Learning from patient and family experiences of unsafe care��Dr Tom Reader
Presented to: Clinical Human Factors Group, 19/10/21
2
"Complaints were not given a high enough priority in identifying issues and learning lessons” …yet… "the truth (of unsafe care) was uncovered... mainly because of the persistent complaints made by a very determined group of patients and those close to them" (Francis, 2013, p. 7 & 65)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vincent, C. A., & Coulter, A. (2002). Patient safety: what about the patient?. BMJ Quality & Safety, 11(1), 76-80.
Francis, R. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry. London: The Stationery Office
What is the role of patients in patient safety?
3
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Davis, R. E., Jacklin, R., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. A. (2007). Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?. Health expectations, 10(3), 259-267.
Lyons, M. (2007). Should patients have a role in patient safety? A safety engineering view. BMJ Quality & Safety, 16(2), 140-142.
Patients are already involved
4
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reader, T. W., Gillespie, A., & Roberts, J. (2014). Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ quality & safety, 23(8), 678-689.
Complaints to the NHS in 2017-18
Three studies
Study 1: Analysis of 1,100 healthcare complaints from 56 NHS trusts – using the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool – to determine the types of safety insights provided by patients and families (HCAT codifies complaints in terms of the severity of safety problems reported)
Study 2: Comparison of 5 years of complaints (n=5,265) and staff incident reports (n=81,077) at a large multisite hospital to examine overlaps in reporting and content
Study 3: Analysis of 2,017 healthcare complaints from 59 NHS trusts using HCAT to assess the validity of safety information provided by patients and families
5
Study 1. Patients observe “blind spots” in care
- 32% of complaints related to problems in accessing care (emergency) or discharge (e.g., no instructions)
- 54% of complaints relate to systemic problems (e.g., across multiple units, recurring problems relating to neglect)
- 35% of complaints relate to problems in omissions (e.g., not receiving medications, treatment plans)
6
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Gillespie, A., & Reader, T. W. (2018). Patient‐centered insights: using health care complaints to reveal hot spots and blind spots in quality and safety. The Milbank Quarterly, 96(3), 530-567
Blindspots: Systemicness
Complaints can reveal systematic failings in care that cross multiple stages, problems, staff groups, and visits: these are the most severe
Study 2. Patient and staff accounts of error can differ
7
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Van Dael, J., Gillespie, A., Reader, T., Smalley, K., Papadimitriou, D., Glampson, B., ... & Mayer, E. (2021). Getting the whole story: Integrating patient complaints and staff reports of unsafe care. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13558196211029323.
Clinical omissions �
“they forgot to administer my medication”; “I was discharged without examination”
Failure to listen
“my symptoms were dismissed”;
“his screams of pain were ignored”;
“no one believed me”
Internal coordination �
“blood transfusion error”;
“test not received in the lab”;
“sample gone missing”
74% of incidents reported by patients as moderate or higher harm (eg, “kidney failure”; “organ perforation”) were reported by staff as low or no harm; patients take a longer view on harm
Study 3. Healthcare complaints about safety problems have validity
8
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reader, T. W., & Gillespie, A. (2021). Stakeholders in safety: Patient reports on unsafe clinical behaviors distinguish hospital mortality rates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 439.
Low severity | Medium severity | High severity |
Health-care assistant unable to find vein for blood sample (id_635) | Nurse did not have experience for providing surgical aftercare (id_225) | Locum doctor operated instead of a gallbladder surgeon (id_613) |
Hour delay in replacing catheter after it had been incorrectly put in (id_1069) | Doctor refused to administer more pain relief because he was too busy (id_1407) | Heavily bleeding patient in labor left in corridor for 4–5 hours (id_2089) |
Blood test causing a large hematoma (id_815) | Knee operation resulting in nerve damage (id_919) | Repair of aortic graft resulting in catastrophic infections (id_1099) |
Dirty pajamas not changed (id_397) | Patient in poor hygienic state (e.g., no cleaning, shaving) (id_2090) | Patient lying in own urine and bed sores for 10 days (id_1727) |
Short delay in administration of antibiotics (id_1677) | Patient given steroid injections instead of anesthetic injections (id_1482) | Did not stop administering Epilim to young patient, resulting in pancreatitis and diabetes (id_360) |
Fractured wrist misdiagnosed as muscle damage; revised a week later (id_518) | Severe pneumonia and sepsis misdiagnosed as slight (nonurgent) infection (id_72) | Tumor in kidney misdiagnosed as cyst before donation of the other kidney (id_413) |
9
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Gillespie, A., & Reader, T. W. (2021). Identifying and encouraging high-quality healthcare: an analysis of the content and aims of patient letters of compliment. BMJ quality & safety, 30(6), 484-492.
Conclusions
10