MUN Delegate Scoring Rubric - (in Atlas)
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEF
1
MUN DELEGATE EVALUATION SHEET - Pre-Conference
2
Delegate Name:
3
CATEGORYExemplary (7)Proficient (5)Developing (3)Emerging (1)IE
4
Knowledge & Understanding - Formatting of Conference Documents
5
Policy Statement FORMATPolicy statement is completely written in proper formatPolicy statement mostly follows proper format with a small errorPolicy statement has a couple of formatting errors.Several formatting errors in policy statementNo policy statement submitted or submitted incomplete.
6
Clause FORMATAll clauses written in proper formatProper format is mostly followed.A few problems with formatting of clauses.Several formatting errors in clausesNo operative clauses submitted or submtted incomplete.
7
Communication - Written
8
Written Policy Statement Policy statement is well written with excellent word choice. Evidence of thoughtful writingPolicy statement is nicely written. Some places where more thought could be demonstrated.Policy statement is basic. Understandable, but not much more.Policy statement does not meet requirements. Poor writing demonstrated.No policy statement submitted or submtted incomplete.
9
Clarity of position (written Policy Statement)Delegate's stated position is perfectly clearDelegate's stated position is pretty clearDelegate's stated position is fairly clear.Delegate's stated position is difficult to determine.No policy statement submitted or submtted incomplete.
10
Clarity of written clausesDelegate's purpose / goal is perfectly clear in each clause.Delegate's purpose / goal is primarily clear in each clause.Delegate's purpose / goal in clauses is clear with some questions.Delegate's purposes / goals in clauses are confusing.No operative clauses submitted or submtted incomplete.
11
Transfer of Learning
12
M.SS2.8 Analyze the causes of significant current and historical events and/or global issuesDelegate's stated position indicates thorough understanding of the issue and supports country's real stanceDelegate's stated position indicates understanding of the issue and mostly supports country's real stanceDelegate's stated postion indicates some understanding of the issue and is a mix of realistic and non-realistic stances.Delegate's stated position demonstrates lack of understanding of the issue and is primarily the opposite of country's real stanceNo policy statement submitted or submtted incomplete.
13
SSIL M.SS2.10 Propose solutions to current and global issuesDelegate has submitted clauses that are practical and demonstrate thorough knowledge of topic.Delegate has submitted clauses that are mostly practical and show a good overall knowledge of topic.Delegate's clauses are a mixture of practical and impractical. Needs to understand topic better.Delegate's clauses are more impractical than practical. Limited knowledge of topic shown in clauses.No operative clauses submitted or submtted incomplete.
14
15
16
17
MUN DELEGATE EVALUATION SHEET - Conference
18
CATEGORYExemplary (7)Proficient (5)Developing (3)Emerging (1)IE
19
Communication - Speaking
20
Voice clarity / volumeDelegate speaks with an easily understood voice and can be easily heard.Delegate is usually easy to hear and understand.A few problems with voice clarity, but can be understood.Lack of voice clarity makes it difficult to understand delegate.Delegate did not speak
21
Eye-contactDelegate did an excellent job of making eye-contact with entire delegation.Delegate did a good job of making eye-contact with entire delegationDelegate made some eye contact, but was limited to certain areas of delegation.Delegate rarely looked at delegation while speaking.Delegate did not speak
22
Transfer
23
Logical ThinkingDelegate did an outstanding job of supporting / opposing clauses with logical thought and evidence.Delegate did a good job of supporting / opposing clauses with logical thought and evidence.Delegate demonstrated some logic in supporting / opposing clauses, but had difficulty with logic at times.Delegate had difficulty developing logical support or opposition to clauses.Delegate did not speak in this manner.
24
QuestioningDelegate demonstrated excellent skills in questioning speakersDelegate demonstrated good skills in questioning speakersDelegate raised good points to speakers, but had some difficulty expressing self clearly.Delegate had difficulty forming questions in a clear manner.Delegate did not speak in this manner.
25
Knowledge & Understanding - Parliamentary ProcedureDelegate demonstrated complete understanding of rules of Parliamentary procedure.Delegate followed most parliamentary procedure rules correctlyDelegate demonstrated some knowledge of Parliamentary procedure while struggling with other rules.Delegate did not seem to understand most of the rules of Parliamentary procedure.Delegate did not speak
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
CATEGORYExemplary (7)Proficient (5)Developing (3)Emerging (1)IE
42
Communication - Speaking
43
Voice clarity / volumeDelegate speaks with an easily understood voice and can be easily heard.Delegate is usually easy to hear and understand.A few problems with voice clarity, but can be understood.Lack of voice clarity makes it difficult to understand delegate.Delegate did not speak
44
Eye-contactDelegate did an excellent job of making eye-contact with entire delegation.Delegate did a good job of making eye-contact with entire delegationDelegate made some eye contact, but was limited to certain areas of delegation.Delegate rarely looked at delegation while speaking.Delegate did not speak
45
46
47
48
49
CATEGORYExemplary (7)Proficient (5)Developing (3)Emerging (1)IE
50
Communication - Speaking
51
Voice clarity / volumeDelegate speaks with an easily understood voice and can be easily heard.Delegate is usually easy to hear and understand.A few problems with voice clarity, but can be understood.Lack of voice clarity makes it difficult to understand delegate.Delegate did not speak
52
Eye-contactDelegate did an excellent job of making eye-contact with entire delegation.Delegate did a good job of making eye-contact with entire delegationDelegate made some eye contact, but was limited to certain areas of delegation.Delegate rarely looked at delegation while speaking.Delegate did not speak
53
54
55
56
57
CATEGORYExemplary (7)Proficient (5)Developing (3)Emerging (1)IE
58
Communication - Speaking
59
Voice clarity / volumeDelegate speaks with an easily understood voice and can be easily heard.Delegate is usually easy to hear and understand.A few problems with voice clarity, but can be understood.Lack of voice clarity makes it difficult to understand delegate.Delegate did not speak
60
Eye-contactDelegate did an excellent job of making eye-contact with entire delegation.Delegate did a good job of making eye-contact with entire delegationDelegate made some eye contact, but was limited to certain areas of delegation.Delegate rarely looked at delegation while speaking.Delegate did not speak
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet1
Sheet2
Sheet3