1 of 15

4 min presentation in DD2438

Group 2:2

Josef Lindkvist and Arnau Casas Saez

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xIr7reqGNqfnxZYPrjLBm0tCAnRB3Yd0GFFXuhGUvVQ/edit?usp=sharing

2 of 15

Problem 1 & 2

Car and Drone collision avoidance

3 of 15

Go back to regular A*

  • Problem 1: Hybrid A* gave bad velocities and times for the car and drone
  • Problem 2: Resulting path was not expected with nodes time reservation for other rounds
  • Solution 1: A* with heuristic velocities (it worked better in Assignment 1)
  • Solution 2: Reserve the node all way into a direction + allow similar directions

4 of 15

A* rounds

  • First round -> best path
  • Reserve most used directions for next rounds
  • Try to see how it converges
  • More rounds!

5 of 15

Drone Controller

  • PD controller from group 4 adapting from visibility graph A* to GridMap A*

6 of 15

Car Controller

  • Added a collision detector
    • Proportional navigation
      • If Collision detected -> Let the car with
      • highest priority pass first. (from second Astar)
        • need to refine our priority calculations
      • Rectangle area instead of cone

7 of 15

Problem 3 & 4

Car and Drone formation

👑

👑

8 of 15

Grid with A*

  • Added door points + edges
  • A* from door to door
  • Adjust nodes so they avoid other car paths

9 of 15

PD Controller

Drone

Car

  • Same as Group 1:4
  • Modified to adapt velocity to stay in formation
  • Same as Group 1:18
  • Modified to soften navigation

10 of 15

Our plan to optimize formation

We keep track of each car’s distance to the next gate.

11 of 15

👑

The car with the longest distance left to the next gate becomes king. Updated sequentially.

12 of 15

👑

The other cars then “waits” for the king car until they have the same distance to the gate as the king. Then keeping that distance until they pass the gate.

13 of 15

👑

The other cars then “waits” for the king car until they have the same distance to the gate as the king. Then keeping that distance until they pass the gate.

14 of 15

15 of 15

Progress Status Week 9

  • Planned Time spent: 50%
    • (Out of the combined 200h)
  • Actual Time spent: 51%
    • Out of the combined 200h
  • Actual Progress: 50%
    • (estimate progress towards completing assignment)
  • Risk of not completing assignment: 4%