1 of 29

Monitoring and Evaluation ��

2 of 29

M&E: Importance

  • Helps nderstand the situation on the ground and be able to respond appropriately, adequately, and in a timely manner
  • Allows corrections and adjustments in original plans and targets
  • Contributes to the smooth implementation of programs and projects
  • Is an integral component of implementation to promote accountability among actors

3 of 29

M&E: Challenges

  • Baseline data – usually unavailable, incomplete, totally lost, difficult to (re)construct
    • Reporting of physical and financial progress
      • Established norm
      • Access, synthesis, analysis

    • Reporting on results and outcomes – uneven, requires more resources

  • Sources of data – government, contractors
      • Who talks to beneficiaries/communities
      • Participation

4 of 29

M&E: Challenges

  • Political pressure – public scrutiny, media attention
    • Expectations, targets, commitments Resources, capacities
      • Pace, magnitude, quality
      • Anniversaries
      • Human hardships viz institutional and organizational challenges
        • Business is unusual

  • Quick wins viz long-term results
    • Safeguards
    • Building back better

  • Lessons
    • Doing better next time

5 of 29

M&E: Challenges

  • Women, children, youth
  • Persons with disabilities
  • Elderly
  • Indigenous peoples
  • Informal settlers, laborers
  • Fisherfolks, farmers
  • Environment
  • Others

6 of 29

Where it has worked – challenging, but possible!

  • Queensland Recovery
    • Clear results framework - measurable results and targets; focused on 7 priority areas
    • Institutional arrangement – identified actors and groups, roles relationships

7 of 29

BBB: Care, speed (Aceh-Nias)

  • Single-mindedness in approach, targets, direction
  • Expectations and satisfaction

8 of 29

Harnessing community participation to fast track recovery

  • Community planning
    • Shared responsibility and accountability for use of resources and delivery of results

9 of 29

RAND (Recovery Aceh Nias Database) http://rand.brr.go.id �

Using technology for M&E

* Powerpoint on RAND from BRR Institute

10 of 29

Outputs – thematic maps

11 of 29

Outputs – funding source, partners

Funding Agency Type

Committed (USD)

Disbursed (USD)

# of Projects

Academic Institutions

1,993,105

365,082

7

Bilateral

1,116,011,013

644,011,134

352

Government Agency

18,452,038

6,851,466

16

International Financial Institutions

293,898,179

148,712,559

54

International NGO

1,324,052,586

895,472,189

960

National NGO

40,553,617

21,221,949

29

Other

30,016,803

2,296,957

23

Private Sector and community

148,343,190

79,950,879

244

UN

460,808,887

356,091,766

147

12 of 29

Output – Key performance indicators

13 of 29

Compliance Rate

14 of 29

Accountability through GIS

GPS

coordinate

15 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Post-disaster Impact

    • Reduction in income: loss of existing livelihoods and resources; relocation to locations with limited or no employment

    • Short-term assistance from local and international donors reinforced dependency and did not respond to long-term livelihood recovery needs.

  • All SIM-SIA slides are from IPC

16 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Coping strategies (given uncertainty of income)
    • Additional or temporary jobs
    • Consumption decline
    • Multiple loans for basic expenditures
    • Reduced number of meals and cheaper low-quality food
    • Removing children from school (unless 4Ps); no allowance to children for school

  • Credit and debt levels
    • Borrowing from multiple sources; stable interest rates
    • Increased indebtedness; inability to pay off loans

17 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Social relations and cohesion
    • Increasing reliance on women’s income; preference for home-based work; greater engagement of women in community activities
    • Youth taking temporary work; more trustworthy image
    • Expanded community collaboration
    • Increased tensions within community and greater insecurity; negative happenings blamed on newcomers/outsiders

18 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Resettlement options and housing conditions
    • Delays between needs assessment and arrival of assistance
    • Extended stays in “temporary” shelters; dangerous
    • Reluctance to resettle in off-city sites provided by government;
      • no employment;
      • inadequate basic services
      • unaffordable repayment rates
      • 1/3 to ½ left to return to the city
      • Inadequate information re resettlement
    • In-city relocation: no change in household composition; outside city drop in number of household members;
    • Youth active in recovery efforts.

19 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Local governance and recovery
    • Long-established indigenous knowledge in communities on handling disaster largely unrecognized
    • Local community organizations and local leaders often marginalized
    • Inequitable outcomes in cash and relief distribution; targeting and sources of assistance not clear, with some allegedly favored more than others
    • Disaster preparedness still weak; women left out of training programs
    • Affected communities’ confusion as to which level of government responsible for providing recovery assistance.

20 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Community recommendations
    • Provide sustainable livelihood support, not merely short-term relief assistance.
    • Improve communication within the community for improved resource distribution
    • Establish in-city resettlement as a far better option than distant out-of-city sites.
    • Strengthen local preparedness.

21 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Issues
    • Encouraging affected persons to return to a state of normal life as soon as possible: not only through livelihoods, safety, residential location and affordability, security of tenure but also:
    • Social networking
    • Trauma counseling; role of spiritual support
    • Community organization; POs; building on community knowledge and initiatives
    • Enabling NGOs and social action groups to operate with flexibility; international vs capital-city-based vs. local NGOs; faith-based groups

22 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • Issues
    • Reinforcing the willingness of some to take on more risks, new actions and leadership after experiencing disaster traumas, e.g. women assuming positions of leadership; youth active in disaster management
    • Social class and image building: resilience vs suffering

23 of 29

SIA and SIM: Post-Ondoy (Ketsana) and Pepeng (Parma)

  • The sustainability of disaster-recovery efforts �lies in local communities initiating and �participating in actions affecting their lives. �Listen, learn and link up with them as partners.
    • Relief intertwined with recovery, development and sustainability
    • Participation of the affected persons in planning and decision-making
    • Power of family, friendship work-based networks

24 of 29

Managing expectations through communications

Local & Statewide Progress Reports

Local & Statewide Websites

25 of 29

Communicating progress on Yolanda

26 of 29

Aid tracking

27 of 29

28 of 29

29 of 29