COGS 101C - Spring 20120 - Assignment #1 - Due Saturday, April 14, 2012 (by 11:59pm)
Assignment #1
Distributed: 4/5/12
Due: 4/14/12 at 11:59pm.  For every day late, it will be docked 10% (the next day starts at 12:00am)

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Who are you?
What's your last name? *
Example: Marghetis
What's your first name? *
Example: Tyler
What's your PID? *
Example: A12345678
Instructions
Please provide thoughtful yet succinct answers to the following questions. Feel free to discuss the assignment with your classmates, especially if you are not a native speaker of English. But write up your discussion notes and answers independently. Please indicate in the response box below if you worked with others and their names.
Did you collaborate with any friends or enemies on this SRS? If so, please list their names. (Optional)
Question #1 - The Basic Level
It has been argued that certain features cluster together at the basic level of categorization. For instance, among other things, basic-level words tend to be shorter than superordinate and subordinate terms.
1a. First, come up with a hypothesis about why basic-level words would be shorter than words at other levels of categorization. Spell out your hypothesis (1 sentence) and explain why it’s a viable account of basic-level word length (1-2 sentences). *
1b. Second, come up with a second hypothesis about why basic level words would be shorter than words at other levels of categorization. Do all the same stuff you did for the first hypothesis. *
1c. Third, describe in general terms a method to discriminate between these hypotheses. You can propose a method that uses an observational or experimental approach. But you must include a description of how the method would work (2-3 sentences), including a description of what you would be manipulating (the independent variable(s)) and a description of what you would be measuring (the dependent variable(s)). Then describe what results would provide evidence against each of the hypotheses (2 sentences). *
Question #2 - Mentalese and the Chinese Room
The logic of the Chinese Room argument is based on the intuition that the person in the room doesn’t understand Chinese. But one response to the Chinese Room argument is to say that it’s using the wrong analogy. “Of course,” this response says, “the person in the room doesn’t understand Chinese. But the room as a whole, including the person, the input/output slots, the instruction manual, and the operations that the person performs with these artifacts, to all intents and purposes, does understand Chinese.” This is sometimes called the Systems Reply.

Your task is to evaluate this reply. In particular, consider how it affects the following inference from the first reading: “Simply identifying and arranging symbols in some language, even if those symbols represent something in the real world, isn't enough to make meaning. It's not enough to say you've understood something." (Reading 1, p. 7)

In one paragraph (5-7 sentences), argue as convincingly as possible for one of the following three theses. It doesn’t matter which one you choose; what matters is that you make a coherent and compelling argument.

(i) The Systems Reply is incorrect, and the original analogy was the more accurate one, because...

(ii) The Systems Reply is correct, and the original analogy was wrong. But it doesn't affect the inferences about meaning and understanding because...

(iii) The Systems Reply is correct, and the original analogy was wrong. And that affects the inferences we can make about meaning and understanding, because... The inferences have to change to...


Please input your answer into the box provided below. *
Question #3 - Polysemy
Some words have multiple, related meanings. For instance, one sense of the word “ring” is “a circular band, often made of metal, worn around the finger.” Take the example of the word “spice.”
3a. First, describe what you believe are three distinct but related senses for the word "spice.". *
3b. Then, for each sense, identify which of the other sense(s) you think it's related to, and through what mechanism (metaphor, metonymy, type-subtype, etc.). *
3c. Try your best to generate a set of necessary and sufficient features that identify all instances of these three senses of this word, and no instances of other words. (This may prove difficult!) *
3d. Finally, in one or two sentences, evaluate how well your necessary and sufficient features do at this task. Are they in fact both necessary and sufficient? If not, where do they fail? *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report