9 | 8.3% | 8.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Australia farmed shrimp | 4.6 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Bangladesh farmed shrimp | 1.2 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | China farmed shrimp | 32.7 | 0.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Ecuador farmed shrimp | 218.0 | 2.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Guatemala farmed shrimp | 19.5 | 0.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | Honduras farmed shrimp | 27.7 | 0.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | India farmed shrimp | 159.9 | 1.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | Indonesia farmed shrimp | 81.2 | 0.8% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
23 | Madagascar farmed shrimp | 3.8 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | Mexico farmed shrimp | 25.0 | 0.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Mexico, Sinaloa blue shrimp, wild, Fair Trade USA | 0.8 | 0.0% | Mexican Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Nicaragua farmed shrimp | 18.1 | 0.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | Nigeria farmed shrimp | 0.1 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | Philippines farmed shrimp | 1.5 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | Tanzania farmed shrimp | 0.1 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | Thailand farmed shrimp | 114.6 | 1.2% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
31 | Venezuela farmed shrimp | 3.1 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | Vietnam farmed shrimp | 79.0 | 0.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Improving (FIP A-C; AIP) | 335.0 | 3.5% | 11.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Argentina Offshore Red Shrimp FIP, CeDePesca | 80.0 | 0.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | Argentina Onshore Red Shrimp FIP, CeDePesca | 20.0 | 0.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | India Kerala Deep-Sea Shrimp, FDSSK | 4.2 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | India Kerala shrimp and cephalopods FIP, SEAI-KFCCS | 51.2 | 0.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | India Palk Bay Flower Shrimp, bluesensus | 4.1 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | Indonesia Central Java white prawn - trammel net and trap | 3.0 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | Indonesia South Kalimantan shrimp - trammel nets | 0.5 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | Indonesia East Java – PT ATINA Sidoarjo Ecoshrimp AIP | 0.1 | 0.0% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
43 | Indonesia East Java -Shrimp Improvement Program (SIP) | 19.0 | 0.2% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
44 | Indonesia South Sulawesi – ASIC EcoShrimp | 0.4 | 0.0% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
45 | Mexico Gulf of California Small Scale Blue Shrimp FIP, Eastern Fish/Meridian/Ocean Garden | 7.5 | 0.1% | Mexican Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
46 | Mexico Sinaloa Artisanal Blue Shrimp FIP, Del Pacifico | 1.7 | 0.0% | Mexican Shrimp SR | *This FIP also has a Fair Trade certification for a portion of its volume. Fair Trade volume has been reported above, and remaining FIP volume is reported here. | ||||||||||||||||||||
47 | Thailand Chumphon – Shrimp Health Resources Improvement Project (SHRImp) | 11.0 | 0.1% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
48 | Thailand Rayong – Shrimp Health Resources Improvement Project (SHRImp) | 6.0 | 0.1% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
49 | Thailand Surat Thani – Shrimp Health Resources Improvement Project (SHRImp) | 36.0 | 0.4% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
50 | US Alabama Shrimp FIP, Audubon Nature Institute | 9.8 | 0.1% | US GoM Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
51 | US Florida Pink Shrimp FIP, Cox's Wholesale Seafood | 3.6 | 0.0% | US GoM Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
52 | US Louisiana Shrimp FIP, Audubon Nature Institute | 40.9 | 0.4% | US GoM Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
53 | US Mississippi Shrimp FIP, Audubon Nature Institute | 4.5 | 0.0% | US GoM Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
54 | US Texas Shrimp FIP, Audubon Nature Institute | 31.6 | 0.3% | US GoM Shrimp SR | |||||||||||||||||||||
55 | Vietnam Bac Lieu Shrimp AIP | 0.2 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | Gap to 75: Stalled Improvements (FIPs D, E, or inactive) | 25.1 | 0.3% | 12.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
58 | US Florida Shrimp FIP, Wood's Fisheries | 0.7 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | Mexico Baja California Sur Shrimp FIP, Northern Chef | 0.8 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | Mexican Pacific Ocean Shrimp FIP, Meridian/Ocean Garden/Promarmex | 23.0 | 0.2% | Mexican Shrimp SR | *After withdrawing from MSC FA, the FIP remained inactive in 2021. | ||||||||||||||||||||
61 | Panama Shrimp FIP | 0.6 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | Gap to 75: SR FIP/AIP Initiation/Expansion Priority | 1112.2 | 11.6% | 23.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
64 | Indonesia, farmed shrimp (non-improving volume) | 836.5 | 8.7% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | *National level policy change is expected to positively affect all shrimp culture in Indonesia, thus all shrimp production volume is counted here, not just the primary species of interest to the SR participants (giant tiger prawn and whiteleg shrimp) | ||||||||||||||||||||
65 | Mexico Pacific, wild (non-FIP volume) | 28.7 | 0.3% | Mexican Shrimp SR | * includes the previous MSC FA fishery Mexico Pacific Shrimp that withdrew from certification - T75 ID LS_5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
66 | Thailand, farmed shrimp (non-improving volume) | 247.0 | 2.6% | Asian Farmed Shrimp SR | *National level policy change is expected to positively affect all shrimp culture in Thailand, thus all shrimp production volume is counted here, not just the primary species of interest to the SR participants (giant tiger prawn and whiteleg shrimp) - this strategy is different than how Chris has done SR associations and flagged SR priorities (only SR priorities are the Past AIP volumes). | ||||||||||||||||||||
67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | Gap to 75: Options for Closing the Gap to 75 | 5230.3 | 54.7% | 78.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
69 | China, farmed shrimp (non-improving volume) | 2479.7 | 25.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | China, wild shrimp | 855.8 | 8.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | Ecuador, farmed shrimp (non-improving volume) | 462.0 | 4.8% | *Current ongoing work in sustainability by the Sustainable Shrimp Partnership. | |||||||||||||||||||||
72 | India, farmed shrimp (non-improving volume) | 608.7 | 6.4% | *ongoing improvement: https://www.seafoodwatch.org/our-projects/farmed-shrimp-in-india (375 000 t); National level policy change is expected to positively affect all shrimp culture in India, thus all shrimp production volume is counted here, not just the primary species of interest to the SR participants (giant tiger prawn and whiteleg shrimp) | |||||||||||||||||||||
73 | Vietnam, farmed shrimp (non-improving volume) | 824.1 | 8.6% | *ongoing improvement: https://www.seafoodwatch.org/our-projects/farmed-shrimp-in-vietnam (160 000 t); National level policy change is expected to positively affect all shrimp culture in Vietnam, thus all shrimp production volume is counted here, not just the primary species of interest to the SR participants (giant tiger prawn and whiteleg shrimp) | |||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | Other large volumes not included in the Route to 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | Bangladesh, farmed shrimp | 132.6 | 1.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | India, wild shrimp (non-FIP volume) | 407.2 | 4.3% | *India has significant wild production and sells to unengaged markets (likely much remains domestic) | |||||||||||||||||||||
78 | Indonesia, wild shrimp (non-FIP volume) | 312.8 | 3.3% | *Indonesia has significant wild production and sells to markets with engagement activities (likely much remains domestic, though China and Japan are also likely export destinations) | |||||||||||||||||||||
79 | Mexico, farmed shrimp | 145.1 | 1.5% | *Mexico has significant farmed production volume and exports of shrimp to engaged markets (US) but is not currently considered under the scope of the Mexican Seafood SR. We can evaluate the interest of the US supply chain on this topic. | |||||||||||||||||||||
80 | Vietnam, wild shrimp | 31.9 | 0.3% | *Vietnam has some wild production volume and sells some products to engaged markets, but wild shrimp likely much remains domestic in the unengaged market | |||||||||||||||||||||
81 | Malaysia farmed shrimp | 53.6 | 0.6% | *previously certified volume LS_16; There is no evidence of any certified farms or products from Malaysia. Last year volume was assigned to Malaysia as there was an imbalance between the global certified volume and the sum of certified volumes by country. This was not the case in 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
82 | Peru farmed shrimp | 43.5 | 0.5% | *previously certified volume LS_20: There is no evidence of any certified volume this year from Peru, but there is evidence of a couple of certified farms. Last year volume was assigned to Peru as there was an imbalance between the global certified volume and the sum of certified volumes by country. This was not the case in 2021. | |||||||||||||||||||||
83 | Saudi Arabia farmed shrimp | 60.8 | 0.6% | *previously certified volume LS_22: evidence of one GGAP farm, but no volume. Fall in number of certified farms. | |||||||||||||||||||||
84 | United States of America | 2.0 | 0.0% | *previously certified volume LS_25: There is no evidence of any certified farms or products from the US. Last year volume was assigned to the US as there was an imbalance between the global certified volume and the sum of certified volumes by country. This was not the case in 2021. | |||||||||||||||||||||
85 | Thailand (FAO 71) Wild Shrimp | 29.5 | 0.3% | * multispecies trawl fisheries in GoT are in focus of improvement efforts | |||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | Additional Notes: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |