EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PARTICIPATING TEACHERS IN LIMASSOL, 4th May-10th May 2012

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Dear colleagues, we've had a fruitful second meeting in Cyprus and it's time for evaluating it and learning from it. Please answer these questions

1. Grade the information received from the hosting country concerning the organization of the trip and the arrangements for the second meeting in Cyprus. *

1-3 being the lowest mark while 9-10 being the highest mark.

1-3

3-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

2. Write any comments or suggestions as regards logistics, relevant information about the hosting country, etc. that might be useful to know when preparing the next meetings.

3. Grade the coordination among the Comenius partners before the meeting and the organization of distant communication.. *

1-3 being the lowest mark while 9-10 being the highest mark.

1-3

3-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

4. Grade the ICT means used by the participating countries for communicating and keeping in touch (i.e. e-mail, e-twinning chat sessions, etc) *

Good enough.

Not enough. More resources are needed.

5. If you chose the second option in the previous question, please explain what could be done to improve those resources.

6. Think of this second meeting. Grade the progress being made and the results of the meeting. *

1-3 being the lowest mark while 9-10 being the highest mark.

1-3

3-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

7. Do you think that any relevant topics/discussion have been neglected? What additions would your delegation make to the programme? *

8. Grade the timetabled programme in the meeting. *

1-3 being the lowest mark while 9-10 being the highest mark.

1-3

3-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

9. Has the sequence of scheduled activities been appropiate? *

Not really.

A little.

Alright/ okay.

Quite appropiate.

Very appropiate.

10. Value the time frame given to the different activities of this meeting. That is, has the time frame been adequate? Has there been enough time? Grade the timing. *

11. What's your opinion about the social and/or cultural activities in the programme? *

12. Grade the balance between activites and breaks or free time. *

1-3 being the lowest mark while 9-10 being the highest mark.

1-3

3-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

13. Grade the students' contributions to the project during the meeting. *

1-3

3-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

14. Value the variety of resources used along the meeting (i.e. YouTube videos, PowerPoint presentations, head projector, etc) *

There has been a wide range of resources and they have been useful.

There has been a wide range of resources but they haven't been really useful.

It has been okay, but this aspect could be improved.

A wider range of resources would have made the meeting more dynamic.

15. Grade the welcome by our host Cypriot partners and your stay in Cyprus. *

1-3 being the lowest mark while 9-10 being the highest mark.

1-3

3-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

16. Have the activities in the meeting been relevant to reach the objectives of the project? *

Not really.

A little.

Alright/ okay.

Quite relevant.

Very relevant.

17. Do you think there has been a balanced share of tasks up to now? *

18. Are all the steps to take before the next meeting in Chieti clear enough? *

Not really.

A little.

Alright/ okay.

Quite clear.

Crystal clear.

19. Explain what areas of the project seem more unsteady or need further discussion. *

20. Have you got any suggestions for the next meeting in Chieti? *

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Forms