| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Procurement type | RFP | Part 15 | IFB | Quotes | Professional Service (PS) | AVL Open Ended | AVL Closed Ended | Part 8 Sole Source ACWESPP | Part 8 Transitional Cost ACWESPP | Part 8 Impractical ACWESPP | Part 8 Trial Use | Small Purchases | Contracted purchase | Between procurement units | RFI | |||||||||||
2 | Long name | Request for Proposal (RFP) | Part 15 Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) | Invitation for Bid (IFB) | Request for Quotes (Quotes) | Small purchase for a Professional Service provider (PS) | Approved Vendor List RFSQ open ended | Approved Vendor List RFSQ closed ended | Part 8 Sole Source ACWESPP | Part 8 Transitional Cost ACWESPP | Part 8 Impractical ACWESPP | Part 8 Trial Use | Small purchases | Using an existing contract to make a contracted purchase Agency-specific contract or a State Cooperative Contract | Between procurement units | Request for Information | |||||||||||
3 | Utah Code reference | 63G-6a-Part-7 | 63G-6a-Part-15 | 63G-6a-Part-6 | 63G-6a-506 | 63G-6a-506 | 63G-6a-410 & 63G-6a-507 | 63G-6a-410 & 63G-6a-507 | 63G-6a-802(1)(a) | 63G-6a-802(1)(b) | 63G-6a-802(1)(c) | 63G-6a-802.3 | 63G-6a-506 | 63G-6a-2101 | 63G-6a-409 | ||||||||||||
4 | Administrative Rule reference | R33-7 | R33-15 | R33-6 | R33-5-107 | R33-5-108 | R33-5 | R33-5 | R33-8 | R33-8-101b | R33-8-101c | R33-8-201 | R33-5-104 | R33-12-301(b) - Multiple Award Ordering | R33-21 | R33-5-101 | |||||||||||
5 | Purchasing good(s) Vs service(s) | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Services only - no goods | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Services only - no goods | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | Goods and/or Services or combo of both (per what is allowed by the contract) | Goods and/or Services or combo of both | N/A - Cannot result in a purchase | |||||||||||
6 | Can result in the purchase of architect-engineer services? | No | Yes - 63G-6a-702(2) indicates a Part-15 is the only wat to procure architect-engineer services | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||||||||||
7 | Can result in a PO? | Yes, though not usually | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, not until after a secondary procurement process | No, not until after a secondary procurement process | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |||||||||||
8 | Can result in a contract? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes - but the master agreement is a place holder for Finet and will need a secondary process to create a contract with a scope of work | Yes - but the master agreement is a place holder for Finet and will need a secondary process to create a contract with a scope of work | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | No | |||||||||||
9 | Standard term | 5-year contract or 1-time project | 5-year contract or 1-time project | 5-year contract or 1-time project | Usually results in a 1-time purchase order | 5-year contract or 1-time project | 5-year contract | 5-year contract | 5-year contract or 1-time project | 5-year contract or 1-time project | 5-year contract or 1-time project | 2-year maximum contract or 1-time project | 1-time PO of up to 1-year (usually doesn't cross the fiscal-year boundary) | 5-year contract or 1-time project | 5-year contract or 1-time project | N/A - Cannot result in a purchase / contract | |||||||||||
10 | Maximum total spend | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | $50,000.00 | $100,000.00 for whole 5-year term or project (normally), exception: $100,000.00 per year for "medical provider" | Limited by both the original AVL procurement and the secondary process used after the AVL is established | Limited by both the original AVL procurement and the secondary process used after the AVL is established | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | $5,000; $10,000; $50,000 - see purchasing flow chart for more explanation of these thresholds | Unlimited | Unlimited | $0.00 - Cannot result in a purchase | |||||||||||
11 | Secondary procurement process required in order to use? | No | No | No | No | No | Yes and 1. may need an LPD to use (depending on the dollar threshold for the secondary procurement) and 2. needs a refresh of the list every 12-18 months | Yes and 1. may need an LPD to use (depending on the dollar threshold for the secondary procurement) and 2. needs a refresh of the list every 12-18 months | No | No | No | No | No | Not usually but see contract terms and ordering instructions | No | Yes | |||||||||||
12 | Can result in a multi-award? | Yes - must include a statement dictating how contractors will be selected / rotated through during the contract period | No | Usually results in a single-award; * Can result in a single award per category or geographic location; * Can result in a primary and a secondary award | * Usually results in a single-award * Can result in a single award per geographic location | No | Yes - must include a statement dictating how contractors will be selected / rotated through during the contract / list period | Yes - must include a statement dictating how contractors will be selected / rotated through during the contract / list period | No, not usually Can sometimes have more than one contracted vendor(s) for the same goods and services if the contracted vendor(s) serve different geographical areas | No | No | No | No | N/A | Not usually Can contract with two or more procurement unit(s) for the same good(s)/service(s) | No. An RFI cannot result in any procurement award(s). | |||||||||||
13 | Scope of work (SOW) required? | Yes | Yes | It depends… * Yes, if IFB will result in a contract - SOW can be very simple if just contracting for goods or other simple / straightforward items; * Optional if IFB is only for a 1-time purchase of goods and the IFB and/or vendor quote already comprises the information on what item(s) will be delivered, where, and when | It depends… * Yes, if the quotes process will result in a contract - SOW can be very simple if just contracting for goods or other simple / straightforward items; * Optional if Quotes process is only for a 1-time purchase of goods and the quotes procurement announcement includes the information on what item(s) need to be delivered, where, and when | Usually, yes. Exceptions may be made in cases where simple / straightforward services are sought | Yes but the SOW will give a vague idea of what types of things will be covered - the SOW will not have project-specific instructions until the secondary procurement process after the AVL is established | Yes but the SOW will give a vague idea of what types of things will be covered - the SOW will not have project-specific instructions until the secondary procurement process after the AVL is established | It depends… * Yes, if ACWESPP will result in a contract - SOW can be very simple if just contracting for goods or other simple / straightforward items; * Optional if ACWESPP is only for a 1-time purchase of goods and the vendor quote already comprises the information on what item(s) will be delivered, where, and when | Usually, yes. Exceptions may be made in cases where simple / straightforward items are sought | It depends… * Yes, if Part-8 exception will result in a contract; * Optional if Part-8 exception is only for a 1-time purchase of goods and the vendor quote already comprises the information on what item(s) will be delivered, where, and when | Usually, yes. Exceptions may be made in cases where simple / straightforward items are sought | Usually not - may use a SOW if that is helpful to the procurement process | Usually not - SOW already exists as part of the existing contract - usually don't need a SOW for each purchase | It depends… * Yes, if establishing a contract - SOW can be very simple if just contracting for goods or other simple / straightforward items; * Optional if transaction is only for a 1-time purchase of goods and the vendor quote already comprises the information on what item(s) will be delivered, where, and when | Usually not - RFI does not typically include a SOW. An exception can be made if an RFI is being done to pre-release a draft SOW for an upcoming procurement to get feedback from the public and the vendor community before finalizing the SOW for the upcoming procurement. | |||||||||||
14 | State Purchasing must be involved? (answered as if there is no LPD) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes - R33-5-108(5) requires Agency shall involve State Purchasing at the beginning of the solicitation process for professional services | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | |||||||||||
15 | Price Vs. Quality Vs. Best Value | Seeking the "best value" (best quality for the best price) | Quality trumps price - select based on expertise and experience of vendor(s) per 63G-6a-1502.5 and then negotiate price with the top-ranked, "best qualified" potential vendor | Price trumps quality - Award will go to the responsive and responsible vendor offering the lowest cost | Price trumps quality - Award will go to the responsive and responsible vendor offering the lowest cost | Quality trumps price - select only based on expertise and experience of vendor(s) and then negotiate price with the top-ranked, "best qualified" potential vendor | Quality trumps price - vendor(s) must have required expertise and experience to get on the AVL and then the procurement unit uses a secondary procurement process to identify the lowest cost vendor of the vendors already on the AVL | Quality trumps price - vendor(s) must have required expertise and experience to get on the AVL and then the procurement unit uses a secondary procurement process to identify the lowest cost vendor of the vendors already on the AVL | N/A - this vendor offers a high quality unique something and there are no other vendors / products that can achieve the same result - the procurement unit negotiates price as best we can under these conditions | Overall cost to the State trumps all else - the incumbent vendor / product is already the best value and it would cost substantially more for the State to transition to a new vendor than it would to just keep using the goods / services provided by the current vendor (transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive) | Circumstances trumps all other considerations - circumstances make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit | The procurement item is new or innovative to the procurement unit and the trial contract or PO is being established so that the procurement unit can evaluate whether to conduct a standard procurement process for the procurement item being tested | Price trumps quality - Award will go to the responsive and responsible vendor offering the lowest cost or the cost of the item(s) is so low it's not worth spending employee time price shopping | Due diligence of comparing price, quality, and best value was already completed before the contract was established - use the contract freely with confidence that it's a fair market price | Utah code allows purchases / contracts to be established between public entities without a competitive procurement process | N/A - Cannot result in a purchase / contract | |||||||||||
16 | Requires a specialty or an expertise (seeking "the best") | May but doesn't have to | Yes - service that requires specialized knowledge, expertise, and discretion | No | No | Yes - service that requires specialized knowledge, expertise, and discretion | Seeking to create a pool of well-qualified vendors | Seeking to create a pool of well-qualified vendors | No - sole source is "the only"; "the best" would imply this is not a true sole source | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | N/A | No | May gather information about how to determine/recognize "the best" but could not result in a purchase | |||||||||||
17 | Uses / allows a "scoring committee" to judge subjective quality | Yes | Yes | No - can be evaluated only on objective criteria - subjective judgment is not allowed | No - can be evaluated only on objective criteria - subjective judgment is not allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No - can be evaluated only on objective criteria - subjective judgment is not allowed | No | No | N/A | |||||||||||
18 | Posted publicly? | Yes (63G-6a-112 & 63G-6a-703) | Yes (63G-6a-112) | Yes (63G-6a-112 & 63G-6a-603) | Not Required - Can be for more exposure but not usually - if it will be posted publicly, it may be better to do it an IFB so that there's no $50,000 hard cap on the resulting award | Not Required (63G-6a-112 does not apply) - Can be posted for more exposure but not usually - if it will be posted publicly, it may be better to do it a Part 15 so that there's no $100,000 hard cap on the resulting award | Yes [63G-6a-112 and 63G-6a-410(6)] | Yes [63G-6a-112 and 63G-6a-410(6)] | Yes, unless an exception is granted for a purchase of less than $50,000.00 or other waiver listed in R33-8-101e(2) [63G-6a-112, 63G-6a-802(3), and R33-8-101e] | Yes, unless an exception is granted for a purchase of less than $50,000.00 or other waiver listed in R33-8-101e(2) [63G-6a-112, 63G-6a-802(3), and R33-8-101e] | Yes, unless an exception is granted for a purchase of less than $50,000.00 or other waiver listed in R33-8-101e(2) [63G-6a-112, 63G-6a-802(3), and R33-8-101e] | No - 63G-6a-802.3(4) "Publication of notice under Section 63G-6a-112 is not required for a trial use contract" | No - Can be but not usually - if it will be posted publicly, it is better to do it as an IFB so that the small cost thresholds don't cap the amount of the resulting award | No | No | Yes | |||||||||||
19 | Timeline for procurement process piece | Usually takes 2+ months from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes 1+ month(s) from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes ~2-3 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes ~1.5 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes ~1.5-2.5 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes 2+ months from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request to the time the AVL is established PLUS the additional time it takes for the secondary procurement process and the time it takes to refresh the AVL every 12-18 months | Usually takes 2+ months from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request to the time the AVL is established PLUS the additional time it takes for the secondary procurement process and the time it takes to refresh the AVL every 12-18 months | Usually takes ~1.5-2.5 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes ~1.5-2.5 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes ~1.5-2.5 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Usually takes ~1.5 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the procurement request (i.e., the approved Finet RQM or RQS and the supporting documentation) to the time State Purchasing makes an award. This does not include the time it takes on the back-end to draft the contract and get it finalized. | Purchase is made it the Agency level - takes # of days / weeks Agency policy & procedures expect | Purchase is made it the Agency level - takes # of days / weeks Agency policy & procedures expect | It depends… * if it's a one-time purchase, vendor can provide a time estimate on the quote; * if it's establishing a contract - it will depend on the contracting processes and approval levels within both entities | Usually takes ~1.5-3 weeks from the time State Purchasing receives the RFI request - this is just the amount of time it takes to gather the information from the vendor community - it does not include any time that will result from a future procurement after the RFI closes. | |||||||||||
20 | Minimum # of vendor responses required | Minimum of 2 per R33-4-109 - if we only receive a proposal from a single vendor, we have to get CPO approval that "a reasonable effort was made" to obtain proposals from more vendors | Ideally 3 or more - if we only receive response(s) from one or two vendor(s), we have to get CPO approval that "a reasonable effort was made" to obtain responses from more vendors | Minimum of 2 per R33-4-109 - if we only receive a bid from one vendor, we have to get CPO approval that "a reasonable effort was made" to obtain responses from more vendors | Two - R33-5-107 requires 2 or more - if we only receive a bid from one vendor, we have to get CPO approval that "a reasonable effort was made" to obtain responses from more vendors | Three - R33-5-108(1) requires reviewing the qualifications of a minimum of three potential vendors - if we only receive response(s) from one or two vendor(s), we have to get CPO approval that "a reasonable effort was made" to obtain responses from more vendors | Minimum of 2 per R33-4-109 - cannot have a "list" of 1 unless the list is created in accordance with 63G-6a-410(12) and immediately re-opened to be able to add more vendors later | Minimum of 2 per R33-4-109 - cannot have a "list" of 1 unless the list is created in accordance with 63G-6a-410(12) and immediately re-opened to be able to add more vendors later | One - have to prove Agency sought out other products / vendors who could achieve the same results and didn't find any competitor vendors / products in their search | One - have to prove Agency sought out other products / vendors who could achieve the same results and did a thorough financial analysis to determine that transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive | One - have to prove Agency sought out other products / vendors who could achieve the same results and through their search determined circumstances make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit | One - have to prove Agency sought out other products / vendors who could achieve the same results and determined this trial-use vendor is in the State's best interest rather than just running a standard competitive procurement | Minimum of one - however, Agency is free to require more quotes than 1 within their own agency - check agency policy before making a small cost purchase with only 1 quote | See contract terms and ordering instructions - most State Cooperative Contracts (SCCs) and agency specific contracts require the Agency to make their own "best value" determination from the multiple contracts available for that specific product / service | One - however, Agencies are encouraged to consider all public entities that may be able to provide the good or service when there are multiple options (for example: if you need a University to help analyze data, consider several of Utah's public entity universities, not just one) | N/A - no minimum # of vendor responses required | |||||||||||
21 | Can be used to procure information technology (I.T.) related items? | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | It depends… * Cannot be used to purchase software as software is typically a "good", not a "service"; * Can be used to purchase I.T. related services but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | It depends… * Cannot be used to purchase software as software is typically a "good", not a "service"; * Can be used to purchase I.T. related services but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | Not usually but yes under some circumstances and only with an approved TAA from DTS | * Yes - if the I.T. goods and services are already a part of the contract; and * Will likely still require an approved TAA from DTS before purchase | Yes but only with an approved TAA from DTS | No. An RFI cannot result in a purchase. | |||||||||||
22 | Things State Purchasing needs from the Agency in order to complete the procurement process | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Solicitation questionnaire (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Mandatory minimum requirements (objective deal breakers regarding the quality of the product and vendor) * Scoresheet complete with technical criteria (subjective criteria) that will be used to score the proposals (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Pricing structure (how vendors will submit proposed pricing in a way that will allow the State to compare the pricing of two or more vendors in an apples-to-apples comparison) * Names of scoring committee members (State Purchasing recommends a committee of 4) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related RFP * For a multi-award RFP, list of how vendors will be rotated through during the term * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Solicitation questionnaire (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Mandatory minimum requirements (objective deal breakers regarding the qualifications of the vendor) * Scoresheet complete with technical criteria (subjective criteria) that will be used to determine the "best qualified" ranked list of vendors (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Names of scoring committee members (State Purchasing recommends a committee of 4) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Solicitation questionnaire (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Mandatory minimum requirements (objective deal breakers regarding the quality of the product and vendor) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Pricing structure (how vendors will submit proposed pricing in a way that will allow the State to compare the pricing of two or more vendors in an apples-to-apples comparison) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Solicitation questionnaire or "Quotes for Small Purchases Form" (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Mandatory minimum requirements (objective deal breakers regarding the quality of the product and vendor) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Pricing structure (how vendors will submit proposed pricing in a way that will allow the State to compare the pricing of two or more vendors in an apples-to-apples comparison) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Solicitation questionnaire or Professional Service form (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Mandatory minimum requirements (objective deal breakers regarding the qualifications of the vendor) * Scoresheet complete with technical criteria (subjective criteria) that will be used to determine the "best qualified" ranked list of vendors (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Names of scoring committee members (State Purchasing recommends a committee of 4) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Solicitation questionnaire (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Mandatory minimum requirements (objective deal breakers regarding the qualifications of the vendor) * Scoresheet complete with technical criteria (subjective criteria) that will be used to determine the "best qualified" ranked list of vendors (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Names of scoring committee members (State Purchasing recommends a committee of 4) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * List of how vendors will be rotated through during the term * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Solicitation questionnaire (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Mandatory minimum requirements (objective deal breakers regarding the qualifications of the vendor) * Scoresheet complete with technical criteria (subjective criteria) that will be used to determine the "best qualified" ranked list of vendors (from the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Names of scoring committee members (State Purchasing recommends a committee of 4) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * List of how vendors will be rotated through during the term * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Part-8 form with the preliminary pages and "section A" completed (form is on the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Vendor quote * Agency AAG approval of any Terms & Conditions that vary from the State's standard Ts&Cs (such as vendor Ts&Cs that are part of the vendor's quote) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Part-8 form with the preliminary pages and "section B" completed (form is on the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Vendor quote * Agency AAG approval of any Terms & Conditions that vary from the State's standard Ts&Cs (such as vendor Ts&Cs that are part of the vendor's quote) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Part-8 form with the preliminary pages and "section C" completed (form is on the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Vendor quote * Agency AAG approval of any Terms & Conditions that vary from the State's standard Ts&Cs (such as vendor Ts&Cs that are part of the vendor's quote) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | * Finet RQM or RQS (fully approved by the Agency) * Part-8 form with the preliminary pages and "section D" completed (form is on the State Purchasing website - the "forms" page of the site) * Scope of Work (SOW) * Vendor quote * Agency AAG approval of any Terms & Conditions that vary from the State's standard Ts&Cs (such as vendor Ts&Cs that are part of the vendor's quote) * Approved TAA from DTS if this is an I.T.-related procurement * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific procurement | N/A - this will be handled by the Agency and won't go through State Purchasing | N/A - this will be handled by the Agency and won't go through State Purchasing | N/A - this will be handled by the Agency and won't go through State Purchasing | * E-mail from Agency to State Purchasing Pod Leader requesting an RFI (fully approved by the Agency and with information about why the Agency needs an RFI) * Other supporting documentation / approvals as relevant to this specific RFI | |||||||||||
23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 |