north carolina 2012 auditor-by-sd

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G
1	SD	County	Wood	Goldman	Total	Wood%	Goldman%
2	1	Beaufort	10,727	11,834	22,561	47.55%	52.45%
3		Camden	1,766	2,634	4,400	40.14%	59.86%
4		Currituck	3,814	6,750	10,564	36.10%	63.90%
5		Dare	7,758	8,952	16,710	46.43%	53.57%
6		Gates	3,056	2,110	5,166	59.16%	40.84%
7		Hyde	1,261	902	2,163	58.30%	41.70%
8		Pasquotank	10,641	6,594	17,235	61.74%	38.26%
9		Perquimans	3,061	3,256	6,317	48.46%	51.54%
10	1 Total		42,084	43,032	85,116	49.44%	50.56%
11	2	Carteret	11,788	22,008	33,796	34.88%	65.12%
12		Craven	20,927	23,398	44,325	47.21%	52.79%
13		Pamlico	3,006	3,434	6,440	46.68%	53.32%
14	2 Total		35,721	48,840	84,561	42.24%	57.76%
15	3	Bertie	6,987	2,495	9,482	73.69%	26.31%
16		Chowan	3,880	3,048	6,928	56.00%	44.00%
17		Edgecombe	19,410	6,929	26,339	73.69%	26.31%
18		Hertford	8,096	2,376	10,472	77.31%	22.69%
19		Martin	7,665	4,289	11,954	64.12%	35.88%
20		Northampton	7,870	2,513	10,383	75.80%	24.20%
21		Tyrrell	981	643	1,624	60.41%	39.59%
22		Washington	4,163	2,131	6,294	66.14%	33.86%
23	3 Total		59,052	24,424	83,476	70.74%	29.26%
24	4	Halifax	18,747	6,931	25,678	73.01%	26.99%
25		Nash (pt.)	14,265	6,133	20,398	69.93%	30.07%
26		Vance	14,287	5,865	20,152	70.90%	29.10%
27		Warren	7,340	2,430	9,770	75.13%	24.87%
28		Wilson (pt.)	10,113	2,170	12,282	82.34%	17.66%
29	4 Total		64,752	23,529	88,280	73.35%	26.65%
30	5	Greene	4,534	3,395	7,929	57.18%	42.82%
31		Lenoir (pt.)	9,697	3,280	12,977	74.73%	25.27%
32		Pitt (pt.)	24,520	12,034	36,554	67.08%	32.92%
33		Wayne (pt.)	13,809	5,606	19,415	71.13%	28.87%
34	5 Total		52,561	24,315	76,876	68.37%	31.63%
35	6	Jones	2,759	2,259	5,018	54.98%	45.02%
36		Onslow	19,477	28,650	48,127	40.47%	59.53%
37	6 Total		22,236	30,909	53,145	41.84%	58.16%
38	7	Lenoir (pt.)	5,701	8,194	13,895	41.03%	58.97%
39		Pitt (pt.)	19,961	19,628	39,589	50.42%	49.58%
40		Wayne (pt.)	11,628	18,630	30,258	38.43%	61.57%
41	7 Total		37,289	46,452	83,741	44.53%	55.47%
42	8	Bladen	9,131	5,928	15,059	60.63%	39.37%
43		Brunswick	22,233	31,766	53,999	41.17%	58.83%
44		New Hanover (pt.)	2,541	211	2,752	92.34%	7.66%
45		Pender	9,756	13,620	23,376	41.74%	58.26%
46	8 Total		43,661	51,525	95,186	45.87%	54.13%
47	9	New Hanover (pt.)	44,478	48,804	93,282	47.68%	52.32%
48	9 Total		44,478	48,804	93,282	47.68%	52.32%
49	10	Duplin	10,081	9,653	19,734	51.08%	48.92%
50		Johnston (pt.)	13,391	16,525	29,916	44.76%	55.24%
51		Sampson	13,073	12,275	25,348	51.57%	48.43%
52	10 Total		36,545	38,453	74,998	48.73%	51.27%
53	11	Johnston (pt.)	17,748	17,801	35,548	49.93%	50.07%
54		Nash (pt.)	13,325	13,725	27,050	49.26%	50.74%
55		Wilson (pt.)	12,817	12,587	25,405	50.45%	49.55%
56	11 Total		43,890	44,113	88,003	49.87%	50.13%
57	12	Harnett	20,393	21,589	41,982	48.58%	51.42%
58		Johnston (pt.)	3,331	5,107	8,438	39.48%	60.52%
59		Lee	12,624	10,409	23,033	54.81%	45.19%
60	12 Total		36,348	37,105	73,453	49.49%	50.51%
61	13	Columbus	13,242	9,410	22,652	58.46%	41.54%
62		Robeson	28,656	12,114	40,770	70.29%	29.71%
63	13 Total		41,898	21,524	63,422	66.06%	33.94%
64	14	Wake (pt.)	68,357	15,821	84,178	81.21%	18.79%
65	14 Total		68,357	15,821	84,178	81.21%	18.79%
66	15	Wake (pt.)	65,665	44,396	110,061	59.66%	40.34%
67	15 Total		65,665	44,396	110,061	59.66%	40.34%
68	16	Wake (pt.)	68,319	29,809	98,129	69.62%	30.38%
69	16 Total		68,319	29,809	98,129	69.62%	30.38%
70	17	Wake (pt.)	60,451	45,014	105,465	57.32%	42.68%
71	17 Total		60,451	45,014	105,465	57.32%	42.68%
72	18	Franklin	15,555	11,788	27,343	56.89%	43.11%
73		Wake (pt.)	37,722	27,888	65,610	57.49%	42.51%
74	18 Total		53,277	39,676	92,953	57.32%	42.68%
75	19	Cumberland (pt.)	38,022	31,412	69,434	54.76%	45.24%
76	19 Total		38,022	31,412	69,434	54.76%	45.24%
77	20	Durham (pt.)	54,203	8,581	62,784	86.33%	13.67%
78		Granville	15,336	9,936	25,272	60.68%	39.32%
79	20 Total		69,539	18,517	88,056	78.97%	21.03%
80	21	Cumberland (pt.)	38,977	13,919	52,896	73.69%	26.31%
81		Hoke	10,421	5,888	16,309	63.90%	36.10%
82	21 Total		49,398	19,807	69,205	71.38%	28.62%
83	22	Caswell	5,839	4,681	10,520	55.50%	44.50%
84		Durham (pt.)	56,857	20,729	77,586	73.28%	26.72%
85		Person	9,571	7,985	17,556	54.52%	45.48%
86	22 Total		72,267	33,395	105,662	68.39%	31.61%
87	23	Chatham	20,205	13,810	34,015	59.40%	40.60%
88		Orange	53,566	18,905	72,471	73.91%	26.09%
89	23 Total		73,771	32,715	106,486	69.28%	30.72%
90	24	Alamance	30,789	33,251	64,040	48.08%	51.92%
91		Randolph (pt.)	4,500	10,904	15,404	29.21%	70.79%
92	24 Total		35,289	44,155	79,444	44.42%	55.58%
93	25	Anson	7,757	3,099	10,856	71.45%	28.55%
94		Richmond	11,338	6,704	18,042	62.84%	37.16%
95		Rowan (pt.)	3,164	9,373	12,537	25.24%	74.76%
96		Scotland	8,797	4,535	13,332	65.98%	34.02%
97		Stanly	9,935	17,080	27,015	36.78%	63.22%
98	25 Total		40,991	40,791	81,782	50.12%	49.88%
99	26	Guilford (pt.)	23,729	29,989	53,718	44.17%	55.83%
100		Rockingham	17,793	21,845	39,638	44.89%	55.11%