ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST
1
Author: Molloy1st NEG: Bond2nd AFF: Trapp2nd NEG: HedayatniaAFF: ZenkichNEG: MeahAFF: PerillaNEG: TroconisNEG: Whyman
2
Harms: Is there a big problem in the status quo?HARMS continued
3
ASEAN is all talk.China is more integrated than SE Asia.ASEAN is fine--we don't need military alliance.
4
China is on the loose.Trade deficit hurts US--no ev.--SEATO would boost this--no ev of this either.
5
China will challenge US on high seas.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Solvency: Will the legislation solve that problem?SOLVENCY continued
14
I really need you to show me some expert who says we should get the SEATO band back together, that it's possible and that it's desireable.
15
SEATO was really about the Western interests in Asia.
16
SEATO died b/c of lack of interest. No interest now.
17
SEATO won't end China's naval rise. First anti-ship BM. No-no-no. Those missiles have been around for a long, long time. Not even China's first. Be careful with your evidence.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Advantages of adopting the plan. Solved harms are Advantages, but there might be others on the side. ADVANTAGES continued
24
Overlap with TPP will increase jobs. Evidence doesn't say this.
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Disadvantages of adopting the planDISADVANTAGES continued
35
Don't aggravate China. They own our debt.
36
Conflict with NATO could have us kicked out of SEATO or NATO. This seems as highly unlikely as anyone recreating SEATO to begin with. I just with we weren't all just assuming that this can be done, as if by magic. Not a fan of magic legislation.Will further militarize Pakistan in Kashmir.
37
Will help both despotic regimes and China.
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Alternative ways of solving the problem better than the plan.ALTERNATIVES continued
47
48
49
50
51
52
PO Means
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100