1 of 35

Blogosphere Debates - The Frontier for Scientific Discussion

Tom Stafford

Social Media for Researchers

23 September, 2014

2 of 35

Stafford, T., & Bell, V. (2012). Brain network: social media and the cognitive scientist. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(10), 489–490. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.001

3 of 35

digital disruption meets scholarship

What Jason Mitchell's 'On the emptiness of failed replications' gets right

by Tom Stafford http://osc.centerforopenscience.org/2014/07/10/what-jason-mitchell-gets-right/

4 of 35

Source: Wikimedia Commons

5 of 35

A ‘proper place’ for discussion

“The swift rebuttal was prompted by scientists' alarm at the speed with which the accusations have spread through the community. The provocative title — 'Voodoo correlations in social neuroscience' — and iconoclastic tone have attracted coverage on many blogs, including that of Newsweek. Those attacked say they have not had the chance to argue their case in the normal academic channels.”

“The major question here, seems to be the propriety of the BMJ and Dr Jones in going beyond the reasonable response to a press release, by asking potential opponents for a detailed statistical critique, without offering the authors of the study any right to reply alongside”

6 of 35

The posse

Unpredictable, en-mass criticism

7 of 35

8 of 35

9 of 35

10 of 35

11 of 35

12 of 35

The posse

Unpredictable, en-mass criticism

….Particularly around methodology

….General raising of standards

(see also Why Psychologists’ Food Fight Matters: “Important findings” haven’t been replicated, and science may have to change its ways By Michelle N. Meyer and Christopher Chabris, in Slate.)

13 of 35

You don’t know who is in town

Cross-disciplinarity means we have all become non-specialists

= requires ‘upskilling’, not dumbing down

The scholarships of translation and integration, not just discovery (Finders, 2013; after Boyer, 1996)

Flinders, M. (2013). The tyranny of relevance and the art of translation. Political Studies Review, 11(2), 149-167.

14 of 35

Know what to save when the barn catches fire

Cognitive limits to social media activity

Danger of judging your achievements by how you think they might appear to others

Crowding out of thoughtful consideration

15 of 35

Know what to save when the barn catches fire

Cognitive limits to social media activity

Danger of judging your achievements by how you think they might appear to others

Crowding out of thoughtful consideration

Simple strategy: follow your interest only (and assume everything is public)

16 of 35

They are not counted, they are weighed

17 of 35

They are not counted, they are weighed...because

18 of 35

19 of 35

Michael Leunig http://www.leunig.com.au/

Image of Michael Leunig’s cartoon “Sorry No Ducks” removed for copyright reasons

20 of 35

Connection to your peers

21 of 35

22 of 35

Far away is nearer

Twitter: “it's like having a little part of you that's always down the pub” (@dougald)

….or in the conference bar

23 of 35

Source: Wikimedia Commons

24 of 35

25 of 35

Questions? Comments?

@tomstafford

26 of 35

What should we do when things go wrong?

Don't take things personally. You job should be to to provide nuance, context and a measured tone. Most of the time, striving for this with honesty and patience will make you look good and people who throw mud look bad. Also Hanlon's Razor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

27 of 35

Would you recommend sustained social media engagement to ECRs

Only if they felt an interest/intrinsic motivation. For the moment blogging/etc is optional - you need a public profile of some kind, but if you have a basic webpage your time might be better spent doing research

28 of 35

How polished should you be

Polished enough to be understood

I agree with Tristram that you can make the kind of thought you are having clear as part of what you write

29 of 35

Blogging as public engagement

A useful understanding of public engagement focusses on specific publics and two-way engagement (not just dissemination/broadcast). If you do this sincerely the activities most appropriate for public engagement will become clearer

30 of 35

Should you have multiple blogs

It is fine to have multiple kinds of posts on a blog (personal, news, analysis,etc), but you can decide how many blogs you need by thinking about the specific publics you want to read it (interested layperson? committed specialist? specific interest but time limited?)

31 of 35

Optimising tweet dissemination

In short: this is known, but not by me

One strategy: play the numbers - use clickbait headlines, tweet at 9am and 2pm, etc

Another strategy: engage with the specific public you want to hear about your stuff (this is the hard way)

32 of 35

Blogs for learning and teaching

Writing in public is valuable for academics and students : it is hard work, so you need high intrinsic motivation and/or a good structure

Research showing the benefits of writing over reading for learning: http://www.tomstafford.staff.shef.ac.uk/?p=271

33 of 35

Where do you find the time?

I am not a perfectionist

34 of 35

Source: Nature

35 of 35

My blogs

personal blog: http://idiolect.org.uk

group blog: http://mindhacks.com

project: blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/biasandblame/

academic: http://tomstafford.staff.shef.ac.uk

private teaching blog, facebook, twitter, course wiki