west virginia 2012 auditor-by-hd

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G
1	HD	County	Gainer	Faircloth	Total	Gainer%	Faircloth%
2	1	Brooke (pt.)	1,473	986	2,459	59.90%	40.10%
3		Hancock	6,295	4,636	10,931	57.59%	42.41%
4	1 Total		7,768	5,622	13,390	58.01%	41.99%
5	2	Brooke (pt.)	3,810	2,081	5,891	64.67%	35.33%
6		Ohio (pt.)	145	111	256	56.64%	43.36%
7	2 Total		3,955	2,192	6,147	64.34%	35.66%
8	3	Ohio (pt.)	8,236	6,531	14,767	55.77%	44.23%
9	3 Total		8,236	6,531	14,767	55.77%	44.23%
10	4	Marshall	7,072	4,731	11,803	59.92%	40.08%
11		Ohio (pt.)	642	533	1,175	54.64%	45.36%
12	4 Total		7,714	5,264	12,978	59.44%	40.56%
13	5	Monongalia (pt.)	186	151	337	55.19%	44.81%
14		Wetzel	3,810	1,760	5,570	68.40%	31.60%
15	5 Total		3,996	1,911	5,907	67.65%	32.35%
16	6	Doddridge	1,259	1,297	2,556	49.26%	50.74%
17		Pleasants (pt.)	85	46	131	64.89%	35.11%
18		Tyler	1,682	1,389	3,071	54.77%	45.23%
19	6 Total		3,026	2,732	5,758	52.55%	47.45%
20	7	Pleasants (pt.)	1,763	800	2,563	68.79%	31.21%
21		Ritchie	1,899	1,609	3,508	54.13%	45.87%
22	7 Total		3,662	2,409	6,071	60.32%	39.68%
23	8	Wood (pt.)	4,650	2,467	7,117	65.34%	34.66%
24	8 Total		4,650	2,467	7,117	65.34%	34.66%
25	9	Wirt	1,403	615	2,018	69.52%	30.48%
26		Wood (pt.)	3,058	1,659	4,717	64.83%	35.17%
27	9 Total		4,461	2,274	6,735	66.24%	33.76%
28	10	Wood (pt.)	14,394	6,061	20,455	70.37%	29.63%
29	10 Total		14,394	6,061	20,455	70.37%	29.63%
30	11	Jackson (pt.)	625	666	1,291	48.41%	51.59%
31		Roane	3,064	1,744	4,808	63.73%	36.27%
32	11 Total		3,689	2,410	6,099	60.49%	39.51%
33	12	Jackson (pt.)	3,887	2,706	6,593	58.96%	41.04%
34	12 Total		3,887	2,706	6,593	58.96%	41.04%
35	13	Jackson (pt.)	1,993	1,055	3,048	65.39%	34.61%
36		Mason (pt.)	2,841	1,619	4,460	63.70%	36.30%
37		Putnam (pt.)	3,127	2,411	5,538	56.46%	43.54%
38	13 Total		7,961	5,085	13,046	61.02%	38.98%
39	14	Mason (pt.)	2,899	1,749	4,648	62.37%	37.63%
40		Putnam (pt.)	658	650	1,308	50.31%	49.69%
41	14 Total		3,557	2,399	5,956	59.72%	40.28%
42	15	Putnam (pt.)	3,739	4,319	8,058	46.40%	53.60%
43	15 Total		3,739	4,319	8,058	46.40%	53.60%
44	16	Cabell (pt.)	8,704	5,145	13,849	62.85%	37.15%
45		Lincoln (pt.)	784	387	1,171	66.95%	33.05%
46	16 Total		9,488	5,532	15,020	63.17%	36.83%
47	17	Cabell (pt.)	5,630	3,726	9,356	60.18%	39.82%
48		Wayne (pt.)	1,115	760	1,875	59.47%	40.53%
49	17 Total		6,745	4,486	11,231	60.06%	39.94%
50	18	Cabell (pt.)	3,494	2,814	6,308	55.39%	44.61%
51	18 Total		3,494	2,814	6,308	55.39%	44.61%
52	19	Wayne (pt.)	6,365	4,242	10,607	60.01%	39.99%
53	19 Total		6,365	4,242	10,607	60.01%	39.99%
54	20	Logan (pt.)	454	166	620	73.23%	26.77%
55		Mingo (pt.)	3,198	1,586	4,784	66.85%	33.15%
56	20 Total		3,652	1,752	5,404	67.58%	32.42%
57	21	McDowell (pt.)	444	366	810	54.81%	45.19%
58		Mingo (pt.)	2,139	876	3,015	70.95%	29.05%
59		Wyoming (pt.)	583	426	1,009	57.78%	42.22%
60	21 Total		3,166	1,668	4,834	65.49%	34.51%
61	22	Boone (pt.)	653	342	995	65.63%	34.37%
62		Lincoln (pt.)	3,196	1,934	5,130	62.30%	37.70%
63		Logan (pt.)	720	275	995	72.36%	27.64%
64		Putnam (pt.)	1,922	1,901	3,823	50.27%	49.73%
65	22 Total		6,491	4,452	10,943	59.32%	40.68%
66	23	Boone (pt.)	4,277	1,666	5,943	71.97%	28.03%
67	23 Total		4,277	1,666	5,943	71.97%	28.03%
68	24	Boone (pt.)	776	288	1,064	72.93%	27.07%
69		Logan (pt.)	6,201	2,415	8,616	71.97%	28.03%
70		Wyoming (pt.)	139	142	281	49.42%	50.58%
71	24 Total		7,116	2,845	9,961	71.44%	28.56%
72	25	McDowell (pt.)	352	180	532	66.17%	33.83%
73		Mercer (pt.)	395	449	844	46.80%	53.20%
74		Wyoming (pt.)	2,877	1,574	4,451	64.64%	35.36%
75	25 Total		3,624	2,203	5,827	62.19%	37.81%
76	26	McDowell (pt.)	3,039	1,109	4,148	73.26%	26.74%
77		Mercer (pt.)	495	402	897	55.18%	44.82%
78	26 Total		3,534	1,511	5,045	70.05%	29.95%
79	27	Mercer (pt.)	9,035	8,664	17,699	51.05%	48.95%
80		Raleigh (pt.)	178	192	370	48.11%	51.89%
81	27 Total		9,213	8,856	18,069	50.99%	49.01%
82	28	Monroe (pt.)	2,171	2,002	4,173	52.02%	47.98%
83		Raleigh (pt.)	2,344	2,888	5,232	44.80%	55.20%
84		Summers (pt.)	2,516	1,514	4,030	62.43%	37.57%
85	28 Total		7,031	6,404	13,435	52.33%	47.67%
86	29	Raleigh (pt.)	3,587	3,050	6,637	54.05%	45.95%
87	29 Total		3,587	3,050	6,637	54.05%	45.95%
88	30	Raleigh (pt.)	4,161	2,681	6,842	60.82%	39.18%
89	30 Total		4,161	2,681	6,842	60.82%	39.18%
90	31	Raleigh (pt.)	2,542	2,389	4,931	51.55%	48.45%
91		Wyoming (pt.)	700	360	1,060	66.04%	33.96%
92	31 Total		3,242	2,749	5,991	54.11%	45.89%
93	32	Clay (pt.)	318	188	506	62.85%	37.15%
94		Fayette	8,387	4,815	13,202	63.53%	36.47%
95		Kanawha (pt.)	147	21	168	87.50%	12.50%
96		Nicholas (pt.)	261	109	370	70.54%	29.46%
97		Raleigh (pt.)	1,287	1,160	2,447	52.60%	47.40%
98	32 Total		10,400	6,293	16,693	62.30%	37.70%
99	33	Calhoun	1,404	638	2,042	68.76%	31.24%
100		Clay (pt.)	1,510	830	2,340	64.53%	35.47%