A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Last, First | Period | 10 footnotes/endnotes citations | Superscripts | Footnote/Endnote | Writing Errors | Writing | Sources | Bibliography - errors | Readability | Misc. Comments | Grade | Timestamp | |||||||
2 | AhirPriyank | Period 4 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper., Incomplete Essay | Superscript error - not in order, you cannot repeat numbers in Chicago | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, Missing information - incomplete references | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Missing information - incomplete Essay | |||||||||
3 | AjasbiK | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
4 | AlvarezMarissa | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, There was at least one discussion footnote., Do not use hanging indents. | Parts not written well. | The essay fails to account for the opposing arguments, The voice of the college is NOT obvious., The essay does NOT make sense and is NOT well argued. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing, Parts not worded well | ??? "Universally guns have created a serious issue throughout the United States." Is it universal or just in the US? = choose your words carefully. First paragraph needs SERIOUS work. Not well written. You contradicted yourself. "It boils down to this: the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." If this were true, then students and teachers SHOULD CARRY ARMS. - Do you see the contradiction in your argument? You need serious rewriting. | |||||||||
5 | ArcosA | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | Parker and Davis' two essays were NOT sources for the paper., Three other sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | ||||||||||
6 | AvinaBeltranM | Period 2 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | minimal or no writing errors | The essay is well argued | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized | average writing | Incomplete essay. The introduction needs to follow the prompt. | |||||||||
7 | AzcunaCallahan | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations were superscripted but on 5 were listed in the Endnotes = incomplete | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors, Never use first name to refer to authors = Kate also in her article | The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were NOT introduced. | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Capitalization errors. | Parts not worded well | Many issues - SUCH AS: "There is much ambiguity whether it is safer to have them on or off and whether other school who do not allow are restricting peoples second amendment." ON OR OFF WHAT? whether other school??? PEOPLES = ERROR SECOND AMENDMENT IS A PROPER NOUN. Missing 7 endnotes. | |||||||||
8 | BakerL | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized | average writing | Watch the spelling and grammar. | |||||||||
9 | BeltranJacqueline | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, Capitalization errors. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The voice of the college is NOT obvious., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | Error: 2. Linda M. hesselstrom Do not use multiple fonts and sizes. | |||||||||
10 | BenitezCristian | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The voice of the essay is NOT appropriate to that of a college and does NOT address the issue of guns on campus well., The essay does NOT make sense and is NOT well argued. | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | Your intro says one thing. Your conclusion says another. I'm not sure what you are arguing. Formatting is good. | |||||||||
11 | BergrenNoah | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used., Kessler, Do concealed-weapon laws result in less crime? = need caps and quotation marks | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | in crime rates.3, 4 - wrong way to do multiple source citation in Chicago (what you hat is ok in CSE but NOT in Chicago. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Very nice use of discussion footnote. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors, minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | Do concealed-weapon laws result in less crime = caps error in both Endnotes and Bibliogrpahy. | |||||||||
12 | BibasP | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no url for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Bibliography - Not Last, First , Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography, Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing | The conclusion needs to refer back to the idea in the introduction that it is impossible for it to be universal. | |||||||||
13 | BobbsJ | Period 2 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively , 2 superscripts | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, 4 endnotes | minimal or no writing errors | incomplete essay | The sources were credible and reliable. | No Bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
14 | BrookerS | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography | average writing | The conclusion needs to refer back to the idea in the introduction about innocent people protecting themselves more than school shootings and murderers. | |||||||||
15 | BrownC | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Not Last, First | average writing | Ballantine is not in the bibliography. | |||||||||
16 | BurnerKatherine | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, There was at least one discussion footnote., Missing information - incomplete references., Misused parentheses. Dates wrong. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - singular antecedent... plural pronoun - a student should do their best | The voice of the essay is NOT appropriate to that of a college and does NOT address the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., Introduction needs development., The last two sentences of the intro contradict each other - don't they??? | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | average writing, Parts not worded well | Error: "If a person who is unknown walks into a classroom, and the teacher of that class has a gun, will they " | |||||||||
17 | CassidyErin | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively , Superscript Punctuation error ....end of sentence." superscript - Periods go inside the quotation mark." Superscript goes outside of the quotation mark., do not superscript the punctuation. | No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., Missing information - incomplete references. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - singular antecedent... plural pronoun - a student should do their best, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors, Capitalization errors like: The columbine massacre | The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., Introduction needs development., Conclusion needs development. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | average writing, Parts not worded well | Many, many mechanical errors like: sandy hook shooting, The Gaurdian, | |||||||||
18 | Castellanosl | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
19 | CastilloAlejandro | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively , Superscript error - used (in-text), 1,2,3 are not superscripted. | No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., Missing quotation marks for article titles. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay fails to account for the opposing arguments, The essay does NOT make sense and is NOT well argued., No discussion footnote. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | average writing, Parts not worded well | Your intro needs to be rewritten. Poor writing. | |||||||||
20 | CastillonB | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
21 | CervantesBrenda | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The voice of the college is obvious., The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | excellent work. | |||||||||
22 | ChangSarah | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, Footnote/Endnote error - (Publisher) not in parentheses for print sources, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - singular antecedent... plural pronoun - a student should do their best, Parts not written well. | The essay is well argued, The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | average writing, Parts not worded well | Choose your words carefully. Your use of the word "cease" is not optimal. Error: "an individual who has a gun in their possession" | |||||||||
23 | CharmelloDominic | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Do not indent 2nd and subsequent uses of sources = ERROR. ALSO 3. Hasselstorm, A Peaceful Women, 300. = needs quotation marks. Error: 8. Peg McEntee, Utah Teacher Shoots Herself - no first name in shorten form | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., No discussion footnote. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | YOu quoted authors but neglected to use quotation marks - WHY? = Error. E.G. = Missouri lawmakers expanded the potential for teachers to bring guns to schools...1 AND I am a peace loving woman. But several events in the past ten years have convinced me I'm safer when I carry a pistol.2 | |||||||||
24 | ChavezJesse | Period 5 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Parts not written well. | The voice of the essay is NOT appropriate to that of a college and does NOT address the issue of guns on campus well., The voice of the college is NOT obvious., Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | No Bibliography, Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete | |||||||||
25 | ChicaK | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
26 | CoveyS | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - (Publisher) not in parentheses for print sources, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay is well argued, Conclusion needs development. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing | The essay seems to about the need to avoid being raped or murdered. Stick to the prompt and the law about concealed weapons on college campuses. | |||||||||
27 | CovingtonKaitlin | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The voice of the college is obvious., The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | Error: 13. "What we Actually Know about the Connection between Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and Gun Violence" 14. "What we Actually Know about the Connection between Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and Gun Violence" should be Author, "title" | |||||||||
28 | CrewS | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | Good job. | |||||||||
29 | DaCostaLima | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | In the introduction, a transition is needed between the first 2 sentences. In the conclusion, the last sentence should talk about increasing...causing more deaths rather than reducing because the essay is about increasing. | |||||||||
30 | DahlJames | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively , Where is superscript 11? | There was at least one discussion footnote., Missing information - incomplete references., I do not see superscript 11 in the text - it's in your endnotes. | Parts not written well. | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced., Introduction needs development. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing, Parts not worded well | "Dr. David Roberts Grimes, a physicist and cancer researcher at Oxford University" - why is he qualified to speak on this topic? Do NOT employ different fonts and sizes in the same document. | |||||||||
31 | DaSilvaJuliana | Period 4 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper., no citations used. | no superscripts | No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., Missing information - incomplete references. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors, Parts not written well. | The voice of the essay is NOT appropriate to that of a college and does NOT address the issue of guns on campus well., The voice of the college is NOT obvious., The essay does NOT make sense and is NOT well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were NOT introduced. | A minimum of sources were NOT in the paper. | No Bibliography | Poorly written | Your intro is filled with mechanical errors (spelling, grammar, punctuation). | |||||||||
32 | DavisB | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Introduction needs development. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | Introduction needs work. Incorporate the conclusion into your introduction. | |||||||||
33 | DenmanK | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar | Introduction needs development., Conclusion needs development. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Not Last, First , Bibliography - entries not alphabetized , Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography, Error: numbered sources instead of alphabetizing., Repeated reference | average writing | Follow the prompt. The essay should not just be a lesson about the laws. | |||||||||
34 | DoeringR | Period 1 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | only 2 superscripts | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | No Bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
35 | DomnikoJrA | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscript Punctuation error ....end of sentence." superscript - Periods go inside the quotation mark." Superscript goes outside of the quotation mark. | Footnote/Endnote error - no url for web site, Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing | ||||||||||
