ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST
1
TimestampTrialProviderModelPrompt_TypeTemperatureReasoning_ConfigValid_JSONGuessReasoningRaw_ResponseAPI_Full_ResponseSuccessErrorInput_TokensOutput_TokensTotal_Tokens
2
2025-10-21T11:32:54.8583581openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00I would choose a number slightly below the midpoint (50) to account for the possibility of other participants choosing higher numbers. By choosing 33, I aim to be closer to 2/3 of the average if most participants pick numbers above 50. This strategy increases my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "I would choose a number slightly below the midpoint (50) to account for the possibility of other participants choosing higher numbers. By choosing 33, I aim to be closer to 2/3 of the average if most participants pick numbers above 50. This strategy increases my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwT7gHltivfY4RL3V6Twlqrd0v2O",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would choose a number slightly below the midpoint (50) to account for the possibility of other participants choosing higher numbers. By choosing 33, I aim to be closer to 2/3 of the average if most participants pick numbers above 50. This strategy increases my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013973,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 74,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 190,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE190
3
2025-10-21T11:32:58.0899982openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00The average guess of all participants will likely be around 50 because it is the midway point of the range. To maximize my chances of winning, I need to guess 2/3 of this average, which would be around 33. Since most participants may overthink and choose a number higher than 50, I will play it safe and go slightly lower with the guess of 50 to be closest to 2/3 of the probable average.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "The average guess of all participants will likely be around 50 because it is the midway point of the range. To maximize my chances of winning, I need to guess 2/3 of this average, which would be around 33. Since most participants may overthink and choose a number higher than 50, I will play it safe and go slightly lower with the guess of 50 to be closest to 2/3 of the probable average."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTASos0jlGomSxjc4irBEM0QSNc",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"The average guess of all participants will likely be around 50 because it is the midway point of the range. To maximize my chances of winning, I need to guess 2/3 of this average, which would be around 33. Since most participants may overthink and choose a number higher than 50, I will play it safe and go slightly lower with the guess of 50 to be closest to 2/3 of the probable average.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013976,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 106,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 222,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE222
4
2025-10-21T11:33:00.9487883openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I am playing against humans, I need to consider that people tend to think in similar ways. In this game, the average guess tends to be around 50 because it is the midpoint of the range (0-100). To maximize my chances of winning, I should guess 2/3 of the average guess (33.33) which is close to 33. However, to ensure I am not too far from the average and to avoid being undercut by other players, I will guess slightly higher at 50.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against humans, I need to consider that people tend to think in similar ways. In this game, the average guess tends to be around 50 because it is the midpoint of the range (0-100). To maximize my chances of winning, I should guess 2/3 of the average guess (33.33) which is close to 33. However, to ensure I am not too far from the average and to avoid being undercut by other players, I will guess slightly higher at 50."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTDFqT6HxC0GoFZJ9ecNWb3B7aA",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against humans, I need to consider that people tend to think in similar ways. In this game, the average guess tends to be around 50 because it is the midpoint of the range (0-100). To maximize my chances of winning, I should guess 2/3 of the average guess (33.33) which is close to 33. However, to ensure I am not too far from the average and to avoid being undercut by other players, I will guess slightly higher at 50.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013979,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 121,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 237,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE237
5
2025-10-21T11:33:04.1005334openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since the guess should be 2/3 of the average of all participants, I need to consider that most people will likely think between 0 and 100. Many people will try to guess around the midpoint (50) since it is a common heuristic. Therefore, I'll go with 50 as my guess, as it is likely to be close to 2/3 of the overall average
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since the guess should be 2/3 of the average of all participants, I need to consider that most people will likely think between 0 and 100. Many people will try to guess around the midpoint (50) since it is a common heuristic. Therefore, I'll go with 50 as my guess, as it is likely to be close to 2/3 of the overall average"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTGD5sfiwpMKV9kPM37txC5kGyQ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since the guess should be 2/3 of the average of all participants, I need to consider that most people will likely think between 0 and 100. Many people will try to guess around the midpoint (50) since it is a common heuristic. Therefore, I'll go with 50 as my guess, as it is likely to be close to 2/3 of the overall average\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013982,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 96,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 212,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE212
6
2025-10-21T11:33:08.2685425openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I would choose 50 as my guess because in a game like this where everyone is trying to outsmart each other, the best strategy is to aim for the middle ground. Since the range is between 0 and 100, picking 50 seems like a safe bet as it is neither too high nor too low. This way, if some participants guess really high, 50 will balance out the average, and if some guess really low, 50 will pull the average up. By aiming for the middle, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average, which is the key to winning this game.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I would choose 50 as my guess because in a game like this where everyone is trying to outsmart each other, the best strategy is to aim for the middle ground. Since the range is between 0 and 100, picking 50 seems like a safe bet as it is neither too high nor too low. This way, if some participants guess really high, 50 will balance out the average, and if some guess really low, 50 will pull the average up. By aiming for the middle, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average, which is the key to winning this game."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTJBTfMuxBEphvBuMYBqSCt5ZJk",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would choose 50 as my guess because in a game like this where everyone is trying to outsmart each other, the best strategy is to aim for the middle ground. Since the range is between 0 and 100, picking 50 seems like a safe bet as it is neither too high nor too low. This way, if some participants guess really high, 50 will balance out the average, and if some guess really low, 50 will pull the average up. By aiming for the middle, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average, which is the key to winning this game.\" \n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013985,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 144,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 260,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE260
7
2025-10-21T11:33:11.9913116openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE40.00I would assume that most people will think logically and aim for a number around 50, as it is the midpoint of the range (0-100). To maximize my chances of winning, I need to predict that the average guess will be around 50 and then guess 2/3 of that average, which would be around 33. Since I cannot guess a fraction, I rounded up to 40 to be safe, considering that some participants might go higher than 50.
{
"guess": 40,
"reasoning": "I would assume that most people will think logically and aim for a number around 50, as it is the midpoint of the range (0-100). To maximize my chances of winning, I need to predict that the average guess will be around 50 and then guess 2/3 of that average, which would be around 33. Since I cannot guess a fraction, I rounded up to 40 to be safe, considering that some participants might go higher than 50."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTOoHXexQmNcY4SKN40OOERUJ9X",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 40,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would assume that most people will think logically and aim for a number around 50, as it is the midpoint of the range (0-100). To maximize my chances of winning, I need to predict that the average guess will be around 50 and then guess 2/3 of that average, which would be around 33. Since I cannot guess a fraction, I rounded up to 40 to be safe, considering that some participants might go higher than 50.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013990,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 112,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 228,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE228
8
2025-10-21T11:33:16.3933727openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00In this game, the average of all guesses will likely be somewhere around 50, as participants will choose numbers from 0 to 100 randomly. To maximize my chances of winning, I need to guess 2/3 of the average, which would be roughly 33. Since I know other participants might think the same way, I'll go slightly higher to 50 to account for potential higher average guesses. This way, I aim to be closest to 2/3 of the final average and increase my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "In this game, the average of all guesses will likely be somewhere around 50, as participants will choose numbers from 0 to 100 randomly. To maximize my chances of winning, I need to guess 2/3 of the average, which would be roughly 33. Since I know other participants might think the same way, I'll go slightly higher to 50 to account for potential higher average guesses. This way, I aim to be closest to 2/3 of the final average and increase my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTRAPqVRhh645nglo95C5EsddS3",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"In this game, the average of all guesses will likely be somewhere around 50, as participants will choose numbers from 0 to 100 randomly. To maximize my chances of winning, I need to guess 2/3 of the average, which would be roughly 33. Since I know other participants might think the same way, I'll go slightly higher to 50 to account for potential higher average guesses. This way, I aim to be closest to 2/3 of the final average and increase my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013993,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 122,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 238,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE238
9
2025-10-21T11:33:18.8641128openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00Since the average person might guess around 50, I want to guess 2/3 of that which would be 33. By guessing lower than the average, I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "Since the average person might guess around 50, I want to guess 2/3 of that which would be 33. By guessing lower than the average, I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTWTeFZCoOG2s3lMQiA5qgDnb4w",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since the average person might guess around 50, I want to guess 2/3 of that which would be 33. By guessing lower than the average, I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761013998,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 65,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 181,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE181
10
2025-10-21T11:33:21.4885299openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I am playing against humans and the average guess will likely be influenced by the range of 0-100, I want to strategically place my guess in the middle of that range to account for potential outliers and extremes. By choosing 50, I am positioning myself to be close to the average without being too high or too low, thus maximizing my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against humans and the average guess will likely be influenced by the range of 0-100, I want to strategically place my guess in the middle of that range to account for potential outliers and extremes. By choosing 50, I am positioning myself to be close to the average without being too high or too low, thus maximizing my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTYybWxdEMSt11EbRSJCWsmI9wS",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against humans and the average guess will likely be influenced by the range of 0-100, I want to strategically place my guess in the middle of that range to account for potential outliers and extremes. By choosing 50, I am positioning myself to be close to the average without being too high or too low, thus maximizing my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014000,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 89,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 205,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE205
11
2025-10-21T11:33:24.49179110openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00In this scenario, it's important to think about what the other participants might guess. Since the average guess of all participants will likely be between 0 and 100, it would be reasonable to assume that some participants will guess high and some low. By choosing a number in the middle, such as 50, I am hedging my bets by positioning myself to be close to 2/3 of the average regardless of the distribution of guesses. This way, I have a better chance of being closest to the actual 2/3 average and winning the game.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "In this scenario, it's important to think about what the other participants might guess. Since the average guess of all participants will likely be between 0 and 100, it would be reasonable to assume that some participants will guess high and some low. By choosing a number in the middle, such as 50, I am hedging my bets by positioning myself to be close to 2/3 of the average regardless of the distribution of guesses. This way, I have a better chance of being closest to the actual 2/3 average and winning the game."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwTbWDlMKe6k4m1SymqdgHPvFLIx",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"In this scenario, it's important to think about what the other participants might guess. Since the average guess of all participants will likely be between 0 and 100, it would be reasonable to assume that some participants will guess high and some low. By choosing a number in the middle, such as 50, I am hedging my bets by positioning myself to be close to 2/3 of the average regardless of the distribution of guesses. This way, I have a better chance of being closest to the actual 2/3 average and winning the game.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014003,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 129,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 245,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE245
12
2025-10-22T01:05:25.0872531openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I am playing against humans, I need to think about what the average person might guess. People tend to pick numbers around the middle of the range (0-100), so I will guess 50. This way, even if some participants choose numbers higher or lower, I have a good chance of being close to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against humans, I need to think about what the average person might guess. People tend to pick numbers around the middle of the range (0-100), so I will guess 50. This way, even if some participants choose numbers higher or lower, I have a good chance of being close to 2/3 of the average guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99O3fdDqwy5lBLZZsujzrYd8Fkl",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against humans, I need to think about what the average person might guess. People tend to pick numbers around the middle of the range (0-100), so I will guess 50. This way, even if some participants choose numbers higher or lower, I have a good chance of being close to 2/3 of the average guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062722,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 88,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 204,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE204
13
2025-10-22T01:05:27.6337542openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00By understanding human behavior and biases, I know that many people will likely choose numbers closer to the midpoint of 0 and 100, such as 50. By selecting a number in the middle, I increase the chances of my guess being close to the average of all guesses. Additionally, by aiming for 2/3 of the average, I anticipate that most participants will overestimate the average, so guessing slightly below the midpoint gives me a better chance of being closer to 2/3 of the average.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "By understanding human behavior and biases, I know that many people will likely choose numbers closer to the midpoint of 0 and 100, such as 50. By selecting a number in the middle, I increase the chances of my guess being close to the average of all guesses. Additionally, by aiming for 2/3 of the average, I anticipate that most participants will overestimate the average, so guessing slightly below the midpoint gives me a better chance of being closer to 2/3 of the average."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99SXu91USarYQjni0JaqP9iMT6r",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"By understanding human behavior and biases, I know that many people will likely choose numbers closer to the midpoint of 0 and 100, such as 50. By selecting a number in the middle, I increase the chances of my guess being close to the average of all guesses. Additionally, by aiming for 2/3 of the average, I anticipate that most participants will overestimate the average, so guessing slightly below the midpoint gives me a better chance of being closer to 2/3 of the average.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062726,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 118,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 234,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE234
14
2025-10-22T01:05:30.0384283openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I would guess 50 because in an ideal scenario, all players would choose a number between 0 and 100, leading to an average guess of 50. By choosing 50, which is 2/3 of the average, I would stand a good chance of winning if other participants also follow a similar strategy. It's a strategic balance between not guessing too high to skew the average and not guessing too low to be too far from 2/3 of the average.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I would guess 50 because in an ideal scenario, all players would choose a number between 0 and 100, leading to an average guess of 50. By choosing 50, which is 2/3 of the average, I would stand a good chance of winning if other participants also follow a similar strategy. It's a strategic balance between not guessing too high to skew the average and not guessing too low to be too far from 2/3 of the average."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99UXhmdPFGHT9SvWgvFbipu8abd",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would guess 50 because in an ideal scenario, all players would choose a number between 0 and 100, leading to an average guess of 50. By choosing 50, which is 2/3 of the average, I would stand a good chance of winning if other participants also follow a similar strategy. It's a strategic balance between not guessing too high to skew the average and not guessing too low to be too far from 2/3 of the average.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062728,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 112,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 228,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE228
15
2025-10-22T01:05:32.5376124openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since the average human will likely guess around 50 (being the middle point of 0 and 100), I will aim to guess 2/3 of that average, which is approximately 33.33. To account for potential higher guesses, I rounded it up to 50 in order to have a higher chance of being closest to 2/3 of the actual average.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since the average human will likely guess around 50 (being the middle point of 0 and 100), I will aim to guess 2/3 of that average, which is approximately 33.33. To account for potential higher guesses, I rounded it up to 50 in order to have a higher chance of being closest to 2/3 of the actual average."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99XidOs54WLZ61jA5MElglVLyWD",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since the average human will likely guess around 50 (being the middle point of 0 and 100), I will aim to guess 2/3 of that average, which is approximately 33.33. To account for potential higher guesses, I rounded it up to 50 in order to have a higher chance of being closest to 2/3 of the actual average.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062731,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 92,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 208,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE208
16
2025-10-22T01:05:37.9330395openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since we are playing against humans, it is likely that some participants will guess high numbers and some will guess low numbers. In this case, it is best to aim for a number around the average guess of all participants, which is 50. This way, if some participants guess low, my 2/3 of the average guess will likely be higher than their guesses, and if some participants guess high, my guess will still be competitive. Overall, choosing 50 gives me a good balance to potentially be closest to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since we are playing against humans, it is likely that some participants will guess high numbers and some will guess low numbers. In this case, it is best to aim for a number around the average guess of all participants, which is 50. This way, if some participants guess low, my 2/3 of the average guess will likely be higher than their guesses, and if some participants guess high, my guess will still be competitive. Overall, choosing 50 gives me a good balance to potentially be closest to 2/3 of the average guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99aiQPe0SW9lUhoDN7dCXJ4iinQ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since we are playing against humans, it is likely that some participants will guess high numbers and some will guess low numbers. In this case, it is best to aim for a number around the average guess of all participants, which is 50. This way, if some participants guess low, my 2/3 of the average guess will likely be higher than their guesses, and if some participants guess high, my guess will still be competitive. Overall, choosing 50 gives me a good balance to potentially be closest to 2/3 of the average guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062734,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 128,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 244,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE244
17
2025-10-22T01:05:40.1405136openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00In the game 'Guess 2/3 of the Average,' the optimal strategy is to guess around two-thirds of the average guess of all participants. Since the guesses will likely be spread out, it would be beneficial to aim for a number slightly higher than the midpoint of the possible range (0-100). By choosing 33, I am strategically positioning myself to be close to two-thirds of the average without going too high or too low, increasing my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "In the game 'Guess 2/3 of the Average,' the optimal strategy is to guess around two-thirds of the average guess of all participants. Since the guesses will likely be spread out, it would be beneficial to aim for a number slightly higher than the midpoint of the possible range (0-100). By choosing 33, I am strategically positioning myself to be close to two-thirds of the average without going too high or too low, increasing my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99ebvigOjRWc7rwuSx8LdMQ6tFX",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"In the game 'Guess 2/3 of the Average,' the optimal strategy is to guess around two-thirds of the average guess of all participants. Since the guesses will likely be spread out, it would be beneficial to aim for a number slightly higher than the midpoint of the possible range (0-100). By choosing 33, I am strategically positioning myself to be close to two-thirds of the average without going too high or too low, increasing my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062738,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 110,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 226,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE226
18
2025-10-22T01:05:42.8068087openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I will guess 50 because the average guess of all participants is likely to be around 50. If everyone follows the same logic and guesses around 50, then 2/3 of the average would be around 33.33, which is closest to my guess of 50. By choosing a number slightly above 2/3 of the average, I increase my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I will guess 50 because the average guess of all participants is likely to be around 50. If everyone follows the same logic and guesses around 50, then 2/3 of the average would be around 33.33, which is closest to my guess of 50. By choosing a number slightly above 2/3 of the average, I increase my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99hm4puJCT5b7BHXvY49MGhBT2h",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I will guess 50 because the average guess of all participants is likely to be around 50. If everyone follows the same logic and guesses around 50, then 2/3 of the average would be around 33.33, which is closest to my guess of 50. By choosing a number slightly above 2/3 of the average, I increase my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062741,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 94,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 210,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE210
19
2025-10-22T01:05:44.7768618openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I believe that many people will focus on choosing a number closer to the average of all guesses, so I will go with the middle point, which is 50. By selecting 50, I position myself right in the middle of the possible range and increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I believe that many people will focus on choosing a number closer to the average of all guesses, so I will go with the middle point, which is 50. By selecting 50, I position myself right in the middle of the possible range and increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99jBwN3yoYM5r7cQ8Pq5i3bRQjl",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I believe that many people will focus on choosing a number closer to the average of all guesses, so I will go with the middle point, which is 50. By selecting 50, I position myself right in the middle of the possible range and increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062743,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 81,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 197,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE197
20
2025-10-22T01:05:47.0882429openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Statistically, people tend to pick numbers around the midpoint of the range (0-100) in this type of game. By guessing 50, which is exactly the midpoint, I maximize my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average of all guesses. This strategy exploits the tendency of participants to pick numbers around the median, boosting my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Statistically, people tend to pick numbers around the midpoint of the range (0-100) in this type of game. By guessing 50, which is exactly the midpoint, I maximize my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average of all guesses. This strategy exploits the tendency of participants to pick numbers around the median, boosting my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99lpuU00fONm2mJe7LI4tqxDVNJ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Statistically, people tend to pick numbers around the midpoint of the range (0-100) in this type of game. By guessing 50, which is exactly the midpoint, I maximize my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average of all guesses. This strategy exploits the tendency of participants to pick numbers around the median, boosting my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062745,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 90,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 206,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE206
