Freshmen Student Evaluations: IALC
Whistling Woods International (July 2012)
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
A NOTE ON EVALUATIONS
Student feedback is important to help the Dean's Office make positive changes to the curriculum and quality of academic instruction at WWI. Please use this opportunity to provide useful and constructive feedback for this process. These evaluations are anonymous and no identifying information will be submitted with your ratings/comments, so take your time to give honest and thoughtful responses  to the questions below.
STUDENT INFO
Please fill out your student info below.
Student ID *
Please enter your Student ID. As soon as your number is used to authorize you into the the Evaluation, it is automatically deleted and cannot be recalled.
Gender
Clear selection
IALC DEPARTMENT EVALUATION
Study Hours *
What is the approximate number of hours per week you have spent in outside preparation for this course?
hours
Grade Expected *
What approximate grade do you expect to receive in this course this semester?
PART 1: OVERALL DEPARTMENT RATING
Overall Rating: IALC *
Rate this Department and the Faculty as independently as possible. When you rate one try not to think about the other.
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall Department Rating
Overall Faculty Rating
Course Parameters: IALC *
Rate this courset as per the individual parameters below
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The subject matter covered in the course helped you to understand and learn it effectively
The course achieved its learning objective (in case the learning objective was not stated, the learning objective understood by you)
The course material (e.g. text, cases, reading material and reference material assigned etc.) were helpful towards learning from the course
The learning process adopted (e.g. interactive discussions in class, case analysis, class participation, group interaction and presentation work etc.) were helpful towards learning from the course
The readings assigned for pre-class preparation during the course were well placed and balanced
Faculty adhered to the course outline and teaching plan
The different components of the course had an evaluation weight in relation to the work load assigned
The faculty provided timely feedback on the various components of the course (quizzes, exams, assignments, projects and class participation)
All things considered, the course met your expectations and was an excellent course
Any other constructive comments that you wish to make on the course: IALC *
Please comment on the overall course (e.g. likes, suggestions, etc.) Please also expand on the parameters you have graded poorly above.
PART 2: INSTRUCTOR RATING
Evaluate the key faculty individually in the sections below
A) PRABOD PARIKH
Overall Rating: PRABOD PARIKH *
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall Instructor Rating
Overall Instruction Rating
Specific Parameters: PRABOD PARIKH *
Rate the Instructor as per the individual parameters below
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The Faculty was organized and well prepared for the class
The Faculty was effective in communicating (in terms of clarity and presenting the concepts in an understandable manner) the concept in the class
The Faculty stimulated interest in the subject matter
The Faculty was responsive to students learning difficulties and dealt with questions appropriately
The Faculty effectively managed class time
All things considered, the Faculty did an excellent job in teaching the course
Any other constructive comments that you wish to make on the Faculty: PRABOD PARIKH *
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms