ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBEBFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBNBOBP
1
Seapark Apartments
2
Date25 Oct 1978198028 Mar 198031 May 199722 Apr 200018 Sept 200412 Aug 2006Between Aug 2006 and Jun 200714 Jun 200731 Jul 200721 Jan 200818 Feb 201327 Feb 201320 Mar 201319 Apr 201324 Jul 201325 Jul 201327 Jul 201330 Jul 20131 Aug 201310 Sept 20131 Oct 201327 Nov 20136 Nov 201410 Feb 201525, 28, 29 May 201518 Jan 20161 Mar 201624 Jun 20164 Jul 20163 Jan 201710 Jul 201721 Nov 201722 Dec 201715 Mar 201818 Mar 201813 Apr-26 Jun30 Jul 20197 Jun 2022
3
EventS.E.A. Housing Corporation Sdn Bhd (SHC) issued developer's license ref 991/10/78(10)SHC develops Sea Park ApartmentsS.E.A Housing Corporation Sdn Bhd obtains advertising permit ref 45/139/81(3)

Brochure reads: The SEA Park Apartments are in an almost enclosed area with ample parking lots..."

However S&P reads: The expression "the common areas" of the said Land and the said Block shall exclude all areas reserved and/or designated as parking areas for motor vehicles which areas shall remain the property of the company...		Application for subdivision of the 6 plots for 6 apartment blocks approvedStrata titles issued and registeredSHC's lawyers (KB Ong) writes letter to all owners offering sale of "car-park lands" for RM1.32m. SHC will contribute a sum for repainting, and assume responsibilty for outstanding debtsSeapark Apartment AGM, where carparks were offered for sale to owners, at RM6,050/bay (RM5,000 price + RM1,050 legal fees)

Resolution passed to appoint Block A MC to purchase disputed lands, and provide easements		Some residents disagree to the transaction of the carparks. Some insist the car parks should be part and parcel of the units they purchased (oral history, Annie Loo), some disagreed with the transaction process where Block A MC is the purchaser who will then sell it on and provide easement to the other blocks (Joint MC Council meeting, 5 Jan 2010).SHC's solicitors sends letter to MC solicitors noting non-completion of sale of disputed lands, and increases car park rental from RM30 to RM120.

States intention to sell to third party if no response wthin 30 days.		SHC sends letter to MCs of all blocks, offering disputed lands and one apartment unit (used as MC office), for sale to all MCs at RM840,000SHC sells disputed lands + one apartment unit to Yap Say Tee (YST), for RM250,000 + RM150,000

(Borang 14A signed by SHC on 16 Jan 2008, signed by YST on 25 Jan 2008)		News report in The Star - Notice from law firm put up around the disputed lands, asking residents to vacate the parking lots.YST files saman pemula seeking the return of the disputed lands to him, permission to evict anyone and anything, assistance of police if necessary, costs and relief.Lau Weng San press con with JMCCourt order allowing YST to evictApprox. 300 owners file police report against YST, after "his gang" started stopping cars to ask owners for payment for trespassingCounsel for MC Wallace Wong files stay of execution of court orderExcavators brought in to dig up car parks

Date from Seapark Apartment MC's own notes, also from Afidavit sokongan kedua defendan-defendan		Judge grants stay of execution until next hearingYST hold press con at Seapark police stationYST's suit succeeds at Shah Alam High Court. Court orders costs RM2,000 paid by each of the three deponents.Residents application to strike out YST's suit succeeds.Court rules against striking out application by YSTSometime here MCs filed suit against SHC, YST and PendaftarSHC filed to strike out the caseSHC's application to strike out grantedAppeal against High Court decision by MCs dismissed.MC's appeal against SHC's application to strike out successful.MC's appeal against SHC's application to strike out successful.Court rules against Seapark Apartment MCs. Declares YST as registered and beneficial owner of the disputed lands, orders them surrendered to him. Also orders compensation for loss of use from 21 Jan 2008 until the date of surrender, with 4% interest per year from the date of the order (24 Jun) until resolution, along with costs amounting to RM30,000 to SHC (1st defendant), RM50,000 to YST (2nd defendant), and 30,000 to Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Selangor (3rd defendant).MCs file notice of appeal against High Court decisionSometime here MCs filed appealMC's appeal against High Court decision fails in court of appeal. MCs decide to appeal to Federal CourtSometime here, Federal Court appeal fails.YST's daughter Cecilia claims residents unwilling to meet to resolveShah Alam High Court order to surrender the 4 disputed parcels of land and unit B101YST obtains court order, deadline on this day for cars to be removed. Residents demonstrate.Residents complain that thugs "extorting" them for moneyResidents complain that they are forced to leave rubbish outside homes because communal bins removed.Case management for compensationResidents asking govt intervention as YST sued for RM8mil in compensation. Court order to garnishee banks to pay MCs, to pay YST.
4
LinkAssessment of Damages, by Knight FrankAssessment of Damages, by Knight FrankAssessment of Damages, by Knight FrankJudgement, Civil suit no 21NCV-32-08/2014, Pg.11Judgement, Civil suit no 21NCV-32-08/2014, Pg.11Ikatan dokumen bersama Jilid I, Pg 59 & 60Assessment of Damages, by Knight Frank - Appendix LAnnie Loo
Minutes of Joint MC Council Meeting, 5 Jan 2010		Assessment of Damages, by Knight Frank - Appendix MAssessment of Damages, by Knight Frank - Appendix MJudgement, Civil suit no 21NCV-32-08/2014, Pg.6 Saman pemula no. 24-304-02/2013, Jilid 4 exhibit, in affidavit sokongan CCYY-1, Pg 0832https://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2013/03/20/parking-poser-for-apartment-folk/https://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2013/08/01/landowner-tells-his-side-of-the-storyhttps://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2013/07/30/uproar-over-parking-lot/

Afidavit sokongan kedua defendan-defendan, Jilid 4 exhibit, in affidavit sokongan CCYY-1, Pg 0835		https://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2013/08/01/landowner-tells-his-side-of-the-storyhttps://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/court-rules-favour-seapark-apartments-residentsJudgement, Civil suit no 21NCV-32-08/2014https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/community/2017/07/10/carpark-dispute-at-sea-park-apartment-drags-on

Accessible here:
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4353312		https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/345540/sea-park-apartment-parking-lot-war-residents-now-claim-thugs-extortinghttps://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/346650/sea-park-apartment-residents-raise-stink-over-poorly-placed-rubbish-binshttps://www.sinchew.com.my/?p=2946487Pelaksanaan no: BA-37G-58-05/2022
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100