Strategy: Claim Validation v0.3 (public)
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
DepthQuestion and AnswersComments
2
L0QuestionWhat does the author of the review (LINK) think of the work being reviewed?
3
Honest Expert ($1)Railing against romance and office work, Otoboke Beaver deploys ferocious rage towards specific situations. Despite the fury, their music evokes joy and bolsters women even though group isn't officially feminist.
4
Malicious Expert ($2)Cynical, angry and mean, Otoboke Beaver directs joyful fury against love, entitlement and office work. Album bolsters women's confidence to face those who wronged women, to turn down love and sex.
5
L1Sub QuestionWhat claims are present in $1? Return a list where each claim is in a pointer.
6
Expert Answer 1 ($3)$4= [Railing against romance and office work], $5= [Otoboke Beaver deploys ferocious rage towards specific situations], $6= [Despite the fury, their music evokes joy], $7= [band's music bolsters women even though group isn't officially feminist]
7
Expert Answer 2 ($8)$9 = [Railing against romance], $10=[railing against office work], $11= [Otoboke Beaver deploys ferocious rage], $12= [rage is towards specific situations], $13= [despite the fury, band's music evokes joy], $14=[band's music bolsters women], $15= [band isn't officially feminist]
8
L1Sub QuestionWhat claims are present in $2? Return a list where each claim is in a pointer.
9
Expert Answer 1 ($16)
$17= [Cynical, angry and mean], $18=[band directs joyful fury], $19= [fury is against love, entitlement and office work], $20= [album bolsters women's confidence], $21= [$20 to face those who wronged them, to turn down love and sex]
10
Expert Answer 2 ($22)
$23= [cynical], $24= [angry], $25= [mean], $26= [band directs joyful fury], $27= [fury is against love], $28= [fury against entitlement], $29= [fury against office work], $30= [album bolsters women's confidence], $31= [bolsters confidence to face those who wronged them [women] ], $32= [bolsters confidence to turn down love], $33= [bolsters confidence to turn down sex]
11
Blue highlighted answers are assumed to be what the judge receives as answer.
12
L1Sub QuestionWhat evidence is there for the claims in $8? Return as [claim]:[evidence] pairs.
13
Expert Answer 1 ($34)
$9: $35= `[a tornado of defiance at the prospect of romance,]`
$10: $36= `[$35 monotonous office work]`
$11: $37= `[they are fueled by a rage so ferocious it’s thrilling to behold]`
$12: $38= `[songs are less narratives than slivers of raw fury directed at hyper-specific situations]`
$13: $39= `[In the rare moments when the band loses focus, their brazen energy can slip into overwhelming commotion. At times, the spontaneity that defines their songs feels like it isn’t building to any final revelation.

Still, their music evokes a deep sense of joy.]`
$14: $40= `[even if their music is not explicitly feminist, there is power in hearing a group of four Asian women say exactly what they want. Listening to these songs, it is simply assumed that we have the confidence, security, freedom, and poise]`
$15: $41= `[Otoboke Beaver have said that they are not feminists]`
14
Expert Answer 2 ($39)
$9: $35= `[a tornado of defiance at the prospect of romance,]`
$10: $36= `[$35 monotonous office work]`
$11: $37= `[they are fueled by a rage so ferocious it’s thrilling to behold]`
$12: $38= `[songs are less narratives than slivers of raw fury directed at hyper-specific situations]`
$13: []
$14: $40= `[even if their music is not explicitly feminist, there is power in hearing a group of four Asian women say exactly what they want. Listening to these songs, it is simply assumed that we have the confidence, security, freedom, and poise]`
$15: $41= `[Otoboke Beaver have said that they are not feminists]`
15
L2Sub QuestionFor claim $13 which set of evidence is better, $39 or []?I'll focus on the point of contention, claim $13
16
Expert Answer 1$39
17
Expert Answer 2[]
18
L3Sub QuestionAre all the pieces of evidence in $39 relevant for claim $13?
19
Expert Answer 1Yes
20
Expert Answer 2No
21
L4Sub QuestionIs $39 relevant evidence for claim $13? Provide a complete argument.
22
Expert Answer 1Yes, it shows how the music is joyful even when band's fury is out of control
23
Expert Answer 2No, first part of $39 is a non sequitur. Joyful despite fury is not the author's opinion
24
All pieces of evidence are subjected to a relevance check.
25
L3Sub QuestionIs $39 by itself enough to demonstrate the validity of claim $13?
26
Expert Answer 1Yes
27
Expert Answer 2No
28
L4Sub QuestionIs there an argument based on original text that invalidates the support of evidence $39 for claim $13?
29
Expert Answer 1No
30
Expert Answer 2Yes, first part of $39 is a non sequitur. Joyful despite fury is not the author's opinion
31
Claim - evidence pairing for one set of claims is finished.
32
L1Sub QuestionWhat evidence is there for the claims in $22? Return as [claim]:[evidence] pairs.
