ABCDEFGHI
1
EXAMPLE OF CURRENT DEMOCRATIC ELECTION SYSTEM BEING UNFAIR "The case for online anytime voting"
2
Population18,297
3
Under 1831.10%% of Population Not getting what they want
4
Remaining Voters12,607% of Voters Getting what they want% of Population getting what they want% of Voters not getting what they want
5
6
Mayor
7
CANDIDATE % OF VOTEVOTES
8
ELMORE, DIANE HOEM  NP23.00%422Loser23.00%
9
HACKWORTH, ROYCE L.  NP24.63%452Loser24.63%
10
JOHNSON, CHRIS J.  NP37.17%682Winner37.17%5.41%94.59%
11
KRAUS, MIKE  NP279Loser15.20%
12
13
Total Votes183514.56%Total Losing Votes62.83%
14
15
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elko,_Nevada
16
http://www.nvsos.gov/SOSelectionPages/results/2011CityGeneral/CityofElko.aspx
17
18
Please check out my post at occupyr it covers a possible solution to this problem.
19
http://www.occupyr.com/Strategy/thread.php?id=582
20
21
If you wish to add to this spread sheet please leave the above intact and do your own math and comments below.
22
23
Good work Zak. I'm impressed with how you demonstrated how only 5% of the population voters controlled 95% of the people. --Cabbot
24
Nice zak i put it on my wall. Travis
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41