Current Detainer/Notification Acceptance Status

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

06/17/2015 - FOD emailed Sheriff B(6); B(7)C with details of PEP and invitation to meet to further discuss PEP. No response received from SF County. On 01/14/2016, (A)FOD emailed newly elected Sheriff B(6); B(7)C and her staff to meet and discuss the PEP. Awaiting response from SF County. Confirmed meeting with SF Sheriff and her staff for February 11, 2016 at 9am. The FOD, DFOD, Chief Counsel and AFOD met with Sheriff B(6); B(7)C and her staff on February 11th. We decided to evaluate how we can work together on public safety issues within the guidelines of San Francisco City and County policies. The FOD had subsequent conversations with the Sheriff and provided direct POCs for the Sheriff's Office to clarify NCIC matters as they relate to 247 requests. The Sheriff is considering her position on the PEP.

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Meeting went fairly well--they are going to re-draft their policy to allow for acceptance of the notification and modify their "notification to alien" to allow the alien to choose whether to speak to ICE. Time frame is roughly 2 weeks.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Broadcast email--will request a meeting with Sheriff after other requests have been addressed (issue of offering possible dates and then having them booked)

New Haven Police Department

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

The NHPD will not accept I-247D and I-247N; however, it has been ERO's experience that they will notify ICE when releasing an alien where a detainer has been lodged.

East Haven Police Department

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

The East Haven Police Department will not hold an alien solely upon a detainer request. However, if a person detained or held in the East Haven Police Department’s custody is
subject to a detainer and is eligible to be released on the underlying state charge or charges and there are no other outstanding criminal warrants lodged, the subject shall be released, provided however that notice of the
impending release may be given to ICE pursuant 8 C.F.R. 287.7.

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

PEP Letter to Superintendent via email

Have not meet however currently accepting I-247D with I-200 and will notify ICE prior to release.

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

06/25/2015 | (a)DFOD B(6); B(7)C and AFOD B(6); B(7)C met with Major B(6); B(7)C at the 2015 Georgia Jail Association Summer Conference in Savannah, GA. B(6); B(7)C is willing to meet with (a)FOD B(6); B(7)C to further discuss PEP; meeting will be scheduled in July | Note that B(6); B(7)C provides ERO Atlanta with a daily list of arrests and releases

09/22/2015 | Attempts to schedule a meeting with B(6); B(7)C have been unsuccessful

11/03/2015 | (a)FOD B(6); B(7)C met with Sheriff B(6); B(7)C; Sheriff is willing to further discuss acceptance of Form I-247N. Meeting with the Sheriff and Jail Administrator to be scheduled

11/10/2015 | (a)FOD B(6); B(7)C scheduled a follow-up meeting between (a)DFOD B(6); B(7)C and Jail Administrator B(6); B(7)C @ 10 a.m. on 11/18/2015

11/18/2015 | (a)DFOD B(6); B(7)C, AFOD B(6); B(7)C, and SDDO B(6); B(7)C met with Jail Administrator B(6); B(7)C. B(6); B(7)C is still unwilling to accept Forms I-247N | I-247D

12/22/2015 | (a)FOD B(6); B(7)C sent a letter to Sheriff Hill noting what transpired at the 11/18/2015 meeting and advising that ICE is still open to partnership discussions

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

LEITF member. HQ will conduct the outreach per Field Ops. S1 will engage Cook County on July 10th for the second time as a followup to his initial meeting on June 19th. HQERO handling Cook County discussion.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Franklin County Regional Jail

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Jail will not honor detainers due to insurance provider for elected officials not willing to support litigation stemming from honoring them.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Woodford County Detention Center

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Will not honor detainers or contact ICE. ICE can make arrangements to take custody of someone leaving the jail but are not allowed in sally port.

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

September 2014

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Prince George’s County Detention Center has stated that they will not allow ERO in their facility, and will not notify ERO of detainee releases, will not honor detainers. The Detention Center Director stated that they would not participate in PEP or change their policies. In few cases, sepcifically with HSI crimnal prosecutions and warrants have been used to get PG to accept detainers

Washtenaw County Sheriffs Department

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

January 2016

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

AFOD met with Chief Deputy B(6); B(7)C. On 1/27/16, Washtenaw County Jail would not honor an ICE detainer resulting in the release of Priority 1(e) alien, Aggravated Felon.

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Met with Jail Staff and provided information to Sheriff. They are willing to provide informtion to ICE.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

On 06/19/2015, DFOD B(6); B(7)C made PEP presentation to members of Oregon State Sheriff's Association and spoke individually to numerous sheriffs in attendance. Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP.

Boise SDDO had in-person meeting with Jail Commander regarding PEP. Neither the I-247D or N will be honored without a judicially issued arrest warrant attached thereto.

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

County sued under Miranda-Olivares... Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP

09/28/2015 Update: Oregon USAO hosting meeting with Clackamas, Marion, Multnomah and Washington county sheriffs, district attorneys, county counsels, et.al to discuss PEP. DEAD B(6); B(7)C and AFODs B(6); B(7)C will be participating.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

When first contacted, Jail Commander thought that PEP and the use of the I-247N made sense, but wanted to confer with the sheriff. However, Grant County Sheriff B(6); B(7)C advised that he is not in support of the new form or process.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Files the 247N, but does not act on them. SDDO reached out 10/22/15, awaiting return call.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP

Boise SDDO had in-person meeting with Jail Commander regarding PEP. Neither the I-247D or N will be honored without a judicially issued arrest warrant attached thereto.

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP

09/28/2015 Update: Oregon USAO hosting meeting with Clackamas, Marion, Multnomah and Washington county sheriffs, district attorneys, county counsels, et.al to discuss PEP. DEAD B(6); B(7)C and AFODs B(6); B(7)C will be participating. 10/22/2015 - SDDO reached out 3x over last week via phone to engage jail commander. No return call.

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Ground Zero for detainer issues, County for Portland, OR, adjacent to Clackamas County which was subject of Miranda-Olivares. Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP.

09/28/2015 Update: Oregon USAO hosting meeting with Clackamas, Marion, Multnomah and Washington county sheriffs, district attorneys, county counsels, et.al to discuss PEP. DEAD B(6); B(7)C and AFODs B(6); B(7)C will be participating.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Will notify immediately before release based on 247N, for immediate pickup. However geographical distance of this jurisdiction precludes immediate response. Not willing to give advance notice. // SDDO reached out 10/22/15, jail cmndr stated there have been no new instructions from sheriff

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

FOD B(6); B(7)C participated in teleconference with A/S B(6); B(7)C and representatives of the Mayor's Office. Mayor is considering amending his executive order to at least allow for some notifications. Expect to see a new draft mayor's order soon.

On December 22, 2015, an MOU was signed with the City of Philadelphia in which they will honr our 247-N on certain cases (priority 1 and other serious offenses listed in priority 2) & 247 D that is accompanied with an judicial order. '

On January 4, 2016, Mayor Kenney signed an Executive Order prohibiting the release notification or detention on behalf of ICE absent a judicial warrant and a conviction for a first or second degree felony involving violence.

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP.

The field office has not recieved a resonse from the County. ERO management is scheduling a meeting with jails officials early November.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP.

10/23/2015 - Have not received a response from the County concerning future on PEP. ERO management is scheduling a meeting with jails officials early November.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

1: Not Willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP.

Have not received a response concerning future meeting on PEP. ERO Management is scheduling a meeting in early November.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2015

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

California State Sheriffs Association

State of California- All Sheriff Departments

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

SFR AOR was January 1, 2014.

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

The three FODS from CA and DD Tim Robbins had a meeting on PEP on 6/11/15

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP. FOD spoke with Sheriff B(6); B(7)C on 12/01/2015. Sheriff B(6); B(7)C stated Contra Costa County will likely begin participating in the PEP and to honor the I-247N starting on January 1st, 2016. Follow-up required on January 2nd. DFOD B(6); B(7)C on 02/10/2016 following up on PEP participation. Per Sheriff B(6); B(7)C, the PEP was discussed at their executive team meeting and the County will be reviewing their policies to see what addtional training, and/or operational changes would need to occur to formally begin accepting the I-247N. DFOD B(6); B(7)C reached out to the Sheriff's executive assistant, B(6); B(7)C to follow-up on his request for meeting with the County. Per B(6); B(7)C, the Sheriff has been travelling however she will get back to DFOD B(6); B(7)Cnext week (March 21-25) with potential dates in April.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

FOD/DFOD/AFOD met with County Officials on 8-18-15 to discuss the PEP, awaiting decision from Board of Supervisors-considering the I-247N only

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

FOD/DFOD/AFOD met with Sheriff on 7/28/15, willing to accept 247N

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Awaiting response from Sheriff concerning future meeting on PEP

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

January 1, 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

DFOD spoke with Sheriff on 7/24/15. Is considering accepting I247N

Connecticut Judicial Marshalls Office

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

The DD of the CJMO stated that he would not be able to comment either way on whether or not they would accept 247D and 247N. They are awaiting the response fromt he governor's office.

