ABCDEFGHIJKLM
1
F I N A L
2
GROUP nr.Student NamesStudent nr.Project TitleGeneral CommentsGrade
3
1M.A. (Thijs) van der Lely4000773.spacePromising project that challenges architectural conventions. The ability to interact simultaneously with multiple building components (i.e. floors, ceilings) can lead to unique spatial experiences that have yet to be explored. Implementing the logic synchronously in multiple storeys would allow the project to reach higher design levels. 8
4
M. L. M. (Milou) van Min4004787
5
Oana Anghelache4329589
6
H.M. (Rienk) Klaassen4103424
7
P. A. (Stef) Hoeijmakers4016025
8
9
2Ira Tavlaridi4331400HypervoidsTo a great extent, a highly appealing project. The newly gained knowledge was elaborately applied to the design process. However, by focusing the working prototype solely on the ceiling component, it somehow constrained the architectural potential of the concept. At the present stage, the project is considered much more reactive than interactive.7.5
10
J. E. (Jordy) Vos4002563
11
R. A. L. (Roel) Vogels4004035
12
Simon Thien Guang Dinh4322053
13
Zhenke Jin4331176
14
15
3Albert Achammer4311825Interactive WallInteresting idea that allows for an engaging interplay with the wall surface. Nevertheless, the working prototype is weaker than the original intentions. Compared to the prototype, the developed visualizations are far more advanced and, further, provide a much better understanding of the concept. However, more functions could have been added to the system, so that it better attracts human attention, As is also the case with Group 2, the project is highly reactive, rather than interactive.7.5
16
George Georgopoulos4325575
17
Mattia Tintori4298020
18
Michal Kornecki4319591
19
Perry Low Jeng Jin4306996
20
21
4E. E. (Mia) Tsiamis4323017E-CLOUDGenuine and inspiring concept of energy harvesting. Collecting energy from everyday human activities and giving back a reward can be perceived as a strong societal statement that is out of the ordinary. The prototype was also interesting, though - architecturally speaking - it could encourage a more collective, rather than individualistic, experience.8
22
Kotryna Žvironaitė4320271
23
Luca Vacchini4320050
24
Marco Galli4322185
25
26
5B. J. (Berend) Raaphorst4028953IRISThe mutlifunctionality of the module reinforces the conceptual underpinnings of this project. Yet, further design possibilities could have been investigated, mostly in terms of the module's morphological diversity (deviation from the "one-size-fits-all" logic).8.5
27
Eldin Fajkovic4004833
28
Ilham Lakhal 4090004
29
Thijs IJperlaan1512595
30
31
6Erdi Gao4304993AMPLIExemplary project. Fascinating idea for interactivity that holds promising potential. The effect of sound, an otherwise invisible spatial parameter, becomes visible and raises human awareness. In addition, it goes beyond a mere installation, as it is augmented with functional attributes.9.5
32
J. M. (Hans) de Jonge1361295
33
Matteo Biella4330757
34
Patricio Simbana Escobar4326385
35
V. J. (Vicky) Metzen4314328
36
37
7Matteo Falduto4314344Torsion Tube Solar DiffuserIntriguing concept and ingenious adaptation of an industrial artifact at building scale. There is room for further design explorations in using the collected solar energy for functions beyond diffuse natural light in interior spaces.9
38
R. P. (Radoslaw) Flis4322363
39
M. (Javid) Jooshesh4288661
40
Kasper Siderius4024443
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100