| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Timestamp | Should we have more game reviews? | Would you be interested in more technical items? | Do you want more interviews? | What do you think about the frequency of posts? | How trustworthy is Game Maker Blog? | Do we cover things quickly when they happen? | How good is Game Maker Blog at breaking stories? | How well-written are the articles? | Did you listen to GMTalk? | Any other feedback? | What one thing could we do to improve the site? | Who are you? | Response to feedback | |||||||
2 | 2/7/2010 9:15:34 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Bit of a mix | Quite | Quite | Yes | Test! | Resolved | |||||||||
3 | 2/7/2010 17:35:16 | Yes | No | No | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Quite | Very | No, but I knew it existed | KEY: | Working towards | |||||||||
4 | 2/7/2010 17:37:10 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | More discussion of competitors | Rejected | |||||||||
5 | 2/7/2010 18:26:16 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Quite | Very | Quite | Yes | More opinion pieces to provoke debate about Game Maker, and it's community. | ||||||||||
6 | 2/7/2010 18:27:34 | Yes | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | You blokes are doing a great job. | ||||||||||
7 | 2/7/2010 18:28:44 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Bit of a mix | Quite | Very | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
8 | 2/7/2010 18:30:40 | No | No | No | More posts would be good | It's alright | Bit of a mix | Alright | It varies | Yes | Game Maker Blog would look better with a logo up top. | Have more than one person posting articles. Like I've seen more than one person posting... One person posting games, and the other GM News. But how about more people post both... So that more people will be posting the news as well as the reviews instead of 1 person posting news and 5 people posting reviews... O_O | Ideally more people would post articles! Perhaps I need to go on a recruitment drive but we don't want a free-for-all! Will consider a logo | ||||||||
9 | 2/7/2010 18:32:00 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | It's alright | Quite | Quite | Quite | No, never heard of it | |||||||||||
10 | 2/7/2010 18:45:48 | No | No | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | It's alright | Bit of a mix | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | Be more thorough in your posts. Several posts lack depth. For instance, when you post a graph about YoYo Games, analyze the trends. For instance how do they manage to have the upload bandwidth be half the download bandwidth. Does on average every uploaded game get 2 plays? Provide more info and analysis rather then just summarizing items. | Agreed. Where articles are preplanned I think this is done well but it is not the case for breaking news. | |||||||||
11 | 2/7/2010 18:49:28 | Yes | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Very | Very | Quite | Quite | Yes | Boop-boopity-boop. | Jazz everything up a bit. | |||||||||
12 | 2/7/2010 18:50:21 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Quite | Very | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | New GMA.. | Needs a total rewrite I know. Will probably look for a partner to work with on this | |||||||||
13 | 2/7/2010 18:55:13 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Bit of a mix | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
14 | 2/7/2010 19:01:29 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Very | Yes | |||||||||||
15 | 2/7/2010 19:01:32 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Very | It varies | Yes | |||||||||||
16 | 2/7/2010 19:09:15 | Yes | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Very | Quite | Very | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
17 | 2/7/2010 19:09:43 | Yes | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Very | Very | It varies | Yes | I'm consistently impressed with how fast GMBlog is. I hear it here first, always. | The look of the site is quite flavorless and unmemorable. Though I say it as shouldn't, you may think. Find a way to inject a little color into the site, something contemporary and fashionable. | |||||||||
18 | 2/7/2010 19:28:16 | Yes | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Very | It varies | No, never heard of it | |||||||||||
19 | 2/7/2010 19:31:32 | No | No | No | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Very | Yes | More articles about media =D I love the head to head comparisons of magazines and video shows. | Think we cover the media enough already. Some people think we cover it far too much. Head to head comparisons are hard when there aren't two or more strong competing media projects releasing at the same or a similar time. Perhaps something about GM radio services could be done. | Head to Head comparison of GMIndie 21 and GMLive 9 done | ||||||||
20 | 2/7/2010 19:46:51 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Very | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
21 | 2/7/2010 19:52:57 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Quite | Yes | |||||||||||
22 | 2/7/2010 20:17:00 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Bit of a mix | Alright | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
23 | 2/7/2010 20:17:02 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Alright | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
24 | 2/7/2010 20:22:59 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Quite | Quite | Very | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
25 | 2/7/2010 20:29:16 | Yes | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Very | Quite | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | no feedback | nothing | |||||||||
26 | 2/7/2010 20:48:48 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
27 | 2/7/2010 20:56:24 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Very | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | I noticed some reviews are, for the most part, poorly written. I dislike reviews that are unnecessarily long. State the facts, be concise. Other than that, they are great. | More reviewers should be joining the team. As well as NAL there is Scoz and Coolist recently joined | |||||||||
28 | 2/7/2010 21:27:52 | No | Yes | No | I want lots more posts | Quite | Quite | Quite | Quite | Yes | no but thanks for your time | nothing | |||||||||
29 | 2/7/2010 21:58:43 | Yes | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Quite | Quite | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
30 | 2/7/2010 22:08:17 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Bit of a mix | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
31 | 2/7/2010 22:28:24 | Yes | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Very | Yes | nothing. | Mainly the number of articles. I actually rather enjoy reading them on this site, and more of them would be great. Because I work on a computer all day, I get bored every now and again and flick of the GMB to see if there is anything to read about. It’s one of the few sites at my work which isn’t actually blocked (the GMC is blocked). | Thanks. Will try to get more regular posts but sometimes it is very hard when not much is happening. Also hard to find contributors who will make regular posts. | ||||||||
32 | 2/7/2010 22:29:25 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Alright | It varies | Yes | Phil writes best. | ||||||||||
33 | 2/7/2010 23:16:34 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | Feature articles on RoketGames more :D (Just kidding :P) | ||||||||||
34 | 2/7/2010 23:33:33 | Yes | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
35 | 2/8/2010 0:39:36 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | Maybe add more about competitions | Nothing | If we get sponsors we will add more competitions! If you mean coverage of competitons we purposely ignore those that are set up by very minor sites with little or low value prizes. | ||||||||
36 | 2/8/2010 1:07:47 | No | Yes | No | I want lots more posts | Quite | Bit of a mix | Alright | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | The site's design / layout. Too simple. | ||||||||||
37 | 2/8/2010 1:08:01 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Bit of a mix | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
38 | 2/8/2010 2:29:10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Very | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
39 | 2/8/2010 3:06:50 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Quite | Quite | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
40 | 2/8/2010 4:26:18 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Quite | Very | No, but I knew it existed | it is fine | ||||||||||
41 | 2/8/2010 4:41:14 | Yes | Yes | No | I want lots more posts | Quite | Quite | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
42 | 2/8/2010 5:14:28 | No | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
43 | 2/8/2010 6:08:17 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Quite | Bit of a mix | Quite | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | Are you really advertising DS Gamemaker with no link to the real thing? | Nothing really unavailable from other sources (ex. the glog). More insider or hard to find info would be amazing (ex. competition finalists). | DSGM are a paying advertiser. If YoYo Games want to purchase adverts we will willingly accept. But a large proportion of our readers will already be active GM users and have GM pro Will work on more articles with contest winners/finalists | ||||||||
44 | 2/8/2010 7:11:46 | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Very | Yes | ||||||||||||
45 | 2/8/2010 8:00:03 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Quite | Very | Very | Quite | No, never heard of it | Having more in-depth technical articles / reviews of good tutorials would be a wonderful addition to this blog as while there are a few good tutorials, many of them are, to say the least, crappy. Having you guys review some of the good tutorials would benefit everyone in the following ways: 1) Good tutorials would recieve more attention, thus people writing the good ones are more likely to write more (and generally other good tutorials) 2) You are experienced enough to tell which tutorials are good and which are shotty, and which explain good techniques vs bad | ||||||||||