36 | DraperEthan | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, Do not use hanging indent in Endnotes (only in Bibliography). | Writing Error - singular antecedent... plural pronoun - a student should do their best, "anyone being able to get their hands on one" | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | Well written | overall well done. | |||||||||
37 | FanielMailani | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | "Columbine High School Shootings Fast Facts," CNN = not in your Bibliography | Parts not written well., watch wording. | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | average writing | "The purpose of a gun is to kill an object." = no - not objects - objects are not alive. Choose words carefully. | |||||||||
38 | FiskR | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - singular antecedent... plural pronoun - a student should do their best, " but if the carrier is careless or a mentally ill individual, they can bring harm" = error | The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Not used in paper: NCSL. "Guns on Campus: | average writing, Poorly written | Much of your paper lacks commentary and argumentation. You pasted together many quotes - you need to make better arguments. | |||||||||
39 | FleishmanN | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing | ||||||||||
40 | FowlerA | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., The disussion end note needs to be complete thought. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized | average writing | ||||||||||
41 | FreemanJ | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography, Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing | Error: did not use authors' names in the endnotes or bibliography. | |||||||||
42 | GertychP | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
43 | GiangrandeNatalie | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, Missing information - incomplete references. | Parts not written well. | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Ganderson's name is misspelled in Bibliography. | average writing | Error: "to the Sandy Hook shooting in 2014" Do not use different fonts and sizes in the same document! Deborah Gorman-Smith = not in Bibliography. Nor is Discover Policing, "Training/ Academy Life," | |||||||||
44 | GomezJessica | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, There was at least one discussion footnote., use a space between each note. | Parts not written well. | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Misspelled: Hesselstrom Linda | average writing | Incorrect: Jefferson City. “ Missouri Governor Vetoes Bill Allowing Overall - well done! | |||||||||
45 | GonzalezMariela | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess | minimal or no writing errors | The essay is well argued | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | Good job. The conclusion and Intro could use further development. | |||||||||
46 | GravesN | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
47 | GrundmanJ | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote seemed out of place to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - misnamed, minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
48 | GutierrezIsabella | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, Footnote/Endnote error - (Publisher) not in parentheses for print sources, There was at least one discussion footnote., do not have multiple fonts. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized , Error: numberd sources instead of alphabetizing. | Well written | Check endnote and bibliography erros | |||||||||
49 | HaleE | Period 2 | no citations used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively , Some (#)'s | No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., No endnotes | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Conclusion needs development. | No sources listed | No Bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
50 | HepworthDarcy | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, Missing information - incomplete references. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - singular antecedent... plural pronoun - a student should do their best, "this teacher may have been able to save their students" | The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were NOT introduced. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | average writing, Parts not worded well | Is this logical: "Adam killed them, not the gun."??? It would have been much harder for him had he not had a gun... | |||||||||
51 | HogoboomWyatt | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Watch awkward phrases | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Awkward writing: "displays his study in an article that " | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | delete your second Bibliography. | |||||||||
52 | HongoS | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | minimal or no writing errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced., Conclusion needs development. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | The campus scenario from the introduction should be referred to in the conclusion. | |||||||||
53 | HoustonA | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Conclusion needs development. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | The conclusion should refer back to the classroom scenario in the introduction. | |||||||||
54 | JacobsonK | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized | average writing | The conclusion should refer to the school scenario in the introduction. | |||||||||
55 | JavenC | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
56 | JermanD | Period 5 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts not consecutive | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, Footnote/Endnote error - references not in order 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. etc, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., 4 endnotes | Writing Error - poor grammar | Introduction needs development., Your thesis is not clear. | The sources were credible and reliable. | only 1 source | average writing | The conclusion should refer to the history of weapons in the introduction. The argument changes from defending to challenging the law. | |||||||||
57 | JimenezChristian | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Beem is in your Bibliography but NOT in your Endnotes. Remove. | Well written | good overall. | |||||||||
58 | JohnsonDante | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc) | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | Well written | I think you used direct citations but did not use quotation marks = ERROR | |||||||||
59 | JohnsonJason | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | The essay could use a much more developed conclusion. | |||||||||
60 | JuliusA | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
61 | KarsseboomRamirezN | Period 1 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | no superscripts | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | minimal or no writing errors | The essay does NOT make sense and is NOT well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | No Bibliography | average writing | Follow the prompt and include a thesis statement. | |||||||||
62 | KayL | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Parts not written well. | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
63 | KramerK | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscript Punctuation error ....end of sentence." superscript - Periods go inside the quotation mark." Superscript goes outside of the quotation mark. | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay is well argued | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Parts not worded well | Watch the spelling, grammar, run-on sentences and sentences that need capital letters. | |||||||||
64 | LaoJ | Period 1 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar | stick to the prompt | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized , Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography | average writing | Incomplete essay. No conclusion | |||||||||
65 | LavoieE | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | The conclusion needs to refer back to the classroom scenario in the introduction. | |||||||||
66 | LayanaJenna | Period 4 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, You nave multiple repeated numbers like #1 and #3 | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors, Parts not written well., UC Santa Barbra = misspelled. | Incomplete essay | A minimum of sources were used in the paper. | No Bibliography | Parts not worded well | Error: "be armed to the tee" Do not use multiple fonts and sizes in the same document. Inconsistent - you used IBID BUT then you used the shortened from - be consistent. | |||||||||
67 | LeeK | Period 2 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | No endnotes | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay is well argued | 4 sources | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
68 | LeeS | Period 2 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | 5 in-text, not all superscripts | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., 2 endnotes | Writing Error - poor grammar | Conclusion needs development., incomplete essay | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Not Last, First , only 1 source | average writing | In college, there is no purpose of a gun. The body and conclusion of the essay need to refer back to this idea and not dwell on the opposite view point. | |||||||||
69 | lemusK | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., incomplete information | minimal or no writing errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
70 | LeonB | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | ||||||||||
71 | LeonD | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Conclusion needs development. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
72 | LewisHunter | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors, SP: 7. Kate Murphey, | The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | This doesn't make sense: " In conclusion, our children are at risk. At risk not from a gun but from a deranged person in possession of a gun. " | |||||||||
73 | LiangLauren | Period 3 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., A minimum of sources were used in the paper. | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | |||||||||
74 | LopezH | Period 2 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscript Punctuation error ....end of sentence." superscript - Periods go inside the quotation mark." Superscript goes outside of the quotation mark., 6 #'s | No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., No endnotes | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized | average writing | ||||||||||
75 | ManouchehryShawn | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The voice of the essay is NOT appropriate to that of a college and does NOT address the issue of guns on campus well., The voice of the college is NOT obvious. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | No Bibliography | Parts not worded well, Poorly written | ERROR: The right to bear arms, as stated in the first Amendment of the constitution, | |||||||||
76 | MarksC | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography | Well written | The strong classroom scenario in the introduction should be revisited in the conclusion. | |||||||||
77 | MartinezA | Period 2 | The superscripts did not match the endnotes/footnotes. | no superscripts | No endnotes | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | Authors mentioned in the text were introduced., Conclusion needs development. | No sources listed | No Bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
78 | MartinezDanielle | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., - penalty | Writing Error - singular antecedent... plural pronoun - a student should do their best | The voice of the essay is NOT appropriate to that of a college and does NOT address the issue of guns on campus well., The essay fails to account for the opposing arguments, The voice of the college is NOT obvious., The essay does NOT make sense and is NOT well argued. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized , minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | Why is this person qualified to speak about guns? "Kevin Bradford, specialist in marketing at the University of Notre Dame's" REally??? "Citizens should only be allowed to carry a concealed weapon when traveling alone in foreign places for their own protection." You want foreigners carrying guns in the US to feel safe? That doesn't make me feel safer. Your essay isn't well thought out. | |||||||||
79 | McCleanMegan | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess | minimal or no writing errors, choose words carefully | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors, minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | So what's a positive gun and what's a negative gun? "Guns, both positive and negative, can either save or destroy a life." = choose your words carefully. | |||||||||
80 | McCleanMorgan | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess | minimal or no writing errors | Authors mentioned in the text were NOT introduced., = ERROR | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., A minimum of sources were used in the paper., The sources were credible and reliable. | Missing item | average writing | Kate Murphy and Jordan Rubio reveal in their article ... = missing in Bibliography and also in Endnotes = ERROR | |||||||||
