Account Options>

  1. Sign in
Rubric for Action Research Project
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Action Research Project
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
ReflectionComplete in all respects; reflection is written in first person and contains required informationComplete reflection in most respectsReflection lacking in some respectsReflection lacking in most respects with incomplete entries
5
Literature reviewRelates literature review clearly to the focus of study and exhibits seamless synthesis with logical transitionsRelates literature review to focus of study and exhibits synthesis with logical transitionsRelates literature review loosely to study and exhibits some synthesis and transitionsRelates literature review minimally to study and lacks synthesis and transitions
6
PurposeContains well articulated purpose with clearly stated primary and secondary questionsContains purpose and primary and secondary questionsContains unclear purpose and minimal articulation of primary and secondary questionsDoes not contains a purpose statement
7
Setting/ParticipantsDescribes setting and participants in engaging detailDescribes setting and participantsDescribes setting and participants in minimal detailDoes not describe setting or participants
8
InterventionDocuments intervention using detailed descriptionDocuments intervention using some descriptionDocuments intervention with little descriptionDoes not document intervention
9
Data collectionEvidences multiple forms of data collection with clear explanation in appendixEvidences several forms of data collection with explanation in appendixEvidences data collection with some explanation in appendixDoes not evidence data collection or explanation in appendix
10
ValidityExplains methods to increase validity in detailExplains methods to increase validityExplains methods with limited detailDoes not explain methods to increase validity
11
Results of studyProvides results from multiple and appropriate forms of dataProvides results from dataProvides minimal results from some dataDoes not provide evidence of results from data
12
ConclusionsDescribes conclusions clearly with elaboration on future plansDescribes conclusions with some elaboration on future plansDescribes conclusions minimally with no future plans explainedDoes not describe conclusions
13
General--APA useUses APA accurately and consistentlyUses APA with minor violationsUses APA inconsistentlyDoes not use APA
14
Total:
15
Copyright © 2013 by Thomas Edison State College. All rights reserved.
16
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
17
Scale: 37–40 = A (93–100); 36 = A– (90–92); 34–35 = B+ (88–89); 28–33 = B (83–87); 26–27 = B– (80–82); 24–25 = C+ (78–79); 18–23 = C (73–77); 16–17 = C– (70–72); 8–15 = D (60–69); 0–7 = F (below 60).
Loading...
 
 
 
Rubric for Final Paper