Data Publishing Bibliography
Comments
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
Comment only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUV
1
YearAuthors/TitlePublication typedoidoi linklinkData Fitness for UseBibliometricsPublishing servicesWorkflowsCost ModelsRepositories CertificationGeneral
2
2016Bishop, B. W. & Hank, C. F. (2016) Fitness for Use in Data Curation Profiles for Biocollections [Presentation] American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, October 2016, Copenhagen, DenmarkPresentationx
3
http://sedataglossary.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page
4
2016Kidwell MC, Lazarević LB, Baranski E, Hardwicke TE, Piechowski S, Falkenberg L-S, et al. (2016) Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency. PLoS Biol 14(5): e1002456Articlehttp://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456x
5
2016NIH Commons FAIR metrics group (2016) WG interim reportReport https://goo.gl/n4PpWvx
6
2016Scientific Data Journal (2016) Let referees see the data, editorial, Nature Scientific Data Journal, 3, 160033http://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.33x
7
2016W3C (2016) Data on the Web Best Practices: Data Quality Vocabulary, W3C Working Group NoteDocumentationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/#mapping-ISOZaverix
8
2016Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., and Baak, A. et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3:160018http://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18x
9
2014Aalbersberg, IJJ (2014) Bringing Digital Science Deep Inside the Scientific Article: the Elsevier Article of the Future ProjectArticlehttp://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/8446/9652Article of the future concept including cross-linking
10
2014Düsterhus, A., Hense A. (2014), Automated Quality Evaluation for a more Effective Data Peer Review. Data Science Journal 06/2014; 13:67-78Articledoi:10.2481/dsj.14-009 http://dx.doi.org/10.2481/dsj.14-009xquality evaluation process designed to analyse the technical quality as well as the content of a dataset
11
2014Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D. and Vellino, A. (2014), Measuring
academic influence: Not all citations are equal.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
Articledoi: 10.1002/asi.23179http://lemire.me/fr/documents/publications/citationjasist2013.pdf
12
2014Peer Review of Datasets: When, Why, and How
Matthew S. Mayernik 1, Sarah Callaghan 2, Roland Leigh 3, Jonathan Tedds 3, Steven Worley 1
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 2014
Articledoi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00083.1http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00083.1Devising methods for data peer review, if done with forethought, can increase the
trustworthiness and value of individual datasets and strengthen research findings.
13
2014Kratz J and Strasser C (2014)
Data publication consensus and controversies [v1; ref status: approved with reservations 1, http://f1000r.es/3ag] F1000Research 2014, 3:94
Review Articledoi:10.12688/f1000research.4264http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.4264
14
2013International Renewable Energy Agency (2013) Data quality for the Global Renewable Energy Atlas – Solar and WindReport / Documentationhttps://goo.gl/a8xr1Qx
15
2013Li Jianzhong & Liu Xianmin (2013) An important aspect of big data: data usability, Journal of Computer Research and Development, v6Articlex
16
2013Maarten Hoogerwerf, Mathias Losch, Jochen Schirrwagen, Sarah Callaghan, Paolo Manghi, Katerina Iatropoulou, Dimitra Keramida, and Najla Rettberg. Linking data and publications: Towards a cross-disciplinary approach. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1):244-254, June
2013
Articledoi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.257http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.257
17
2013Donatella Castelli, Paolo Manghi, and Costantino Thanos. A vision towards scientic communication infrastructures. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 13(3-4):155-169, 2013Articledoi:10.1007/2Fs00799-013-0106-7http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00799-013-0106-7Pre-print version: http://puma.isti.cnr.it/linkdoc.php?idauth=1&idcol=1&icode=2013-A0-041&authority=cnr.isti&collection=cnr.isti&langver=it
18
2013GEO Data Sharing Working Group (DSWG) GEOSS Data Quality GuidelinesReporthttps://earthobservations.org/documents/dsp/GEOSS_Data_Quality_Guidelines.pdfx
19
2013Socha, YM (ed.) CODATA-ICSTI Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices (2013) Out of cite, out of mind: the current state of practice and technology for the citation of data: Data Science Journal, Vol. 12Reportdoi:10.2481/dsj.OSOM13-043http://dx.doi.org/10.2481/dsj.OSOM13-043x
20
2013Barranguet, C. & Koers, H. (2013). Articles connecting to data as a valuable content enrichment for marine scientists. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 66(1-2), 1-2Editorialdoi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.036http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.036
21
