ABCDEFGHIJK
1
TimestampRuleProblem Policy AddressesImplementation Start TimeRule Activation DependenciesHypothesis Discord NamePolicy NameImplementation End Time
2
6/28/2024 22:19:21budget fitting applies percent weight to fitting based on budget amount requested from total amount requestedThe Ambassador Program has had huge issues with managing individuals greed to access more and more resources. This has caused us to be in very hard position where Q2 budget could not be agreed upon until token price increased to cover our costs. Current fitting incentivizes each workgroup to request large amount of funds or add a lot of projects to proposal.As soon as accepted. However if we decide to skip improving Q3 requests and do flatliner this time, then lets start with Q4Budget fitting only activates if on the Budget iteration total budget request exceed the leftoversweighting fitting based on rewards requested would favor decentralisation and smaller budget requests. It would be best if some gaussian logic would be used, but because I don't know math a simple percent will be good enough imo. This will incentive lowering budget and making sure only core activities get covered, this incentivises to propose projects that are actually planned to be delivered not just to increase budget.tevosaksBudget Fitting - Shrink Budgets
3
7/9/2024 20:59:21If Proposal is considered as a new initiative they can only request up to limited AGIX.Proposal and Reporting have caused a lot of tensions and a lot of concerns are raised.Start from Q4 2024The Exhange Rate flucuation and conversion to ASI could invoke the difference of limit. To counter that we collect sentiment about different suggested limits and reasons.
after data collection and discussion we can decide the quarters limit for new iniatives.
Not new initiatives are previous workgroups, guilds and projects that has been approved last quarter.		This Rule will provide a better guarantee we decentralize treasury between all core contributors. So that instead of fidgeting contantly with reports and arguments will give an opportunity to build trust small step at the timetevosaksSlow Start
4
8/1/2024 18:46:51Existing groups require to pass quarterly Report sentimentWhen we review proposals we mix together both proposal and quarterly reports and also we jump into fixing report instead of understanding what is wrongQ4 2024With this policy we will have simple Google Form to measure Quarterly Report by:
Clarity (1-4); the detail of budget requests (1-4); The access and visibility to deliverables (1-4)
Each measure is followed with qualitative reason.

When any of these metrics have 1, the group can not request more funds.
The feedback can be turned to unjustified in public meetings.		Addresses Quarterly report separately from proposal request. And helps to also assess general wibe from rest of the communitytevo saksSentiment metricsAt the end of Q4 2024
5
9/9/2024 18:05:21Existing groups require to submit quarterly Reports 1 week before the Proposal Submission deadline for sentiment analysisWhen we review proposals we mix together both proposal and quarterly reports and also we jump into fixing report instead of understanding what is wrongImplement in Q4 if proposal is ratified before December 2024The Policy rule only acts when the first Proposal deadline is decided. From then, a suggested Quarterly Report submission deadline will be enacted, which is seven days before. If the Proposal Deadline is decided too late and makes this process too short, then Policy Experiment will be skipped and carried over to next quarter.

Quarterly Reports will be measured in scale of 1 to 4 based on these metrics: Readability, Clarity (on what the report is about), The quality and detail of resource allocation, The accessibility to deliverables.

Each measure will follow qualitative reasons to be a valid measure.		At first we felt like its about raising awareness of the Report and helping workgroups focus on reporting before planning next proposal. But its also a great way to signal what is community expecting from reporting and we can strive also for excellence. Either way this policy will extend Proposal and reporting process, but separating the submissions out will help smoothen flow of discussion from retrospective & reporting > Planning and proposing, Instead of having them happen all at once.tevosaksQuarterly Report MeasuresIf Implemented in Q4 then in Q1 a decision needs to be made if we want to measure reports again
6
11/10/2024 15:29:55Quarterly budget allocation start with the process of defining key program areas and budget percentage from total Quarterly allocationSegregating different areas of activities and allowing more fair distribution of funds on diverse sets areasAt the same time when Proposal Submission period Starts for Q1 2025The results are valid if more than 10% of Core Contributors contribute to budget allocations.
The goal of result is to calculate the average results of our collective data.
First calculate the each category averages.
And then modify the calculated averages based on the percentage of total amount that category was selected.
we may need to combine some categories once we see the data.		Implementing a structured allocation based on emergent program categories encourage balanced development across community initiatives. By focusing on collective agreed areas, we anticipate a more strategic impact, better resource utilization, and greater community engagement with budget-related processestevosaksProgram Category & Budget AllocationAfter calculation and decision on final Q1 allocations
7
1/21/2025 20:10:12If a WG wants to change mid-quarter what some of their budget will be used for: If the changed budget line is 0-5% of a WG's total quarterly budget, the WG can change this at their own discretion without any consultation (1x per quarter). If it's 5-35% of the total quarterly budget, the WG should submit the suggested change to #decisions-to-be-made Discord channel, tagging @Core Contributor, and there will be 1 week for any objections to be registered. (If no objections, the WG can go ahead: but if anyone objects, discuss in a Governance meeting and try to resolve.) A 35% + change request needs to be included in the WG's budget proposal for the following Quarter (note that it would be separate from, and in addition to, their budget cap for that Quarter. So if a WG has a cap of 5k AGIX for Quarter 2 2025, and has 1k AGIX unspent from Q1 that it wants to reallocate, it will therefore have a total of 6k AGIX to work with). If a WG has unused budget at the end of a Quarter that they still intend to use as originally planned, they don't need to do anything special - they just do the work as and when they can.To enable WG budgets to be more responsive, and resolve the problem of when a WG needs to make budget changes mid-Quarter to respond to new circumstances. To clarify what level of community consultation needs to be done, so that it's transparent.as soon as ratifiednoneWill enable WGs to be more quickly responsive to new circumstances, and make a change to their agreed budget if they need to. Will make any changes transparent and give a chance for people to object, and will avoid people being able to make massive changes to what they spend budget on without approval.CallyFromAuron (on behalf of Governance WG)Budget Change Requestcheck at the end of Q1 2025
8
2/19/2025 10:30:04This budget is for ideas that are new - i.e. it cannot be used for things that are already being done. It should be used within 3 months of your application being agreed It cannot be used to create a new WG. It could be used for things like (a pilot to try something new that a WG would then develop further, a completely one-off and self-contained piece of work, a cross-Program "task force" or other temporary initiative to work on something)As a program, we have noticed that we do not have any agreed process for how to use the “New Ideas” budget. Hence, the need to create one.A soon as it is ratifiedA proposer must be a Core Contributor.
A proposal to use a particular Quarter’s “New Ideas” budget can be made at any point in that Quarter; but only in that Quarter (i.e. no asking in Q1 to use the New Ideas budget for Q2).
The amount can be anything up to and including the entire New Ideas budget for that quarter (unless any has already been used, in which case the max would be whatever’s left)		The policy would give clarity to the utilization of the new ideas budget as we have had proposer in recent times, and there seem not to be a clearcut process on how the budget should be used. We will keep a log, e.g. in a spreadsheet, of the date, which Quarter’s budget, who would be paid, how much money, link to the proposal, accepted or refused. This would go in the Budget Planner for the quarter in which the proposal is funded.effiom (on behalf of Governance WG)How to use the new ideas budgetnone
9
2/19/2025 13:48:05The proposer shares their proposal, with comments open, for a week, in “Decision To Be Made” channel on discord. People can comment any objections they have, and the proposer can decide to amend the proposal in response if they want. The final version is discussed in a meeting, and the decision is made by verbal consent (i.e. “does anyone object?”). If more than 10%? of those present have objections that can’t be resolved, it’s a no - otherwise, the proposer can go ahead.As a program, we have noticed that we do not have any agreed decision-making process for the “New Ideas” budget. Hence, the need to create one.A soon as it is ratifiedThe decision-making meeting would be a Governance meeting - but the process should be raised in Town Hall and in “Decision To Be Made” channel in Discord. There is no limit to how many times a proposal can be suggested until it is funded; but once it’s been funded, a similar proposal can’t be presented again (either by the original proposer, or anyone else). Also, the proposals should be brief, and just need to cover - a budget (what will be done, how much it will cost, and who will be paid) and what evidence they will show at the end to demonstrate what they have done.The policy would give clarity to the decision-making process for the new ideas budget. We will keep a log, e.g. in a spreadsheet, of the date, which Quarter’s budget, who would be paid, how much money, link to the proposal, accepted or refused. This would go in the Budget Planner for the quarter in which the decision was made.Effiom (for Governance WG)Decision-making Process for New Ideas BudgetNone
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100