ECS 251: Advanced OS
MapReduce
Administrative
Proposals handed back, will talk more about in this lecture
Today is the start of two weeks of Google papers
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
This is a good thing:
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
This is a good thing:
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
This is a good thing:
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
This is a good thing:
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
This is a good thing:
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
This is also a bad thing:
My view on 251 students
For this quarter, you are all my PhD Students
This is also a bad thing:
View on introductions
Serves as the foundation for the rest of your paper
Good: solid foundation
Bad: shaky foundation
Bottom line
One group got a 5 -- nice job
Some groups got 3 or 4 -- also, should be proud
About 1/2 of the groups got 0 -- still some work left
The way to think about it
Don’t look at it like it’s a 0, think about it as an opportunity to get feedback directly from me about your work
Common mistakes
Missing key citations / foundational work
Poor flow
Poor grammar
Incomplete assignment
Didn’t describe proposed work well