1 of 20

Fox C-6

Attendance Boundary

Adjustments

2 of 20

Boundary Adjustment Goals

  1. Balance Middle School Enrollments
  2. Balance Elementary School Enrollments
  3. Consider and Plan for Enrollment growth �and/or Enrollment shifts
  4. Maintain or Improve Efficiency of �Student Transportation
  5. Simplify the Feeder Pathways

3 of 20

Background

Strategy #1: Develop comprehensive long range plan for district facilities that supports student application of state academic standards

MSIP Standard

Action Steps

Person(s) Responsible

Start Date

Completion Date

Cost

G-8.6

G-8.7

1. Conduct a facilities study and develop a facility plan that will seek input from school/community groups, address potential sources of funding, and take into account changes in enrollment, space utilization and other critical issues such a redistricting of attendance boundaries.

Superintendent

Asst Supt of Finance

Asst Supt of HR

Asst Supt Sec Ed

Asst Supt Elem Ed

Fall 2016

Spring 2017

G-8.6

G-8.7

2. Implement the facilities plan

Cabinet

Spring 2017

On-going

Goal #4 Finance

Provide financial structure to maintain appropriate instructional resources, support services, and functional and safe facilities

Outcome A: On a daily basis the district will provide a clean and healthy learning environment for students and staff.

4 of 20

Background

5 of 20

Background - CSIP

6 of 20

Background - CSIP

7 of 20

The Process

  • Adjusting boundaries was a priority outlined by the committee throughout the Comprehensive School Improvement Planning (CSIP) process. All members of the community were invited to participate and provide input in this process to develop a final plan for the district over the next five years.
  • At the beginning of the 2016-2017 school year, the District began communicating its efforts to meet two major priorities of the CSIP by examining sixth grade and attendance boundaries.
  • In late October and early November, principals selected representatives from each of their feeder pathways to serve on an Attendance Boundaries Committee.
  • This committee met from November 2016 through January 2017 to examine potential changes to Fox C-6 boundaries.
  • Attendance Boundary Committee was presented with several proposal ideas.
  • Committee provided input and feedback toward the development of a final plan.
  • Final proposal was presented to the committee in January for final conversation. In an exit slip from that meeting, 97% of the committee agreed or strongly agreed that Administration listened to the committee’s feedback in making its final proposal.

8 of 20

The Process - Communications

The Process - Communications

1st Quarter CSIP Update

10/17/2016

Boundary Committee Meeting 1

11/9/2016

Email to Solicit Volunteers for Boundaries Committee (Job Description)

10/18/2016

Boundary Meeting Minutes and Community Update

11/10/2016

Staffing Meeting-Middle School Principals

10/24/2016

Second Sixth Grade Teacher Meeting

11/10/2016

Facilities Review-RMS

10/25/2016

MS Principal Meeting-Finalize Transition Plans

11/22/2016

Town Hall Meeting

10/25/2016

Facilities Review-FMS

11/29/2016

CKC Information to Principals and Buildings

10/26/2016

Proposals and Reminder to Boundary Committee

12/1/2016

Boundary Committee Selected and Informed

10/28/2016

Boundary Committee Meeting 2

12/7/2016

MS Scheduling Meeting-for 6th grade

10/31/2016

Facilities Review-FMS

12/15/2016

SPED staffing for Middle Schools Report

11/4/2016

Facilities Review-AMS

12/19/2016

Boundary Committee Meeting Agenda and Reminder

11/7/2016

Reminder to Boundary Committee

1/9/2017

Sixth Grade Teacher Meeting Agenda and Reminder

11/7/2016

Boundary Committee Meeting 3

1/11/2017

Middle School Transfer survey to elementary and high school teachers

11/11/2016

2nd Quarter CSIP Update with Sixth Grade and Boundary information

1/17/2017

SPED Middle School Transfer survey to elementary SPED teachers

11/11/2016

Boundary Proposal presented to the public

1/19/2017

9 of 20

The Process

10 of 20

The Proposal

  • Balanced Middle School enrollments based on building capacity, allowing for the fulfillment of true Middle School teaching philosophy with two full teams at each grade level.
  • Increased capacity at the elementary level as a result of the sixth grade transition to middle school.
  • Considerations and planning for potential growth and development throughout the district’s boundaries.
  • Maintained efficiency for student Transportation with limited additions to miles or travel time.
  • A reduction and simplification in feeder pathways from 19 to 13, creating a distinct flow with two middle schools (Fox and Ridgewood) feeding Fox High School and two middle schools (Antonia and Seckman) feeding Seckman High School.
  • Limited disruption to students and families, as this proposal affects only about 3% of the student population or about 380 students.

11 of 20

Priority and Decision Matrix

Community Priority

Previous Situation

Adopted Proposal

  1. Balance Middle School Enrollments

Middle School building capacity not utilized to account for two middle school teams per grade level

Middle Schools are on target with their capacity, providing room for growth while still maintaining enough enrollment for two middle school teams per grade level.

  1. Balance Elementary School Enrollments

Some buildings were over utilizing their capacity while others had capacity and lacked students.

Boundary adjustments account for growth in areas of need and the transition of sixth grade classrooms out of elementary buildings provides additional capacity.

  1. Consider and Plan for Enrollment growth and/or Enrollment shifts

Boundaries had not been examined or adjusted since the opening of Antonia Middle School in 2007. No long-term growth planning.

Newly developed subdivisions and areas slotted for development have been assigned to buildings with capacity, allowing longevity in the event of increased enrollment due to growth.

  1. Maintain or Improve Efficiency of Student Transportation

Nearly $800,000 saved by improving the efficiency of transportation routes throughout the district.

Limited adjustments to transportation miles or travel time, keeping student transportation efficiency high.

  1. Simplify the Feeder Pathways

19 distinct feeder pathways for the district with certain groups of students going to middle or high school with only a handful of their peers.

13 feeder pathways. Each high school is fed by two middle schools.

12 of 20

Proposed High School Attendance Boundary revisions.

13 of 20

Proposed High School Attendance Boundaries 2017 and beyond

14 of 20

Proposed Middle School Attendance Boundary revisions

15 of 20

Proposed Middle School Attendance Boundaries 2017 and beyond

16 of 20

Proposed Elementary School Attendance Boundary revisions

17 of 20

Feeder Pathways

2017 and beyond

18 of 20

19 of 20

20 of 20