81 | MedfordBrett | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscript error - used (in-text), Superscript go AFTER the quotation, not before the source. | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., Format WRONG = 1.Sara Gates,"Sean McCutcheon, Armed Highland School Officer, Accidentally Discharges Gun; District Puts Program on Hold"(Huffington Post: Politics, 2013). | Writing Error - poor grammar, Parts poorly worded and phrased. | The voice of the essay is NOT appropriate to that of a college and does NOT address the issue of guns on campus well., The voice of the college is NOT obvious., The essay does NOT make sense and is NOT well argued. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Parts not worded well, Poorly written | Intro is poorly worded. | |||||||||
82 | MonroyE | Period 5 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | no superscripts | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay is well argued, Conclusion needs development. | A minimum of 5 sources were NOT in the paper. | No Bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
83 | MontalvoMelisa | Period 4 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay is well argued, The voice of the college is obvious., The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic., The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Excellent - College Level | good work | |||||||||
84 | MontaniC | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no url for web site, Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
85 | MooreB | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, Footnote/Endnote error - no url for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc) | The essay is well argued, The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | No Bibliography | Well written, did not follow prompt | The prompt was: Write an argumentative essay in which you defend, challenge or qualify this practice. A side was was not chosen or argued. | |||||||||
86 | MostertW | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote., endnotes found in draft 1 | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Well written | ||||||||||
87 | NarumiM | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
88 | NebelGrant | Period 3 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - did not indent first line, There was at least one discussion footnote., Do not indent further the second and subsequent use of a sources like you did for footnotes: 3,5,6,8,11 | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Having a gun on you at all time is just asking for trouble. | The essay is well argued, The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | A minimum of sources were used in the paper., All the sources in this paper are credible and academic. | Bibliography - Hanging indent errors | Well written | Mostly well done | |||||||||
89 | NegreteRory | Period 3 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively , Essay incomplete | Essay incomplete | Essay incomplete | Essay incomplete | Essay incomplete | No Bibliography | Essay incomplete | Essay incomplete | |||||||||
90 | NolanM | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | The voice of the essay is appropriate to that of a college and addresses the issue of guns on campus well., The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | Excellent - College Level | Good job. | |||||||||
91 | NootbaarLarsTaylor | Period 3 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | A minimum of sources were NOT in the paper. | No Bibliography | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | |||||||||
92 | NowparvarArmon | Period 4 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | no superscripts | No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | Incomplete essay | No Bibliography | Incomplete essay | incomplete | |||||||||
93 | OstlerN | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - Author - not First Last, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing | ||||||||||
94 | PalleyN | Period 2 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | minimal or no errors in Endnotes/Footnotess, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - poor grammar | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced., Conclusion needs development. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized , Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing | The conclusion needs to refer back to the introduction and the idea that there is a rift between proponents and opponents of college campus safety. The conclusion currently is about one portion of the law. | |||||||||
95 | PanesA | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | minimal or no writing errors | Authors mentioned in the text were NOT introduced., Introduction and conclusion need work. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | The introduction and conclusion need to reflect the prompt more and have a stronger hook. | |||||||||
96 | PeoplesA | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote. | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors, Parts not written well. | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized | average writing, Parts not worded well | In the conclusion, refer back to the professor image from the introduction. | |||||||||
97 | PierceR | Period 1 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, No discussion footnote was used - ERROR. | Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued. | The sources were credible and reliable. | minimal or no errors in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
98 | PordesC | Period 5 | no citations used. | no superscripts | No endnotes | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay is well argued, incomplete essay | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography | average writing | ||||||||||
99 | RableN | Period 5 | Yes - at least 10 citations are used. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | Footnote/Endnote error - no access date for web site, There was at least one discussion footnote., The discussion note needs to be a complete thought. | Writing Error - used 2nd person (you, your, yourself, etc), Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., The discussion footnote made sense to be outside the main essay., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - entries not alphabetized | average writing | In the introduction, what are the 2 polar opposite solutions? | |||||||||
100 | ReppucciN | Period 5 | No - there aren't 10 citations in the paper. | Superscripts used consecutively and effectively | No discussion footnote was used - ERROR., Missing information - incomplete references., 5 endnotes | Writing Error - poor grammar, Writing Error - punctuation/spelling errors | The essay makes sense and is well argued., Authors mentioned in the text were introduced. | The sources were credible and reliable. | Bibliography - Not Last, First , Bibliography - incomplete information in bibliography, Bibliography - error - included access date | average writing |