ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
2
🌿 PINA 2026 Permaculture Design Contest — Judge Scoring Form
3
Score each category 1–10 using the dropdown. 140 points total. All fields required.
4
5
6
Judge Name:Date:
7
Contestant / Design Title:Contestant Email:
8
Track (Youth / Open / Practitioner):Location / Region:
9
10
SCORING — Rate each category 1 (very weak) to 10 (exceptional)
11
CategoryWhat to EvaluateSourceScore
(1–10)
Judge Notes / Comments
12
1. Ethical IntegrationEarth Care, People Care, Fair Share; permaculture ethics shaping design decisions2026 Rubric
13
2. Context AwarenessClimate/regional response; site constraints; scale and access realism2026 Rubric
14
3. Design Clarity & Systems ThinkingElement relationships; functional stacking; whole-systems approach2026 Rubric
15
4. Feasibility & Implementation ReadinessRealistic plan; budget awareness; evidence of forward momentum2026 Rubric
16
5. Potential Positive ImpactEcological regeneration; social/community benefit; replicable/educational value2026 Rubric
17
6. Presentation & CommunicationClarity of drawings/diagrams; narrative strength; appropriate professionalism2026 Rubric
18
7. Overall Impression of DesignHolistic quality, cohesion, and creativity of the full submission2024 Matrix
19
8. Design NarrativeStrength, clarity, and persuasiveness of the written narrative2024 Matrix
20
9. Graphics & VisualsQuality and utility of maps, diagrams, photos, and visual materials2024 Matrix
21
10. Total Impact of DesignOverall scope and depth of ecological and social impact2024 Matrix
22
11. Public VisibilityPotential for the design to be seen, shared, and highlighted publicly2024 Matrix
23
12. Community Engagement & EducationEngagement with surrounding community; educational programming2024 Matrix
24
13. Partnerships & Multiple StakeholdersEvidence of partnerships, institutional support, or multi-stakeholder buy-in2024 Matrix
25
14. Permaculture Flower Elements & Forms of CapitalDesign addresses multiple Permaculture Flower domains and multiple forms of capital2024 Matrix
26
TOTAL SCORE0out of 140 points
27
28
QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK — Please complete before submitting
29
Key Strengths of this Design:
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Areas for Improvement:
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Additional Comments / Context:
44
45
46
47
48
Advance to Public Voting Stage?
49
Select recommendation:Yes — Advance
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100