46 | 2/8/2010 8:35:28 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Very | Very | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | Nothing, the site and the articles are professional, well done and interesting. | ||||||||||
47 | 2/8/2010 8:36:03 | Yes | Yes | Yes | I want lots more posts | It's alright | Very | Very | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | Its very good :) | ||||||||||
48 | 2/8/2010 12:41:22 | Yes | No | Yes | I want lots more posts | Quite | Quite | Alright | Very | Yes | i love gamemaker blog. | A forum would be cool. | no plans to add forum/chat - we are a blog and you can comment on the stories. there are already other game maker forums/chats and it would be silly to duplicate their offerings | ||||||||
49 | 2/8/2010 14:53:56 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
50 | 2/8/2010 15:29:37 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Very | Very | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
51 | 2/8/2010 15:33:07 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Alright | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | N/A | ||||||||||
52 | 2/8/2010 15:40:00 | No | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Very | Very | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
53 | 2/8/2010 16:05:35 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | It's alright | Very | Quite | Quite | No, never heard of it | Before GM8 was released, I released a fake leak image on the GMC, a poster here believed it and posted it immediately(That's why I said 'Very' at the speed of posting. So maybe there should be a more checking about how real things are. | A more connection to the users, maybe a chat system on the right. | no plans to add forum/chat - we are a blog and you can comment on the stories. there are already other game maker forums/chats and it would be silly to duplicate their offerings | ||||||||
54 | 2/8/2010 16:28:41 | Yes | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Quite | Very | No, but I knew it existed | Two things I think are great about GMB is that the quality of writing is good, and you usually wait until you've got solid facts before writing about something. Something I've always disliked about other Game Maker news sites is that they are so interested in trying to snare people with sensational headlines that they end up not reporting any real news, and help spread bad rumors to boot. GMB generally avoids this, which makes it much more credible, in my mind. Overall, I think you guys do a pretty good job. I wouldn't mind seeing more reviews / interviews, but I think you've hit a good stride with the number of posts you make now, so I'm not sure how well that would mesh with the way things are now. | Nested comments, so replies (at least one or two levels) get added to the person's comment that you are replying to, instead of at the end of the list. I know WordPress can do this. | implemented | ||||||||
55 | 2/8/2010 16:32:49 | No | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Quite | Very | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | Visiting GMB is now a part of my daily routine. | |||||||||||
56 | 2/8/2010 16:46:45 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
57 | 2/8/2010 17:31:45 | Yes | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Quite | Quite | Alright | Quite | No, never heard of it | Would love it if the blog covers other news about Indie games. | It's fine as it is so far. | |||||||||
58 | 2/8/2010 18:21:45 | No | Yes | No | I want lots more posts | Very | Very | Quite | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | You have a really great site, that I visit regularly to read. It's almost like a continually updated GM magazine. Great work :D | I think a forum for the site, would be nice. Not too large though to try focus on the blogging aspect of the site. | no plans to add forum/chat - we are a blog and you can comment on the stories. there are already other game maker forums/chats and it would be silly to duplicate their offerings | ||||||||
59 | 2/8/2010 19:05:01 | No | Yes | Yes | Less posts would be good | It's alright | It varies | No, but I knew it existed | I'd like to see less meta-coverage . I don't need to see reviews of every GM related podcast, magazine, etc. I also don't need analysis of rivalries in the GM community. I'd prefer that GMB stick to news and commentary that I cannot find elsewhere. | Point taken. We don't cover every release. But many people want to read about Game Maker media | |||||||||||
60 | 2/9/2010 2:28:44 | No | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Very | Very | Very | Quite | No, never heard of it | I enjoy reading the blog. There have been a few times where I thought articles were a bit harsh when talking about various GM magazines/TV shows that fail/suck, and thought it would be nicer to be more supportive and less critical...although in fairness, the magazines/TV shows are usually pretty amateurish...but yeah, that's the only area where I could maybe see improvement. Although to be honest, again, I haven't really noticed this kind of criticism as much in recent months. But yeah - feel free to do what you want! It's just something I noticed. Good luck with the blog, and thanks. | I read the blog via my RSS Reader (Google Reader), so unfortunately I never really go to the site. The site seems clean and easy to navigate, though - there doesn't seem to be anything annoying about it. If I was you, I would probably put up more ads, because it might help you get more money and the site looks like it has the room to put them (there seems to be enough empty space to put another ad or two in there). Also, if you put ads in the RSS Feed, that might work too; that way, people like me who don't visit the site will also see the ads and thus hopefully earn you more money. | More ads!? Didn't think I would hear that. Use of RSS feeds/aggregators is something we need to have a careful balance between. Recently I was approached by another site who wished to automatically repost our articles in their forum and declined. Obviously there is little we can do to stop people doing this if they so wish, so I will probably look at including an advertisment in each RSS post. | ||||||||
61 | 2/9/2010 11:21:42 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Quite | No, never heard of it | |||||||||||
62 | 2/9/2010 23:18:47 | Yes | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Quite | Bit of a mix | Alright | Quite | Yes | Add a news archive. | Not sure what you mean about this? All the old news is on the site - do you mean the ability to browse stories by date/month? | |||||||||
63 | 2/10/2010 21:52:56 | No | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Quite | Very | No, but I knew it existed | Keep up the good work :) | ||||||||||
64 | 2/11/2010 0:40:51 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Alright | Very | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
65 | 2/11/2010 7:20:43 | No | Yes | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Quite | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
66 | 2/11/2010 13:15:02 | Yes | Yes | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Very | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | I imagine someone from Game Maker Blog getting paged as soon as something happens and immediately a story pops into his/her head, just waiting to be typed up and posted. That's how fast you are. | ||||||||||
67 | 2/12/2010 2:50:32 | Yes | Yes | No | More posts would be good | Very | Quite | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | I really like the work all of you are doing here, so I'd like to say thanks. I don't go on the GMC forums a lot, due to an overload of posts and a lack of time, so it's nice to be able to come to the blog and get updates on anything very important happening. | I don't have any problems with the site. | |||||||||
68 | 2/12/2010 7:47:33 | No | Yes | No | There are about the right number of posts | Very | Quite | Alright | Very | No, but I knew it existed | I don't like the advertisment of DS Game Maker as it is a rip-off. | DS Game Maker is a totally different product from Game Maker. You are aware that there were products with the same or very similar names before Mark Overmars made GM? It is generic term. As people who read GMB are likely to use GM it makes sense for DSGM to want to advertise to people who are actively interested in easy game creation software | |||||||||
69 | 2/12/2010 9:29:02 | Yes | No | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Bit of a mix | Alright | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
70 | 2/12/2010 9:29:02 | Yes | No | Yes | There are about the right number of posts | Quite | Bit of a mix | Alright | Quite | No, but I knew it existed | |||||||||||
71 | 2/12/2010 12:40:04 | Yes | No | Yes | More posts would be good | Very | Very | Alright | Quite | Yes | A more Game Maker related site theme would be nice. Everything else seems fine. | ||||||||||
72 | 2/13/2010 17:14:43 | Yes | Yes | Yes | I want lots more posts | Very | Very | Very | Very | No, but I knew it existed | juce | be super duper good | |||||||||
73 | |||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||
75 | |||||||||||||||||||||
76 | |||||||||||||||||||||
77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
78 | |||||||||||||||||||||
79 | |||||||||||||||||||||
80 | |||||||||||||||||||||
81 | |||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||
83 | |||||||||||||||||||||
84 | |||||||||||||||||||||
85 | |||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||
87 | |||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||
89 | |||||||||||||||||||||
90 | |||||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||
92 | |||||||||||||||||||||
93 | |||||||||||||||||||||
94 | |||||||||||||||||||||
95 | |||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||
97 | |||||||||||||||||||||
98 | |||||||||||||||||||||
99 |