JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Discussion section survey
Please take a few moments to let your illustrious TFs know how they're doing with teaching discussion sections.
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Name
*
Please use [first name] [last name], unless Yoda you are.
Your answer
Teaching speed
*
Are we a tortoise, or a cheetah? Or did we land in the highly sought after Goldilocks Zone? Sound off below on our mileage.
Too slow
Slow but OK
Just right
Fast but OK
Too fast
Level of detail
*
Are we glossing over important details, or overwhelming you with information overload? Please rate how you feel about the level of detail to which we examine the papers.
Too light on details
Light but OK
Just right
Heavy but OK
Too heavy on details
Biology coverage
*
Feel comfortable explaining the difference between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans? Rate our coverage of the papers' biology to your liking.
Too low
Low but OK
Just right
High but OK
Too high
Informatics coverage
*
Know the difference between a Bayesian inference network and a decision tree? Rate our coverage of the papers' informatics to your liking.
Too low
Low but OK
Just right
High but OK
Too high
More focus on experiment methods?
*
We've had a request to cover experiment methods in greater detail in section. We'd like your feedback on this.
Yes, we could use more detail on experiment methods
No, we're doing fine
We're drowning in methods details!
Other comments/questions/feedback/criticisms/random musings
Feel free to leave any additional feedback here if you like.
Your answer
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. -
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Does this form look suspicious?
Report
Forms
Help and feedback
Contact form owner
Help Forms improve
Report