rubric_WritAssgnt3A_msp-530_jan12
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Written Assignment 3A (first part)
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
CompletenessStudent addresses all elements in the assignment and is of the prescribed lengthStudent addresses most of elements in the assignment and is of the prescribed lengthStudent addresses some elements in the assignment; may be less than the prescribed lengthAssignment is incomplete in most respects; does not address elements of the assignment or meet the length requirement
5
Critical thinkingStudent demonstrates a sophisticated critical evaluation of the effects of NEPA actions on the environment.Student demonstrates an accomplished critical evaluation of the effects of NEPA actions on the environmentStudent demonstrates an acceptable critical evaluation of the effects of NEPA actions on the environmentStudent demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the effects of NEPA actions on the environment
6
Explanation and examplesStudent provides more than one excellent example of the difficulties of forecasting impactsYStudent provides at least one excellent example of the difficulties of forecasting impactsStudent recognizes the difficulties of forecasting impacts but does not support this recognition with a useful exampleStudent fails to consider the difficulty of forecasting impacts
7
Total:
8
Copyright © 2012 by Thomas Edison State College. All rights reserved.
9
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
10
Scale: 12 = A (93–100); 11 = A– (90–92); 10 = B+ (88–89); 9 = B (83–87); 8 = B–
(80–82); 7 = C+ (78–79); 6 = C (72–77); 5 = C– (70–71); 2–4 = D (60–69); 0–1 = F
(below 60).
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Loading...
 
 
 
Rubric for Online Discussions