1 of 10

01 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

EXECUTIVE DECISION

Who offers the strongest NASCAR sponsorship visibility?

Five sponsors. Fifteen races. One clear historical leader — with a crucial caveat.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

01 / 10

BUSCH LIGHT

Leads both modeled visibility and cost efficiency

DECISION BRIEF · 10 MINUTES

2 of 10

02 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

THE ANSWER FIRST

Prioritize Busch Light for validation — not immediate commitment

Three findings establish the case and define the decision risk.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

02 / 10

624.25

Visibility points

#1 of five sponsors

54.28

Points per est. $1M

#1 modeled efficiency

4 / 4

Stable rankings

Across weight scenarios

DECISION RULE

Verify costs, missing race data, availability, and brand fit before signing.

3 of 10

03 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

THE METHOD

One composite score connects race, media, and fan exposure

75 sponsor-race observations; four evidence categories with explicit weights.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

03 / 10

40%

RACE PERFORMANCE

Finish position + laps led

30%

MEDIA COVERAGE

News exposure

20%

SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT

Reddit + YouTube

10%

SPECIAL EVENTS

Wins + event indicators

INPUT DATA → NORMALIZED COMPONENTS → WEIGHTED VISIBILITY → COST-ADJUSTED EFFICIENCY

4 of 10

04 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

IMPORTANT CONSTRAINTS

Missing results and estimated contract costs limit precision

Confidence must come from transparent caveats, not false certainty.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

04 / 10

4 of 15

Busch Light finish-position observations available in the analyzed window.

Estimated cost

Cost midpoints are scenario assumptions, not confirmed sponsor contracts.

Not ROI

Visibility points are an exposure proxy; no verified incremental revenue or profit.

Implication: validate missing inputs and real commercial terms before comparing offers.

5 of 10

05 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

FINDING 01 — EXPOSURE

Busch Light generates 69% more visibility than runner-up NAPA

624.25 vs. 368.73 composite points in the analyzed window.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

05 / 10

Busch Light

624.25

NAPA

368.73

Ally

340.06

FedEx

246.46

McDonald's

96.78

Composite visibility points • Source: Project 4 rankings

+69% VS. NAPA

6 of 10

06 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

FINDING 02 — VALUE

Busch Light’s modeled efficiency is more than 2.5× Ally’s

Efficiency = visibility points ÷ estimated sponsorship cost in $millions.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

06 / 10

Busch Light

54.28

Ally

21.25

NAPA

17.15

FedEx

13.32

McDonald's

8.07

Points per estimated $1M • Costs unverified • Source: Project 4 efficiency rankings

2.55× VS. ALLY

7 of 10

07 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

FINDING 03 — ROBUSTNESS

Four weight-setting tests preserve the same sponsor order

The ranking is stable across the tested assumptions — not proof of complete data quality.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

07 / 10

BASELINE

40 / 30 / 20 / 10

UNCHANGED

PERFORMANCE-HEAVY

50 / 25 / 15 / 10

UNCHANGED

MEDIA-HEAVY

30 / 40 / 20 / 10

UNCHANGED

EQUAL WEIGHTS

25 / 25 / 25 / 25

UNCHANGED

Consistent rank: 1 Busch Light · 2 NAPA · 3 Ally · 4 FedEx · 5 McDonald’s

8 of 10

08 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

SPONSOR SHORTLIST

One preferred diligence target, two credible alternatives

Different priorities change which alternative deserves the next conversation.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

08 / 10

01 Busch Light

FIRST TO VALIDATE

624.25 visibility | 54.28 efficiency

High model rank; data audit required.

02 NAPA

EXPOSURE ALTERNATIVE

368.73 visibility | 17.15 efficiency

Second in visibility; higher cost assumption.

03 Ally

VALUE ALTERNATIVE

340.06 visibility | 21.25 efficiency

Better modeled efficiency than NAPA.

No recommendation implies that a sponsor is available or aligned with NY Racing’s commercial needs.

9 of 10

09 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

THE COMMERCIAL TRADE-OFF

Historical model leadership is not a signed-deal recommendation

Use these decision gates to convert rankings into a commercially valid shortlist.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

09 / 10

01

CONFIRM

Partner availability and actual sponsorship quote

02

VALIDATE

Missing on-track data and multi-season stability

03

ALIGN

Audience overlap, category fit and activation rights

GO / NO-GO = confirmed economics + verified exposure + strategic fit

10 of 10

10 / NY RACING • SPONSORSHIP INTELLIGENCE

DECISION AND NEXT STEPS

Launch targeted diligence before allocating sponsorship budget

A clear, bounded next action for NY Racing leadership.

2026 NASCAR SPONSORSHIP VISIBILITY | RESEARCH-BASED, NOT CONTRACTUAL ROI

10 / 10

NOW

Commercial outreach

Request availability, fee quotes, rights and deliverables

NEXT

Model validation

Audit missing finishes and update cost sensitivity

THEN

Executive decision

Compare proposals against audience and activation fit

RECOMMENDATION → Prioritize Busch Light for further evaluation, with NAPA and Ally as comparators.