21
2025-10-22T01:05:50.25388210openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00Since I am playing against other humans, I can assume that most people will overthink this and try to be clever. This might lead to guesses all over the place, but a common strategy is to think about what others might guess and aim for 2/3 of that average. Statistically, this tends to converge towards 33. Therefore, my best bet is to go with 33 as my guess.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against other humans, I can assume that most people will overthink this and try to be clever. This might lead to guesses all over the place, but a common strategy is to think about what others might guess and aim for 2/3 of that average. Statistically, this tends to converge towards 33. Therefore, my best bet is to go with 33 as my guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99npCTUhYViJSuTLL6WJAKgITV1",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against other humans, I can assume that most people will overthink this and try to be clever. This might lead to guesses all over the place, but a common strategy is to think about what others might guess and aim for 2/3 of that average. Statistically, this tends to converge towards 33. Therefore, my best bet is to go with 33 as my guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062747,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 98,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 214,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE214
22
2025-10-22T01:05:52.43693611openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00Since I am playing against humans, I need to consider that most people will likely guess around the middle of the range (between 0 and 100). In this scenario, I want to select a number that is close to 2/3 of the average of these guesses. By choosing 33, I am positioning myself to be below the average if most participants choose numbers closer to the middle, giving me a higher chance of winning
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against humans, I need to consider that most people will likely guess around the middle of the range (between 0 and 100). In this scenario, I want to select a number that is close to 2/3 of the average of these guesses. By choosing 33, I am positioning myself to be below the average if most participants choose numbers closer to the middle, giving me a higher chance of winning"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99qCLBODJbirG0W36bFIyIdQpIq",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against humans, I need to consider that most people will likely guess around the middle of the range (between 0 and 100). In this scenario, I want to select a number that is close to 2/3 of the average of these guesses. By choosing 33, I am positioning myself to be below the average if most participants choose numbers closer to the middle, giving me a higher chance of winning\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062750,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 103,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 219,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE219
23
2025-10-22T01:05:54.52508012openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I am playing against humans, I would assume that most people will overthink and try to strategize their guess to be clever. In reality, the average guess will likely be around the middle of 0 and 100, which is 50. By choosing 50 as my guess, I am aiming to be closest to 2/3 of the average guess of all participants regardless of their strategies. This way, I increase my chances of winning the game.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against humans, I would assume that most people will overthink and try to strategize their guess to be clever. In reality, the average guess will likely be around the middle of 0 and 100, which is 50. By choosing 50 as my guess, I am aiming to be closest to 2/3 of the average guess of all participants regardless of their strategies. This way, I increase my chances of winning the game."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99sesEQAiseKR0njwcGOfF7BYTA",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against humans, I would assume that most people will overthink and try to strategize their guess to be clever. In reality, the average guess will likely be around the middle of 0 and 100, which is 50. By choosing 50 as my guess, I am aiming to be closest to 2/3 of the average guess of all participants regardless of their strategies. This way, I increase my chances of winning the game.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062752,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 109,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 225,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE225
24
2025-10-22T01:05:57.65199413openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I would choose 50 as my guess because in this game, participants are likely to guess a number between 0 and 100. Since the average of all participants' guesses will fall around the middle of this range, I want to be close to 2/3 of that average. 2/3 of 50 is 33.33, which is close to the expected average of all guesses. This strategy gives me a good chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess of all participants.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I would choose 50 as my guess because in this game, participants are likely to guess a number between 0 and 100. Since the average of all participants' guesses will fall around the middle of this range, I want to be close to 2/3 of that average. 2/3 of 50 is 33.33, which is close to the expected average of all guesses. This strategy gives me a good chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess of all participants."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99vcCXCxfohlQuiNsZjJzatPl5I",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would choose 50 as my guess because in this game, participants are likely to guess a number between 0 and 100. Since the average of all participants' guesses will fall around the middle of this range, I want to be close to 2/3 of that average. 2/3 of 50 is 33.33, which is close to the expected average of all guesses. This strategy gives me a good chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess of all participants.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062755,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 120,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 236,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE236
25
2025-10-22T01:06:01.32123014openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I am playing against humans, it's likely that most people will aim for a number around the middle, such as 50, as it's a common intuitive choice. If I assume that the average guess will be around 50, then 2/3 of that would be around 33. Therefore, I will guess 50, as it's close to the average but slightly higher to increase my chances of being closer to 2/3 of the average.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against humans, it's likely that most people will aim for a number around the middle, such as 50, as it's a common intuitive choice. If I assume that the average guess will be around 50, then 2/3 of that would be around 33. Therefore, I will guess 50, as it's close to the average but slightly higher to increase my chances of being closer to 2/3 of the average."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT99yp9rcCq94FmitH1FgHA2c0pvS",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against humans, it's likely that most people will aim for a number around the middle, such as 50, as it's a common intuitive choice. If I assume that the average guess will be around 50, then 2/3 of that would be around 33. Therefore, I will guess 50, as it's close to the average but slightly higher to increase my chances of being closer to 2/3 of the average.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062758,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 110,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 226,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE226
26
2025-10-22T01:06:07.48349115openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I would choose a number close to the midpoint of 0 and 100 (which is 50) because if all participants think like me and choose numbers around the midpoint, the average of all guesses would also be around 50. Then, 2/3 of that average would be around 33.33, so by guessing 50, I am giving myself a good chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I would choose a number close to the midpoint of 0 and 100 (which is 50) because if all participants think like me and choose numbers around the midpoint, the average of all guesses would also be around 50. Then, 2/3 of that average would be around 33.33, so by guessing 50, I am giving myself a good chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9A4ohU0J2qKrnNd7gsp3n2Gzujs",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would choose a number close to the midpoint of 0 and 100 (which is 50) because if all participants think like me and choose numbers around the midpoint, the average of all guesses would also be around 50. Then, 2/3 of that average would be around 33.33, so by guessing 50, I am giving myself a good chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062764,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 104,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 220,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE220
27
2025-10-22T01:06:12.15261816openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00By choosing 50, I am strategically hedging my bet to maximize my chances of winning. Since the average guess will likely fall somewhere between 0 and 100, I want to pick a number that is around the midpoint to account for both high and low guesses. By going with 50, I am positioning myself to be close to 2/3 of the average, thereby increasing my odds of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "By choosing 50, I am strategically hedging my bet to maximize my chances of winning. Since the average guess will likely fall somewhere between 0 and 100, I want to pick a number that is around the midpoint to account for both high and low guesses. By going with 50, I am positioning myself to be close to 2/3 of the average, thereby increasing my odds of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9A8E71p53FGbICinFBie7pOWq8I",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"By choosing 50, I am strategically hedging my bet to maximize my chances of winning. Since the average guess will likely fall somewhere between 0 and 100, I want to pick a number that is around the midpoint to account for both high and low guesses. By going with 50, I am positioning myself to be close to 2/3 of the average, thereby increasing my odds of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062768,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 98,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 214,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE214
28
2025-10-22T01:06:13.80530217openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00In this game, it is crucial to think about what others might guess. Since most people are likely to choose numbers close to 0 and 100, I will eliminate extreme values and aim for a number that is around the midpoint. By selecting 50, I am strategically positioned to be close to 2/3 of the average of all guesses, giving me a good chance of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "In this game, it is crucial to think about what others might guess. Since most people are likely to choose numbers close to 0 and 100, I will eliminate extreme values and aim for a number that is around the midpoint. By selecting 50, I am strategically positioned to be close to 2/3 of the average of all guesses, giving me a good chance of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9ACLZQZsL5q3LZKj7WfRglXkp76",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"In this game, it is crucial to think about what others might guess. Since most people are likely to choose numbers close to 0 and 100, I will eliminate extreme values and aim for a number that is around the midpoint. By selecting 50, I am strategically positioned to be close to 2/3 of the average of all guesses, giving me a good chance of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062772,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 94,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 210,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE210
29
2025-10-22T01:06:16.18560218openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00The key to winning this game is to think about what others might guess and aim to be 2/3 of that average. Since the range is 0-100, it is unlikely that many people will guess close to 0 or 100. Therefore, it is safer to choose a number closer to the middle like 50. However, to optimize my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average, I will choose a number slightly lower than 50, guessing 33. This way, even if some participants guess closer to 50, I have a chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average overall.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "The key to winning this game is to think about what others might guess and aim to be 2/3 of that average. Since the range is 0-100, it is unlikely that many people will guess close to 0 or 100. Therefore, it is safer to choose a number closer to the middle like 50. However, to optimize my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average, I will choose a number slightly lower than 50, guessing 33. This way, even if some participants guess closer to 50, I have a chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average overall."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AEFVTzyDfacBnJ8LZOeKXr2oCJ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"The key to winning this game is to think about what others might guess and aim to be 2/3 of that average. Since the range is 0-100, it is unlikely that many people will guess close to 0 or 100. Therefore, it is safer to choose a number closer to the middle like 50. However, to optimize my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average, I will choose a number slightly lower than 50, guessing 33. This way, even if some participants guess closer to 50, I have a chance of being closest to 2/3 of the average overall.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062774,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 146,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 262,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE262
30
2025-10-22T01:06:19.31418419openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00To maximize my chances of winning, I need to think about what others might guess. Since the average human tends to think in round numbers, it's likely that many participants will choose numbers like 0, 25, 50, 75, or 100. By choosing a number slightly lower than the middle value of 50, such as 33, I am positioning myself to be closest to 2/3 of the average if many participants choose numbers around 50. This strategy gives me a better chance of winning compared to guessing a number closer to the extremes like 0 or 100.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "To maximize my chances of winning, I need to think about what others might guess. Since the average human tends to think in round numbers, it's likely that many participants will choose numbers like 0, 25, 50, 75, or 100. By choosing a number slightly lower than the middle value of 50, such as 33, I am positioning myself to be closest to 2/3 of the average if many participants choose numbers around 50. This strategy gives me a better chance of winning compared to guessing a number closer to the extremes like 0 or 100."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AGLAr2tyIuDVjo0V7hjhRUzpf9",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"To maximize my chances of winning, I need to think about what others might guess. Since the average human tends to think in round numbers, it's likely that many participants will choose numbers like 0, 25, 50, 75, or 100. By choosing a number slightly lower than the middle value of 50, such as 33, I am positioning myself to be closest to 2/3 of the average if many participants choose numbers around 50. This strategy gives me a better chance of winning compared to guessing a number closer to the extremes like 0 or 100.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062776,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 137,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 253,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE253
31
2025-10-22T01:06:22.39689720openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I know I am playing against humans who might also think logically, I will assume that most people will try to guess around the midpoint (50) of the range (0-100). Therefore, I will choose 50 as my guess, as it is likely to be close to the average of all guesses. By aiming for 2/3 of the average, I calculate that 2/3 of the average will be around 33, which is close to my guess of 50. This strategy gives me a good chance of winning if most participants follow a similar thought process.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I know I am playing against humans who might also think logically, I will assume that most people will try to guess around the midpoint (50) of the range (0-100). Therefore, I will choose 50 as my guess, as it is likely to be close to the average of all guesses. By aiming for 2/3 of the average, I calculate that 2/3 of the average will be around 33, which is close to my guess of 50. This strategy gives me a good chance of winning if most participants follow a similar thought process."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AJoycoof6xFJrRHMJoQreHHPoh",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I know I am playing against humans who might also think logically, I will assume that most people will try to guess around the midpoint (50) of the range (0-100). Therefore, I will choose 50 as my guess, as it is likely to be close to the average of all guesses. By aiming for 2/3 of the average, I calculate that 2/3 of the average will be around 33, which is close to my guess of 50. This strategy gives me a good chance of winning if most participants follow a similar thought process.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062779,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 133,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 249,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE249
32
2025-10-22T01:06:24.21570321openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00To maximize my chances of winning, I need to consider the behavior of other participants. Since the average guess will likely be influenced by guesses on the higher end (people tend to avoid extreme low guesses in fear of being too far off), I will aim for a number close to the middle, hence 50. This strategy allows me to be closer to 2/3 of the average if the majority of players choose numbers on the higher end of the spectrum.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "To maximize my chances of winning, I need to consider the behavior of other participants. Since the average guess will likely be influenced by guesses on the higher end (people tend to avoid extreme low guesses in fear of being too far off), I will aim for a number close to the middle, hence 50. This strategy allows me to be closer to 2/3 of the average if the majority of players choose numbers on the higher end of the spectrum."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AMRXM0rsIMiSu3B9XHLPKOKhuA",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"To maximize my chances of winning, I need to consider the behavior of other participants. Since the average guess will likely be influenced by guesses on the higher end (people tend to avoid extreme low guesses in fear of being too far off), I will aim for a number close to the middle, hence 50. This strategy allows me to be closer to 2/3 of the average if the majority of players choose numbers on the higher end of the spectrum.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062782,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 107,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 223,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE223
33
2025-10-22T01:06:26.84510422openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00My goal is to be as close to 2/3 of the average guess as possible. Since participants will likely choose a wide range of numbers, I want my guess to be lower than the average to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of it. By choosing 33, I am taking into consideration that some participants may guess high numbers, so I want to be conservative and go lower to offset those high guesses.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "My goal is to be as close to 2/3 of the average guess as possible. Since participants will likely choose a wide range of numbers, I want my guess to be lower than the average to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of it. By choosing 33, I am taking into consideration that some participants may guess high numbers, so I want to be conservative and go lower to offset those high guesses."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AOpH44OPxYphblVBMPkCr80fQo",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"My goal is to be as close to 2/3 of the average guess as possible. Since participants will likely choose a wide range of numbers, I want my guess to be lower than the average to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of it. By choosing 33, I am taking into consideration that some participants may guess high numbers, so I want to be conservative and go lower to offset those high guesses.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062784,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 103,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 219,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE219
34
2025-10-22T01:06:28.75999623openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I will choose a number close to the middle range (50) to account for both optimistic and pessimistic guesses. By aiming for the average, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of it, which will give me a good shot at winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I will choose a number close to the middle range (50) to account for both optimistic and pessimistic guesses. By aiming for the average, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of it, which will give me a good shot at winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9ARiqWvK0F942uwW0Ny8w1xzLjn",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I will choose a number close to the middle range (50) to account for both optimistic and pessimistic guesses. By aiming for the average, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of it, which will give me a good shot at winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062787,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 69,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 185,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE185
35
2025-10-22T01:06:31.89566124openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00In this game, the optimal strategy is to think about what the average guess might be and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since I'm playing against humans who may choose numbers that range from 0 to 100, I estimate that many people will aim for a number close to the middle, around 50. Therefore, I will also choose 50 as my guess. This way, if the average guess is 50, my guess of 50 would be 2/3 of that average, maximizing my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "In this game, the optimal strategy is to think about what the average guess might be and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since I'm playing against humans who may choose numbers that range from 0 to 100, I estimate that many people will aim for a number close to the middle, around 50. Therefore, I will also choose 50 as my guess. This way, if the average guess is 50, my guess of 50 would be 2/3 of that average, maximizing my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9ATgz4YiB3U4xGETgYOsaU0xVtB",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"In this game, the optimal strategy is to think about what the average guess might be and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since I'm playing against humans who may choose numbers that range from 0 to 100, I estimate that many people will aim for a number close to the middle, around 50. Therefore, I will also choose 50 as my guess. This way, if the average guess is 50, my guess of 50 would be 2/3 of that average, maximizing my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062789,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 125,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 241,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE241
36
2025-10-22T01:06:33.75944825openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00Since we are playing against humans, it is likely that many people will try to overthink and strategize to outsmart others. In this case, I want to avoid guessing too high or too low of a number to minimize the risk of being too far from the average. By choosing a number in the middle range, such as 33, I aim to cover a wide range of guesses without being too extreme. This way, I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "Since we are playing against humans, it is likely that many people will try to overthink and strategize to outsmart others. In this case, I want to avoid guessing too high or too low of a number to minimize the risk of being too far from the average. By choosing a number in the middle range, such as 33, I aim to cover a wide range of guesses without being too extreme. This way, I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AWfVPNmdT676g1C4KXDNbcqHaI",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since we are playing against humans, it is likely that many people will try to overthink and strategize to outsmart others. In this case, I want to avoid guessing too high or too low of a number to minimize the risk of being too far from the average. By choosing a number in the middle range, such as 33, I aim to cover a wide range of guesses without being too extreme. This way, I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062792,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 118,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 234,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE234
37
2025-10-22T01:06:36.98919626openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00I chose 33 as my guess because I want to strike a balance between being too high and too low. Since the range is from 0 to 100, I want to avoid outliers and think about what the average guess might be. People tend to think of round numbers like 50 or 75, so by guessing slightly below that at 33, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average without being too far off from the overall range of guesses. This way, I have a good shot at winning the game.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "I chose 33 as my guess because I want to strike a balance between being too high and too low. Since the range is from 0 to 100, I want to avoid outliers and think about what the average guess might be. People tend to think of round numbers like 50 or 75, so by guessing slightly below that at 33, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average without being too far off from the overall range of guesses. This way, I have a good shot at winning the game."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AYl16GWCh2T9K7Cz1fONpD50tm",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"I chose 33 as my guess because I want to strike a balance between being too high and too low. Since the range is from 0 to 100, I want to avoid outliers and think about what the average guess might be. People tend to think of round numbers like 50 or 75, so by guessing slightly below that at 33, I increase my chances of being close to 2/3 of the average without being too far off from the overall range of guesses. This way, I have a good shot at winning the game.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062794,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 127,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 243,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE243
38
2025-10-22T01:06:39.09566527openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I would initially consider the possibility that most participants will choose numbers closer to 0 or 100, as these are the extreme values. Therefore, I would aim for a number around the middle, such as 50, to potentially be closer to 2/3 of the average of all guesses. This strategy increases my chances of being closer to the actual average, ultimately leading to a higher likelihood of winning the game.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I would initially consider the possibility that most participants will choose numbers closer to 0 or 100, as these are the extreme values. Therefore, I would aim for a number around the middle, such as 50, to potentially be closer to 2/3 of the average of all guesses. This strategy increases my chances of being closer to the actual average, ultimately leading to a higher likelihood of winning the game."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AbZLzBrlJuWyu8IMU2Gi4qniam",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would initially consider the possibility that most participants will choose numbers closer to 0 or 100, as these are the extreme values. Therefore, I would aim for a number around the middle, such as 50, to potentially be closer to 2/3 of the average of all guesses. This strategy increases my chances of being closer to the actual average, ultimately leading to a higher likelihood of winning the game.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062797,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 99,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 215,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE215
39
2025-10-22T01:06:42.35909428openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00In the 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game, the optimal strategy is to think about what the average person might guess and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since the participants are human beings, it is likely that their guesses will be spread out across the range of 0 to 100. I believe that many people may choose numbers around the mid-range of 50, so I will go slightly lower with 33. This way, even if the average guess is higher than 50, my 2/3 of the average guess will still be a competitive number.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "In the 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game, the optimal strategy is to think about what the average person might guess and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since the participants are human beings, it is likely that their guesses will be spread out across the range of 0 to 100. I believe that many people may choose numbers around the mid-range of 50, so I will go slightly lower with 33. This way, even if the average guess is higher than 50, my 2/3 of the average guess will still be a competitive number."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AdqmUpnaFPClFUEyGERLO2jrAr",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"In the 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game, the optimal strategy is to think about what the average person might guess and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since the participants are human beings, it is likely that their guesses will be spread out across the range of 0 to 100. I believe that many people may choose numbers around the mid-range of 50, so I will go slightly lower with 33. This way, even if the average guess is higher than 50, my 2/3 of the average guess will still be a competitive number.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062799,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 136,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 252,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE252
40
2025-10-22T01:06:44.84342829openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I would choose 50 as my guess because the range is between 0 and 100, making the average of all guesses likely to be around 50. If others follow a similar strategy, by choosing 2/3 of that average, it would be approximately 33.3. By guessing 50, I am aiming to be the closest to 2/3 of the average without going over, giving me a good chance of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I would choose 50 as my guess because the range is between 0 and 100, making the average of all guesses likely to be around 50. If others follow a similar strategy, by choosing 2/3 of that average, it would be approximately 33.3. By guessing 50, I am aiming to be the closest to 2/3 of the average without going over, giving me a good chance of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Agz5jogUEODgCEyKnwqfQa6Ymq",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would choose 50 as my guess because the range is between 0 and 100, making the average of all guesses likely to be around 50. If others follow a similar strategy, by choosing 2/3 of that average, it would be approximately 33.3. By guessing 50, I am aiming to be the closest to 2/3 of the average without going over, giving me a good chance of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062802,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 105,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 221,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE221
41
2025-10-22T01:06:47.83638330openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I would guess 50 because if everyone in the group is rational and follows the same thought process, they should all come up with a number between 0 and 100. Therefore, the average guess of all participants would likely be around 50. If I take 2/3 of that average, it would be around 33.33. By guessing 50, I am aiming to be as close as possible to 2/3 of the average, maximizing my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I would guess 50 because if everyone in the group is rational and follows the same thought process, they should all come up with a number between 0 and 100. Therefore, the average guess of all participants would likely be around 50. If I take 2/3 of that average, it would be around 33.33. By guessing 50, I am aiming to be as close as possible to 2/3 of the average, maximizing my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AjU95wo7OnQTqClq5mRl9nG0yY",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would guess 50 because if everyone in the group is rational and follows the same thought process, they should all come up with a number between 0 and 100. Therefore, the average guess of all participants would likely be around 50. If I take 2/3 of that average, it would be around 33.33. By guessing 50, I am aiming to be as close as possible to 2/3 of the average, maximizing my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062805,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 114,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 230,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE230
42
2025-10-22T01:06:49.95616531openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00To maximize my chances of winning in this game, I need to consider that most people will likely choose numbers around the middle of the range (0-100). Since the average of all guesses will be influenced by those close to the extreme ends, I want to choose a number close to half of the range (50) to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "To maximize my chances of winning in this game, I need to consider that most people will likely choose numbers around the middle of the range (0-100). Since the average of all guesses will be influenced by those close to the extreme ends, I want to choose a number close to half of the range (50) to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Amge4hfHk0xDKXk5pVrHrVY4rk",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"To maximize my chances of winning in this game, I need to consider that most people will likely choose numbers around the middle of the range (0-100). Since the average of all guesses will be influenced by those close to the extreme ends, I want to choose a number close to half of the range (50) to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062808,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 96,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 212,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE212
43
2025-10-22T01:06:53.08716432openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I am playing against other humans, there is a high chance that most people will try to think logically and aim for a number around the midpoint of 0 and 100, which is 50. If we assume that most people choose the number 50, then 2/3 of the average guess would be around 33.33. Therefore, by guessing 50, I am positioning myself close to this value and maximizing my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against other humans, there is a high chance that most people will try to think logically and aim for a number around the midpoint of 0 and 100, which is 50. If we assume that most people choose the number 50, then 2/3 of the average guess would be around 33.33. Therefore, by guessing 50, I am positioning myself close to this value and maximizing my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Aolp7XPwi0XpjgTLOcWJ0LM7hg",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against other humans, there is a high chance that most people will try to think logically and aim for a number around the midpoint of 0 and 100, which is 50. If we assume that most people choose the number 50, then 2/3 of the average guess would be around 33.33. Therefore, by guessing 50, I am positioning myself close to this value and maximizing my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062810,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 117,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 233,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE233
44
2025-10-22T01:06:54.94326133openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00In this game, the optimal strategy is to consider what the average guess is likely to be and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since most people are likely to choose a number around the middle (50) due to anchoring bias, I will also go with 50. If a large number of participants choose higher numbers, the average will increase, making 2/3 of that number higher as well. By choosing 50, I position myself to potentially win if the average is closer to 75 or 80 while balancing against lower averages as well.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "In this game, the optimal strategy is to consider what the average guess is likely to be and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since most people are likely to choose a number around the middle (50) due to anchoring bias, I will also go with 50. If a large number of participants choose higher numbers, the average will increase, making 2/3 of that number higher as well. By choosing 50, I position myself to potentially win if the average is closer to 75 or 80 while balancing against lower averages as well."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9ArjzSIzP68gky6VifGSb1aI2uQ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"In this game, the optimal strategy is to consider what the average guess is likely to be and then calculate 2/3 of that number. Since most people are likely to choose a number around the middle (50) due to anchoring bias, I will also go with 50. If a large number of participants choose higher numbers, the average will increase, making 2/3 of that number higher as well. By choosing 50, I position myself to potentially win if the average is closer to 75 or 80 while balancing against lower averages as well.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062813,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 130,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 246,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE246
45
2025-10-22T01:06:56.56931134openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since I am playing against other humans, I should assume that some will pick high numbers and some will pick low numbers. The average of all guesses will likely tend towards the middle, around 50. Therefore, I will guess 2/3 of that average, which is approximately 33. This way, I am hedging my bet and aiming to be closest to the final result.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since I am playing against other humans, I should assume that some will pick high numbers and some will pick low numbers. The average of all guesses will likely tend towards the middle, around 50. Therefore, I will guess 2/3 of that average, which is approximately 33. This way, I am hedging my bet and aiming to be closest to the final result."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AtQbBfuSDkSAuIYahQWM7q1Fde",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since I am playing against other humans, I should assume that some will pick high numbers and some will pick low numbers. The average of all guesses will likely tend towards the middle, around 50. Therefore, I will guess 2/3 of that average, which is approximately 33. This way, I am hedging my bet and aiming to be closest to the final result.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062815,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 93,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 209,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE209
46
2025-10-22T01:06:59.12918335openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00In a game like this where participants are likely to think about what others might guess, I would expect many people to choose numbers around the middle, such as 50. Since the goal is to be 2/3 of the average, I would guess 50, as if most people choose around the middle, the average will be around 50, making 2/3 of that approximately 33. This way, I position myself to possibly be the closest to 2/3 of the average.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "In a game like this where participants are likely to think about what others might guess, I would expect many people to choose numbers around the middle, such as 50. Since the goal is to be 2/3 of the average, I would guess 50, as if most people choose around the middle, the average will be around 50, making 2/3 of that approximately 33. This way, I position myself to possibly be the closest to 2/3 of the average."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9AvkakSSYfbc6Y6Hr0hR0XGKCSx",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"In a game like this where participants are likely to think about what others might guess, I would expect many people to choose numbers around the middle, such as 50. Since the goal is to be 2/3 of the average, I would guess 50, as if most people choose around the middle, the average will be around 50, making 2/3 of that approximately 33. This way, I position myself to possibly be the closest to 2/3 of the average.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062817,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 117,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 233,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE233
47
2025-10-22T01:07:01.89300036openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00Since the average guess will likely be higher than 50 due to people's tendency to choose numbers closer to 100, I want to guess slightly below the halfway mark to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average. By guessing 50, I am positioning myself to potentially win if the average guess turns out to be higher than 75 (2/3 of 75 is 50).
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "Since the average guess will likely be higher than 50 due to people's tendency to choose numbers closer to 100, I want to guess slightly below the halfway mark to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average. By guessing 50, I am positioning myself to potentially win if the average guess turns out to be higher than 75 (2/3 of 75 is 50)."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Ay5fIcVD8lrAVVOw6sQWvCwcTs",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"Since the average guess will likely be higher than 50 due to people's tendency to choose numbers closer to 100, I want to guess slightly below the halfway mark to increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average. By guessing 50, I am positioning myself to potentially win if the average guess turns out to be higher than 75 (2/3 of 75 is 50).\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062820,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 100,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 216,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE216
48
2025-10-22T01:07:04.24400737openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00If we assume participants all aim to guess 2/3 of the average, the average guess will likely be around 67 (since 67 * 2/3 = 44). By guessing 50, I position myself slightly above this average, giving me a good chance to win if others follow the same logic. Additionally, 50 is a round number that is easy for others to consider when making their guess.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "If we assume participants all aim to guess 2/3 of the average, the average guess will likely be around 67 (since 67 * 2/3 = 44). By guessing 50, I position myself slightly above this average, giving me a good chance to win if others follow the same logic. Additionally, 50 is a round number that is easy for others to consider when making their guess."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9B0r3HEeoATUvfSGvU7AtfQ74OJ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"If we assume participants all aim to guess 2/3 of the average, the average guess will likely be around 67 (since 67 * 2/3 = 44). By guessing 50, I position myself slightly above this average, giving me a good chance to win if others follow the same logic. Additionally, 50 is a round number that is easy for others to consider when making their guess.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062822,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 100,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 216,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE216
49
2025-10-22T01:07:05.90128038openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE50.00I will strategically choose 50 because it is the most common midpoint guess and likely to be close to the average of all guesses. By choosing 50, I aim to stay close to 2/3 of the average, increasing my chances of winning.
{
"guess": 50,
"reasoning": "I will strategically choose 50 because it is the most common midpoint guess and likely to be close to the average of all guesses. By choosing 50, I aim to stay close to 2/3 of the average, increasing my chances of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9B2LLYB0mjDrgMN8VtLvlfMAQUO",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 50,\n \"reasoning\": \"I will strategically choose 50 because it is the most common midpoint guess and likely to be close to the average of all guesses. By choosing 50, I aim to stay close to 2/3 of the average, increasing my chances of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062824,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 66,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 182,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE182
50
2025-10-22T01:07:08.13994039openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE33.00I would consider the nature of human psychology in this game. People tend to think in round numbers and it's likely that many will choose numbers like 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100. By choosing a number slightly lower than the midpoint (50), I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average, especially if many participants choose numbers above 50.
{
"guess": 33,
"reasoning": "I would consider the nature of human psychology in this game. People tend to think in round numbers and it's likely that many will choose numbers like 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100. By choosing a number slightly lower than the midpoint (50), I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average, especially if many participants choose numbers above 50."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9B4GdyeZvjrw9xNxrgJMJNF5lVB",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 33,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would consider the nature of human psychology in this game. People tend to think in round numbers and it's likely that many will choose numbers like 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100. By choosing a number slightly lower than the midpoint (50), I increase my chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average, especially if many participants choose numbers above 50.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062826,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 98,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 214,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE214
51
2025-10-22T01:07:09.61557740openaigpt-3.5-turboA_baseline1TRUE22.00I would strategically aim for a number that is low compared to the total range of possible guesses, as it is likely that many participants will guess high numbers. By choosing a relatively low number like 22, my guess will be closer to 2/3 of the average of all guesses, giving me a better chance of winning.
{
"guess": 22,
"reasoning": "I would strategically aim for a number that is low compared to the total range of possible guesses, as it is likely that many participants will guess high numbers. By choosing a relatively low number like 22, my guess will be closer to 2/3 of the average of all guesses, giving me a better chance of winning."
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9B6f0UE4CKAV65cAnN6OCTVqhCc",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"guess\": 22,\n \"reasoning\": \"I would strategically aim for a number that is low compared to the total range of possible guesses, as it is likely that many participants will guess high numbers. By choosing a relatively low number like 22, my guess will be closer to 2/3 of the average of all guesses, giving me a better chance of winning.\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761062828,
"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 81,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 197,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE197
52
2025-10-21T11:34:34.7337181openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE21.00Starting with the assumption that everyone else is guessing randomly between 1 and 100, the average of their guesses will be approximately 50. As a result, 2/3 of that average is approximately 33. However, knowing this, players may adjust their guesses lower because they also understand the strategy. If all players think this way and reduce their guess down to 33, then 2/3 of 33 is 22. Therefore, I would adjust my guess even lower to align with the second round of thought. This process of iteratively guessing lower may continue and the guesses will converge towards zero over the successive rounds. Since most people are likely to consider the first or second levels of thinking, the optimal strategy is to guess a little bit lower than the 2/3 of 33, but not exactly zero.
{
"reasoning": "Starting with the assumption that everyone else is guessing randomly between 1 and 100, the average of their guesses will be approximately 50. As a result, 2/3 of that average is approximately 33. However, knowing this, players may adjust their guesses lower because they also understand the strategy. If all players think this way and reduce their guess down to 33, then 2/3 of 33 is 22. Therefore, I would adjust my guess even lower to align with the second round of thought. This process of iteratively guessing lower may continue and the guesses will converge towards zero over the successive rounds. Since most people are likely to consider the first or second levels of thinking, the optimal strategy is to guess a little bit lower than the 2/3 of 33, but not exactly zero.",
"guess": "21"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwUgMSIEyvYEKXRlhJCB9uDZhhAV",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Starting with the assumption that everyone else is guessing randomly between 1 and 100, the average of their guesses will be approximately 50. As a result, 2/3 of that average is approximately 33. However, knowing this, players may adjust their guesses lower because they also understand the strategy. If all players think this way and reduce their guess down to 33, then 2/3 of 33 is 22. Therefore, I would adjust my guess even lower to align with the second round of thought. This process of iteratively guessing lower may continue and the guesses will converge towards zero over the successive rounds. Since most people are likely to consider the first or second levels of thinking, the optimal strategy is to guess a little bit lower than the 2/3 of 33, but not exactly zero.\", \n \"guess\": \"21\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014070,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 184,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 300,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE300
53
2025-10-21T11:34:42.1805262openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE10.00If we were playing this game with perfectly rational competitors, who themselves knew that they were competing with perfectly rational competitors, there's a 'stepping-down' logic that applies. The maximum guess is 100, so two-thirds of that is about 66.67. However, if all players know this, they will all guess around 66.67 as the new maximum, so two-thirds of that is about 44.45. Following this logic through iteratively, the numbers get lower and lower to approach zero. However, adjusting for the factor that this involves 'real world' people who might not all be perfectly rational or fully understand the iterative logic, aiming a little higher than zero might be a better real world guess. Some might guess numbers larger out of misunderstanding the game, increasing the average somewhat. Therefore, aiming at a relatively low number but not quite zero could be a reasonable approach. Additionally, periodically adjusting your guess considering the average guess of other participants during the game can optimize your chances of winning.
{
"reasoning": "If we were playing this game with perfectly rational competitors, who themselves knew that they were competing with perfectly rational competitors, there's a 'stepping-down' logic that applies. The maximum guess is 100, so two-thirds of that is about 66.67. However, if all players know this, they will all guess around 66.67 as the new maximum, so two-thirds of that is about 44.45. Following this logic through iteratively, the numbers get lower and lower to approach zero. However, adjusting for the factor that this involves 'real world' people who might not all be perfectly rational or fully understand the iterative logic, aiming a little higher than zero might be a better real world guess. Some might guess numbers larger out of misunderstanding the game, increasing the average somewhat. Therefore, aiming at a relatively low number but not quite zero could be a reasonable approach. Additionally, periodically adjusting your guess considering the average guess of other participants during the game can optimize your chances of winning.",

"guess": "10"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwUmWpokPUsyQFa9lsgnIez5O110",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"If we were playing this game with perfectly rational competitors, who themselves knew that they were competing with perfectly rational competitors, there's a 'stepping-down' logic that applies. The maximum guess is 100, so two-thirds of that is about 66.67. However, if all players know this, they will all guess around 66.67 as the new maximum, so two-thirds of that is about 44.45. Following this logic through iteratively, the numbers get lower and lower to approach zero. However, adjusting for the factor that this involves 'real world' people who might not all be perfectly rational or fully understand the iterative logic, aiming a little higher than zero might be a better real world guess. Some might guess numbers larger out of misunderstanding the game, increasing the average somewhat. Therefore, aiming at a relatively low number but not quite zero could be a reasonable approach. Additionally, periodically adjusting your guess considering the average guess of other participants during the game can optimize your chances of winning.\",\n\n\"guess\": \"10\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014076,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 218,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 334,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE334
54
2025-10-21T11:34:48.4859163openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE15.00If everyone is randomizing their guess between 0 and 100, the average should come out to be about 50. Logically, 2/3 of that is approximately 33. However, if all players are logically thinking in the same way and they also guess 33, in next turn, the best guess will be 2/3 of 33, which is about 22. Similarly, if all players adapt again, in another turn the best guess will be 2/3 of 22, which is about 15. This recursive thinking will continue until the number approaches 0. But, considering that not all participants would think this far or act perfectly rational, a guess somewhere between 10 to 20 might be optimal to tackle the mix of logic-based and random guesses.
{
"reasoning": "If everyone is randomizing their guess between 0 and 100, the average should come out to be about 50. Logically, 2/3 of that is approximately 33. However, if all players are logically thinking in the same way and they also guess 33, in next turn, the best guess will be 2/3 of 33, which is about 22. Similarly, if all players adapt again, in another turn the best guess will be 2/3 of 22, which is about 15. This recursive thinking will continue until the number approaches 0. But, considering that not all participants would think this far or act perfectly rational, a guess somewhere between 10 to 20 might be optimal to tackle the mix of logic-based and random guesses.",
"guess": 15
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwUuBY6qFwatEwNrmR5mzcHjGosO",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"If everyone is randomizing their guess between 0 and 100, the average should come out to be about 50. Logically, 2/3 of that is approximately 33. However, if all players are logically thinking in the same way and they also guess 33, in next turn, the best guess will be 2/3 of 33, which is about 22. Similarly, if all players adapt again, in another turn the best guess will be 2/3 of 22, which is about 15. This recursive thinking will continue until the number approaches 0. But, considering that not all participants would think this far or act perfectly rational, a guess somewhere between 10 to 20 might be optimal to tackle the mix of logic-based and random guesses.\",\n \"guess\": 15\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014084,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 177,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 293,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE293
55
2025-10-21T11:34:56.5171834openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00Firstly, let's assume everyone is rational and out for their own best interest. If everyone guesses a random number between 0 and 100, the average might land around 50. Two thirds of 50 is about 33. So one might use that number as an initial guess. However, if everyone else also assumes 33, the average would drop to 33 and two thirds of 33 is 22. Continuing this line of thought, the number continues decreasing until it gets closer to 0. Considering this, it would be best to guess a smaller number. Additionally, one must consider that not all participants would follow this line of thinking. Some may guess randomly hence a guess of 0 might be too much of a risk. Therefore, a number slightly above 0 could be more optimal.