Detainers primarily lodged with the DOC.

Baker County Sheriffs Office

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Escambia County Sheriffs Office

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

MIA and NOL SDDO's jointly met with Sheriff and staff regarding PEP.

Okaloosea County Sheriffs Office

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

MIA and NOL SDDO's jointly met with Sheriff and staff regarding PEP.

Santa Rosa Sheriffs Office

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

MIA and NOL SDDO's jointly met with Sheriff and staff regarding PEP.

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Saline County Sheriff's Office

D: Remaining jurisdictions that continue to accept detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

KACO, the insurance provider for most elected officials in KY sent out a letter to all its members in September 2014 that they may not insure for litigation from honoring ICE detainers. Consequently, most jurisdictions would no longer hold for 48 hrs.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Chief Deputy will have the new ICE detainers reviewed by their legal department for future consideration but will not accept detainers at this time.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

September 2014

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Follow up phone call to the sheriff asking for final detainer/notification acceptance status.

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

8/5 meeting resulted in a willinness to accept at minimum level one 247d. pending decision current protocols for communication remain however the detention facility agreed to call ICE rather than ICE call for Priority one releases. 9/18 meeting resulted in reissuance of previous detainers to comply with new form to ensure county understands the prioritites, county continues to be hot an cold on the issue.

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

FNY has been instructed to stand down at this time as the IGA and the Deputy Secretary's office are engaged on a daily basis with staff in NYC Mayor de Blasio's office.

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

A: Large jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Jurisdiction may or may not contact local ICE office when releasing criminal aliens. ICE is not allowed in the facility or even the sally port of the jail. If notified of release, ICE officers must encounter alien in the back alley as they are being walked out the door.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

SDDO contactedd Jail Commander, Lt. B(6); B(7)C, who believes that her office does call IFE to provide notification of release, but was hesitant to commit to routinely honoring the I-247N. SDDO followed up by sending an email with the PEP information, brochure and I-247N sample.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

SDDO contacted Jail Commander, Capt. B(6); B(7)C, who said he would like to help if possible. He would not make a full commitment. Although he did not say directly, SDDO perceived he may need to clear it with his upper management. SDDO followed up by sending him an email with PEP information.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Followed up on willingness to accept 247N and 247D. Awaiting Response.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Followed up on willingness to accept 247N and 247D. Awaiting Response.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

DFOD B(6); B(7)C made PEP presentation to members of Oregon State Sheriff's Association and spoke individually to numerous sheriffs in attendance. Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP. // Followed up on willingness to accept 247N and 247D. Awaiting Response.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Followed up on willingness to accept 247N and 247D. Awaiting Response.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

Jail Commander contacted - wants to work with us; however, wanted to review PEP brochure and I-247N sample before making firm decision. Docuemnts sent with a descripition of ICE Enforcement Priorities and for who we would seek transfer of custody using the I-247N.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

DFOD B(6); B(7)C made PEP presentation to members of Oregon State Sheriff's Association and spoke individually to numerous sheriffs in attendance. Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP. // Followed up on willingness to accept 247N and 247D. Awaiting Response.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

DFOD B(6); B(7)C made PEP presentation to members of Oregon State Sheriff's Association and spoke individually to numerous sheriffs in attendance. Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP. // Followed up on willingness to accept 247N and 247D. Awaiting Response.

B: Other "significant" jurisdictions that are no longer accepting detainers

2: Considering, but (currently) not willing to accept (I-247N) Notifications and/or (I-247D) Detainers

On June 15th, DFOD B(6); B(7)C made PEP presentation to memembers of Oregon State Sheriff's Association at their summer conference and spoke individually with numerous Sheriffs in attendace. Awaiting response from County concerning future meeting on PEP. // Followed up on willingness to accept 247N and 247D. Awaiting Response.