2013Berman F. & Cerf, V. (2013). Who Will Pay for Public Access to Research Data? Science, 341(6146), 616-617Articledoi:10.1126/science.1241625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1241625
22
2013Brembs, B., Button, K. & Munafó, M. (2013). Deep Impact : Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7.Articledoi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291
23
2013Callaghan, S., Murphy, F., Tedds, J., Allan, R., Kunze, J., Lawrence, R., Mayernik, M.S. & Whyte, A. (2013). Processes and Procedures for Data Publication: A Case Study in the Geosciences. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1), 193–203.Articledoi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.253http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.253
24
2013Chavan V, Penev L, Hobern D (2013) Cultural Change in Data Publishing Is Essential. BioScience 63 (6): 419-420. Articledoi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.6.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.6.3
25
2013Costas, R., Meijer, I., Zahedi, Z. & Wouters, P. (2013). The Value of Research Data - Metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view. A Knowledge Exchange Report Reportwww.knowledge-exchange.info/datametrics
26
2013Fortin, J.-M. & Currie, D.J. (2013). Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding, PLoS ONE,
8(6):e65263
Articledoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065263http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065263
27
2013Costello, Mark et al (2013) Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewedArticledoi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.002xdetailed evaluation of repository and workflow types, in particular with respect to qualityx
28
2013Hall, N., Corey B., Mann, W. & Wilson, T. (2013). Model Language for Research Data Management Policies. Association of Southeastern Research Libraries, Durham, NC, Southeastern Universities Research Association, Washington, DC.Proposalhttp://www.aserl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ASERL-SURA_Model_Language_RDM_Policy_Language_FINAL.pdf
29
2013Kowalczyk, S. & Shankar, K. (2013). Data Sharing in the Sciences. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 247–294.Articledoi:10.1002/aris.2011.1440450113http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450113
30
2013Leadbetter, A., Raymond, L., Chandler, C., Pikula, L., Pissierssens, P., Urban, E. (2013). Ocean Data Publication Cookbook (IOC Manuals and Guides 64). Oostende, Belgium: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO.Reporthttp://www.iode.org/mg64detailed outline of repository workflow for WHOAS and PDL
31
2013Mayernik, M.S. (2013). Bridging Data Lifecycles: Tracking data use via data citations workshop report. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-494+PROC.Reportdoi:10.5065/D6PZ56TXhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5065/D6PZ56TXhttp://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/assets/technotes/TECH-NOTE-000-000-000-860.pdf
32
2013Monastersky, R. (2013). Publishing frontiers: The library reboot. Nature, 495(7442), 430–432Articledoi:10.1038/495430ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/495430a
33
2013Parsons, M.A. & Fox, P.A. (2013). Is Data Publication the Right Metaphor? Data Science Journal, 12, WDS32-WDS46, Proceedings of the 1st WDS Conference in Kyoto 2011 Articledoi:10.2481/dsj.WDS-042http://dx.doi.org/10.2481/dsj.WDS-042
34
2013Piwowar, H. (2013). Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159–159Articledoi:10.1038/493159ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/493159a
35
2013Piwowar, H.A. & Vision, T.J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ PrePrints 1:e1v1 Articledoi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.1v1http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1v1
36
2013Priem, J. (2013). Scholarship: Beyond the paper, Nature, 495(7442), 437– 440Articledoi:10.1038/495437ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/495437aaltmetrics - scientific products get certified through algorithms, Google page rank(x)(x)future of scholarly publishing incl. data leaving traditional journals behind
37
2013Report on Knowledge Exchange workshop: Price of keeping knowledge: financial streams for digital preservation. Amsterdam (2013). Reporthttp://www.knowledge-exchange.info/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=Files/Filer/downloads/Primary+Research+Data/Workshop+Price+of+Keeping+Knowledge/Report+KE+workshop+Price+of+Keeping+Knowledge+17+January+2013.pdfx
38
2013Smith V, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Biserkov J, Miller J, Livermore L, Baker E, Mietchen D, Couvreur T, Mueller G, Dikow T, Helgen K, Frank J, Agosti D, Roberts D, Penev L (2013) Beyond dead trees: integrating the scientific process in the Biodiversity Data Journal. Biodiversity Data Journal 1: e995. Editorialdoi: 10.3897/BDJ.1.e995http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e995http://biodiversitydatajournal.com/articles.php?id=995&display_type=list&element_type=9
39
2013Van Noorden, R. (2013). Data-sharing: Everything on display. Nature, 500, 243-245Articledoi:10.1038/nj7461-243ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nj7461-243a
40
2013Wright, S.J., Kozlowski W.A., Dietrich, D., Kahn, H.J. & Steinhart, G.S. (2013). Using Data Curation Profiles to Design the Datastar Dataset Registry. D-Lib, 19(7/8)Articledoi:10.1045/july2013-wrighthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1045/july2013-wright
41
2013Rodrigo Costas, Ingeborg Meijer, Zohreh Zahedi and Paul Wouters of the Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). Leiden University.http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/datametricsx
42
2012Australian National Data Service (ANDS) Business Plan 2011/12Reporthttp://ands.org.au/resource/ands_business_plan_2011_12.pdfx
43
2012Abrams, S., Cruse, P. & Kunze, J. (2012). Pay Once, Preservation Forever A “Paid‐Up” Cost Model for Long‐Term Preservation. California Digital LibraryWikihttp://wiki.ucop.edu/display/Curation/Cost+Modeling x
44
2012Ball, A. (2012). Review of Data Management Lifecycle Models (version 1.0). REDm-MED Project Document redm1rep120110ab10. Bath, UK: University of Bath.Reporthttp://opus.bath.ac.uk/28587/1/redm1rep120110ab10.pdf
45
2012Beagrie, N. & Pink, C. (2012). Benefits from Research Data Management in Universitys for Industry and Not-for-Profit Research Partners. Charles Beagrie Ltd and University of BathReporthttp://opus.bath.ac.uk/32509/1/RDM_Benefits_vFinal.pdfx
46
2012Bellini, E. u. a. (2012). APARSEN Persistent Identifiers Interoperability Framework, Public Report. Fondazione Rinascimento Digitale, Florence, ItalyReporthttp://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/04/APARSEN-REP-D22_1-01-1_9.pdf
47
2012Borgman, C.L. (2012). The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059–1078.Articledoi:10.1002/asi.22634http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634
48
2012Breeze, J.L., Poline, J. & Kennedy, D. N. (2012). Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging. Gigascience 1, 1Articledoi:10.1186/2047-217X-1-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-9
49
2012Callaghan, S., Lowry, R. & Walton, D. (2012). Data Citation and Publication by NERC’s Environmental Data Centres. Ariadne, 68Articlehttp://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue68/callaghan-et-al
50
2012Callaghan, S., Donegan, S., Pepler, S., Thorley, M., Cunningham, N., Kirsch, P., Ault, L., et al. (2012). Making Data a First Class Scientific Output: Data Citation and Publication by NERC’s Environmental Data Centres. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), 107–113.Articledoi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.218http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.218
51
2012Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS): Reference model
for an open archival information system (OAIS), CCSDS 650.0-M-2 Magenta
Book (2012)
Reporthttp://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf
52
2012Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Darby, R., Gitmans, K., Lambert, S., Suhonen, J., Wilson, M., Science, H., et al. (2012). Compilation of results on drivers and barriers and new opportunities.Reporthttp://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/08/ODE-CompilationResultsDriversBarriersNewOpportunities1.pdf
53
2012DFG-Förderatlas 2012 - Kennzahlen zur öffentlich finanzierten Forschung in DeutschlandReportISBN:978-3-527-33378-3http://www.dfg.de/foerderatlasx
54
2012DP4lib Projekt (2012). Kostenmodell für einen LZA-Dienst Reporthttp://dp4lib.langzeitarchivierung.de/downloads/DP4lib-Kostenmodell_eines_LZA-Dienstes_v1.0.pdfx
55
2012GRDI2020. (2012). Global Research Data Infrastructures: The Big Data Challenges. GRDI2020 Final Roadmap Report. Reporthttp://www.grdi2020.eu/Repository/FileScaricati/e2b03611-e58f-4242-946a-5b21f17d2947.pdf
56
2012Grootveld, M. & van Egmond, J. (2012). Peer-Reviewed Open Research Data: Results of a Pilot. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(2), 81–91Articledoi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.231http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.231
57
2012Halevi, G. & Moed, H.F. (2012). The evolution of big data as a research and scientific topic: overview of the literature. Research Trends, 30, 03-06.Articlehttp://www.researchtrends.com/issue-30-september-2012/the-evolution-of-big-data-as-a-research-and-scientific-topic-overview-of-the-literature/
58
2012Jahnke, L. & Asher, A. (2012). The Problem of Data. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, D.C. ReportISBN 978-1-932326-42-0http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub154
59
2012Klump, J. (2012). Offener Zugang zu Forschungsdaten: Open Data und Open Access to Data – Die ungleichen Geschwister, in Open Initiatives: Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft, edited by U. Herb, pp. 45–53, universaar, Saarbrücken, GermanyMonographISBN:978-3-86223-062-4 nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-universaar-873http://universaar.uni-saarland.de/monographien/volltexte/2012/87/
60
2012Lewis, D.W. (2012). The Inevitability of Open Access. College & Research Libraries News, 73(5), 493–506Articlehdl:1805/2929http://hdl.handle.net/1805/2929http://crl.acrl.org/content/73/5/493.abstract
61
