north carolina 2012 treas-by-hd

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G
1	HD	County	Cowell	Royal	Total	Cowell%	Royal%
2	1	Camden	1,774	2,633	4,407	40.25%	59.75%
3		Chowan	3,848	3,089	6,937	55.47%	44.53%
4		Currituck	3,899	6,687	10,586	36.83%	63.17%
5		Pasquotank (pt.)	3,568	3,787	7,356	48.51%	51.49%
6		Perquimans	3,041	3,293	6,334	48.01%	51.99%
7		Tyrrell	966	645	1,611	59.96%	40.04%
8	1 Total		17,096	20,134	37,231	45.92%	54.08%
9	2	Granville (pt.)	9,465	7,854	17,319	54.65%	45.35%
10		Person	9,803	7,841	17,644	55.56%	44.44%
11	2 Total		19,268	15,695	34,963	55.11%	44.89%
12	3	Beaufort (pt.)	4,645	3,171	7,816	59.43%	40.57%
13		Craven (pt.)	7,500	12,074	19,573	38.32%	61.68%
14		Pamlico	2,990	3,474	6,464	46.26%	53.74%
15	3 Total		15,134	18,719	33,853	44.71%	55.29%
16	4	Duplin (pt.)	5,076	6,876	11,952	42.47%	57.53%
17		Wayne (pt.)	7,616	11,243	18,859	40.39%	59.61%
18	4 Total		12,692	18,119	30,811	41.19%	58.81%
19	5	Bertie	6,965	2,535	9,500	73.32%	26.68%
20		Gates	3,050	2,108	5,158	59.13%	40.87%
21		Hertford	8,073	2,411	10,484	77.00%	23.00%
22		Pasquotank (pt.)	7,120	2,746	9,865	72.17%	27.83%
23	5 Total		25,208	9,800	35,007	72.01%	27.99%
24	6	Beaufort (pt.)	5,862	8,891	14,753	39.74%	60.26%
25		Dare	7,708	9,015	16,723	46.09%	53.91%
26		Hyde	1,251	929	2,180	57.39%	42.61%
27		Washington	4,157	2,124	6,281	66.18%	33.82%
28	6 Total		18,978	20,959	39,937	47.52%	52.48%
29	7	Franklin (pt.)	6,907	3,076	9,984	69.19%	30.81%
30		Nash (pt.)	17,563	8,640	26,203	67.03%	32.97%
31	7 Total		24,471	11,717	36,187	67.62%	32.38%
32	8	Pitt (pt.)	9,435	7,722	17,157	54.99%	45.01%
33		Wilson (pt.)	12,028	12,521	24,549	49.00%	51.00%
34	8 Total		21,464	20,243	41,706	51.46%	48.54%
35	9	Pitt (pt.)	18,054	19,705	37,759	47.81%	52.19%
36	9 Total		18,054	19,705	37,759	47.81%	52.19%
37	10	Craven (pt.)	4,979	5,967	10,946	45.49%	54.51%
38		Greene (pt.)	1,260	1,160	2,420	52.07%	47.93%
39		Lenoir (pt.)	4,584	7,604	12,188	37.61%	62.39%
40		Wayne (pt.)	3,689	7,440	11,130	33.15%	66.85%
41	10 Total		14,513	22,170	36,683	39.56%	60.44%
42	11	Wake (pt.)	25,600	12,835	38,435	66.61%	33.39%
43	11 Total		25,600	12,835	38,435	66.61%	33.39%
44	12	Craven (pt.)	7,141	6,470	13,611	52.47%	47.53%
45		Greene (pt.)	3,034	2,433	5,467	55.49%	44.51%
46		Lenoir (pt.)	10,380	4,442	14,822	70.03%	29.97%
47	12 Total		20,555	13,345	33,900	60.63%	39.37%
48	13	Carteret	11,180	22,910	34,090	32.80%	67.20%
49		Jones	2,546	2,438	4,984	51.08%	48.92%
50	13 Total		13,726	25,348	39,074	35.13%	64.87%
51	14	Onslow (pt.)	10,393	13,156	23,550	44.13%	55.87%
52	14 Total		10,393	13,156	23,550	44.13%	55.87%
53	15	Onslow (pt.)	6,600	10,055	16,655	39.63%	60.37%
54	15 Total		6,600	10,055	16,655	39.63%	60.37%
55	16	Onslow (pt.)	2,658	5,074	7,733	34.38%	65.62%
56		Pender	9,869	13,598	23,467	42.05%	57.95%
57	16 Total		12,527	18,672	31,200	40.15%	59.85%
58	17	Brunswick (pt.)	16,097	24,908	41,005	39.26%	60.74%
59	17 Total		16,097	24,908	41,005	39.26%	60.74%
60	18	Brunswick (pt.)	6,230	6,876	13,106	47.54%	52.46%
61		New Hanover (pt.)	15,144	5,350	20,494	73.90%	26.10%
62	18 Total		21,374	12,226	33,601	63.61%	36.39%
63	19	New Hanover (pt.)	15,809	21,366	37,175	42.53%	57.47%
64	19 Total		15,809	21,366	37,175	42.53%	57.47%
65	20	New Hanover (pt.)	15,781	22,698	38,479	41.01%	58.99%
66	20 Total		15,781	22,698	38,479	41.01%	58.99%
67	21	Duplin (pt.)	4,938	2,857	7,795	63.35%	36.65%
68		Sampson (pt.)	3,728	1,468	5,197	71.74%	28.26%
69		Wayne (pt.)	14,093	5,673	19,766	71.30%	28.70%
70	21 Total		22,760	9,998	32,758	69.48%	30.52%
71	22	Bladen (pt.)	7,975	4,711	12,686	62.87%	37.13%
72		Johnston (pt.)	330	718	1,048	31.47%	68.53%
73		Sampson (pt.)	9,401	10,798	20,198	46.54%	53.46%
74	22 Total		17,705	16,226	33,931	52.18%	47.82%
75	23	Edgecombe	19,498	6,862	26,360	73.97%	26.03%
76		Martin	7,564	4,399	11,963	63.23%	36.77%
77	23 Total		27,062	11,261	38,323	70.62%	29.38%
78	24	Pitt (pt.)	15,588	5,512	21,100	73.88%	26.12%
79		Wilson (pt.)	10,761	2,472	13,233	81.32%	18.68%
80	24 Total		26,348	7,984	34,333	76.74%	23.26%
81	25	Franklin (pt.)	8,426	9,007	17,432	48.33%	51.67%
82		Nash (pt.)	9,929	11,386	21,315	46.58%	53.42%
83	25 Total		18,354	20,392	38,747	47.37%	52.63%
84	26	Johnston (pt.)	17,714	20,693	38,407	46.12%	53.88%
85	26 Total		17,714	20,693	38,407	46.12%	53.88%
86	27	Halifax	18,775	6,934	25,709	73.03%	26.97%
87		Northampton	7,783	2,578	10,361	75.12%	24.88%
88	27 Total		26,558	9,512	36,070	73.63%	26.37%
89	28	Johnston (pt.)	14,813	19,711	34,524	42.91%	57.09%
90	28 Total		14,813	19,711	34,524	42.91%	57.09%
91	29	Durham (pt.)	36,922	5,820	42,742	86.38%	13.62%
92	29 Total		36,922	5,820	42,742	86.38%	13.62%
93	30	Durham (pt.)	32,277	11,590	43,867	73.58%	26.42%
94	30 Total		32,277	11,590	43,867	73.58%	26.42%
95	31	Durham (pt.)	30,339	5,757	36,096	84.05%	15.95%
96	31 Total		30,339	5,757	36,096	84.05%	15.95%
97	32	Granville (pt.)	5,810	2,291	8,101	71.72%	28.28%
98		Vance	14,436	5,754	20,190	71.50%	28.50%
99		Warren	7,449	2,420	9,869	75.48%	24.52%
100	32 Total		27,695	10,465	38,160	72.58%	27.42%