ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
NARRATIVE REPORT
2
3
#IndicatorEvidencePublic (Yes/No)OFFICERemarksRelated SDG
4
2.1Research on hunger
5
2.1.1Zero Hunger: CiteScore
This indicator measures the proportion of a university’s publications
appear in the top 10% of journals according to the Citescore metric.
It is intended to reflect on excellence of academic output.
This indicator is normalised and it is worth 10% of the score in this
SDG (equivalent to 2.6% of the overall score).
6
2.1.2 Zero hunger: FWCI
This indicator explores the quality of a university’s output in the area
of hunger research using the number of citations received as a metric.
This number is normalised by publication type (paper, review,
conference proceeding, book, or book chapter), by year of
publication, and by subject. Subjects are defined using Elsevier’s
ASJC classification.
This indicator is normalised and it is worth 10% of the score in this
SDG (equivalent to 2.6% of the overall score).
7
2.1.3 Zero hunger: publications
The number of publications looks at the scale of research output from
a university around hunger. It is not scaled by the size of the
institution – rather it looks at the overall impact.
This indicator is normalised and it is worth 7% of the score in this
SDG (equivalent to 1.82% of the overall score)
8
2.2Campus food waste
Food waste can occur at each level of the food production process:
production, handling and storage, processing, distribution and
consumption. Causes can also vary, but usually they are related to
inadequate market systems, in-proper transportation of fresh
products, production of excess food, too large quantities
purchased/displayed, large portion meals, attitude that disposing is
cheaper than re-using. This indicator measures the proportion of food
(metric ton) wasted/discarded per person on campus.

This metric is worth 15.4% of the score in this SDG (equivalent
to 4% of the overall score).

This metric relates to the UN Targets 2.1

This year’s approach will use two linked questions.
The first question (indicator 2.2.1: Campus food waste tracking)
confirms if a university is measuring food waste. If you do, we will
ask you to provide evidence.		https://www.butuan.gov.ph/%F0%9D%97%A6%F0%9D%97%96%F0%9D%97%A5%F0%9D%97%94%F0%9D%97%A3%F0%9D%97%96%F0%9D%97%AC%F0%9D%97%96%F0%9D%97%9F%F0%9D%97%98-%F0%9D%97%A3%F0%9D%97%9B-%F0%9D%97%A6%F0%9D%97%A8%F0%9D%97%A3%F0%9D%97%A2/Documents from TBI (MOA wd Scrapcycle)SDG 13
9
10
11
2.2.1Campus food waste tracking
Measure the amount of food waste generated
from food served within the university.
Up to three points based on:
• Existence of measurement – maximum of
one point for whole university, 0.5 for partial
measurement
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point
12
2.2.2 Indicator: Campus food waste
Year: 2024
The second question (indicator 2.2.2: Campus food waste) calculates
the food waste per person. These values will only be scored where
universities have indicated that they are measuring food waste across
the whole university.
This indicator is normalised and it is worth 7.7% of the score in this
SDG (equivalent to 2% of the overall score).
Cheaper AF (Junel Guigaguit)
Scrap Cycle (Ask TBI)
13
Total food waste
This is the total of food (metric ton)
that is discarded or lost uneaten by
all catering services on campus in the
year 2024.
14
Campus population
This is the sum of the FTE (Full Time
Equivalent) number of students and
the FTE number of employees in the
year 2024.		Campus PopulationNOHRMS
15
2.3Student hunger
Universities need to realise students at risk of being food insecure,
which means they do not have access to nutritious, affordable food.
There are a total of 12 points that could be gained from meeting the
criteria in this metric, 19.2% of the score in this SDG (equivalent to
5% of the overall score).
This metric and indicators relate to the UN Targets 2.2 and 2.C
16
2.3.1 Student food insecurity and hunger
Year: 2024
Have a programme in place on student food
insecurity.
Up to three points based on:
• Existence of programme – one point
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		UNDPYES - Posted in CSU Home PageCSUCC
17
2.3.2 Students hunger interventions.
Year: 2024
This indicator has been split into two indicators this
year: 2.3.2 Students hunger interventions and 2.3.5
Staff hunger interventions.
Provide interventions to prevent or alleviate
hunger among students (e.g. including supply
and access to food banks/pantries).
Up to three points based on:
• Provision of intervention – one point
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		Pause to Pass during Mid Term Exam
18
Pause to Pass Final ExamYES - Posted in CSU Home PageOCCS
19
2.3.3 Sustainable food choices on campus
Year: 2024
Provide sustainable food choices for all on
campus, including vegetarian and vegan food.
Up to three points based on:
• Existence of choices – maximum one point for
all food outlets, only 0.5 points for selected food
outlets
• Evidence provided – up to one point
Is the evidence provided public – one point		Sustainable food choicesNOUCHW
20
2.3.4 Healthy and affordable food choices
Year: 2024
Provide healthy and affordable food choices for
all on campus.
Up to three points based on:
• Existence of choices – maximum one point
for all food outlets, only 0.5 points for selected
food outlets
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		Healthy and Affordable food choicesNOUCHW
21
2.3.5 Staff hunger interventions
Year: 2024
Provide interventions to prevent or alleviate
hunger among members of staff (e.g. including
supply and access to food banks/pantries).
Up to three points based on:
• Provision of intervention – one point
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		Pause to Pass during Mid Term ExamYES - Posted in CSU Home PageOCCSThis activity is open to everyone. However, it is only available during the exam period. It aims to help and support students while they are taking their exams.
22
Pause to Pass Final Exam
23
2.4Proportion of graduates in agriculture and aquaculture
including sustainability aspects
Here we measure the proportion of total graduates who receive
a degree associated with any aspect of food sustainability within
an agricultural and aquaculture course.
This metric tries to capture whether an institution actively teaches
food sustainability within accredited undergraduate and
postgraduate agriculture and aquaculture courses.
This metric relates to the UN Targets 2.3.
This indicator is normalised and is worth 19.2% of the score in
this SDG (equivalent to 4.98% of the overall score).		LIKHA SUMMIT 2024YES - Posted in the CSU FB PageCSU
24
2.4.1 Indicator: Proportion of graduates in agriculture and aquaculture
Year: 2024
25
Number of graduates