2012Mennes, M., Biswal, B., Castellanos, F.X. & Milham, M. P. (2012). Making data sharing work: the FCP/INDI experience. NeuroImageArticledoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.064http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.064
62
2012Milia, N., Congiu, A., Anagnostou, P., Montinaro, F., Capocasa, M., Sanna, E. & Destro Bisol, G. (2012). Mine, yours, ours? Sharing Data on Human Genetic Variation. PloS one, 7(6):e37552.Articledoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037552http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037552
63
2012Mooney, H. & Newton, M.P. (2012). The Anatomy of a Data Citation: Discovery, Reuse, and Credit. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 1(1):eP10351.Articledoi:10.7710/2162-3309.1035 http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1035
64
2012Neuroth, H., Strathmann, S., Oßwald, A., Scheffel, R., Klump, J. & Ludwig, J. (Eds.). (2012). Langzeitarchivierung von Forschungsdaten. Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Boizenburg: Verlag Werner HülsbuschReporthttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0008-2012031401
65
2012Palaiologk, A.S., Economides, A.A., Tjalsma, H.D. & Sesink, L.S. (2012). An activity-based costing model for long-term preservation and dissemination of digital research data: the case of DANS. Articledoi:10.1007/s00799-012-0092-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00799-012-0092-1x
66
2012Piwowar, H.A. (2012). Making data Count: tracking data impact through the scholarly literature and beyond. Github.Articlehttps://github.com/hpiwowar/datacitationstudy/blob/master/citationpractices.md
67
2012Poline, J.-B., Breeze, J.L., Ghosh, S., Gorgolewski, K., Halchenko, Y. O., Hanke, M., et al. (2012). Data sharing in neuroimaging research. Front. Neuroinform. 6:9Articledoi:10.3389/fninf.2012.00009http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2012.00009
68
2012Priem, J., Piwowar, H.A. & Hemminger, B.M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv12034745v1 csDL 20 Mar 2012, 1203.4745, 1–23.ArticlearXiv:1203.4745v1http://arxiv.org/html/1203.4745http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745
69
2012Quadt, F., Düsterhus, A., Höck, H., Lautenschlager, M., Hense, A.V., Hense, A.N. & Dames, M. (2012). Atarrabi - A Workflow System for the Publication of Environmental Data. Data Science Journal, 11, 89-109Articledoi:10.2481/dsj.012-027http://dx.doi.org/10.2481/dsj.012-027
70
2012Report on Knowledge Exchange workshop: Cost models for keeping knowledge: economic models for digital preservation. Copenhagen (2012)Reporthttp://www.knowledge-exchange.info/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fdownloads%2fPrimary+Research+Data%2fCost+models+workshop%2fReport+KE+cost+models+workshop+11+June+2012.pdfx
71
2012Rohlfing, T. & Poline, J.-B. (2012). Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline, NeuroImage, 59(4), 4189-4195Articledoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.080http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.080
72
2012Simons, N. (2012). Implementing DOIs for Research Data. D-Lib Magazine, 18(5/6)Articledoi:10.1045/may2012-simons http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/may2012-simons
73
2012Stockhause, M., Höck, H., Toussaint, F. & Lautenschlager, M. (2012) Quality assessment concept of the World Data Center for Climate and its application to CMIP5 data. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 5, 781-802.Articledoi:10.5194/gmdd-5-781-2012http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-5-781-2012x
74
2012The Royal Society (2012). Science as an open enterprise. The Royal Society Science Policy Centre.ReportISBN:978-0-85403-962-http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE.pdf
75
2012Thomson Reuters (2012). Collaborative Science: solving the issues of discovery, attribution and measurement in data sharing.Essayhttp://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/dci/collaborative_science_essay.pdf
76
2012Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N. & Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2012). Compartir los datos de investigación en ciencia: introducción al data sharing. El Profesional de la Informacion, 21(2), 173–184.Articledoi:10.3145/epi.2012.mar.08http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.08
77
2012Uhlir, P.F. (2012). For Attribution — Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards. Summary of an International Workshop. National Research Council of the National Academics. National Academies Press.ReportISBN: 9780309267281 http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13564
78
2012Wouters, P. & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Image Rochester NY: SURFfoundation.Reporthttp://www.surf.nl/nl/publicaties/Documents/Users%20narcissism%20and%20control.pdf
79
2012Wouters, P., Beaulieu, A., Scharnhorst, A. & Wyatt, S. (eds) (2012). Virtual Knowledge. The MIT Press.MonographISBN: 9780262018395 http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/virtual-knowledge-0
80
2011Lawrence, B., Jones, C., Matthews, B., Pepler, S. & Callaghan, S. (2011). Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication. International Journal of Digital Curation 6, 4–37Articlex