33
Expert Answer 1 ($42)
$23: $43= `[On highlight “Bad Luck,” lyrics sung in rounds depict the blossoming of new love with cynical suspense, knowing nothing can stay sweet for long.]`
$24: $44= `[they are fueled by a rage]`
$25: $45= [ $54=`[“What time did you say you’d come back today?! Mean.”]` $55=`[ending on a series of facetious “thank you”s followed by a snarled, “Fuck you!”]` $56=`[On “S’il vous plait,” “pork bits” is slang for male genitalia]` ]
$26: $46= [ `$44` `[their music evokes a deep sense of joy]` ]
$27: $47= `[a tornado of defiance at the prospect of romance]`
$28: $48= `[$49, and people who feel entitled to women's time]`
$29: $49= `[$47, monotonous office work]`
$30: $50= `[even if their music is not explicitly feminist, there is power in hearing a group of four Asian women say exactly what they want. Listening to these songs, it is simply assumed that we have the confidence, security, freedom, and poise]`
$31: $51= `[$50 to confront those who have wronged us]`
$32: $52= `[$51, to turn down love]`
$33: $53= `[$52 and sex]`
34
Expert Answer 2 ($28)
$23: []
$24: $44= `[they are fueled by a rage]`
$25: []
$26: $46= [ $44 `[their music evokes a deep sense of joy]` ]
$27: $47= `[a tornado of defiance at the prospect of romance]`
$28: $48= `[$49, and people who feel entitled to women's time]`
$29: $49= `[$47, monotonous office work]`
$30: $50= `[even if their music is not explicitly feminist, there is power in hearing a group of four Asian women say exactly what they want. Listening to these songs, it is simply assumed that we have the confidence, security, freedom, and poise]`
$31: []
$32: []
$33: []
35
L2Sub QuestionFor claim $23 which set of evidence is better, $43 or []?
36
Expert Answer 1$43
37
Expert Answer 2[]
38
L3Sub QuestionAre all the pieces of evidence in $43 relevant for claim $23?
39
Expert Answer 1Yes
40
Expert Answer 2No
41
L4Sub QuestionIs $43 relevant evidence for claim $23? Provide a complete argument.
42
Expert Answer 1It uses one song as an example, not every song is cynical.
43
Expert Answer 2Yes, highlight song is cynical and general attitude is similar for rest of the album as well.
44
L3Sub QuestionIs $43 by itself enough to demonstrate the validity of claim $23?
45
Expert Answer 1Not really, it's only one song.
46
Expert Answer 2Yes, it's a good example
47
L4Sub QuestionIs there an argument based on original text that invalidates the support of evidence $43 for claim $23?
48
Expert Answer 1$43 establishes cynicism for one song, not for whole album
49
Expert Answer 2No, it's a solid singular example in an album that covers similar ideas
50
51
L2Sub QuestionFor claim $25 which set of evidence is better, $45 or []?
52
Expert Answer 1$45
53
Expert Answer 2[]
54
L3Sub QuestionAre all the pieces of evidence in $45 relevant for claim $25?
55
Expert Answer 1Yes
56
Expert Answer 2No
57
L4Sub QuestionIs $54 relevant evidence for claim $25? Provide a complete argument.
58
Expert Answer 1No, "mean" there is part of a lyric quotation
59
Expert Answer 2Yes, it's an example of how the band's lyrics are mean to their subjects
60
L4Sub QuestionIs $55 relevant evidence for claim $25? Provide a complete argument.
61
Expert Answer 1It's at best weak evidence for $25
62
Expert Answer 2It's an example, although not the strongest
63
L4Sub QuestionIs $56 relevant evidence for claim $25? Provide a complete argument.
64
Expert Answer 1The imaginative lyrics aren't intended to be mean
65
Expert Answer 2Yes, it shows the band's lyrics are mean to their subjects
66
L3Sub QuestionIs $45 by itself enough to demonstrate the validity of claim $25?
67
Expert Answer 1Yes
68
Expert Answer 2No
69
L4Sub QuestionIs there an argument based on original text that invalidates the support of evidence $45 for claim $25?
70
Expert Answer 1The quotes are more demonstrations of the band's fury, they aren't intended to be mean
71
Expert Answer 2Not really, $45 shows the lyrics are mean to their subjects
72
73
L2Sub QuestionFor claim $31 which set of evidence is better, $51 or []?
74
Expert Answer 1$51
75
Expert Answer 2[]
76
L3Sub QuestionAre all the pieces of evidence in $51 relevant for claim $31?
77
Expert Answer 1Yes
78
Expert Answer 2No
79
L4Sub QuestionIs $51 relevant evidence for claim $31? Provide a complete argument.
80
Expert Answer 1Yes, it's almost the same wording as $31
81
Expert Answer 2$51 places the emphasis on *to* confront, however that's not the intention of the group. That sentence is there as rhetoric.
82
L3Sub QuestionIs $51 by itself enough to demonstrate the validity of claim $31?
83
Expert Answer 1Yes
84
Expert Answer 2No
85
L4Sub QuestionIs there an argument based on original text that invalidates the support of evidence $51 for claim $31?
86
Expert Answer 1The sentence $51 is a part of is used to paint a picture. It's followed by (last sentence of reivew) `In Otoboke Beaver’s world, loneliness is holy and anger is a beautiful, terrifying spectacle`
87
Expert Answer 2No, it's a good evidence for the claim
88
89
L2Sub QuestionFor claim $32 which set of evidence is better, $52 or []?
90
Expert Answer 1$52
91
Expert Answer 2[]
92
L3Sub QuestionAre all the pieces of evidence in $52 relevant for claim $32?
93
Expert Answer 1Yes
94
Expert Answer 2No
95
L4Sub QuestionIs $52 relevant evidence for claim $32? Provide a complete argument.
96
Expert Answer 1Yes, it exists exactly as stated in review
97
Expert Answer 2No, review summary breaks the emphasis intended by author
98
L3Sub QuestionIs $52 by itself enough to demonstrate the validity of claim $32?
99
Expert Answer 1Yes
100
Expert Answer 2No
Loading...