1
2024 CHILD-FRIENDLY
LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT (CFLGA)
2
OUTLINE
3
The objective of the CFLGA is to assess the performance of the LGU in implementing child friendly policies, programs, projects, and services.
More specifically, it seeks to:
CFLGA OBJECTIVES
2022 SCFLG Conferees
BALICUATRO Cluster
San Antonio
Catarman
San Roque
Catubig
Laoang
Lapinig
Pambujan
Gamay
CENTRAL Cluster
PACIFIC Cluster
5
SURVIVAL
DEVELOPMENT
PROTECTION
PARTICIPATION
GOVERNANCE
ASSESSMENT AREAS
6
1. SURVIVAL
7
SUB-INDICATOR | SCORE |
1.1 Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children aged 12 months old | 5 |
1.2 Prevalence of malnutrition among children 0-59 months old | 5 |
1.3 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with pre-natal and postpartum services | |
| 3 |
| 2 |
1. SURVIVAL
8
SURVIVAL
AMENDMENT:
Following the National Nutrition Council (NNC) guidance, the Revised Rating for the Survival Indicator 1.2: prevalence of malnutrition is as follows:
Operation Timbang (OPT) Plus coverage of 60-110% is equivalent to 1.00 point and the malnutrition prevalence status will follow the prevalence within the World Health Organization (WHO).
9
SURVIVAL
10
SURVIVAL
11
SURVIVAL
1.1 Means of Verification (MOVs):
If with data:
If insufficient supply due to logistical concern:
*Certification from MHO or MPDC or the ACTUAL total population of children of aged 12 months old
12
SURVIVAL
13
SURVIVAL
SURVIVAL
15
SURVIVAL
1.3 Means of Verification (MOVs):
If with data:
If No Reported Pregnant Adolescent:
*Certification of ACTUAL Population
*Scan the MOVs properly and clearly
16
SURVIVAL
1.2 Means of Verification (MOVs):
*Certification of ACTUAL population of the subject children
*Scan the MOV clearly and properly.
17
SURVIVAL
1.1 | |
Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children (FIC) aged 12 months old�(95-100%= 5, 90-94%=4, 85-89%=3, 80-84%=2, Below 80=0) | MOV for 1.1:��If with data: �Child Care Data from the Field Health Service Information System (FHSIS) Report �Target Client List (TCL) Records��If insufficient supply due to logistical concern: �Duly received Request for Supplies of Vaccines prepared or dated at least one (1) Quarter prior to the audit |
18
SURVIVAL
1.2 | |||
Prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-59 months old �(60-110%=1, Less than 60%= 0) | MOV: Accomplished OPT Plus Form 2A: City/Municipality Summary Report of the Local Health/Nutrition Office | Prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-59 months old�(Stunting -Prevalence within 10 to <20% or better = 2.0�Wasting -Prevalence within 5 to <10% or better = 1.50�Overweight -Prevalence within 5 to <10% or better) | MOV: Accomplished OPT Plus Form 2A: City/Municipality Summary Report of the Local Health/Nutrition Office |
19
SURVIVAL
1.3.1 | |
Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with prenatal services�(80-100% = 3.00�70-79.99% = 2.00�60-69.99%= 1.00�Below 60% -=0.00) | MOV: Data from the National Safe Motherhood Program - Pregnancy Tracking from the local health unit |
20
SURVIVAL
1.3.2 | |
Percentage Coverage Of Pregnant Adolescents With Postpartum Services �80-100%- 2.00�70-79.99%- 1.00�Below 70%- 0.00 | MOV: Data from the National Safe Motherhood Program - Pregnancy Tracking from the local health unit |
21
SURVIVAL
22
2. DEVELOPMENT
23
SUB-INDICATOR | SCORE |
2.1 Percentage coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided with early childhood care and development (ECCD) services, both public and privately managed, and may be center, home, or community-based | 5 |
2.2 Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either private or publicly managed (center, home, community, or other modalities | 5 |
2.3 Percentage of out-of-school children and youth (OSCY) assisted for enrolment or re-enrolment to school, alternative learning system (ALS), or other flexible learning options | 5 |
2. DEVELOPMENT
24
2. DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT:
On the Development Indicator 2.2.2 on ECCD center-based services, the means of verification (MOV) to be used is either the DSWD-issued Certificate of Accreditation or the ECCD Council-issued Certificate of Recognition.