81
2011Callaway, E. (2011). Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature, 479(7371), 15.Articledoi:10.1038/479015ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/479015a
82
2011Chavan, V. & Penev, L. (2011). The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. BMC Bioinformatics, 12 (Suppl 15):S2.Articledoi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S2http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S2
83
2011DataCite (2011). DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data.Metadata Schemadoi:10.5438/0005http://dx.doi.org/10.5438/0005
84
2011HennekenEA, Accomazzi A (2011) Linking to Data - Effect on Citation Rates in Astronomy, ASP Conference Serieshttp://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.3618v1.pdf
85
2011Ingwersen, P. & Chavan, V. (2011). Indicators for the Data Usage Index (DUI): an incentive for publishing primary biodiversity data through global information infrastructure. BMC bioinformatics, 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 15):S3.Articledoi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S3http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S3
86
2011Kejser, U.B., Nielsen, A.B. & Thirifays, A. (2011). Cost model for digital preservation: Cost of digital migration, International Journal of Digital Curation 6(1): 255‐267 Articledoi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.186http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.186x
87
2011Kennedy, D. N., Ascolim, G. & De Schutter, E. (2011). Next steps in data publishing. Neuroinformatics 9, 317–320Editorialdoi:10.1007/s12021-011-9131-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-011-9131-0
88
2011Lawrence, B., Jones, C. & Matthews, B. (2011). Citation and Peer Review of Data : Moving Towards Formal Data Publication. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 4–37.Articledoi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205
89
2011Meyer, E. T. (2011). Splashes and Ripples Synthesizing the Evidence on the Impacts of Digital Resources. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) Report.Reporthttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1846535
90
2011Mooney, H. (2011). Citing data sources in the social sciences: do authors do it? Learned Publishing, 24(2), 99–108.Articledoi:10.1087/20110204http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110204
91
2011Moritz, T., Krishnan, S., Roberts, D., Ingwersen, P., Agosti, D., Penev, L., Cockerill, M., et al. (2011). Towards mainstreaming of biodiversity data publishing: recommendations of the GBIF Data Publishing Framework Task Group. BMC bioinformatics, 12 (Suppl 15):S1.Articledoi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S1http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S1
92
2011National Science Board (2011). National Science Foundation’s Merit Review Criteria: Review and Revisions.Reporthttp://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2011/meritreviewcriteria.pdf
93
2011Nicholson, S. W. & Bennett, T. B. (2011). Data Sharing: Academic libraries and the scholarly enterprise. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 11(1), 505–516.Articledoi:10.1353/pla.2011.0003http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0003https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/toc/pla.11.1.html
94
2011Penev L, Mietchen D, Chavan V, Hagedorn G, Remsen D, Smith V, Shotton D (2011). Pensoft Data Publishing
Policies and Guidelines for Biodiversity Data. Pensoft Publishers
Guidelines
http://www.pensoft.net/J_FILES/Pensoft_Data_
95
2011Policies and Guidelines for Biodiversity Data. Pensoft Publishers, http://www.pensoft.net/J_FILES/Pensoft_Data_Articledoi:10.1045/january2011-pfeiffenberger
96
2011Publishing_Policies_and_Guidelines.pdf Articledoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018657Publishing_Policies_and_Guidelines.pdf
97
2011Priem, J., Piwowar, H.A. & Hemminger, B.H. (2011). Altmetrics in the wild : An exploratory study of impact metrics based on social media. Metrics: Symposium on Informetric and Scientometric Research; 2011. New Orleans, LA, USA.Presentationhttp://jasonpriem.org/self-archived/PLoS-altmetrics-sigmetrics11-abstract.pdf
98
2011Schäfer, A., Pampel, H., Pfeiffenberger, H., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Tissari, S., Darby, R., Giaretta, K., et al. (2011). Baseline Report on Drivers and Barriers in Data Sharing (pp. 1–75).Reporthdl:10013/epic.39262.d001http://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.39262.d001http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/11/ODE-WP3-DEL-0002-1_0_public_final.pdf
99
2011Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., et al. (2011). Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PloS one, 6(6), e21101.Articledoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
100
2011Van den Eynden, V., Corti, L., Wollard, M., Bishop, L. & Horton, L. (2011), Managing and Sharing Data: a best practice guide for researchers, 3rd ed., Universtity of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK.Reporthttp://www.data-archive.ac.uk/media/2894/managingsharing.pdf
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet1