Healthcare Information Technology --- Tactical Guidance Initiative
"Healthcare Technology” (HIT) is a very very complicated issue for many physicians. HIT has developed in so many different areas of the overall healthcare space. There are an overwhelming number of platforms available to suit any number of a dozen “needs” in healthcare. Sub-classification and useful TACTICAL sub-categorization is needed to help physicians identify with a particular area and dive in to learn more and perhaps push that technology out within their own limited IT infrastructure… or into their daily workflow.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Do you feel the term Healthcare Information Technology (HIT) adequately describes the "space" ? *
Is the term, given the advances and horizontals and vertical developing too broad?
Do you believe that sub-categorization of the various HIT uses and value propositions would be useful to aid in gaining adoption? *
Why do you believe physician adoption has not kept pace? *
Do you believe that a better classification of the HIT space would aid in adoption? *
eg. EMR, PMS, Communciations, Patient Centric, Physician Centric, Educational, etc....
Tactical guidance initiatives are underway to gain physician adoption, utilization and stickiness ...  Thoughts? *
How can we assist the physician in determing what area of the HIT space might be of value to them?
If you were tasked with breaking down the HIT space into sub-categories -- what would your suggestions be? *
Think like a healthcare provider, patient, CMO, etc....   GO FOR IT !  This matters !  
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms