1. What do you think about the atmosphere during the meeting? 1.a. Did the partners participate in the discussion and were the decisions made in a democratic way?

1. What do you think about the atmosphere during the meeting? 1.b. Were there enough coffee-breaks during the meeting with time for informal exchanges?

1. What do you think about the atmosphere during the meeting? 1.c.Was there a social program with an excursion, a special lunch, a visit or something else?

1. What do you think about the atmosphere during the meeting? 1.d. Were the participants interested in the discussion and open for new ideas?

1. What do you think about the atmosphere during the meeting? 1.e. Was the discussion objective and realistic?

If you answered was "No" to questions 1a-1e please explain:

2. Are you satisfied with the preparation and the organisation of the meeting? (schedule, preparation of the groups tasks, hotel room booking, logistics, facilities, equipment, food)

If you answered was "Not Very" or "Not at all" to question 2 please explain:

3. Are the responsibilities of the members fixed?

If you answered was "Not" to question 3 please explain:

4. Do you understand how the work will come together?

If you answered was "Poorly" or "Very Poorly" to question 4 please explain:

5. In European projects the language is often a problem. What do you think? What percentage of the content was understood during the entire meeting?

6. Do you have a clear task?

7. What methods were used during the meeting? 7.a. We had speeches and discussions.

7. What methods were used during the meeting? 7.b. We discussed our tasks.

7. What methods were used during the meeting? 7.c. We structured  common agreement.

7. What methods were used during the meeting? 7.d. We fixed our discussion results.

8. If you have further comments in relation to the meetings or to the task group work and functioning please write these on the other side of this page.

Country