25
2. DEVELOPMENT
26
2. DEVELOPMENT
27
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.1 Means of Verification (MOVs):
If with data:
If no children aged 3-4 years old in the City or Municipality:
28
2. DEVELOPMENT
29
2. DEVELOPMENT
30
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.2 Means of Verification (MOVs):
If with no recognition or accreditation available for Indicator 2.2.2:
31
2. DEVELOPMENT
32
2. DEVELOPMENT
33
2. DEVELOPMENT
34
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.3 Means of Verification (MOVs):
Indicator 2.3.1:
Indicator 2.3.2:
35
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.1 | |
Percentage coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided with early �childhood care and development (ECCD) services, both public and privately managed, and �may be center, home, or community-based. �(100% =5.00�95-99.99% =4.00�90-94.99%=3.00�85-89.99%=2.00�80-84.99%=1.00�Below 80%=0.00) | MOV: Enrolment/Registration List from the LSWDO / ECCD Focal Person |
36
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.2a | |
Percentage of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD service. �(100= 2.00�95-99.99%=1.50�90-94.99%=1.00�85-89.99%=0.50�Below 85= 0.000) | MOV: Data on Children Served and Status of Accreditation from the Consolidated Report on Day Care Center and Workers by City or Municipality �If with no recognition or accreditation available for Indicator 2.2.2: �Result of the Internal Assessment conducted by the City or Municipal LSWDO or ECCD Focal Person and the Child Development Worker/ Teacher or Administrator/ Principal/ Director of the public or private Child Development Center/ Learning Center; AND �Official Letter of Request for the External Assessment addressed to the Accreditor with a valid reason for the delay in the on-site visit |
37
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.2b | |
Percentage of accredited or recognized center-based ECCD services �(100% = 3.00�90-99.99% = 2.50�80-89.99% = 2.00�70-79.99% = 1.50�60-69.99% = 1.00�50-59.99% = 0.50�Below 50% = 0.00) | MOV: Certificate of Accreditation or Recognition from the LSWDO |
38
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.3.1 | |
Percentage of children who have dropped out from school that were reintegrated in the academic year being audited �(90-100% = 2.50�80-89.99% = 2.00�70-79.99% = 1.50�60-69.99% = 1.00�50-59.99% = 0.50�Below 50% = 0.00) | MOV: Simple Drop-out Rate from the primary and secondary schools and/or as reported in the Local School Board Meeting/s; data from Local Youth Development Office, if applicable in the LGU |
39
2. DEVELOPMENT
2.3.2 | |
Percentage of OSCY registered/enrolled to schools, ALS, or other flexible learning options (90-100% = 2.50�80-89.99% = 2.00�70-79.99% = 1.50�60-69.99% = 1.00�50-59.99% = 0.50�Below 50% = 0.00) | MOV: Data from the Local Social Welfare and Development Office (LSWDO) and/or the Local Youth Development Office (LYDO) ���Masterlist of OSY Profile |
40
3. PROTECTION
41
SUB-INDICATOR | SCORE |
3.1 Management of reported cases of children in need of special protection (CNSP)
| 5 7 3 |
3. PROTECTION
42
3. PROTECTION
3.1.1 | |
Percentage Coverage of Case Management�(100% = 5.00�90-99.99% = 4.00�80-89.99% = 3.00�70-79.99% = 2.00�60-69.99% = 1.00�Below 60% = 0.00) | MOV: Summary Report certified by the LSWDO that lists the number and type of reported cases and the actions taken for each. |
43
3. PROTECTION
3.1.2 | |
Case Management Report Preparation��(Trained Registered Social Worker - 7.00�Registered Social Worker - 4.00�Trained Public Social Development Worker - 2.00) | MOV: License of the Registered Social Worker (check expiration date); and�• Training Certificate on the Protocol for Case Management of Child Victims of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation and/or Gender-Responsive Case Management |
44
3. PROTECTION
3.1.3 | |
Established referral network (3.00, all or nothing) | MOV: Available flow chart with accompanying referral procedures (refer to Annex 4 for sample flow chart) and Directory of agencies/organizations for referral of interventions/services. |
45
3. PROTECTION
46
3. PROTECTION
47
4. PARTICIPATION
48
SUB-INDICATOR | SCORE |
4.1 Child representation in the Local Council for the Protection of Children (LCPC)
|
1 4 3 |
4.2 Development of policy, programs, projects, and activity (PPAs) with children’s participation in the planning, implementation, or monitoring phase | 7 |
4. PARTICIPATION
49
4. PARTICIPATION
4.1.1 | |
Child Representative in the City/Municipal LCPC.��(Point: 1.00, all or nothing) | MOV: Executive Order on the [Re]Organization of the LCPC from the Office of the Mayor and/or a Legislative Issuance from the Sangguniang Bayan/ Panlungsod citing the name of the child representative(Y/N) |
50
4. PARTICIPATION
4.1.2 | |
Child Representative Selection Process (Selection Process Point�Thru Children’s General Assembly - 4.00 �Appointed/Designated - 2.00) | MOV: Documentation of the Children’s General Assembly from the LSWDO or concerned local office |
51
4. PARTICIPATION
4.1.3 | |
Child Representative in the Barangay LCPC ��(90-100% = 3.00�80-89.99% = 2.00�70-79.99% = 1.00�Below 70% = 0.00) | MOV: Executive Order on the [Re]Organization of the BCPC citing the name of the child representative as consolidated by the Office of the Sangguniang Bayan/Panlungsod and/or the Local Government Operations Officer(Y/N) |
52
4. PARTICIPATION
4.2.a | |
In terms of quantity:��Accomplishment Point�5 or more PPAs - 3.00�3-4 PPAs - 2.00�At least 2 PPAs - 1.00 | MOV:��Documentation Report of the activities highlighting the role played by the children from the organizer or concerned local office |
53
4. PARTICIPATION
4.2.b | |
In terms of quality:��Accomplishment Point�Child-led Advocacy = 4.00�Planning = 3.00�Monitoring = 2.00�Attendance = 1.00 | MOV:��Documentation Report of the activities highlighting the role played by the children from the organizer or concerned local office |
54
4. PARTICIPATION
55
4. PARTICIPATION
56
4. PARTICIPATION
57
4. PARTICIPATION
58
4. PARTICIPATION
59
4. PARTICIPATION
60
4. PARTICIPATION
61
5. GOVERNANCE
62
SUB-INDICATOR | SCORE |
5.1 Database on children | 7 |
5.2 Available and implemented local plans for children | 6 |
5.3 Updated Local Code for Children (LCC) contextualizing or adopting recently issued national laws on children | 5 |
5.4 Budget allocated and utilized for children’s program | 10 |
5.5 Functional LCPC
| 3 5 |
5.6 Child-Friendly Facilities in all Barangays | 4 |
5. GOVERNANCE
63
5. GOVERNANCE
AMENDMENT:
On Sub-indicator regarding budget allocation, the denominator to be used is the National Tax Allotment (NTA) of the LGU instead of the total resources.
64
5. GOVERNANCE
AMENDMENT:
For Sub-indicator 5.5 Functional BCPCs, the rating will now be based on the total number of barangays that meet all the 6 BCPC-specific indicators under the SGLGB set in the DILG MC 2023-103.
Scenario: Barangay A comprises 20 barangays, with only 12 satisfying all the SGLGB BCPC-specific indicators.
Formula: Total Points (5) x (No. of barangays that meet all the BCPC specific indicators / Total no. of barangays)
5 x (12/20)
5 x (.6)
=3
65
SGLGB BCPC-RELATED INDICATORS:
66
5.1.1 | |
Established and updated database on children��(5.00 points, all or nothing) | MOV: Local State of Children Report or Summary Report with the aforementioned details/information |
67
5.1.2 | |
Annual Local State of Children Report ��(2.00 points, all or nothing) | MOV: Local State of Children Report as well as Documentation Report of the NCM |
68
5.2 | |
Available and implemented local plans ��(2.00 points for each plan (maximum of 6.00 points for this indicator) | MOV: Signed copy of the abovementioned Plans |
69
5.3 | |
Updated Local Code for Children (LCC) contextualizing / adopting recently issued national laws on children��(LCC + 4 and above ordinances = 5.00�LCC + 3 ordinances = 4.00�LCC + 2 ordinances = 3.00�LCC + 1 ordinance = 2.00�Ordinance only - 1.00) | MOV: Copy of the approved Ordinance/local issuance |
70
5.4.1 | |
Approved Local Investment Program for Children (LIPC) or an Annual Work and Financial Plan for Children (2 points) | MOV:Signed copy of the LIPC with supporting Resolution |
71
5.4.2 | |
Budget Allocation for Children’s PPAs��(10% and above - 4.00�7-9.99% - 3.00�4-6.99% - 2.00�1-3.99% - 1.00�Below 1% - 0.00) | MOV:Annual Work and Financial Plan for Children signed by the Local Chief Executive and Secretariat and/or Annual Investment Program for Children signed by the LCE and Budget Officer supported by a Resolution from the Local Development Council appropriating funds for the AIP. |
72
5.4.3 | |
Budget utilization of children’s PPAs��(100% = 4.00�90-99.99% = 3.00�80-89.99% = 2.00�70-79.99% = 1.00�Below 70% = 0) | MOV:Liquidation Report/s signed by the City/Municipal Accountant from the Accounting Office |
73
5.5.1 | |
Functional City/Municipal LCPC��(Ideal - 3.00�Mature - 2.00�Progressive, Basic - 0.00) | MOV:��LCPC Functionality Assessment Report from the City/Municipal Local Government Operations Officer |
74
5.5.2 | |
Functional BCPCs | MOV:LCPC Functionality Assessment Report from the City/Municipal Local Government Operations Officer |
75
5.6 | |
Child-friendly facilities in all barangays (Accomplishment Point�All barangays have a �designated play / recreational area - 2.00��All barangays have a �Library / Reading Center - 2.00) | MOV:Monitoring Report on Barangay Facilities and Workers from the City/Municipal Local Government Operations Officer |
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
PASSING RATE
SURVIVAL
DEVELOPMENT
PROTECTION
PARTICIPATION
GOVERNANCE
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
40.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
32.00
FULL SCORE
MINIMUM REQUIREMENT (80%)
86
All data requirements and means of verification shall be generated or sourced from 2022.
AUDIT YEAR COVERAGE
87
TIMELINE
88
POST-AUDIT (TENTATIVE)
19 to 23 August 2024 | 5 working days | CWC Secretariat |
|
26 to 30 August 2024 | 5 working days | RIMTF RC/SCWC |
|
02 to 06 September 2024 | 5 working days | PIMTF PCPC |
|
09 to 13 September 2024 | 5 working days | C/M IMTF LCPC |
|
89
https://bit.ly/2023CFLGAworkshopBatch1
90
2023 CHILD-FRIENDLY
LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT (CFLGA)
END OF PRESENTATION