A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Goal: an at-a-glance view of studies that measured impact of OER or OEP and what those measures are | Guidelines open to anybody to add to the list. If you want to add a column or add more detail feel free to make a copy of the Workbook and share back | Note: Currently unsorted but as list grows I may separate into different sheets | Why: I'm interested in the range of types of impact measures and the frequency of which they occur. I'm not an expert in impact measurement and would like to understand this better for application in my own context. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | authors and year | Unit measured | What it's about | How impact measured | URL | contributer | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Pitt et al 2013 | OER - courses | completion, persistence, mastery between all students and low income | 1. educator views on learner performance. 2. learner survey responses while students used the course materials.3., an analysis of student performance data in instances where students were studying formal assessed courses either alongside, or after using, the open course material from Bridge to Success. | https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1034706.pdf | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Otago Polytechnic | OEP (at institutional level) | the strongest indication of the benefit is expressed in the return on investment (ROI). This is calculated by gains in: 1.branding awareness 2. educational resource quality 3. savings in IT infrastructure costs. | https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Open_Education_Practices:_A_User_Guide_for_Organisations/Measuring_Open_Education | @tanbob | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Weller et al 2015 | OER | impact on teaching and learning practice | via 11 hypotheses | https://oro.open.ac.uk/44963/1/227-1106-2-PB-3.pdf | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Open ED Group | OER | framework -approach to studying the impact of open educational resources (like open textbooks) and open pedagogy | Cost, outcomes, usage, perceptions | https://openedgroup.org/coup | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Ross et al 2018 | OER-textbooks | student views and completion rates | student views of quality and purchasing; course grades and completion rates | https://www.openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPraxis/article/view/892 | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Fischer et al 2015 | OER-textbooks | comparing students who use OER and not | 1. course completion 2. course grade C- or better 3. course grade 4. number of credits taken in given semester | http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Grimaldi et al 2019 | OER | methodological issues in OER studies | access hypothesis: when access rates are high, impact of OER intervention will be lower.Important consideration in impact research. | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212508 | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Hilton et al 2016 | OER-textbooks | course throughput | drop rates, withdrawal rates, and C or better rates. | http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2686 | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Colvard et al, 2018 | OER-textbooks | impact of course level facutly adoption of OER | 1.student academic performance via evaluating final grades and DFW (D, F, and withdrawal letter grades) rates 2) lower socio economic (Pell Grant) vs non Pell grant 3) student performance of underserved populations when a free OER textbook is used instead of a traditional textbook. | http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3386.pdf | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Conole and Brown, 2018 | open ed movement | reflection paper on impact on learning, teaching and research | no measures, summary/reflection | http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/314 | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Wiley et al, 2016 | OER - Z degree | sustaining adoption of OER | there are real costs to adopting OER. INTRO model (for sustaining OER adoption).INcreased Tuition Revenue through OER. Enrollments and drops in Z vs Non Z courses | http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1828 | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Jhangiani et al, 2018 | OER-textbooks | open digital vs open print comparison | perceptions, use, and course performance: performance on course exams ; student study habits ; students’ perception of quality ; students’ perceptions of a fair price ; students’ textbook format preferences | https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/cjsotl_rcacea/article/view/7032/5746 | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Jhangiani and Jhangiani, 2017 | OER-textbooks | perceptions, use and impact of open textbooks | textbook purchasing behaviours; Impact of Textbook Costs on Course Outcomes (course enrollment, persistance and grade); Use of Open Textbooks; perceptions of quality and features; | http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3012 | @tanbob | ||||||||||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Hoosen and Butcher, 2019 | [tbc...] | https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Understanding_the_impact_of_OER_2019_final.pdf | @cmplxtv_studies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Hodgkinson-Williams and Arinto, 2017 | [tbc...] | https://zenodo.org/record/1005330 | @cmplxtv_studies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Law, Perryman, and Law, 2013 | [tbc...] | http://oro.open.ac.uk/39102/ | @cmplxtv_studies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | Reich, 2015 [2011] | http://edutechdebate.org/oer-and-digital-divide/open-educational-resources-expand-educational-inequalities/ | @cmplxtv_studies | |||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | Clinton et al, 2019 | student learning open and commercial textbooks | student learning from, and perceptions of commercial vs open: Textbook Assessment and Usage Scale; validated questionnaire; | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2019.00110/full | @tanbob | |||||||||||||||||||||
22 | https://www.fasttrackimpact.com/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | https://www.slideshare.net/robertfarrow/shaping-open-practice-oer-research-impact-for-research-excellence-framework-2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | prasad | http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/2516/PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Pitt et al 2013 | open initiative | impact of an open initiative and problemetizing the methododlogy | impact on learners - educator perceptions of studnet performance ,student surveys, student performance data; see helpful model on p 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | kirkwood and price 2014 | TEL | meta-anaylsis of TEL - not impact directly but useful things to consider in lit review | lit review: . Efficiency – existing processes carried out in a more cost-effective, time- effective, sustainable or scalable manner. . Enhancement – improving existing processes and the outcomes. . Transformation – radical, positive change in existing processes or intro- ducing new processes. note diff stakeholders may be interested in differnt things | ||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | ATD report | ATD OER program- textbooks | academic and economic impacts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |