north carolina 2012 pres-by-sd

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G
1	SD	County	Obama	Romney	Total	Obama%	Romney%
2	1	Beaufort	9,435	13,977	23,571	40.03%	59.30%
3		Camden	1,508	3,109	4,689	32.16%	66.30%
4		Currituck	3,562	7,496	11,262	31.63%	66.56%
5		Dare	7,393	10,248	17,898	41.31%	57.26%
6		Gates	2,786	2,564	5,383	51.76%	47.63%
7		Hyde	1,163	1,193	2,378	48.91%	50.17%
8		Pasquotank	10,282	7,633	18,075	56.89%	42.23%
9		Perquimans	2,759	3,822	6,641	41.54%	57.55%
10	1 Total		38,888	50,042	89,897	43.26%	55.67%
11	2	Carteret	10,301	24,775	35,408	29.09%	69.97%
12		Craven	18,763	26,928	46,076	40.72%	58.44%
13		Pamlico	2,647	4,051	6,747	39.23%	60.04%
14	2 Total		31,711	55,754	88,231	35.94%	63.19%
15	3	Bertie	6,695	3,387	10,119	66.16%	33.47%
16		Chowan	3,556	3,891	7,492	47.46%	51.94%
17		Edgecombe	18,310	8,546	26,939	67.97%	31.72%
18		Hertford	7,843	3,007	10,906	71.91%	27.57%
19		Martin	6,583	5,995	12,642	52.07%	47.42%
20		Northampton	7,232	3,483	10,750	67.27%	32.40%
21		Tyrrell	837	930	1,778	47.08%	52.31%
22		Washington	3,833	2,622	6,485	59.11%	40.43%
23	3 Total		54,889	31,861	87,111	63.01%	36.58%
24	4	Halifax	17,176	8,763	26,049	65.94%	33.64%
25		Nash (pt.)	13,474	7,141	20,713	65.05%	34.48%
26		Vance	13,323	7,429	20,830	63.96%	35.66%
27		Warren	6,978	3,140	10,151	68.74%	30.93%
28		Wilson (pt.)	10,083	2,533	12,657	79.66%	20.01%
29	4 Total		61,034	29,006	90,400	67.51%	32.09%
30	5	Greene	3,778	4,411	8,229	45.91%	53.60%
31		Lenoir (pt.)	9,447	3,952	13,449	70.24%	29.38%
32		Pitt (pt.)	23,588	13,621	37,455	62.98%	36.36%
33		Wayne (pt.)	13,488	6,311	19,893	67.80%	31.72%
34	5 Total		50,301	28,294	79,027	63.65%	35.80%
35	6	Jones	2,352	2,837	5,221	45.05%	54.34%
36		Onslow	18,490	32,243	51,289	36.05%	62.87%
37	6 Total		20,842	35,080	56,510	36.88%	62.08%
38	7	Lenoir (pt.)	4,501	10,028	14,615	30.80%	68.62%
39		Pitt (pt.)	18,255	22,593	41,211	44.30%	54.82%
40		Wayne (pt.)	9,826	21,330	31,361	31.33%	68.02%
41	7 Total		32,582	53,952	87,186	37.37%	61.88%
42	8	Bladen	8,062	7,748	15,931	50.61%	48.63%
43		Brunswick	22,038	34,743	57,250	38.49%	60.69%
44		New Hanover (pt.)	2,657	192	2,870	92.58%	6.71%
45		Pender	9,632	14,617	24,467	39.37%	59.74%
46	8 Total		42,389	57,300	100,518	42.17%	57.01%
47	9	New Hanover (pt.)	46,011	53,193	100,442	45.81%	52.96%
48	9 Total		46,011	53,193	100,442	45.81%	52.96%
49	10	Duplin	9,033	11,416	20,571	43.91%	55.50%
50		Johnston (pt.)	10,104	20,538	30,942	32.65%	66.37%
51		Sampson	11,566	14,422	26,139	44.25%	55.17%
52	10 Total		30,703	46,376	77,652	39.54%	59.72%
53	11	Johnston (pt.)	14,728	21,734	36,831	39.99%	59.01%
54		Nash (pt.)	10,839	16,701	27,696	39.14%	60.30%
55		Wilson (pt.)	10,792	15,421	26,414	40.86%	58.38%
56	11 Total		36,360	53,855	90,941	39.98%	59.22%
57	12	Harnett	17,331	25,565	43,325	40.00%	59.01%
58		Johnston (pt.)	2,458	6,155	8,712	28.21%	70.66%
59		Lee	10,801	13,158	24,184	44.66%	54.41%
60	12 Total		30,590	44,878	76,221	40.13%	58.88%
61	13	Columbus	11,050	12,941	24,175	45.71%	53.53%
62		Robeson	24,988	17,510	42,834	58.34%	40.88%
63	13 Total		36,038	30,451	67,009	53.78%	45.44%
64	14	Wake (pt.)	66,681	18,902	86,295	77.27%	21.90%
65	14 Total		66,681	18,902	86,295	77.27%	21.90%
66	15	Wake (pt.)	53,182	61,053	115,606	46.00%	52.81%
67	15 Total		53,182	61,053	115,606	46.00%	52.81%
68	16	Wake (pt.)	64,098	37,687	103,672	61.83%	36.35%
69	16 Total		64,098	37,687	103,672	61.83%	36.35%
70	17	Wake (pt.)	51,656	58,142	111,227	46.44%	52.27%
71	17 Total		51,656	58,142	111,227	46.44%	52.27%
72	18	Franklin	13,436	14,603	28,307	47.47%	51.59%
73		Wake (pt.)	31,645	35,812	68,229	46.38%	52.49%
74	18 Total		45,081	50,415	96,536	46.70%	52.22%
75	19	Cumberland (pt.)	36,226	35,869	72,676	49.85%	49.35%
76	19 Total		36,226	35,869	72,676	49.85%	49.35%
77	20	Durham (pt.)	54,576	9,064	64,075	85.18%	14.15%
78		Granville	13,598	12,405	26,211	51.88%	47.33%
79	20 Total		68,174	21,469	90,286	75.51%	23.78%
80	21	Cumberland (pt.)	39,566	14,797	54,709	72.32%	27.05%
81		Hoke	10,076	6,819	17,062	59.06%	39.97%
82	21 Total		49,642	21,616	71,771	69.17%	30.12%
83	22	Caswell	5,348	5,594	11,026	48.50%	50.73%
84		Durham (pt.)	56,648	24,705	82,269	68.86%	30.03%
85		Person	8,418	10,496	19,071	44.14%	55.04%
86	22 Total		70,414	40,795	112,366	62.66%	36.31%
87	23	Chatham	18,361	16,665	35,356	51.93%	47.13%
88		Orange	53,901	21,539	76,496	70.46%	28.16%
89	23 Total		72,262	38,204	111,852	64.61%	34.16%
90	24	Alamance	28,875	38,170	67,642	42.69%	56.43%
91		Randolph (pt.)	3,845	12,010	16,005	24.03%	75.04%
92	24 Total		32,720	50,180	83,647	39.12%	59.99%
93	25	Anson	7,019	4,166	11,238	62.46%	37.07%
94		Richmond	9,904	9,332	19,381	51.10%	48.15%
95		Rowan (pt.)	2,673	10,283	13,127	20.36%	78.33%
96		Scotland	8,215	5,831	14,137	58.11%	41.25%
97		Stanly	8,431	19,904	28,633	29.45%	69.51%
98	25 Total		36,242	49,516	86,516	41.89%	57.23%
99	26	Guilford (pt.)	23,431	33,224	57,208	40.96%	58.08%
100		Rockingham	16,351	25,227	41,928	39.00%	60.17%