20240212report_table1.xlsx

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K
1	Basin	2/1/24	2/12/24	2/1/24	2/12/24	2/12/24	2/12/24‡	Area (mi2)	2/1/24	2/12/24	2/12/24
2		% 2/1 Avg.	% 2/12 Avg.	SWE (in)	SWE (in)	% SCA	Vol (af)	> 5000'	Pillows	Pillows	SNODAS* (in)
3	Upper Sacramento	49	68	6.9	13.7	96.3	93,624	127.8	6.3 ( 1 )	17.6 ( 1 )	20.7
4	McCloud	51	67	7.2	13.0	96.5	123,219	178.2	NA	NA	22.4
5	Pit§	31	67	4.1	5.4	62.4	667,059	2,300.9	9.6 ( 4 )	12.2 ( 4 )	3.6
6	Sac at Bend Bridge	40	73	4.1	11.6	85.4	158,239	256.8	NA	NA	8.7
7	Feather§	43	73	5.0	5.5	81.6	669,342	2,272.5	9.8 ( 6 )	15.8 ( 6 )	7.9
8	Yuba	55	72	5.7	11.2	85.1	333,227	555.7	15.8 ( 4 )	23.0 ( 4 )	15.1
9	American	55	76	6.2	11.9	91.6	540,264	851.3	9.2 ( 11 )	14.3 ( 11 )	12.3
10	Cosumnes	46	79	5.1	11.4	91.1	57,184	94.4	NA	NA	9.1
11	Mokelumne	53	75	6.8	12.6	93.7	227,006	336.8	9.5 ( 1 )	15.0 ( 1 )	13.9
12	Stanislaus	55	77	7.0	12.8	96.4	405,001	591.6	11.4 ( 4 )	18.2 ( 4 )	12.5
13	Tuolumne§	55	80	7.4	10.8	95.4	553,982	960.7	10.0 ( 6 )	15.2 ( 7 )	12.9
14	Merced§	52	78	6.7	10.7	96.0	323,533	565.9	9.3 ( 2 )	14.5 ( 2 )	12.2
15	San Joaquin§	48	75	6.0	10.0	97.5	682,660	1,273.7	6.5 ( 5 )	13.7 ( 6 )	11.1
16	Kings§	47	78	5.8	10.5	96.8	707,557	1,261.0	7.2 ( 5 )	13.1 ( 5 )	10.5
17	Kaweah§	44	86	5.2	9.6	94.5	166,311	326.0	4.6 ( 2 )	10.4 ( 2 )	9.2
18	Tule	25	102†	3.8	10.3	92.8	78,954	143.2	NA	NA	6.0
19	Kern§	36	93	4.3	5.7	91.1	530,475	1,746.9	5.3 ( 6 )	9.5 ( 8 )	6.7
20	Truckee	53	74	4.4	9.6	92.6	229,366	449.8	5.5 ( 5 )	8.9 ( 5 )	9.0
21	Tahoe	57	75	5.4	9.9	86.7	174,497	331.1	7.9 ( 7 )	11.2 ( 7 )	9.7
22	W Carson§	57	73	7.1	10.3	96.0	38,404	70.2	9.7 ( 2 )	14.2 ( 2 )	11.9
23	E Carson§	47	78	5.7	8.3	97.3	168,824	382.1	5.3 ( 5 )	9.3 ( 5 )	7.7
24	W Walker	51	74	6.6	11.0	99.0	111,867	191.4	10.4 ( 3 )	15.3 ( 3 )	11.7
25	E Walker	35	82	5.2	8.1	98.3	163,118	377.6	3.9 ( 1 )	7.5 ( 1 )	5.4
26	Mono	19	90	3.2	5.7	98.2	323,230	1,069.7	NA	NA	3.6
27	Upper Owens	28	80	3.7	7.3	96.2	155,074	397.7	10.8 ( 1 )	21.9 ( 1 )	4.7
28	Owens	36	99†	3.9	4.3	78.1	432,961	1,866.9	2.5 ( 4 )	6.6 ( 5 )	3.1
29
30	§ Data in all ASO-collected basins have been bias-corrected using ASO data and therefore the SWE changes might not represent snowmelt but rather an update to the SWE estimates based on airborne data.
31	† Deep and recent snow in areas that typically are snow-free can report high percent of average for this date because the mean 2001-2021 regression-derived SWE for that area is low or 0.
32	‡ For volume totals above Shasta Lake add Upper Sac, McCloud and Pit volumes. For volume totals above Bend Bridge add Upper Sac, McCloud, Pit and Sac at Bend Bridge volumes.
33	* This is a comparison to the SNODAS (SNOw Data Assimilation System) nationwide product from the National Weather Service.
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100