Record OBS
Review Essay #4
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n5OP2tVe_Fi0LW0kdooDg1xIdybhbCHhImnELcnK9Ms/edit?usp=sharing
Legal Nerdery and the Sullivan case:
https://www.stitcher.com/show/advisory-opinions/episode/originalism-of-moral-substance-200222101 18:36 to 43:15
No need to sign in.
Leave whenever you need to.
I’ll stick around for questions at the end.
Slides and video will be posted later today.
Record
Three Things to Remember
The essays on the AP exam will be closed book.
Write this practice essay without any resources.
Concept Application Essay (20 minutes)
The following is from the 2016 Republican Party Platform.
“Because the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy decisions affect job creation, upward mobility for workers, and equitable prosperity, they should be transparent. Similarly, the Federal Reserve’s important role as a lender of last resort should also be carried out in a more transparent manner. The Republican Party will advance legislation that brings transparency and accountability to the Federal Reserve, the Federal Open Market Committee, and the Federal Reserve’s dealing with foreign banks.”
After reading the passage, respond to A, B, and C below.
Check for the Basics
Possible Answers
Possible Answers
Possible Answers
Possible Answers
Questions?
QUESTIONS?
Remember—
Next Monday our review session will be at 12:35.
Next Wednesday our review session will be at 12:45.
Current Events
The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press….
As with all the liberties guaranteed in the Constitution, freedom of speech is not absolute.
One of the restrictions is on slander (spoken) and libel (written): false statements that are damaging to a person's reputation.
New York Times v. Sullivan: Public figures enjoy less protection against libel and slander. The holding in this case requires that the public figure show that the defendant knew that a statement was false or was reckless in deciding to publish the information without investigating whether it was accurate.
Dominion, of course, is a private company, not a public figure, so Powell’s speech enjoys less protection.
Legal Nerdery and the Sullivan case:
https://www.stitcher.com/show/advisory-opinions/episode/originalism-of-moral-substance-200222101 18:36 to 43:15
Sidney Powell's legal defense: 'Reasonable people' wouldn't believe her election fraud claims
Ex-Trump attorney Sidney Powell's weekslong campaign to invalidate the results of the 2020 election was not based in fact, her lawyers said Monday.
“No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact,” Powell's attorneys said in a court filing defending her against a billion-dollar defamation lawsuit from Dominion Voting Systems, the manufacturer of the election equipment she claimed was involved in the conspiracy to steal the election.
In November, Powell took part in a freewheeling, conspiracy-riddled news conference at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington that is a key focus of the lawsuit. There, she and Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani alleged a coordinated conspiracy using voting systems — including Dominion machines, which she baselessly claimed were created to rig elections for Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chávez — to steal the election from Trump. Dominion is a private U.S. company.