This is the total headcount number
of graduates at all levels (ISCED 6,
7, or 8) from your institution in year
2024.
Graduates of all levels

NOOFFICE OF THE UNIVERSITY REGISTRAR
26
SANGHAYA 2024
27
Number of graduates from
agriculture and aquaculture
courses including
sustainability aspects

This is the total headcount number
of graduates at all levels (ISCED 6,
7, or 8) who were studying any
aspect of food sustainability within
an agricultural and aquaculture
course and successfully completed
the course in year 2024.
This is a subset of the total number
of graduates. (see guidance in PDF)		Graduates of AgricultureNOOFFICE OF THE UNIVERSITY REGISTRAR
28
2.5National hunger
A university’s effort against hunger aggregated at national level. Hunger
here is defined as a severe lack of food which causes suffering or death,
capturing the concept of food security.
There are a total of 12 points that could be gained from meeting
the criteria in this metric, worth 19.2% of the score in this SDG
(equivalent to 5% of the overall score).
This metric and indicators relate to the UN Targets 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5.		Pause to Pass during Mid Term Exam
29
Pause to Pass Final Exam
30
Startup CompetitionYES - Posted in CSU Home PageOCCS
31
2.5.1 Access to food security knowledge
Year: 2024
Provide access on food security and sustainable
agriculture and aquaculture knowledge, skills or
technology to local farmers and food producers.
Up to three points based on:
• Provision of access – maximum one point for
free, only 0.25 points for paid
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐝, 𝐒𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐢𝐫𝐰𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐬YES - Posted in the FB page CAA
32
2.5.2 Events for local farmers and food producers
Year: 2024
Provide events for local farmers and food
producers to connect and transfer knowledge.
Up to three points based on:
• Provision of events – maximum one point for
free, only 0.25 points for paid
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		AgriProd Seedling Distribution
33
AgriProd|Seedling Distribution
34
Extension Service | Training on Irrigated Lowland Rice Production and Management
35
LIKHA 2024YES - Posted in the FB page CAA
36
2.5.3 University access to local farmers and food
producers
Year: 2024
Provide access to university facilities (e.g.
labs, technology, plant stocks) to local farmers
and food producers to improve sustainable
farming practices.
Up to three points based on:
• Provision of access – maximum one point for
free, only 0.25 points for paid
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		Partnership with DA and CSU Butuan

YES - Posted in the FB page CSU
37
2.5.4 Sustainable food purchases
Year: 2024
Prioritise purchase of products from local,
sustainable sources.
Up to three points based on:
• Existence of prioritisation – one point
• Evidence provided – up to one point
• Is the evidence provided public – one point		CSUCC - RESEARCH COLLABORATIONYES - Posted in the FB page CSU
38
2.6Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Food SystemsCheaper AF (Alternative Farms Agriventure)
IECs: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12OTSaCYzYP5zWLfy5pGNyf_ETRXYJugb?usp=sharing
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/CheaperAF
YES - Posted in the FB page NAVIGATU
39
Blackgold Food Products:
IECs: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1xoXe7zZl6lXPJ4DemX_jmYQKkgxuyyFV
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/blackgoldfoodcorporation
40
ScrapCycle:
IECs: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/152QGH0VKWa6xDxt8dLhjNMAmOTXQS3G_
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/ScrapCycle.ph
MOA: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jmCDkzlMKwS2NvvwuiMtMgOfxxgSgmiK/view?usp=sharing
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100