{
"reasoning": "Firstly, let's assume everyone is rational and out for their own best interest. If everyone guesses a random number between 0 and 100, the average might land around 50. Two thirds of 50 is about 33. So one might use that number as an initial guess. However, if everyone else also assumes 33, the average would drop to 33 and two thirds of 33 is 22. Continuing this line of thought, the number continues decreasing until it gets closer to 0. Considering this, it would be best to guess a smaller number. Additionally, one must consider that not all participants would follow this line of thinking. Some may guess randomly hence a guess of 0 might be too much of a risk. Therefore, a number slightly above 0 could be more optimal.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwV04axzs0PAyA5IHRky0GNI6G41",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Firstly, let's assume everyone is rational and out for their own best interest. If everyone guesses a random number between 0 and 100, the average might land around 50. Two thirds of 50 is about 33. So one might use that number as an initial guess. However, if everyone else also assumes 33, the average would drop to 33 and two thirds of 33 is 22. Continuing this line of thought, the number continues decreasing until it gets closer to 0. Considering this, it would be best to guess a smaller number. Additionally, one must consider that not all participants would follow this line of thinking. Some may guess randomly hence a guess of 0 might be too much of a risk. Therefore, a number slightly above 0 could be more optimal.\", \n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014090,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 180,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 296,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE296
56
2025-10-21T11:35:02.8448745openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00If all players acted completely randomly, the average guess would be around 50. So, in an initial thought, we would aim to guess 2/3 of this, which is approximately 33. However, we should consider that other players are also thinking strategically, which should drive down the average guess. So, let's guess 2/3 of 33, which is approximately 22. Further consider that everyone else is thinking like this and thus drives down the average even further. For guessing a number as 2/3 average, the numbers should keep iterating towards lower average eventually leading towards 0. So, if everyone behaves in this way and iterative reductions occur, a very low guess could be optimal, potentially less than 1, assuming everyone is thinking a couple of steps ahead.
{
"reasoning": "If all players acted completely randomly, the average guess would be around 50. So, in an initial thought, we would aim to guess 2/3 of this, which is approximately 33. However, we should consider that other players are also thinking strategically, which should drive down the average guess. So, let's guess 2/3 of 33, which is approximately 22. Further consider that everyone else is thinking like this and thus drives down the average even further. For guessing a number as 2/3 average, the numbers should keep iterating towards lower average eventually leading towards 0. So, if everyone behaves in this way and iterative reductions occur, a very low guess could be optimal, potentially less than 1, assuming everyone is thinking a couple of steps ahead.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwV8WFWhV9UAEUPKYyOsRsHhhwjR",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"If all players acted completely randomly, the average guess would be around 50. So, in an initial thought, we would aim to guess 2/3 of this, which is approximately 33. However, we should consider that other players are also thinking strategically, which should drive down the average guess. So, let's guess 2/3 of 33, which is approximately 22. Further consider that everyone else is thinking like this and thus drives down the average even further. For guessing a number as 2/3 average, the numbers should keep iterating towards lower average eventually leading towards 0. So, if everyone behaves in this way and iterative reductions occur, a very low guess could be optimal, potentially less than 1, assuming everyone is thinking a couple of steps ahead.\", \n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}\n",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014098,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 177,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 293,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE293
57
2025-10-21T11:35:14.5646526openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE7.00When someone hears that they need to guess 2/3 of the average, they will most likely pick a number in the 67 range, considering 100 as the total. However, if everyone typically guesses around 67, the average will come out to be around 67, and 2/3 of this average will be around 45. So, your first instinct might be to guess around 45. This reasoning can be applied again and again. Each time the average guess decreases, and thus the 2/3 of the average also decrease. This is essentially a repeated application of the 2/3 rule on the maximum possible guess of 100, which would theoretically approach to zero after infinite repetitions. However since we're playing against humans, not all players will be able to perfectly reason this. Therefore, I will choose a positive value rather than zero. This reasoning can be modelled mathematically as a decreasing geometric series with 100 as the first term and 2/3 as the common ratio. After a few repetitions, the value will near 5-10 assuming not everyone will perfectly logically reason. Therefore, my guess would be in this range.
{
"reasoning": "When someone hears that they need to guess 2/3 of the average, they will most likely pick a number in the 67 range, considering 100 as the total. However, if everyone typically guesses around 67, the average will come out to be around 67, and 2/3 of this average will be around 45. So, your first instinct might be to guess around 45. This reasoning can be applied again and again. Each time the average guess decreases, and thus the 2/3 of the average also decrease. This is essentially a repeated application of the 2/3 rule on the maximum possible guess of 100, which would theoretically approach to zero after infinite repetitions. However since we're playing against humans, not all players will be able to perfectly reason this. Therefore, I will choose a positive value rather than zero. This reasoning can be modelled mathematically as a decreasing geometric series with 100 as the first term and 2/3 as the common ratio. After a few repetitions, the value will near 5-10 assuming not everyone will perfectly logically reason. Therefore, my guess would be in this range.",
"guess": "7"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwVEOh0Xcd4ccGZEAOyhnENz4KDE",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"When someone hears that they need to guess 2/3 of the average, they will most likely pick a number in the 67 range, considering 100 as the total. However, if everyone typically guesses around 67, the average will come out to be around 67, and 2/3 of this average will be around 45. So, your first instinct might be to guess around 45. This reasoning can be applied again and again. Each time the average guess decreases, and thus the 2/3 of the average also decrease. This is essentially a repeated application of the 2/3 rule on the maximum possible guess of 100, which would theoretically approach to zero after infinite repetitions. However since we're playing against humans, not all players will be able to perfectly reason this. Therefore, I will choose a positive value rather than zero. This reasoning can be modelled mathematically as a decreasing geometric series with 100 as the first term and 2/3 as the common ratio. After a few repetitions, the value will near 5-10 assuming not everyone will perfectly logically reason. Therefore, my guess would be in this range.\",\n\"guess\": \"7\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014104,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 251,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 367,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE367
58
2025-10-21T11:35:23.8653067openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00Since the highest guess one can give is 100, if everyone does so, the result would be 2/3 of 100 which is approximately 67. Thus, most players might initially think to guess about 67. Taking the subsequent step of logic, if a player knows that all players are reasoning in the same way, they might anticipate this and therefore, guess 2/3 of 67, which is approximately 45. Continuing to up this line of reasoning, one might conclude that guesses would keep getting lower and lower until they reach the theoretical equilibrium point of around zero. However, not all players will necessarily apply the same number of iterations or steps of reasoning, and might still guess higher than the equilibrium of zero. Therefore, it's likely that the winning guess will be slightly above zero. It's practically impossible to determine a precise number for this final value without having specific insights into the psychology and strategies of the other players. But a reasonable first-order approximation would be to guess a number close to but not equal to zero, say around 1.
{
"reasoning": "Since the highest guess one can give is 100, if everyone does so, the result would be 2/3 of 100 which is approximately 67. Thus, most players might initially think to guess about 67. Taking the subsequent step of logic, if a player knows that all players are reasoning in the same way, they might anticipate this and therefore, guess 2/3 of 67, which is approximately 45. Continuing to up this line of reasoning, one might conclude that guesses would keep getting lower and lower until they reach the theoretical equilibrium point of around zero. However, not all players will necessarily apply the same number of iterations or steps of reasoning, and might still guess higher than the equilibrium of zero. Therefore, it's likely that the winning guess will be slightly above zero. It's practically impossible to determine a precise number for this final value without having specific insights into the psychology and strategies of the other players. But a reasonable first-order approximation would be to guess a number close to but not equal to zero, say around 1.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwVQ3l3iKMIn8VuetYiHFrotNucz",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Since the highest guess one can give is 100, if everyone does so, the result would be 2/3 of 100 which is approximately 67. Thus, most players might initially think to guess about 67. Taking the subsequent step of logic, if a player knows that all players are reasoning in the same way, they might anticipate this and therefore, guess 2/3 of 67, which is approximately 45. Continuing to up this line of reasoning, one might conclude that guesses would keep getting lower and lower until they reach the theoretical equilibrium point of around zero. However, not all players will necessarily apply the same number of iterations or steps of reasoning, and might still guess higher than the equilibrium of zero. Therefore, it's likely that the winning guess will be slightly above zero. It's practically impossible to determine a precise number for this final value without having specific insights into the psychology and strategies of the other players. But a reasonable first-order approximation would be to guess a number close to but not equal to zero, say around 1.\",\n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014116,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 230,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 346,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE346
59
2025-10-21T11:35:32.2114078openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE20.00In the game 'Guess 2/3 of the average' the notable strategy to win is by iterations. The first thought would be the average has to be less or equal to 100 because no one can guess more than that, so 2/3 of that average would be around 67. However, considering that everyone else would also think that, it's likely that people would guess around 67, and 2/3 of 67 is about 45. Ongoing in the same way, people might guess 45 as a next step, and 2/3 of that is 30. If we continue this recursive logic, the winning number tends to zero. However, you're playing against humans who might not think many steps ahead. Also, not everyone will follow the same deduction path. Considering this factor, our guess should not be too low. Therefore, a guess between 15 and 25 could be a reasonable strategic choice. Let's pick 20 for this example.
{
"reasoning": "In the game 'Guess 2/3 of the average' the notable strategy to win is by iterations. The first thought would be the average has to be less or equal to 100 because no one can guess more than that, so 2/3 of that average would be around 67. However, considering that everyone else would also think that, it's likely that people would guess around 67, and 2/3 of 67 is about 45. Ongoing in the same way, people might guess 45 as a next step, and 2/3 of that is 30. If we continue this recursive logic, the winning number tends to zero. However, you're playing against humans who might not think many steps ahead. Also, not everyone will follow the same deduction path. Considering this factor, our guess should not be too low. Therefore, a guess between 15 and 25 could be a reasonable strategic choice. Let's pick 20 for this example.",
"guess": 20
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwVZW3eGZfYevAy7Cen1KLjQKbOT",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"In the game 'Guess 2/3 of the average' the notable strategy to win is by iterations. The first thought would be the average has to be less or equal to 100 because no one can guess more than that, so 2/3 of that average would be around 67. However, considering that everyone else would also think that, it's likely that people would guess around 67, and 2/3 of 67 is about 45. Ongoing in the same way, people might guess 45 as a next step, and 2/3 of that is 30. If we continue this recursive logic, the winning number tends to zero. However, you're playing against humans who might not think many steps ahead. Also, not everyone will follow the same deduction path. Considering this factor, our guess should not be too low. Therefore, a guess between 15 and 25 could be a reasonable strategic choice. Let's pick 20 for this example.\", \n \"guess\": 20\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014125,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 218,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 334,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE334
60
2025-10-21T11:35:40.7262989openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00Making the best guess requires a depth of iterative thinking. At the first level of thinking, if everyone is guessing randomly, the average would likely be around 50. Therefore, 2/3 of this average would be approximately 33. However, if every player thinks this way, then everyone will guess 33, lowering the average, and subsequently, the '2/3 of the average' target to about 22. If every player calculates this, the cycle continues. Experiencing 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game a few times, people usually settle around a 'guessing equilibrium' value between 0 and 1 as some may guess 0 to disrupt the average. Finally, the second level of thinking would suggest guessing around 1, because other players are likely reasoning similarly. The goal is to be one step ahead of the communal thinking.
{
"reasoning": "Making the best guess requires a depth of iterative thinking. At the first level of thinking, if everyone is guessing randomly, the average would likely be around 50. Therefore, 2/3 of this average would be approximately 33. However, if every player thinks this way, then everyone will guess 33, lowering the average, and subsequently, the '2/3 of the average' target to about 22. If every player calculates this, the cycle continues. Experiencing 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game a few times, people usually settle around a 'guessing equilibrium' value between 0 and 1 as some may guess 0 to disrupt the average. Finally, the second level of thinking would suggest guessing around 1, because other players are likely reasoning similarly. The goal is to be one step ahead of the communal thinking.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwVib86iYw7DIEsguLD0ZnAVecaq",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Making the best guess requires a depth of iterative thinking. At the first level of thinking, if everyone is guessing randomly, the average would likely be around 50. Therefore, 2/3 of this average would be approximately 33. However, if every player thinks this way, then everyone will guess 33, lowering the average, and subsequently, the '2/3 of the average' target to about 22. If every player calculates this, the cycle continues. Experiencing 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game a few times, people usually settle around a 'guessing equilibrium' value between 0 and 1 as some may guess 0 to disrupt the average. Finally, the second level of thinking would suggest guessing around 1, because other players are likely reasoning similarly. The goal is to be one step ahead of the communal thinking.\", \n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014134,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 193,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 309,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE309
61
2025-10-21T11:35:50.11630710openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00First, consider the optimal strategy assuming that everyone else is playing optimally. If everyone else is guessing randomly, their average guess is likely to be around 50. Then, your best guess would be 2/3 of 50, or about 33.33. However, if we assume everyone else is following the same strategy, their guesses would also be around 33.33, so your best guess would become 2/3 of 33.33, or about 22.22. Continuing this line of reasoning, if everyone keeps guessing 2/3 of the previous guess, the guesses would converge to zero. So, in a game against perfectly rational players, the optimal guess would be zero. However, in a game against human players, it's unlikely that all of them would follow this strategy. Some may not understand the strategy or may make errors. So, it's better to guess a little higher than zero. It's hard to specify an exact number because it depends on how many players you think will play optimally, but a reasonable guess might be 1 or 2.
{
"reasoning": "First, consider the optimal strategy assuming that everyone else is playing optimally. If everyone else is guessing randomly, their average guess is likely to be around 50. Then, your best guess would be 2/3 of 50, or about 33.33. However, if we assume everyone else is following the same strategy, their guesses would also be around 33.33, so your best guess would become 2/3 of 33.33, or about 22.22. Continuing this line of reasoning, if everyone keeps guessing 2/3 of the previous guess, the guesses would converge to zero. So, in a game against perfectly rational players, the optimal guess would be zero. However, in a game against human players, it's unlikely that all of them would follow this strategy. Some may not understand the strategy or may make errors. So, it's better to guess a little higher than zero. It's hard to specify an exact number because it depends on how many players you think will play optimally, but a reasonable guess might be 1 or 2.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CSwVqtDJFy9DIgYodinDWUc7hGMm7",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"First, consider the optimal strategy assuming that everyone else is playing optimally. If everyone else is guessing randomly, their average guess is likely to be around 50. Then, your best guess would be 2/3 of 50, or about 33.33. However, if we assume everyone else is following the same strategy, their guesses would also be around 33.33, so your best guess would become 2/3 of 33.33, or about 22.22. Continuing this line of reasoning, if everyone keeps guessing 2/3 of the previous guess, the guesses would converge to zero. So, in a game against perfectly rational players, the optimal guess would be zero. However, in a game against human players, it's unlikely that all of them would follow this strategy. Some may not understand the strategy or may make errors. So, it's better to guess a little higher than zero. It's hard to specify an exact number because it depends on how many players you think will play optimally, but a reasonable guess might be 1 or 2.\",\n\"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761014142,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 237,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 353,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE353
62
2025-10-22T01:10:49.8401231openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE14.67Assuming that all participants are guessing randomly, the average guess would be 50. Therefore, 2/3 of the average guess would be about 33.33. However, because all players are rational and strategic, they would also think this way, leading them to adjust their guess to 2/3 of 33.33, which is about 22.22. This calculated guessing can go on in this fashion for multiple rounds. In reality, not all players will think through to these levels, however, to hedge the bet it's better to lower the guess to accommodate multiple rounds of guessing. Let's consider we've done 2 iterations and adjust our previous guess of about 22 to 2/3 of that, we get approximately 14.67.
{
"reasoning": "Assuming that all participants are guessing randomly, the average guess would be 50. Therefore, 2/3 of the average guess would be about 33.33. However, because all players are rational and strategic, they would also think this way, leading them to adjust their guess to 2/3 of 33.33, which is about 22.22. This calculated guessing can go on in this fashion for multiple rounds. In reality, not all players will think through to these levels, however, to hedge the bet it's better to lower the guess to accommodate multiple rounds of guessing. Let's consider we've done 2 iterations and adjust our previous guess of about 22 to 2/3 of that, we get approximately 14.67.",

"guess": "14.67"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Ea30QFcRcrbDW24hELfOkOn8Ee",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"Assuming that all participants are guessing randomly, the average guess would be 50. Therefore, 2/3 of the average guess would be about 33.33. However, because all players are rational and strategic, they would also think this way, leading them to adjust their guess to 2/3 of 33.33, which is about 22.22. This calculated guessing can go on in this fashion for multiple rounds. In reality, not all players will think through to these levels, however, to hedge the bet it's better to lower the guess to accommodate multiple rounds of guessing. Let's consider we've done 2 iterations and adjust our previous guess of about 22 to 2/3 of that, we get approximately 14.67.\",\n\n\"guess\": \"14.67\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761063044,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 173,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 289,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE289
63
2025-10-22T01:11:28.7856152openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE22.00The first thought might be to choose 67, which is two-thirds of 100. But note that everyone else could also guess this, and the average would then be 67, two-thirds of which is roughly 45. So you might then think to guess 45. But if everyone does this then two-thirds of 45 is 30. You can keep going in this way, and each time the value gets smaller. So the logic is to guess less than 67 and consecutively lower on each iteration considering that everyone might think in the same way and also lower their guesses. But there is a risk of everyone guessing too low, which is why the guess cannot be the absolute lowest number. However, recognizing humans are unlikely to perfectly rationalize this, it is better to guess a number that is somewhere in the middle of these iterations.
{
"reasoning": "The first thought might be to choose 67, which is two-thirds of 100. But note that everyone else could also guess this, and the average would then be 67, two-thirds of which is roughly 45. So you might then think to guess 45. But if everyone does this then two-thirds of 45 is 30. You can keep going in this way, and each time the value gets smaller. So the logic is to guess less than 67 and consecutively lower on each iteration considering that everyone might think in the same way and also lower their guesses. But there is a risk of everyone guessing too low, which is why the guess cannot be the absolute lowest number. However, recognizing humans are unlikely to perfectly rationalize this, it is better to guess a number that is somewhere in the middle of these iterations.",
"guess": "22"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Eg4rLah9kMSgXqtBPgf9EnsHv0",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"The first thought might be to choose 67, which is two-thirds of 100. But note that everyone else could also guess this, and the average would then be 67, two-thirds of which is roughly 45. So you might then think to guess 45. But if everyone does this then two-thirds of 45 is 30. You can keep going in this way, and each time the value gets smaller. So the logic is to guess less than 67 and consecutively lower on each iteration considering that everyone might think in the same way and also lower their guesses. But there is a risk of everyone guessing too low, which is why the guess cannot be the absolute lowest number. However, recognizing humans are unlikely to perfectly rationalize this, it is better to guess a number that is somewhere in the middle of these iterations.\",\n \"guess\": \"22\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761063050,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 187,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 303,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE303
64
2025-10-22T01:11:40.2171303openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00The strategy for this game involves guesswork and a bit of knowledge about game theory. If everyone guesses randomly between 0 and 100, then the average should be around 50. So, according to the rules, the winning guess should be close to 2/3 of 50, which is around 33. However, if everyone thinks this way, the new average guess would be 33 and the winning guess would be 2/3 of 33, equal to about 22. This thinking progresses iteratively until the guess reaches a low number. So ideally to increase chances of winning, we should bet on players estimating this and guessing lower progressively each time. That said, human behavior could be unpredictable. So, to maximize chances, I should guess slightly lower than the theoretical equilibrium, which in this case is 0 (iterating 2/3 again and again leads to 0). Therefore, I will make a guess slightly greater than 0, i.e., 1.
{
"reasoning": "The strategy for this game involves guesswork and a bit of knowledge about game theory. If everyone guesses randomly between 0 and 100, then the average should be around 50. So, according to the rules, the winning guess should be close to 2/3 of 50, which is around 33. However, if everyone thinks this way, the new average guess would be 33 and the winning guess would be 2/3 of 33, equal to about 22. This thinking progresses iteratively until the guess reaches a low number. So ideally to increase chances of winning, we should bet on players estimating this and guessing lower progressively each time. That said, human behavior could be unpredictable. So, to maximize chances, I should guess slightly lower than the theoretical equilibrium, which in this case is 0 (iterating 2/3 again and again leads to 0). Therefore, I will make a guess slightly greater than 0, i.e., 1.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9FJ79JXOW7Sc1b0Fc8EulGIYrmO",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"The strategy for this game involves guesswork and a bit of knowledge about game theory. If everyone guesses randomly between 0 and 100, then the average should be around 50. So, according to the rules, the winning guess should be close to 2/3 of 50, which is around 33. However, if everyone thinks this way, the new average guess would be 33 and the winning guess would be 2/3 of 33, equal to about 22. This thinking progresses iteratively until the guess reaches a low number. So ideally to increase chances of winning, we should bet on players estimating this and guessing lower progressively each time. That said, human behavior could be unpredictable. So, to maximize chances, I should guess slightly lower than the theoretical equilibrium, which in this case is 0 (iterating 2/3 again and again leads to 0). Therefore, I will make a guess slightly greater than 0, i.e., 1.\", \n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761063089,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 218,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 334,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE334
65
2025-10-22T01:11:46.7569804openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE22.00The strategy for this game involves recursive thinking. First, if all players are randomly guessing, the average guess should be around 50. So, 2/3 of that would be around 33.3. But, if everyone else is thinking the same, the new average would be around 33.3, making 2/3 of that number 22.2. This process can be repeated, each time expecting the other players to adjust their guess as well. That being said, we're dealing with humans who likely wouldn't go through more than a few steps of recursion, and some may not understand the game well. Therefore, a somewhat conservative but still lower choice may be better. Given these factors, I would guess around 22 as a nice balance.
{
"reasoning": "The strategy for this game involves recursive thinking. First, if all players are randomly guessing, the average guess should be around 50. So, 2/3 of that would be around 33.3. But, if everyone else is thinking the same, the new average would be around 33.3, making 2/3 of that number 22.2. This process can be repeated, each time expecting the other players to adjust their guess as well. That being said, we're dealing with humans who likely wouldn't go through more than a few steps of recursion, and some may not understand the game well. Therefore, a somewhat conservative but still lower choice may be better. Given these factors, I would guess around 22 as a nice balance.",
"guess": 22
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9FUo23IhkDZx2EQTcAJxuJK4rkm",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"The strategy for this game involves recursive thinking. First, if all players are randomly guessing, the average guess should be around 50. So, 2/3 of that would be around 33.3. But, if everyone else is thinking the same, the new average would be around 33.3, making 2/3 of that number 22.2. This process can be repeated, each time expecting the other players to adjust their guess as well. That being said, we're dealing with humans who likely wouldn't go through more than a few steps of recursion, and some may not understand the game well. Therefore, a somewhat conservative but still lower choice may be better. Given these factors, I would guess around 22 as a nice balance.\",\n\"guess\": 22\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761063100,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 169,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 285,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE285
66
2025-10-22T01:12:03.6095966openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE0.00Initially, one might think to guess around 66.66, being 2/3 of 100. However, you can expect other players to do the same. Hence, the average guess will be less than 100, and 2/3 of it will be less than 66.66. You can then adjust your guess to 2/3 of this number, or about 44.44. However, you must consider that other players might also adjust their guesses, resulting in a lower average guess again. The iterated 'best response' in this scenario would lead to the Nash equilibrium point. Since the game reaches a fixed point at zero fairly quickly when the interval is ranged from 0 to 100 and iteratively multiplied by 2/3, the best guess would be a small number.
{
"reasoning": "Initially, one might think to guess around 66.66, being 2/3 of 100. However, you can expect other players to do the same. Hence, the average guess will be less than 100, and 2/3 of it will be less than 66.66. You can then adjust your guess to 2/3 of this number, or about 44.44. However, you must consider that other players might also adjust their guesses, resulting in a lower average guess again. The iterated 'best response' in this scenario would lead to the Nash equilibrium point. Since the game reaches a fixed point at zero fairly quickly when the interval is ranged from 0 to 100 and iteratively multiplied by 2/3, the best guess would be a small number.",
"guess": "0"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Fi05DYK4C4Os8xDRrKBskGBSAR",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Initially, one might think to guess around 66.66, being 2/3 of 100. However, you can expect other players to do the same. Hence, the average guess will be less than 100, and 2/3 of it will be less than 66.66. You can then adjust your guess to 2/3 of this number, or about 44.44. However, you must consider that other players might also adjust their guesses, resulting in a lower average guess again. The iterated 'best response' in this scenario would lead to the Nash equilibrium point. Since the game reaches a fixed point at zero fairly quickly when the interval is ranged from 0 to 100 and iteratively multiplied by 2/3, the best guess would be a small number.\",\n \"guess\": \"0\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761063114,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 180,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 296,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE296
67
2025-10-22T01:12:11.2429377openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE13.00Assuming that all players are rational and are aiming to win, they will logically start their guess at 2/3 of the maximum possible value, which is 100. This means their initial average guess might be around 66.67. But, if all players think this way, then the 2/3 of this average guess would be around 44.44. Following this level of thinking, in successive steps the guesses would be around 29.63, 19.75, 13.17, etc. Now, all these calculations assume perfect rationality and the process can continue infinitely, but in real life not everyone will think that far. And because we can only guess whole numbers, my guess would be 13, because it's the whole number closest to third rational guess (13.17).
{
"reasoning": "Assuming that all players are rational and are aiming to win, they will logically start their guess at 2/3 of the maximum possible value, which is 100. This means their initial average guess might be around 66.67. But, if all players think this way, then the 2/3 of this average guess would be around 44.44. Following this level of thinking, in successive steps the guesses would be around 29.63, 19.75, 13.17, etc. Now, all these calculations assume perfect rationality and the process can continue infinitely, but in real life not everyone will think that far. And because we can only guess whole numbers, my guess would be 13, because it's the whole number closest to third rational guess (13.17).",
"guess": 13
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9FsG0fAiTbQGELn0WDt49VctOfF",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Assuming that all players are rational and are aiming to win, they will logically start their guess at 2/3 of the maximum possible value, which is 100. This means their initial average guess might be around 66.67. But, if all players think this way, then the 2/3 of this average guess would be around 44.44. Following this level of thinking, in successive steps the guesses would be around 29.63, 19.75, 13.17, etc. Now, all these calculations assume perfect rationality and the process can continue infinitely, but in real life not everyone will think that far. And because we can only guess whole numbers, my guess would be 13, because it's the whole number closest to third rational guess (13.17).\", \n \"guess\": 13\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761063124,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 183,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 299,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE299
68
2025-10-22T01:27:35.5138858openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE15.00When playing this game, the first consideration is to assume every player will guess 100. If so, the average guess will be 100, and 2/3 of that average will be 66.67 making that a viable guess. However, if we consider that every player is thinking rationally, they should know that nobody will guess over 66.67 because that is 2/3 of 100. So, an initial, rational prediction would lead every player to aim for 2/3 of 66.67 (about 44.44). If there is a second level of reasoning, every player would then aim for 2/3 of 44.44 (about 29.63). This iterative process can continue indefinitely, but as it continues, the guess drops rapidly and then slowly converges towards zero. In a group of rational players, the equilibrium value is zero because anything higher can be beaten by a lower guess. But, we know that we're playing against humans who may not all be thinking this way or who may not follow this line of reasoning as far. It could therefore be advantageous to aim for a slightly higher number, say 15, assuming that not every player will reach the conclusion of 0 and there may still be a larger average.
{"reasoning": "When playing this game, the first consideration is to assume every player will guess 100. If so, the average guess will be 100, and 2/3 of that average will be 66.67 making that a viable guess. However, if we consider that every player is thinking rationally, they should know that nobody will guess over 66.67 because that is 2/3 of 100. So, an initial, rational prediction would lead every player to aim for 2/3 of 66.67 (about 44.44). If there is a second level of reasoning, every player would then aim for 2/3 of 44.44 (about 29.63). This iterative process can continue indefinitely, but as it continues, the guess drops rapidly and then slowly converges towards zero. In a group of rational players, the equilibrium value is zero because anything higher can be beaten by a lower guess. But, we know that we're playing against humans who may not all be thinking this way or who may not follow this line of reasoning as far. It could therefore be advantageous to aim for a slightly higher number, say 15, assuming that not every player will reach the conclusion of 0 and there may still be a larger average.",
"guess": 15}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Uj8nEgz8Ck3QgUBKqxgsdgfFMe",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\"reasoning\": \"When playing this game, the first consideration is to assume every player will guess 100. If so, the average guess will be 100, and 2/3 of that average will be 66.67 making that a viable guess. However, if we consider that every player is thinking rationally, they should know that nobody will guess over 66.67 because that is 2/3 of 100. So, an initial, rational prediction would lead every player to aim for 2/3 of 66.67 (about 44.44). If there is a second level of reasoning, every player would then aim for 2/3 of 44.44 (about 29.63). This iterative process can continue indefinitely, but as it continues, the guess drops rapidly and then slowly converges towards zero. In a group of rational players, the equilibrium value is zero because anything higher can be beaten by a lower guess. But, we know that we're playing against humans who may not all be thinking this way or who may not follow this line of reasoning as far. It could therefore be advantageous to aim for a slightly higher number, say 15, assuming that not every player will reach the conclusion of 0 and there may still be a larger average.\", \n\"guess\": 15}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761064045,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 273,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 389,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE389
69
2025-10-22T01:27:41.8455169openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE29.00Firstly, assuming all players are rational, no one would guess more than 66.67, since 2/3 of 100 is 66.67. In the second round of guessing, rational players would deduce this and guess 2/3 of 66.67 which is 44.44. This pattern of guessing 2/3 of the previous round's highest logical guess could continue indefinitely towards zero. However, considering that humans may not iterate this deduction to its theoretical end, it makes sense to assume they'll stop after a few iterations. Let's assume they stop after 2 iterations, which means the target number is 2/3 of 44.44, which is about 29.63. In order to be closest to this number, my guess would then be slightly lower, to account for the fact that the average of all players' guesses might also be slightly lower due to some players guessing too high or too low.
{
"reasoning": "Firstly, assuming all players are rational, no one would guess more than 66.67, since 2/3 of 100 is 66.67. In the second round of guessing, rational players would deduce this and guess 2/3 of 66.67 which is 44.44. This pattern of guessing 2/3 of the previous round's highest logical guess could continue indefinitely towards zero. However, considering that humans may not iterate this deduction to its theoretical end, it makes sense to assume they'll stop after a few iterations. Let's assume they stop after 2 iterations, which means the target number is 2/3 of 44.44, which is about 29.63. In order to be closest to this number, my guess would then be slightly lower, to account for the fact that the average of all players' guesses might also be slightly lower due to some players guessing too high or too low.",
"guess": "29"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9Uui2gqaAY9dBawdCHTUWzmub3F",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Firstly, assuming all players are rational, no one would guess more than 66.67, since 2/3 of 100 is 66.67. In the second round of guessing, rational players would deduce this and guess 2/3 of 66.67 which is 44.44. This pattern of guessing 2/3 of the previous round's highest logical guess could continue indefinitely towards zero. However, considering that humans may not iterate this deduction to its theoretical end, it makes sense to assume they'll stop after a few iterations. Let's assume they stop after 2 iterations, which means the target number is 2/3 of 44.44, which is about 29.63. In order to be closest to this number, my guess would then be slightly lower, to account for the fact that the average of all players' guesses might also be slightly lower due to some players guessing too high or too low.\", \n \"guess\": \"29\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761064056,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 211,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 327,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE327
70
2025-10-22T01:27:50.96087610openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE22.00Initially, it might seem that the best guess would be 66.67 as it is 2/3 of 100. However, if other players use this same reasoning, then the average guess will be 66.67, and hence the target number will be 2/3 of 66.67, which is approximately 44.44. Knowing this, you might then decide to guess 44.44 in the next round. Yet if everyone else were to think like this too, then the average guess would drop to 44.44, and the target would become 2/3 of that: approximately 29.63. This patterns will continue iteratively, converging towards 0. Considering that humans generally do not initially guess 0, it's better to aim for an earlier number in this sequence. Choosing a number around 22 seems like a reasonable, strategic compromise.
{
"reasoning": "Initially, it might seem that the best guess would be 66.67 as it is 2/3 of 100. However, if other players use this same reasoning, then the average guess will be 66.67, and hence the target number will be 2/3 of 66.67, which is approximately 44.44. Knowing this, you might then decide to guess 44.44 in the next round. Yet if everyone else were to think like this too, then the average guess would drop to 44.44, and the target would become 2/3 of that: approximately 29.63. This patterns will continue iteratively, converging towards 0. Considering that humans generally do not initially guess 0, it's better to aim for an earlier number in this sequence. Choosing a number around 22 seems like a reasonable, strategic compromise.",
"guess": 22
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9V0GzkdiyIP4kgQtG85SRknCrdh",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Initially, it might seem that the best guess would be 66.67 as it is 2/3 of 100. However, if other players use this same reasoning, then the average guess will be 66.67, and hence the target number will be 2/3 of 66.67, which is approximately 44.44. Knowing this, you might then decide to guess 44.44 in the next round. Yet if everyone else were to think like this too, then the average guess would drop to 44.44, and the target would become 2/3 of that: approximately 29.63. This patterns will continue iteratively, converging towards 0. Considering that humans generally do not initially guess 0, it's better to aim for an earlier number in this sequence. Choosing a number around 22 seems like a reasonable, strategic compromise.\",\n \"guess\": 22\n}\n",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761064062,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 197,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 313,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE313
71
2025-10-22T01:28:03.26492211openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00If everyone assumes the average guess will be 100 (the maximum), then they would guess 66.67 (2/3 of 100). However, if everyone thinks this way, the average drops to around 66.67, and 2/3 of that would be around 44.44. This thought process would have to continue until a stable point, where everyone guesses the same number, which is 2/3 of itself. To put it differently, this game presents a multi-level thinking problem where each level of thinking influences the next. If everyone uses the first level of reasoning (2/3 of 100), the second level (2/3 of the first level), and so on, it results in a decreasing sequence of geometric progression. If it's assumed that all players will do this calculation (which is not always the case), we arrive at 0 since the sequence tends to 0. However, not everyone will consider all these levels, and some players might guess higher numbers out of error or lack of strategy. Accounting for those inaccuracies, it would be safer to pick a small positive number, say 1.
{
"reasoning": "If everyone assumes the average guess will be 100 (the maximum), then they would guess 66.67 (2/3 of 100). However, if everyone thinks this way, the average drops to around 66.67, and 2/3 of that would be around 44.44. This thought process would have to continue until a stable point, where everyone guesses the same number, which is 2/3 of itself. To put it differently, this game presents a multi-level thinking problem where each level of thinking influences the next. If everyone uses the first level of reasoning (2/3 of 100), the second level (2/3 of the first level), and so on, it results in a decreasing sequence of geometric progression. If it's assumed that all players will do this calculation (which is not always the case), we arrive at 0 since the sequence tends to 0. However, not everyone will consider all these levels, and some players might guess higher numbers out of error or lack of strategy. Accounting for those inaccuracies, it would be safer to pick a small positive number, say 1.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9V9iAot6EAO2nd8F0ohUzR09gO9",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"If everyone assumes the average guess will be 100 (the maximum), then they would guess 66.67 (2/3 of 100). However, if everyone thinks this way, the average drops to around 66.67, and 2/3 of that would be around 44.44. This thought process would have to continue until a stable point, where everyone guesses the same number, which is 2/3 of itself. To put it differently, this game presents a multi-level thinking problem where each level of thinking influences the next. If everyone uses the first level of reasoning (2/3 of 100), the second level (2/3 of the first level), and so on, it results in a decreasing sequence of geometric progression. If it's assumed that all players will do this calculation (which is not always the case), we arrive at 0 since the sequence tends to 0. However, not everyone will consider all these levels, and some players might guess higher numbers out of error or lack of strategy. Accounting for those inaccuracies, it would be safer to pick a small positive number, say 1.\",\n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761064071,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 248,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 364,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE364
72
2025-10-22T01:49:41.83698212openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00The initial thought could be guessing 66.67, considering 2/3 of 100. However, we must consider that everyone else is also strategizing and might guess lower. Hence, if we assume all players adapt a similar strategy and guess 2/3rds of the average from the previous bracket (100, 66.67, 44.44, etc.) until it stabilizes, ideally the value should stabilize around 0 (2/3 of 2/3 of 2/3... of 100 eventually converges to zero). But since humans are involved, they might not necessarily follow this pattern perfectly and might guess numbers slightly higher than 0 to be 'safer'. Therefore, a reasonable guess might be something slightly above 0.
{
"reasoning": "The initial thought could be guessing 66.67, considering 2/3 of 100. However, we must consider that everyone else is also strategizing and might guess lower. Hence, if we assume all players adapt a similar strategy and guess 2/3rds of the average from the previous bracket (100, 66.67, 44.44, etc.) until it stabilizes, ideally the value should stabilize around 0 (2/3 of 2/3 of 2/3... of 100 eventually converges to zero). But since humans are involved, they might not necessarily follow this pattern perfectly and might guess numbers slightly higher than 0 to be 'safer'. Therefore, a reasonable guess might be something slightly above 0.",

"guess": "1.0"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9qArUjY0V9jc9RGhNRZi7JIZdNZ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"The initial thought could be guessing 66.67, considering 2/3 of 100. However, we must consider that everyone else is also strategizing and might guess lower. Hence, if we assume all players adapt a similar strategy and guess 2/3rds of the average from the previous bracket (100, 66.67, 44.44, etc.) until it stabilizes, ideally the value should stabilize around 0 (2/3 of 2/3 of 2/3... of 100 eventually converges to zero). But since humans are involved, they might not necessarily follow this pattern perfectly and might guess numbers slightly higher than 0 to be 'safer'. Therefore, a reasonable guess might be something slightly above 0.\", \n\n\"guess\": \"1.0\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065374,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 173,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 289,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE289
73
2025-10-22T01:49:51.05521013openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE15.00Firstly, if all players were to guess randomly, the average should theoretically be around 50. Therefore, 2/3 of the average would be about 33. However, if everyone followed this reasoning, the new average would be 33, and 2/3 of that would be about 22. This process could continue on and on. Theoretically, if everyone guessed rationally and iterated this process indefinitely, everyone would end up guessing 0 (since 0 is the lower limit). But as we are playing against humans and not all people may think this far, a compromise between the two extremes might be the best. Thus, somewhere around the second or third step could be a solid guess. That would be somewhere around 22 or 15.
{
"reasoning": "Firstly, if all players were to guess randomly, the average should theoretically be around 50. Therefore, 2/3 of the average would be about 33. However, if everyone followed this reasoning, the new average would be 33, and 2/3 of that would be about 22. This process could continue on and on. Theoretically, if everyone guessed rationally and iterated this process indefinitely, everyone would end up guessing 0 (since 0 is the lower limit). But as we are playing against humans and not all people may think this far, a compromise between the two extremes might be the best. Thus, somewhere around the second or third step could be a solid guess. That would be somewhere around 22 or 15.",
"guess": "15"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9qIn0ZqRPDBV3Iys1HhsvA1bVXW",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Firstly, if all players were to guess randomly, the average should theoretically be around 50. Therefore, 2/3 of the average would be about 33. However, if everyone followed this reasoning, the new average would be 33, and 2/3 of that would be about 22. This process could continue on and on. Theoretically, if everyone guessed rationally and iterated this process indefinitely, everyone would end up guessing 0 (since 0 is the lower limit). But as we are playing against humans and not all people may think this far, a compromise between the two extremes might be the best. Thus, somewhere around the second or third step could be a solid guess. That would be somewhere around 22 or 15.\", \n \"guess\": \"15\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065382,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 173,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 289,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE289
74
2025-10-22T01:50:04.98181914openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE10.00The game relies on sequential iterations of rational deduction, also termed as 'Levels of Thinking', which is a common strategy in game theory. Level 0 is the default position where all players would randomly guess a number between 0-100. However, humans being rational, we move to Level 1 where we calculate 2/3 of the average i.e. 2/3*100=66.6. But considering other players could make the same deduction, we move to Level 2, and guess 2/3 of 66.6 i.e., 44.4. As this logical deduction can continue iteratively and the sequence (100, 66.6, 44.4, ...) converges around 0, the optimal strategy is based on how many iterations you believe your opponents will make, which depends largely on their rationality and knowledge of game theory. As we are playing against humans who are also likely to try to outsmart the competition, it's reasonable to take several iterations. My guess would therefore be a value closer to 0 but not 0.
{
"reasoning": "The game relies on sequential iterations of rational deduction, also termed as 'Levels of Thinking', which is a common strategy in game theory. Level 0 is the default position where all players would randomly guess a number between 0-100. However, humans being rational, we move to Level 1 where we calculate 2/3 of the average i.e. 2/3*100=66.6. But considering other players could make the same deduction, we move to Level 2, and guess 2/3 of 66.6 i.e., 44.4. As this logical deduction can continue iteratively and the sequence (100, 66.6, 44.4, ...) converges around 0, the optimal strategy is based on how many iterations you believe your opponents will make, which depends largely on their rationality and knowledge of game theory. As we are playing against humans who are also likely to try to outsmart the competition, it's reasonable to take several iterations. My guess would therefore be a value closer to 0 but not 0.",
"guess": "10"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9qR0rSbnfKMNZyM9fBwBqzMrk5B",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"The game relies on sequential iterations of rational deduction, also termed as 'Levels of Thinking', which is a common strategy in game theory. Level 0 is the default position where all players would randomly guess a number between 0-100. However, humans being rational, we move to Level 1 where we calculate 2/3 of the average i.e. 2/3*100=66.6. But considering other players could make the same deduction, we move to Level 2, and guess 2/3 of 66.6 i.e., 44.4. As this logical deduction can continue iteratively and the sequence (100, 66.6, 44.4, ...) converges around 0, the optimal strategy is based on how many iterations you believe your opponents will make, which depends largely on their rationality and knowledge of game theory. As we are playing against humans who are also likely to try to outsmart the competition, it's reasonable to take several iterations. My guess would therefore be a value closer to 0 but not 0.\", \n \"guess\": \"10\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065391,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 238,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 354,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE354
75
2025-10-22T01:50:13.45602315openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE27.00If all participants are aware of the goal, they are likely to guess a number that is 2/3 of the maximum limit (which is 100), which gives approximately 66.67. However, since we all think in the same way, we need to adjust our guess to 2/3 of 66.67, which is approximate 44.44. Then, considering others might think the same way, we should adjust our guess to 2/3 of that 44.44, which is about 29.63. However, since the participants are human and not everyone will think this way, we should consider a guess slightly less than 30, say 27.
{
"reasoning": "If all participants are aware of the goal, they are likely to guess a number that is 2/3 of the maximum limit (which is 100), which gives approximately 66.67. However, since we all think in the same way, we need to adjust our guess to 2/3 of 66.67, which is approximate 44.44. Then, considering others might think the same way, we should adjust our guess to 2/3 of that 44.44, which is about 29.63. However, since the participants are human and not everyone will think this way, we should consider a guess slightly less than 30, say 27.",

"guess": "27"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9qfpO27NqNexdP3iRkDwOOYd4gN",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"If all participants are aware of the goal, they are likely to guess a number that is 2/3 of the maximum limit (which is 100), which gives approximately 66.67. However, since we all think in the same way, we need to adjust our guess to 2/3 of 66.67, which is approximate 44.44. Then, considering others might think the same way, we should adjust our guess to 2/3 of that 44.44, which is about 29.63. However, since the participants are human and not everyone will think this way, we should consider a guess slightly less than 30, say 27.\",\n\n\"guess\": \"27\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065405,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 155,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 271,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE271
76
2025-10-22T01:50:18.49849916openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE27.00The first logical thing to consider is that no rational player should guess more than 66.67 because 2/3 of 100 is about 66.67. If you are one of the rational players then, as a group, you should not guess anywhere above 66.67, 2/3 of this value is about 44.44. So as a rational player, you should aim lower. This logic can be applied several times along with consideration of human nature. Often, players do not guess in a purely rational way, and you need to consider that there are some who might guess higher initially. Considering human behavior, I would place my best guess at around 27, considering many people may guess around 40, thinking about the first level of step-down reasoning
{
"reasoning": "The first logical thing to consider is that no rational player should guess more than 66.67 because 2/3 of 100 is about 66.67. If you are one of the rational players then, as a group, you should not guess anywhere above 66.67, 2/3 of this value is about 44.44. So as a rational player, you should aim lower. This logic can be applied several times along with consideration of human nature. Often, players do not guess in a purely rational way, and you need to consider that there are some who might guess higher initially. Considering human behavior, I would place my best guess at around 27, considering many people may guess around 40, thinking about the first level of step-down reasoning",

"guess": "27"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9qo5vFlcaAaEM3jtJnxgQet4GJl",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"The first logical thing to consider is that no rational player should guess more than 66.67 because 2/3 of 100 is about 66.67. If you are one of the rational players then, as a group, you should not guess anywhere above 66.67, 2/3 of this value is about 44.44. So as a rational player, you should aim lower. This logic can be applied several times along with consideration of human nature. Often, players do not guess in a purely rational way, and you need to consider that there are some who might guess higher initially. Considering human behavior, I would place my best guess at around 27, considering many people may guess around 40, thinking about the first level of step-down reasoning\",\n \n \"guess\": \"27\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065414,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 175,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 291,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE291
77
2025-10-22T01:50:26.58881817openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00In this game, the aim is to guess two-thirds of the average of all guesses. The average guess is always going to be less than 100 because of the 2/3 rule. If everyone is rational and picks the highest possible number, which is 100, the average will be 100, and thus the winning guess would be 2/3 of 100, or approximately 67. If we assume that the other players also make this logic, they would guess 67. If all players guess 67, the average drops to 67 and the best guess would be 2/3 of this, approximately 45. Considering that players could potentially follow this iterative logic, we could repeat this process until we get a number that, when multiplied by 2/3, equals itself. This happens at 0. However, betting 0 would only be rational if you believe that all other players are perfectly rational and would follow the same thought process until the end. As humans often mix rationality and intuition and don't always follow perfect logic, it might be more strategic to guess a number slightly above 0.
{
"reasoning": "In this game, the aim is to guess two-thirds of the average of all guesses. The average guess is always going to be less than 100 because of the 2/3 rule. If everyone is rational and picks the highest possible number, which is 100, the average will be 100, and thus the winning guess would be 2/3 of 100, or approximately 67. If we assume that the other players also make this logic, they would guess 67. If all players guess 67, the average drops to 67 and the best guess would be 2/3 of this, approximately 45. Considering that players could potentially follow this iterative logic, we could repeat this process until we get a number that, when multiplied by 2/3, equals itself. This happens at 0. However, betting 0 would only be rational if you believe that all other players are perfectly rational and would follow the same thought process until the end. As humans often mix rationality and intuition and don't always follow perfect logic, it might be more strategic to guess a number slightly above 0.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9qtRKvErm6VLvAShFOPiRHADX6C",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"In this game, the aim is to guess two-thirds of the average of all guesses. The average guess is always going to be less than 100 because of the 2/3 rule. If everyone is rational and picks the highest possible number, which is 100, the average will be 100, and thus the winning guess would be 2/3 of 100, or approximately 67. If we assume that the other players also make this logic, they would guess 67. If all players guess 67, the average drops to 67 and the best guess would be 2/3 of this, approximately 45. Considering that players could potentially follow this iterative logic, we could repeat this process until we get a number that, when multiplied by 2/3, equals itself. This happens at 0. However, betting 0 would only be rational if you believe that all other players are perfectly rational and would follow the same thought process until the end. As humans often mix rationality and intuition and don't always follow perfect logic, it might be more strategic to guess a number slightly above 0.\", \n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065419,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 245,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 361,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE361
78
2025-10-22T01:50:35.39506418openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00It's clear that a distinct portion of the player base will likely guess 50 at the onset, as it is half of 100. However, we're looking for 2/3 of the average, not half. If everyone were to guess honestly, the 'perfect strategy' should be around 33.33. But should other players think this way and guess 33.33, 2/3 of that would be around 22.22. This process potentially could be iterated again where everyone guesses 22.22 and then 2/3 of that would be around 14.81. As humans, one may not go beyond these steps of logical deduction. Depending on the sophistication of players, it might be ideal to guess between 14 and 22. However, the result of further iterations tends towards zero, so guessing too high can potentially be problematic. A lower number might be a safer bet. Because there is no 'perfect' guess and a huge factor is predicting the collective behavior of others, it's suggested to pick a number like 1 or zero if you think others will also follow this chain of reasoning.
{
"reasoning": "It's clear that a distinct portion of the player base will likely guess 50 at the onset, as it is half of 100. However, we're looking for 2/3 of the average, not half. If everyone were to guess honestly, the 'perfect strategy' should be around 33.33. But should other players think this way and guess 33.33, 2/3 of that would be around 22.22. This process potentially could be iterated again where everyone guesses 22.22 and then 2/3 of that would be around 14.81. As humans, one may not go beyond these steps of logical deduction. Depending on the sophistication of players, it might be ideal to guess between 14 and 22. However, the result of further iterations tends towards zero, so guessing too high can potentially be problematic. A lower number might be a safer bet. Because there is no 'perfect' guess and a huge factor is predicting the collective behavior of others, it's suggested to pick a number like 1 or zero if you think others will also follow this chain of reasoning.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9r196BVmYDlLgJoPOX7bF1oMmuL",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"It's clear that a distinct portion of the player base will likely guess 50 at the onset, as it is half of 100. However, we're looking for 2/3 of the average, not half. If everyone were to guess honestly, the 'perfect strategy' should be around 33.33. But should other players think this way and guess 33.33, 2/3 of that would be around 22.22. This process potentially could be iterated again where everyone guesses 22.22 and then 2/3 of that would be around 14.81. As humans, one may not go beyond these steps of logical deduction. Depending on the sophistication of players, it might be ideal to guess between 14 and 22. However, the result of further iterations tends towards zero, so guessing too high can potentially be problematic. A lower number might be a safer bet. Because there is no 'perfect' guess and a huge factor is predicting the collective behavior of others, it's suggested to pick a number like 1 or zero if you think others will also follow this chain of reasoning.\",\n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065427,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 246,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 362,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE362
79
2025-10-22T01:50:43.69183919openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE19.75Firstly, no rational player would guess higher than 66.66, as the winning number cannot be higher than this (2/3 of 100). Now, assuming everybody knows this, no one would guess higher than 2/3 of 66.66, i.e., 44.44. And under the similar reasoning, the highest guess people would place would be 2/3 of that, i.e., 29.63. This process can theoretically continue infinitely, each time lowering the maximum possible guess. However, assuming we're playing against humans, not everyone might follow this logic or have this depth of thought. Therefore, I would guess around the 3rd or 4th step of this process, which would be 2/3 of 29.63 i.e., 19.75
{
"reasoning": "Firstly, no rational player would guess higher than 66.66, as the winning number cannot be higher than this (2/3 of 100). Now, assuming everybody knows this, no one would guess higher than 2/3 of 66.66, i.e., 44.44. And under the similar reasoning, the highest guess people would place would be 2/3 of that, i.e., 29.63. This process can theoretically continue infinitely, each time lowering the maximum possible guess. However, assuming we're playing against humans, not everyone might follow this logic or have this depth of thought. Therefore, I would guess around the 3rd or 4th step of this process, which would be 2/3 of 29.63 i.e., 19.75",
"guess": "19.75"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9r9BKrNCbUmjLOhX5vglxepc2Fs",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Firstly, no rational player would guess higher than 66.66, as the winning number cannot be higher than this (2/3 of 100). Now, assuming everybody knows this, no one would guess higher than 2/3 of 66.66, i.e., 44.44. And under the similar reasoning, the highest guess people would place would be 2/3 of that, i.e., 29.63. This process can theoretically continue infinitely, each time lowering the maximum possible guess. However, assuming we're playing against humans, not everyone might follow this logic or have this depth of thought. Therefore, I would guess around the 3rd or 4th step of this process, which would be 2/3 of 29.63 i.e., 19.75\",\n \"guess\": \"19.75\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065435,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 185,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 301,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE301
80
2025-10-22T01:50:50.65304420openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE14.81If people guessed randomly, the average guess would be 50, and 2/3 of that is 33.33. However, we must assume other people will be using some strategy and expecting them to guess 33.33. If each person did this, the average would drop to 22.22 because it is 2/3 of 33.33. But if the average is 22.22, it is better to guess 2/3 of that, or about 14.81. This iterative process of out-guessing your opponents could technically continue indefinitely bringing the best guess closer and closer to 0, but let's stop here, considering that not everyone would be that strategic or iterative in their guesses.
{
"reasoning" : "If people guessed randomly, the average guess would be 50, and 2/3 of that is 33.33. However, we must assume other people will be using some strategy and expecting them to guess 33.33. If each person did this, the average would drop to 22.22 because it is 2/3 of 33.33. But if the average is 22.22, it is better to guess 2/3 of that, or about 14.81. This iterative process of out-guessing your opponents could technically continue indefinitely bringing the best guess closer and closer to 0, but let's stop here, considering that not everyone would be that strategic or iterative in their guesses.",
"guess" : "14.81"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9rIlOvyTKSMefHhDkIl9SwHMdQf",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\" : \"If people guessed randomly, the average guess would be 50, and 2/3 of that is 33.33. However, we must assume other people will be using some strategy and expecting them to guess 33.33. If each person did this, the average would drop to 22.22 because it is 2/3 of 33.33. But if the average is 22.22, it is better to guess 2/3 of that, or about 14.81. This iterative process of out-guessing your opponents could technically continue indefinitely bringing the best guess closer and closer to 0, but let's stop here, considering that not everyone would be that strategic or iterative in their guesses.\",\n\"guess\" : \"14.81\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065444,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 167,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 283,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE283
81
2025-10-22T01:50:56.14978121openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE10.00If all players are rational and aiming to win, they would guess a number that is 2/3 of the average of all guesses. Assuming everyone is basing their guesses at first on the full range provided (0-100), the average of these guesses could reasonably approximate 50. Naturally, players would anticipate this, so they would guess around 2/3 of 50, or about 33. However, knowing this, everyone might adjust their guess down to 2/3 of 33, or approximately 22. This rational adjustment could continue until players hit the lower boundary of 0. Therefore, I would aim to guess on the lower end of this implied range, around 10.
{
"reasoning": "If all players are rational and aiming to win, they would guess a number that is 2/3 of the average of all guesses. Assuming everyone is basing their guesses at first on the full range provided (0-100), the average of these guesses could reasonably approximate 50. Naturally, players would anticipate this, so they would guess around 2/3 of 50, or about 33. However, knowing this, everyone might adjust their guess down to 2/3 of 33, or approximately 22. This rational adjustment could continue until players hit the lower boundary of 0. Therefore, I would aim to guess on the lower end of this implied range, around 10.",
"guess": "10"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9rPfafpP7zHLIwjnISnS1ICiAhl",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"If all players are rational and aiming to win, they would guess a number that is 2/3 of the average of all guesses. Assuming everyone is basing their guesses at first on the full range provided (0-100), the average of these guesses could reasonably approximate 50. Naturally, players would anticipate this, so they would guess around 2/3 of 50, or about 33. However, knowing this, everyone might adjust their guess down to 2/3 of 33, or approximately 22. This rational adjustment could continue until players hit the lower boundary of 0. Therefore, I would aim to guess on the lower end of this implied range, around 10.\", \n \"guess\": \"10\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065451,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 159,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 275,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE275
82
2025-10-22T01:51:04.39063722openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE22.00Since everyone will aim for 2/3 of the average, people will initially guess random numbers and the average is expected to be 50. However, if everyone expects the average to be 50, the perceived average could become 2/3 of 50, which equals to 33.33. A savvy player might guess a number closer to 2/3 of 33.33 which is 22.22. However, if most players follow this line of logic, then the average guess is likely to be even lower. This process could be repeated, dropping the best guess each time, until the optimal guess drops below the minimum of 0. But considering the complexity and the human nature to overestimate, it's unlikely all will drop so far. Hence, a strategic guess considering these factors might be around 22.
{
"reasoning": "Since everyone will aim for 2/3 of the average, people will initially guess random numbers and the average is expected to be 50. However, if everyone expects the average to be 50, the perceived average could become 2/3 of 50, which equals to 33.33. A savvy player might guess a number closer to 2/3 of 33.33 which is 22.22. However, if most players follow this line of logic, then the average guess is likely to be even lower. This process could be repeated, dropping the best guess each time, until the optimal guess drops below the minimum of 0. But considering the complexity and the human nature to overestimate, it's unlikely all will drop so far. Hence, a strategic guess considering these factors might be around 22.",

"guess": "22"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9rU5PwbkLuj0WZFnhcqoMNjmCET",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Since everyone will aim for 2/3 of the average, people will initially guess random numbers and the average is expected to be 50. However, if everyone expects the average to be 50, the perceived average could become 2/3 of 50, which equals to 33.33. A savvy player might guess a number closer to 2/3 of 33.33 which is 22.22. However, if most players follow this line of logic, then the average guess is likely to be even lower. This process could be repeated, dropping the best guess each time, until the optimal guess drops below the minimum of 0. But considering the complexity and the human nature to overestimate, it's unlikely all will drop so far. Hence, a strategic guess considering these factors might be around 22.\",\n\n \"guess\": \"22\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065456,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 186,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 302,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE302
83
2025-10-22T01:51:12.18650023openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE19.80At first glance, one might be inclined to guess 66.6 as that is 2/3 of 100. However, considering the goal is to guess 2/3 of the average guess of all participants, this wouldn't be optimal. Assuming all players are rational and realize this, the average guess would be lower, leading us to guess 2/3 of our original guess (which is around 44.4). But if all players realize this too, the average would be lower again, prompting another guess 2/3 of that (which is around 29.6). This process can go on and on theoretically 'til it reaches near to 0, but since it's a game with humans, whose patience and iterations of strategic thinking can be limited, we wouldn’t reach zero. Hence, it'd be strategic to stop at a certain point. A reasonable stopping point could be to use the logic three times, providing a guess of around 19.8.
{
"reasoning": "At first glance, one might be inclined to guess 66.6 as that is 2/3 of 100. However, considering the goal is to guess 2/3 of the average guess of all participants, this wouldn't be optimal. Assuming all players are rational and realize this, the average guess would be lower, leading us to guess 2/3 of our original guess (which is around 44.4). But if all players realize this too, the average would be lower again, prompting another guess 2/3 of that (which is around 29.6). This process can go on and on theoretically 'til it reaches near to 0, but since it's a game with humans, whose patience and iterations of strategic thinking can be limited, we wouldn’t reach zero. Hence, it'd be strategic to stop at a certain point. A reasonable stopping point could be to use the logic three times, providing a guess of around 19.8.",

"guess": 19.8
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9rcsQtOw54N9RTxeS0cqsqDsBgJ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"At first glance, one might be inclined to guess 66.6 as that is 2/3 of 100. However, considering the goal is to guess 2/3 of the average guess of all participants, this wouldn't be optimal. Assuming all players are rational and realize this, the average guess would be lower, leading us to guess 2/3 of our original guess (which is around 44.4). But if all players realize this too, the average would be lower again, prompting another guess 2/3 of that (which is around 29.6). This process can go on and on theoretically 'til it reaches near to 0, but since it's a game with humans, whose patience and iterations of strategic thinking can be limited, we wouldn\u2019t reach zero. Hence, it'd be strategic to stop at a certain point. A reasonable stopping point could be to use the logic three times, providing a guess of around 19.8.\",\n\n\"guess\": 19.8\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065464,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 216,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 332,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE332
84
2025-10-22T01:51:21.27116524openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE30.00First, assume everyone is rational and believes others are rational as well so all players will try to predict 2/3 of the average guess of the other players. In that case, theoretically, no one should guess a number greater than 66.66 because that's 2/3 of 100 (upper limit). So the maximum average will not exceed 66.66, making 2/3 of it roughly 44.44. Now, anticipating this move, no one should guess a number higher than 44.44, leading to the possible maximum average to be around 44.44 and 2/3 of 44.44 becomes 29.63. In such a 'rational' setting, this process can go on indefinitely, leading towards zero. However, since some players may not be fully rational or not think more than a few steps ahead, a low but not zero guess could be appropriate to maximize chances of winning. Also, considering some players may randomly guess without considering all this, my optimal guess would be slightly above one level of deduction (one level ahead of the simple rational guess of 66.66*2/3). There's no definitive answer, there's a continuous judgment based on how rational you believe your opponents to be.
{
"reasoning": "First, assume everyone is rational and believes others are rational as well so all players will try to predict 2/3 of the average guess of the other players. In that case, theoretically, no one should guess a number greater than 66.66 because that's 2/3 of 100 (upper limit). So the maximum average will not exceed 66.66, making 2/3 of it roughly 44.44. Now, anticipating this move, no one should guess a number higher than 44.44, leading to the possible maximum average to be around 44.44 and 2/3 of 44.44 becomes 29.63. In such a 'rational' setting, this process can go on indefinitely, leading towards zero. However, since some players may not be fully rational or not think more than a few steps ahead, a low but not zero guess could be appropriate to maximize chances of winning. Also, considering some players may randomly guess without considering all this, my optimal guess would be slightly above one level of deduction (one level ahead of the simple rational guess of 66.66*2/3). There's no definitive answer, there's a continuous judgment based on how rational you believe your opponents to be.",

"guess": "30"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9rkdOTmhZ7QBSHbGrA7Pm6tVhaH",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"First, assume everyone is rational and believes others are rational as well so all players will try to predict 2/3 of the average guess of the other players. In that case, theoretically, no one should guess a number greater than 66.66 because that's 2/3 of 100 (upper limit). So the maximum average will not exceed 66.66, making 2/3 of it roughly 44.44. Now, anticipating this move, no one should guess a number higher than 44.44, leading to the possible maximum average to be around 44.44 and 2/3 of 44.44 becomes 29.63. In such a 'rational' setting, this process can go on indefinitely, leading towards zero. However, since some players may not be fully rational or not think more than a few steps ahead, a low but not zero guess could be appropriate to maximize chances of winning. Also, considering some players may randomly guess without considering all this, my optimal guess would be slightly above one level of deduction (one level ahead of the simple rational guess of 66.66*2/3). There's no definitive answer, there's a continuous judgment based on how rational you believe your opponents to be.\",\n\n \"guess\": \"30\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065472,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 274,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 390,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE390
85
2025-10-22T01:51:31.61295925openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00Initially, if everyone guessed randomly, the average should be roughly 50. Therefore, my initial guess would be approximately 2/3 of 50, which is about 33.33. However, considering everyone is aiming to guess 2/3 of the average including my guess, everyone should also be guessing around 33.33. If I anticipate that, my new guess would be 2/3 of 33.33, which is about 22.22. If everyone thinks in this way, then everyone might guess around 22.22, so my strategy changes to guessing 2/3 of 22.22, which is roughly 14.81. If we follow the logic of this, it will result in a sequence that tends towards 0. However, since we're dealing with humans, not everyone will follow this iterative logic thoroughly. So selecting a number in the early parts of the sequence, which is close to 1 seems to be a good strategy. Therefore, my smart guess would be somewhere around 1.
{
"reasoning": "Initially, if everyone guessed randomly, the average should be roughly 50. Therefore, my initial guess would be approximately 2/3 of 50, which is about 33.33. However, considering everyone is aiming to guess 2/3 of the average including my guess, everyone should also be guessing around 33.33. If I anticipate that, my new guess would be 2/3 of 33.33, which is about 22.22. If everyone thinks in this way, then everyone might guess around 22.22, so my strategy changes to guessing 2/3 of 22.22, which is roughly 14.81. If we follow the logic of this, it will result in a sequence that tends towards 0. However, since we're dealing with humans, not everyone will follow this iterative logic thoroughly. So selecting a number in the early parts of the sequence, which is close to 1 seems to be a good strategy. Therefore, my smart guess would be somewhere around 1.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9rthRWd2lv6xb7DBIZcy3D3bGNn",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Initially, if everyone guessed randomly, the average should be roughly 50. Therefore, my initial guess would be approximately 2/3 of 50, which is about 33.33. However, considering everyone is aiming to guess 2/3 of the average including my guess, everyone should also be guessing around 33.33. If I anticipate that, my new guess would be 2/3 of 33.33, which is about 22.22. If everyone thinks in this way, then everyone might guess around 22.22, so my strategy changes to guessing 2/3 of 22.22, which is roughly 14.81. If we follow the logic of this, it will result in a sequence that tends towards 0. However, since we're dealing with humans, not everyone will follow this iterative logic thoroughly. So selecting a number in the early parts of the sequence, which is close to 1 seems to be a good strategy. Therefore, my smart guess would be somewhere around 1.\",\n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065481,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 228,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 344,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE344
86
2025-10-22T01:51:39.39620226openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE22.00Initially, if all players were to play randomly, the ideal guess would be 2/3 of 100, or around 66.7. However, knowing everyone is applying the same strategy, we could anticipate this and guess 2/3 of that instead, which is about 44.4. Since every other player is likely doing the same, we could once again anticipate the trend and guess 2/3 of 44.4, which is about 29.6, and so forth. However, since we were told that players are not highly logical machines but imperfect, human players, it's sensible to assume not everyone will follow this 'iterated elimination' of dominant strategies exactly. Thus, the guess should not be too low as to account for some players potentially choosing larger numbers. A guess within the range of 21-22 might strike a good balance between these considerations, maximizing the chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.
{
"reasoning": "Initially, if all players were to play randomly, the ideal guess would be 2/3 of 100, or around 66.7. However, knowing everyone is applying the same strategy, we could anticipate this and guess 2/3 of that instead, which is about 44.4. Since every other player is likely doing the same, we could once again anticipate the trend and guess 2/3 of 44.4, which is about 29.6, and so forth. However, since we were told that players are not highly logical machines but imperfect, human players, it's sensible to assume not everyone will follow this 'iterated elimination' of dominant strategies exactly. Thus, the guess should not be too low as to account for some players potentially choosing larger numbers. A guess within the range of 21-22 might strike a good balance between these considerations, maximizing the chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.",

"guess": "22"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9s4eFzqcciMjmykvnJQgLO3h25a",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Initially, if all players were to play randomly, the ideal guess would be 2/3 of 100, or around 66.7. However, knowing everyone is applying the same strategy, we could anticipate this and guess 2/3 of that instead, which is about 44.4. Since every other player is likely doing the same, we could once again anticipate the trend and guess 2/3 of 44.4, which is about 29.6, and so forth. However, since we were told that players are not highly logical machines but imperfect, human players, it's sensible to assume not everyone will follow this 'iterated elimination' of dominant strategies exactly. Thus, the guess should not be too low as to account for some players potentially choosing larger numbers. A guess within the range of 21-22 might strike a good balance between these considerations, maximizing the chances of being closest to 2/3 of the average guess.\",\n\n \"guess\": \"22\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065492,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 212,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 328,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE328
87
2025-10-22T01:51:48.30481327openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE0.00To win this game, players need to guess a number that is 2/3 of the average of all guesses. One's initial instinct might be to guess 50, as this is the average of the range. However, if everyone thinks this way, the 2/3 of that average guess is 33.3. So following this line of thinking, it might seem like the optimal guess would be 33. But, let's take it a step further. If every player presumes that everyone else will guess 33 and therefore, they themselves also guess 33, then the 2/3 of that average guess is 22. So players would have to guess 22 and this would initiate a downward spiral. This paradox is generally known as 'guess 2/3 of the average' game and is a commonly used concept in game theory. Theoretically, this process will continue until everyone ends up guessing zero, as it's the only Nash equilibrium in this game, where no player has anything to gain by changing only their own strategy.
{
"reasoning": "To win this game, players need to guess a number that is 2/3 of the average of all guesses. One's initial instinct might be to guess 50, as this is the average of the range. However, if everyone thinks this way, the 2/3 of that average guess is 33.3. So following this line of thinking, it might seem like the optimal guess would be 33. But, let's take it a step further. If every player presumes that everyone else will guess 33 and therefore, they themselves also guess 33, then the 2/3 of that average guess is 22. So players would have to guess 22 and this would initiate a downward spiral. This paradox is generally known as 'guess 2/3 of the average' game and is a commonly used concept in game theory. Theoretically, this process will continue until everyone ends up guessing zero, as it's the only Nash equilibrium in this game, where no player has anything to gain by changing only their own strategy.",

"guess": "0"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9sCR10GneuxusvUlZMmSkennsPH",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"To win this game, players need to guess a number that is 2/3 of the average of all guesses. One's initial instinct might be to guess 50, as this is the average of the range. However, if everyone thinks this way, the 2/3 of that average guess is 33.3. So following this line of thinking, it might seem like the optimal guess would be 33. But, let's take it a step further. If every player presumes that everyone else will guess 33 and therefore, they themselves also guess 33, then the 2/3 of that average guess is 22. So players would have to guess 22 and this would initiate a downward spiral. This paradox is generally known as 'guess 2/3 of the average' game and is a commonly used concept in game theory. Theoretically, this process will continue until everyone ends up guessing zero, as it's the only Nash equilibrium in this game, where no player has anything to gain by changing only their own strategy.\",\n\n \"guess\": \"0\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065500,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 231,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 347,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE347
88
2025-10-22T01:51:55.06398328openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE20.00There's a level of iterative thinking involved, as you'd have to consider what everyone else could potentially guess. Initially, you might think to guess 66.67, as it's 2/3 of 100. But if everyone's thinking the same way, their average will actually be around 66.67. To get 2/3 of that, the ideal guess would be around 44.44. However, if you expect everyone to guess 44.44, your ideal guess would be 2/3 of that, which is around 29.63. Continuing this thought process, this cycle of thoughts might lead people to guess lower and lower. However, it also depends on how much people overthink. Some individuals might not consider this and simply guess within the range of 0 to 100. Hence, to increase my winning chances, I would want to guess a number that is significantly lower but not too low, to take into account of people who overthink and those who don't.
{
"reasoning": "There's a level of iterative thinking involved, as you'd have to consider what everyone else could potentially guess. Initially, you might think to guess 66.67, as it's 2/3 of 100. But if everyone's thinking the same way, their average will actually be around 66.67. To get 2/3 of that, the ideal guess would be around 44.44. However, if you expect everyone to guess 44.44, your ideal guess would be 2/3 of that, which is around 29.63. Continuing this thought process, this cycle of thoughts might lead people to guess lower and lower. However, it also depends on how much people overthink. Some individuals might not consider this and simply guess within the range of 0 to 100. Hence, to increase my winning chances, I would want to guess a number that is significantly lower but not too low, to take into account of people who overthink and those who don't.",
"guess": "20"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9sL3AVw5sGVQzoOXet7LCMqjqtI",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"There's a level of iterative thinking involved, as you'd have to consider what everyone else could potentially guess. Initially, you might think to guess 66.67, as it's 2/3 of 100. But if everyone's thinking the same way, their average will actually be around 66.67. To get 2/3 of that, the ideal guess would be around 44.44. However, if you expect everyone to guess 44.44, your ideal guess would be 2/3 of that, which is around 29.63. Continuing this thought process, this cycle of thoughts might lead people to guess lower and lower. However, it also depends on how much people overthink. Some individuals might not consider this and simply guess within the range of 0 to 100. Hence, to increase my winning chances, I would want to guess a number that is significantly lower but not too low, to take into account of people who overthink and those who don't.\",\n \"guess\": \"20\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065509,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 221,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 337,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE337
89
2025-10-22T01:52:06.05056829openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00Firstly, thinking rationally, people are likely to start their guesses around 50, the mid-point of the range. If everyone did this, the average would be 50 and so 2/3 of the average would be approximately 33. Therefore, a rational first step would be to guess around 33. However, recognizing that others may follow the same process of reasoning, they might also guess around 33. If everyone did this, the average guess would drop to 33 and 2/3 of that is around 22. Therefore, the next rational step could be to guess around 22. This iterative process can continue, and considering that humans are involved and they tend to be welcoming of simpler numbers, a reasonable guess to make could be 1, also taking into account that the guesses should result in a continually shrinking average, so it should not go higher than 1.
{
"reasoning": "Firstly, thinking rationally, people are likely to start their guesses around 50, the mid-point of the range. If everyone did this, the average would be 50 and so 2/3 of the average would be approximately 33. Therefore, a rational first step would be to guess around 33. However, recognizing that others may follow the same process of reasoning, they might also guess around 33. If everyone did this, the average guess would drop to 33 and 2/3 of that is around 22. Therefore, the next rational step could be to guess around 22. This iterative process can continue, and considering that humans are involved and they tend to be welcoming of simpler numbers, a reasonable guess to make could be 1, also taking into account that the guesses should result in a continually shrinking average, so it should not go higher than 1.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9sRHdTWexiFiMdscMEbk19ctxzH",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Firstly, thinking rationally, people are likely to start their guesses around 50, the mid-point of the range. If everyone did this, the average would be 50 and so 2/3 of the average would be approximately 33. Therefore, a rational first step would be to guess around 33. However, recognizing that others may follow the same process of reasoning, they might also guess around 33. If everyone did this, the average guess would drop to 33 and 2/3 of that is around 22. Therefore, the next rational step could be to guess around 22. This iterative process can continue, and considering that humans are involved and they tend to be welcoming of simpler numbers, a reasonable guess to make could be 1, also taking into account that the guesses should result in a continually shrinking average, so it should not go higher than 1.\", \n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065515,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 198,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 314,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE314
90
2025-10-22T01:52:12.88139130openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE22.00Knowing that the highest possible guess is 100, the highest possible average of all guesses would also be 100. Therefore, the highest possible product of two-thirds of the average would be about 66.67, but that only happens if everyone guesses 100 which is very unlikely because it is not a winning strategy. It's more likely participants to think one step ahead and guess 66.67 themselves. However, if everyone guesses 66.67, the winning guess would end up being about 44.44 (2/3 of 66.67). This pattern continues with participants constantly second-guessing each other and lowering their guesses. Considering that participants are humans and can't possibly do infinite iterations of this logical process, a safe bet would be lower than 44.44. Following several iterations of the thought process, a reasonable estimate would be somewhere around 20-25 to cover the majority of guesses.
{
"reasoning": "Knowing that the highest possible guess is 100, the highest possible average of all guesses would also be 100. Therefore, the highest possible product of two-thirds of the average would be about 66.67, but that only happens if everyone guesses 100 which is very unlikely because it is not a winning strategy. It's more likely participants to think one step ahead and guess 66.67 themselves. However, if everyone guesses 66.67, the winning guess would end up being about 44.44 (2/3 of 66.67). This pattern continues with participants constantly second-guessing each other and lowering their guesses. Considering that participants are humans and can't possibly do infinite iterations of this logical process, a safe bet would be lower than 44.44. Following several iterations of the thought process, a reasonable estimate would be somewhere around 20-25 to cover the majority of guesses.",
"guess": "22"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9scZoMdyAva3PYi3pcpcQs5Z5BE",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"Knowing that the highest possible guess is 100, the highest possible average of all guesses would also be 100. Therefore, the highest possible product of two-thirds of the average would be about 66.67, but that only happens if everyone guesses 100 which is very unlikely because it is not a winning strategy. It's more likely participants to think one step ahead and guess 66.67 themselves. However, if everyone guesses 66.67, the winning guess would end up being about 44.44 (2/3 of 66.67). This pattern continues with participants constantly second-guessing each other and lowering their guesses. Considering that participants are humans and can't possibly do infinite iterations of this logical process, a safe bet would be lower than 44.44. Following several iterations of the thought process, a reasonable estimate would be somewhere around 20-25 to cover the majority of guesses.\",\n\"guess\": \"22\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065526,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 199,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 315,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE315
91
2025-10-22T01:52:21.77094731openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE25.00Since the goal is to guess closest to 2/3 of the average guess, everyone will likely think of guessing a number lower than 100 because 2/3 of 100 is around 66. But considering that everyone else would also think in this way and guess an even lower number to get closer to 2/3 of the average, you need to think one level deeper. If everyone is guessing a number around 66, the actual average would be less and hence, 2/3 of that average would be even lesser. Hence, to maximize your chances, try to think of what everyone's average guess would be and then guess 2/3 of that. Going consistently lower in this way, the optimal strategy will probably land somewhere around 20-30.
{
"reasoning": "Since the goal is to guess closest to 2/3 of the average guess, everyone will likely think of guessing a number lower than 100 because 2/3 of 100 is around 66. But considering that everyone else would also think in this way and guess an even lower number to get closer to 2/3 of the average, you need to think one level deeper. If everyone is guessing a number around 66, the actual average would be less and hence, 2/3 of that average would be even lesser. Hence, to maximize your chances, try to think of what everyone's average guess would be and then guess 2/3 of that. Going consistently lower in this way, the optimal strategy will probably land somewhere around 20-30.",
"guess": "25"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9sjjqkqZ5tAz7lrfSDwFqbH7ReQ",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Since the goal is to guess closest to 2/3 of the average guess, everyone will likely think of guessing a number lower than 100 because 2/3 of 100 is around 66. But considering that everyone else would also think in this way and guess an even lower number to get closer to 2/3 of the average, you need to think one level deeper. If everyone is guessing a number around 66, the actual average would be less and hence, 2/3 of that average would be even lesser. Hence, to maximize your chances, try to think of what everyone's average guess would be and then guess 2/3 of that. Going consistently lower in this way, the optimal strategy will probably land somewhere around 20-30.\",\n \"guess\": \"25\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065533,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 173,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 289,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE289
92
2025-10-22T01:52:29.67709032openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE18.00Since all guesses would range from 0 to 100, the average guess of all players would potentially fall around 50. Two-thirds of this number would be approximately 33. However, considering that we're dealing with humans, not everyone will guess as high as 100, knowing that the goal is to achieve 2/3 of the average. So it's rational to expect the average to be somewhat less than 50 though, maybe around 30-40. Therefore, 2/3 of that average would be around 20-26. It's also valid to consider that some people may employ the same strategy and guess that range, bringing the average lower. Therefore, to consider all these factors, my strategic guess would be a bit lower than 20, say around 18.
{
"reasoning": "Since all guesses would range from 0 to 100, the average guess of all players would potentially fall around 50. Two-thirds of this number would be approximately 33. However, considering that we're dealing with humans, not everyone will guess as high as 100, knowing that the goal is to achieve 2/3 of the average. So it's rational to expect the average to be somewhat less than 50 though, maybe around 30-40. Therefore, 2/3 of that average would be around 20-26. It's also valid to consider that some people may employ the same strategy and guess that range, bringing the average lower. Therefore, to consider all these factors, my strategic guess would be a bit lower than 20, say around 18.",
"guess": 18
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9ssMggJIHl3EjuaI7VQfT11w7FB",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"Since all guesses would range from 0 to 100, the average guess of all players would potentially fall around 50. Two-thirds of this number would be approximately 33. However, considering that we're dealing with humans, not everyone will guess as high as 100, knowing that the goal is to achieve 2/3 of the average. So it's rational to expect the average to be somewhat less than 50 though, maybe around 30-40. Therefore, 2/3 of that average would be around 20-26. It's also valid to consider that some people may employ the same strategy and guess that range, bringing the average lower. Therefore, to consider all these factors, my strategic guess would be a bit lower than 20, say around 18.\",\n \"guess\": 18\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065542,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 176,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 292,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE292
93
2025-10-22T01:52:41.65681933openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00The first thing to consider is that if everyone selects a number randomly between 0 and 100, the average will likely fall somewhere near 50. No one will guess higher than 100, so the average can't go beyond that. Two-thirds of 50 is approximately 33, so that might be a good first guess. However, considering you're playing against humans who also want to win, they might use the same logic and guess around 33. This means the new average becomes 33 and two-thirds of 33 is around 22. Assuming others may also think this way, they might guess around 22, further lowering the average. Therefore, some iterative thinking is needed. If you continue this process a few times, your guess should ideally settle to a number slightly over zero. Following this logic of iterative elimination, players will continue guessing smaller numbers, but since the number can't be lower than 0, the safest guess might be surprisingly small.
{
"reasoning": "The first thing to consider is that if everyone selects a number randomly between 0 and 100, the average will likely fall somewhere near 50. No one will guess higher than 100, so the average can't go beyond that. Two-thirds of 50 is approximately 33, so that might be a good first guess. However, considering you're playing against humans who also want to win, they might use the same logic and guess around 33. This means the new average becomes 33 and two-thirds of 33 is around 22. Assuming others may also think this way, they might guess around 22, further lowering the average. Therefore, some iterative thinking is needed. If you continue this process a few times, your guess should ideally settle to a number slightly over zero. Following this logic of iterative elimination, players will continue guessing smaller numbers, but since the number can't be lower than 0, the safest guess might be surprisingly small.",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9t0kNueart20NEvFNisOKzC4Q7b",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"The first thing to consider is that if everyone selects a number randomly between 0 and 100, the average will likely fall somewhere near 50. No one will guess higher than 100, so the average can't go beyond that. Two-thirds of 50 is approximately 33, so that might be a good first guess. However, considering you're playing against humans who also want to win, they might use the same logic and guess around 33. This means the new average becomes 33 and two-thirds of 33 is around 22. Assuming others may also think this way, they might guess around 22, further lowering the average. Therefore, some iterative thinking is needed. If you continue this process a few times, your guess should ideally settle to a number slightly over zero. Following this logic of iterative elimination, players will continue guessing smaller numbers, but since the number can't be lower than 0, the safest guess might be surprisingly small.\",\n \"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065550,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 210,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 326,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE326
94
2025-10-22T01:52:51.03440034openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE20.00The game prompts a player to attempt to outwit others by guessing a number that is 2/3 of the average guess of all participants. The highest possible average is 100 (the limit of guesses), making the highest possible target 2/3 of 100, or approximately 66.7. Hence, no one should rationally guess a number over 66.7, since it would impossibly be 2/3 of the average. If we apply the same reasoning again, players should guess 2/3 of 66.7, which is approximately 44.4. Further iterations would bring this number down gradually. If everyone thinks similarly and iteratively reduces their guesses, the final answer should theoretically converge to 0. However, considering not everyone might make the same deductions or react at the same rate, as some players might not follow such logical patterns, a more prudent guess might be around 20.
{
"reasoning": "The game prompts a player to attempt to outwit others by guessing a number that is 2/3 of the average guess of all participants. The highest possible average is 100 (the limit of guesses), making the highest possible target 2/3 of 100, or approximately 66.7. Hence, no one should rationally guess a number over 66.7, since it would impossibly be 2/3 of the average. If we apply the same reasoning again, players should guess 2/3 of 66.7, which is approximately 44.4. Further iterations would bring this number down gradually. If everyone thinks similarly and iteratively reduces their guesses, the final answer should theoretically converge to 0. However, considering not everyone might make the same deductions or react at the same rate, as some players might not follow such logical patterns, a more prudent guess might be around 20.",
"guess": "20"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9tC33ZAWeyyl031fNdbbmQNyLpt",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"The game prompts a player to attempt to outwit others by guessing a number that is 2/3 of the average guess of all participants. The highest possible average is 100 (the limit of guesses), making the highest possible target 2/3 of 100, or approximately 66.7. Hence, no one should rationally guess a number over 66.7, since it would impossibly be 2/3 of the average. If we apply the same reasoning again, players should guess 2/3 of 66.7, which is approximately 44.4. Further iterations would bring this number down gradually. If everyone thinks similarly and iteratively reduces their guesses, the final answer should theoretically converge to 0. However, considering not everyone might make the same deductions or react at the same rate, as some players might not follow such logical patterns, a more prudent guess might be around 20.\",\n \"guess\": \"20\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065562,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 203,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 319,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE319
95
2025-10-22T01:52:59.06496835openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE23.00First, assuming that all players are completely rational and choose randomly, the average choice would be 50, making 2/3 of the average 33.33. But if I think everyone else will guess around 33.33 and choose a number that is 2/3 of that, it averages out to 22.22. This process can be repeated, but it values keep decreasing until they reach 0. However, since I'm playing against humans, not all players will analyze the game deeply. Therefore, a strategy that could have higher success would be to estimate between 20 to 25. While some other players will overestimate, the majority will probably also reason this out to approximately this range.
{
"reasoning": "First, assuming that all players are completely rational and choose randomly, the average choice would be 50, making 2/3 of the average 33.33. But if I think everyone else will guess around 33.33 and choose a number that is 2/3 of that, it averages out to 22.22. This process can be repeated, but it values keep decreasing until they reach 0. However, since I'm playing against humans, not all players will analyze the game deeply. Therefore, a strategy that could have higher success would be to estimate between 20 to 25. While some other players will overestimate, the majority will probably also reason this out to approximately this range.",
"guess": "23"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9tL4Dyt5UP1QkVJXOnHqAKhhd0S",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"First, assuming that all players are completely rational and choose randomly, the average choice would be 50, making 2/3 of the average 33.33. But if I think everyone else will guess around 33.33 and choose a number that is 2/3 of that, it averages out to 22.22. This process can be repeated, but it values keep decreasing until they reach 0. However, since I'm playing against humans, not all players will analyze the game deeply. Therefore, a strategy that could have higher success would be to estimate between 20 to 25. While some other players will overestimate, the majority will probably also reason this out to approximately this range.\",\n\"guess\": \"23\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065571,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 158,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 274,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE274
96
2025-10-22T01:53:07.14186936openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE14.81First, it is important to note that if all players acted completely randomly, the average would be 50. Hence, 2/3 of that average would be 33.33. However, if we assume individuals we are playing against adopt some level of strategic thinking, we can suppose that they may also guess 33.33 as their initial strategy. Now, considering this, our optimal response to these guesses would be to guess 2/3 of 33.33, which is approximately 22.22. However, this process of rational deduction can be taken to further steps, leading to lower and lower estimates, and ultimately driving the optimal guess towards 0. However, the assumption that all people you play against will think this way is quite strong. It is more likely that people may stop after few steps of rational deduction. Therefore, a realistic guess might be 2/3 of 22.22, which is approximately 14.81.
{
"reasoning": "First, it is important to note that if all players acted completely randomly, the average would be 50. Hence, 2/3 of that average would be 33.33. However, if we assume individuals we are playing against adopt some level of strategic thinking, we can suppose that they may also guess 33.33 as their initial strategy. Now, considering this, our optimal response to these guesses would be to guess 2/3 of 33.33, which is approximately 22.22. However, this process of rational deduction can be taken to further steps, leading to lower and lower estimates, and ultimately driving the optimal guess towards 0. However, the assumption that all people you play against will think this way is quite strong. It is more likely that people may stop after few steps of rational deduction. Therefore, a realistic guess might be 2/3 of 22.22, which is approximately 14.81.",
"guess": 14.81
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9tTRhcNBV0TaRTBig8Kco9ZnpNo",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"First, it is important to note that if all players acted completely randomly, the average would be 50. Hence, 2/3 of that average would be 33.33. However, if we assume individuals we are playing against adopt some level of strategic thinking, we can suppose that they may also guess 33.33 as their initial strategy. Now, considering this, our optimal response to these guesses would be to guess 2/3 of 33.33, which is approximately 22.22. However, this process of rational deduction can be taken to further steps, leading to lower and lower estimates, and ultimately driving the optimal guess towards 0. However, the assumption that all people you play against will think this way is quite strong. It is more likely that people may stop after few steps of rational deduction. Therefore, a realistic guess might be 2/3 of 22.22, which is approximately 14.81.\",\n \"guess\": 14.81\n}\n",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065579,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 211,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 327,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE327
97
2025-10-22T01:53:14.57511437openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00The first step in reasoning would be to assume everyone else will guess randomly between 0 and 100, making the average guess around 50. Therefore, my first attempt would be to guess 2/3 of 50, which is approximately 33. However, other players might also think this way and guess around 33 which would decrease the average. So, my second guess would be 2/3 of 33 which is approximately 22. This process of iteratively pondering about what others might be thinking and adjusting the guess based on that is called 'iterated elimination of weakly dominated strategies'. As we continue this process, the guesses are likely to converge to around zero if all players are highly rational and beings of pure logic. However, considering we're playing against humans who are not perfectly rational, our guess might not converge to zero. Considering the human factor of not going all the way to zero, I would guess a small value slightly bigger than zero.
{
"reasoning": "The first step in reasoning would be to assume everyone else will guess randomly between 0 and 100, making the average guess around 50. Therefore, my first attempt would be to guess 2/3 of 50, which is approximately 33. However, other players might also think this way and guess around 33 which would decrease the average. So, my second guess would be 2/3 of 33 which is approximately 22. This process of iteratively pondering about what others might be thinking and adjusting the guess based on that is called 'iterated elimination of weakly dominated strategies'. As we continue this process, the guesses are likely to converge to around zero if all players are highly rational and beings of pure logic. However, considering we're playing against humans who are not perfectly rational, our guess might not converge to zero. Considering the human factor of not going all the way to zero, I would guess a small value slightly bigger than zero.",

"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9tb132kwuc3SKcwnepXSAa0Z46U",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"The first step in reasoning would be to assume everyone else will guess randomly between 0 and 100, making the average guess around 50. Therefore, my first attempt would be to guess 2/3 of 50, which is approximately 33. However, other players might also think this way and guess around 33 which would decrease the average. So, my second guess would be 2/3 of 33 which is approximately 22. This process of iteratively pondering about what others might be thinking and adjusting the guess based on that is called 'iterated elimination of weakly dominated strategies'. As we continue this process, the guesses are likely to converge to around zero if all players are highly rational and beings of pure logic. However, considering we're playing against humans who are not perfectly rational, our guess might not converge to zero. Considering the human factor of not going all the way to zero, I would guess a small value slightly bigger than zero.\",\n\n\"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065587,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 210,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 326,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE326
98
2025-10-22T01:53:21.38803638openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE23.00The strategy behind 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game is iterative elimination and prediction. If everyone is rational and knows that everyone else is rational, then no one should guess above 66.66 (2/3 of 100), as you are trying to guess 2/3 of the average guess everyone made. Preliminarily, you could guess 44.44 (2/3 of 66.66). However, knowing this, no one should guess above 44.44, the optimal guess would then be 29.63 (2/3 of 44.44). This continues until the guesses narrow down towards 0. However, since we are playing against humans who might not know these strategies, it's better to aim a little bit higher while still being in the 'lower' range of possibilities. Therefore, a guess of about 22-25 seems reasonable, as it balances the iterative elimination logic against potential human unpredictability.
{
"reasoning": "The strategy behind 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game is iterative elimination and prediction. If everyone is rational and knows that everyone else is rational, then no one should guess above 66.66 (2/3 of 100), as you are trying to guess 2/3 of the average guess everyone made. Preliminarily, you could guess 44.44 (2/3 of 66.66). However, knowing this, no one should guess above 44.44, the optimal guess would then be 29.63 (2/3 of 44.44). This continues until the guesses narrow down towards 0. However, since we are playing against humans who might not know these strategies, it's better to aim a little bit higher while still being in the 'lower' range of possibilities. Therefore, a guess of about 22-25 seems reasonable, as it balances the iterative elimination logic against potential human unpredictability."
,
"guess": 23
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9tjEDgG5KSzA5mZiS6q2L1oJJAw",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"The strategy behind 'Guess 2/3 of the Average' game is iterative elimination and prediction. If everyone is rational and knows that everyone else is rational, then no one should guess above 66.66 (2/3 of 100), as you are trying to guess 2/3 of the average guess everyone made. Preliminarily, you could guess 44.44 (2/3 of 66.66). However, knowing this, no one should guess above 44.44, the optimal guess would then be 29.63 (2/3 of 44.44). This continues until the guesses narrow down towards 0. However, since we are playing against humans who might not know these strategies, it's better to aim a little bit higher while still being in the 'lower' range of possibilities. Therefore, a guess of about 22-25 seems reasonable, as it balances the iterative elimination logic against potential human unpredictability.\"\n, \n\"guess\": 23\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065595,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 212,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 328,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE328
99
2025-10-22T01:53:31.11828839openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE1.00Typically, if all players were to guess randomly, the average would be about 50, which would make 2/3rds of the average about 33. But since everyone is trying to guess 2/3rds of the average and everyone knows that everyone else is trying to guess 2/3rds of the average, all players will guess lower than 50. Let's say everyone guesses 33, which would make the new average about 22 (which is 2/3rds of 33). Again, since everyone knows that everyone else is trying to outsmart each other, they might guess even lower than 22. This iterative process might go on until everyone guesses close to 0. To maximize the chances of winning, being one step ahead of others is vital. Hence, my guess will be 1, which is slightly above 0 (2/3rds of the average, if all people guess 0).
{
"reasoning": "Typically, if all players were to guess randomly, the average would be about 50, which would make 2/3rds of the average about 33. But since everyone is trying to guess 2/3rds of the average and everyone knows that everyone else is trying to guess 2/3rds of the average, all players will guess lower than 50. Let's say everyone guesses 33, which would make the new average about 22 (which is 2/3rds of 33). Again, since everyone knows that everyone else is trying to outsmart each other, they might guess even lower than 22. This iterative process might go on until everyone guesses close to 0. To maximize the chances of winning, being one step ahead of others is vital. Hence, my guess will be 1, which is slightly above 0 (2/3rds of the average, if all people guess 0).",
"guess": "1"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9tp8Wi0QunfLqpo9liLusa9Aqfo",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n\"reasoning\": \"Typically, if all players were to guess randomly, the average would be about 50, which would make 2/3rds of the average about 33. But since everyone is trying to guess 2/3rds of the average and everyone knows that everyone else is trying to guess 2/3rds of the average, all players will guess lower than 50. Let's say everyone guesses 33, which would make the new average about 22 (which is 2/3rds of 33). Again, since everyone knows that everyone else is trying to outsmart each other, they might guess even lower than 22. This iterative process might go on until everyone guesses close to 0. To maximize the chances of winning, being one step ahead of others is vital. Hence, my guess will be 1, which is slightly above 0 (2/3rds of the average, if all people guess 0).\",\n\"guess\": \"1\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065601,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 211,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 327,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE327
100
2025-10-22T01:53:37.26199940openaigpt-4A_baseline1TRUE20.00If everybody else is guessing randomly between 0 and 100, the average of all guesses would be around 50, making 2/3 of the average around 33. However, considering that all participants are strategic and aiming for 2/3 of the average, the initial average (50) will likely end up lower. If all players are guessing 33, 2/3 of this is about 22. This thought process could theoretically continue indefinitely, with each subsequent guess being 2/3 of the previous. However, it is unlikely every participant would consider this and guess incrementally lower. A reasonable, strategic guess, then, would be somewhere in the 15-25 range.
{
"reasoning": "If everybody else is guessing randomly between 0 and 100, the average of all guesses would be around 50, making 2/3 of the average around 33. However, considering that all participants are strategic and aiming for 2/3 of the average, the initial average (50) will likely end up lower. If all players are guessing 33, 2/3 of this is about 22. This thought process could theoretically continue indefinitely, with each subsequent guess being 2/3 of the previous. However, it is unlikely every participant would consider this and guess incrementally lower. A reasonable, strategic guess, then, would be somewhere in the 15-25 range.",

"guess": "20"
}
{
"id": "chatcmpl-CT9tzzBFK2UJ5f8yxyNByaPiu7RaK",
"choices": [
{
"finish_reason": "stop",
"index": 0,
"logprobs": null,
"message": {
"content": "{\n \"reasoning\": \"If everybody else is guessing randomly between 0 and 100, the average of all guesses would be around 50, making 2/3 of the average around 33. However, considering that all participants are strategic and aiming for 2/3 of the average, the initial average (50) will likely end up lower. If all players are guessing 33, 2/3 of this is about 22. This thought process could theoretically continue indefinitely, with each subsequent guess being 2/3 of the previous. However, it is unlikely every participant would consider this and guess incrementally lower. A reasonable, strategic guess, then, would be somewhere in the 15-25 range.\",\n\n \"guess\": \"20\"\n}",
"refusal": null,
"role": "assistant",
"annotations": [],
"audio": null,
"function_call": null,
"tool_calls": null
}
}
],
"created": 1761065611,
"model": "gpt-4-0613",
"object": "chat.completion",
"service_tier": "default",
"system_fingerprint": null,
"usage": {
"completion_tokens": 158,
"prompt_tokens": 116,
"total_tokens": 274,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"accepted_prediction_tokens": 0,
"audio_tokens": 0,
"reasoning_tokens": 0,
"rejected_prediction_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"audio_tokens": 0,
"cached_tokens": 0
}
}
}
TRUE274